Comments by "M Fitz" (@MFitz12) on "VICE TV" channel.

  1. Only so much one can cover in 5 mins.
    5
  2. How many plane crashes have you seen where the aircraft did a nose dive into soft fill at 540 mph? Context is everything.
    4
  3.  @jaygunny8402  - Not what I asked. The circumstances are specific and you will be hard pressed to find others like it. I've seen every episode of "Air Disasters". Still waiting. That said, 19 tons of aircraft wreckage was recovered at the Shanksville site, some of which had buried itself up to 45 feet down in the soft fill soil. This includes both engines, the FDR and CVR (both with recoverable data), easily recognizable bits of fuselage that were used as evidence in court, over 500 pieces of U.S. mail Flight 93 was carrying as cargo, human remains belonging to everyone aboard Flight 93 (there are no "bodies" at 540 mph - zero in a fraction of a second - don't try it at home), etc, etc, etc,.. You are badly informed.
    4
  4. Well, since you put it together, don't hold back. Lay out your complete prima facia case.
    3
  5. Welcome to 2004 everyone.
    3
  6. Waiting. If you have an IQ over 60, making that prima facia case should be a snap.
    3
  7.  @oakleypennington8053  - What about the odds of a passport? Who cares?
    3
  8. Because each of the Twin Towers got hit by a plane and not at the same time, so you must be looking at the second one.
    3
  9. That's not true.
    3
  10. NEADS had 9 minutes between being informed Flight 11 might be a hijack and when it impacted the North Tower. Nearest fighters on 15 minute alert were 180 miles from New York (and even farther from the plane as it flew - without transponder). Do the math on that. The other 3 hijacked aircraft all crashed before NEADS were informed they might be hijacked. I emphasize MIGHT in all 4 cases.
    3
  11. No.
    3
  12. Then why does the debris field start at the impact crater and spread east instead of starting in to the west and ending at the crater?
    3
  13. Just figuring that out now?
    3
  14. The one does not in any way prove the other.
    3
  15. St Nicholas Church
    3
  16. Watch Loose Change for a good laugh. Don't let 3 teenagers tell you what to think.
    2
  17. Still waiting.
    2
  18. CAPS LOCK FOR 9/11 Truth in the shell of a nut.
    2
  19. Shot down with what? Why shoot it down and not admit it was shot down? Makes no sense? If 93 was shot down there would be a debris trail along the flight path. There wasn't. It is clear from FAA and NEADS recordings that NEADS were not aware 93 was a possible hijack until after it crashed. No assets available that could have shot it down where it was shot down. Had 93 made it to DC that story might have changed.
    2
  20. Its 5am and already I have found the dumbest thing I will read all day.
    2
  21. Well then go ahead and make a prima facie case for that, making sure to use ALL available evidence, leaving nothing out and relying on fewer unproven assumptions than the commonly accepted narrative. Be the first. Ever.
    2
  22. There are many decaf brands that are just as tasty as the real thing
    2
  23. That is not what makes me wonder about Dick Cheney.
    2
  24.  @Viperwon  - Who is claiming Flight 93 was a "typical" airplane crash (whatever that is supposed to mean). Since G__gle has apparently stopped working again; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzYWw-P3GRc&ab_channel=WITF
    2
  25. 19 tons of wreckage recovered including the FDR and CVR as well as the remains of everyone aboard. This is common knowledge.
    2
  26.  @pdkodude283  - Flight 93 wasn't at MTOW at the time of the crash now was she and why would you be counting MTOW anyway? MTOW includes nearly 30 tons of stuff that is not plane. Seems deliberately dishonest. Needless to say, after a 540 mph impact, 19 tons of debris which could be identified as belonging to an airplane was recovered as were the remains of everyone aboard Flight 93. In addition, the FDR and CVR for Flight 93 were recovered at the site, both with intact recoverable data. Even hundreds of pieces of U.S. Mail Flight 93 was carrying as cargo were recovered. It was Flight 93 and no amount of your personal incredulity or denial for the sake of denial is going to change that. Have a nice day.
    2
  27.  @pdkodude283  - Maximum Take Off Weight is the gross weight. It can't get off the ground at heavier than that. We are discussing those questions. The gross mass of a B757-222 is still irrelevant. About the same amount of debris which could be identified as an aircraft was recovered at the Pentagon. Same aircraft type. nearly identical impact velocities. It is the most one could reasonably expect to recover. Also, why limit yourself to the 9/11 Commission Report, which was about 1% of the total 9/11 investigation?
    2
  28. Nobody believes this was a random event. Stupid thing to say.
    2
  29. And how many times has that occurred with an unresponsive domestic commercial flight full of U .S. citizens?
    2
  30. Take your time.
    2
  31. Most of it in the crater, the rest scattered about. 19 tons recovered in total.
    2
  32. You seem rather poorly informed. I think we have identified the real problem.
    2
  33. If it should have been investigated more how did you draw a conclusion?
    2
  34. Yes.
    2
  35. You are people
    2
  36. Free fall is a measurement of acceleration, not velocity. Therefore there is no such thing as free fall SPEED. Anyone using such a phrase has just told you how ignorant they are.
    2
  37. Truthers are not people. Even a lab rat eventually learns from its mistakes and changes its behavior. Truthers keep repeating the same mistakes over and over expecting different results. This places them somewhere below lab rats.
    2
  38. Speak for yourself.
    2
  39. Great. Prove it. Be the first.
    2
  40. Panc went out of business 2 decades ago.
    2
  41. Why? Because they tell you things you don't want to hear?
    2
  42. I have eyes so no denial required. Clearly NOT a pre-planned demolition, controlled or otherwise. Collapse initiation mechanisms are visible to the naked eye. Sagging floor trusses in the fire and impact damaged zones caused inward bowing of many of the surviving and increasingly overloaded perimeter columns by up to 5 feet until they buckled.
    2
  43.  @Kojimalosophy  - Side Note: I have probably forgotten more about AE911T than you have ever known. A friend of mine even used to be on their board of directors before they booted him for having the audacity to suggest they use the millions of $ in donations they were gathering to do some actual research instead of just using it to fund the next fund raiser. AE911T is almost certainly responsible for more misinformation and outright bullshit about what happened on 9/11/2001 than any other entity in existence. If anyone from AE911T told me the clear daytime sky was blue, I would look up. About the only thing they get right is the date. And yes, I will happily put that to the test.
    2
  44.  @Kojimalosophy  With B7 sorted out are you ready to get into it with me now?
    2
  45. It makes no sense TO YOU. Many of us have no problem at all working that out and it is not a problem.
    2
  46. If they were silent missiles why were they so loud?
    2
  47. Genuinely no idea what you are on about. As for the Pentagon audit, That has been going on since 2000 and was not interrupted by the events of 9/11/2001. Still pops up in the news from time to time. In August 2016 the Army's portion of the audit covered $6.5 trillion worth of transactions going back several decades. No money was ever "missing" though. The figures only refer to dollar values under audit. You seem to be poorly informed.
    2
  48. That didn't happen.
    2
  49. No oil in Afghanistan.
    2
  50. Well, some people are stupid. Like people who Bukake a comments section with a half dozen posts at a shot because they can't put together one cohesive thought. That just looks crazy and dumb and guarantees no one will take you seriously.
    2