General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
GBNews
comments
Comments by "" (@colby25) on "GBNews" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
I am old enough to remember watching a UK tv programme in the early 90s where a muslim lady said that the biggest threat to world peace looking forward was the rise of islamic fundamentalism. I had no idea what she was talking about. A few years later there were the terror attacks on the uss cove and then 9/11. Looking back now, how right she was. Hamas was one of many of those groups that formed in the 80s along with al queda. I have read of thousands forming since. IS being the biggest and most significant. Most are sunni too it would seem tho they all seem to despise israels presence in the muslim middle east. Thats why they wont negotiate any solution. They still seem to want to carry on the 1948/67/73 attempts to destroy israel. As for the footage of the massacre i watched plenty of it. From cctv to videos, some made by the targetted and some by the perpetrators themselves. Horrendous to watch. From random killing of motorists and civilians trying to run and flee. Some whilst trying to hide. Some videos showing them hunting for victims in the kibbutzes. Worst one was cctv watching a terrorist chasing 2 women. He was sprinting and caught up to the first one and he shot her as she struggled. The other lady was then on her knees below him pleading for her life while he was reloading. He then just shot her and walked off. Owen jones and the other marxists need to watch it.. I did actually see them shoot an armed israeli soldier once who was trying to respond in a base but they then showed another video in there of them shooting an unarmed conscript who was trying to hide under a table. There were civilian bodies everywhere.. There was a group of corpses by a bus stop and in cars. It even showed them pulling out the bodies from cars and driving off in them. Then there iwas all that music festival footage as well. It was ethnic cleansing no doubt in my mind and israel has every right to go after those who did this. Try to limit the civilian casualties as much as you can but do what you have to do. There is no other way.
20
@margaridamacgregor1471 No but those who came before us did. Including our family members. My late grandfather was at dunkirk for example.
14
@cmoore7518 Well this just came out as i just googled it "His remarks came a day after the Byline Times outlet published a number of detailed and serious allegations against Mr Wootton, claiming that it had evidence he had pretended to be a man named Martin Branning. Byline Times claimed two victims made criminal complaints to the Metropolitan Police, based on Branning’s activities since 2019. Both News UK – by whom Mr Wootton was formerly employed – and the MailOnline’s publisher have said they are looking into the allegations. Contacted by The Independent following the publication of the Byline Times report, Scotland Yard said: “In June 2023, the Metropolitan Police was contacted with regards to allegations of sexual offences committed by a man. “Officers are assessing information to establish whether any criminal offence has taken place. There is no police investigation at this time.”....... So there is no police investigation at this time in mid july after recieving the complaint in june....... The report goes on..... Mr Wootton’s name has been trending on Twitter frequently in recent days, with posts on social media that make accusations against him gaining millions of views. Shortly before Mr Wootton’s Tuesday night show, The Guardian also published a report which made similar allegations against Branning. The paper reported that it had not been able to independently establish a link between Branning and Mr Wootton. So the guardian has not been able to provide any hard evidence but still published the article anyway. Nice fact based journalism there guardian. Or was the chance of a political kicking too much of an opportunity to miss? I also just found out that byline times is a left wing journalist group funded by activist supporters who seem like they only report on or go after prominent people who have the opposite political views to themselves. No unbiased agenda there then
13
@run2cat4run On the existance of israel they are pretty much all the same
10
jonny mercer ex army officer, my mp. minister of state for veterans. Always stood up for veterans including fighting all those frraudelent claims brought against the soldiers in iraq by now banned public interest llawyers.PIL. Plus he stood by the old veterans who were made to stand trial again for alledged crimes during the troubles in northern ireland. I believe he resigned over it at one point under boris johnson.
7
Loving your country isnt just about loving a flag. Its about loving what your country stands for. And supporting any anti democracy narrative, which is ultimately what putins narrative is, isnt doing that
7
@SimonBailey-qr3kz Maybe you should show us the guilty evidence before assuming a guilty verdict. If he did discriminate then why didnt the bank pass the evidence to the police for investigation?
5
@stormz761 Nah they both support a 2 state solution. Apart from the hamas anti semite apologists of course.
4
@zeekhan4125 Ever wondered why?
4
Since when has hamas and its terrorist ideology stood for humanity?
3
Respect to that guy. It takes some doing to come on tv and speak out like that. He has just confirmed everything i believed to be true about hamas and this conflict. Good luck to him.
3
What this guy doesnt realise is that without the iron dome israel would have been suffering the same kind of civilian casualties as in gaza. At least israel is striking at military targets which they are perfectly entitled to do by international law. Proportionality is the only criticism he could make of them. With what happened on oct 7th plus all these rockets still being fired indiscriminately at israeli civilians then the urgency to wipe out hamas and its command centres and rocket launching sites should give them some leeway on that. Especially as hamas is using palestinian civilians and hostages as human shields as part of its terror strategy. One of many war crimes that hamas has committed. As for his call for a ceasefire he obviously doesnt understand the ultimate aim of hamas and its sponsors here. They want this war to continue so as to bring other arab/muslim states and terror groups into the war alongside them. Yemen terrorists have just joined them for example. They dont want a ceasefire and they deffo dont want negotiation. All this guy is doing is helping to propagandise the hamas narrative which would eventually lead to the destruction of israel and the ethnic cleansing of all jews in the region judging by their actions of october the 7th. A communist supporting a nazi ideology. Wierd.
2
ZOOMMAX-mb3qq Did you know that in 1948/67/73 and now 2023 israel has been invaded by its arab neighbours. They won all the 3 previous wars so not surprisingly they took terrritory as victors. They have been handing it back gradually over time to achieve the peace they desire with their neighbours. If palestine actually got back to negotiating with israel again, like they were pre hamas then a 2 state solution might happen.
2
Well actually just over a hundred years ago some kids in this country did use to run around barefoot. Check out some of francis sutcliffes photography of whitby..
2
Just googled this article which contradicts a lot in your version?. "His remarks came a day after the Byline Times outlet published a number of detailed and serious allegations against Mr Wootton, claiming that it had evidence he had pretended to be a man named Martin Branning. Byline Times claimed two victims made criminal complaints to the Metropolitan Police, based on Branning’s activities since 2019. Both News UK – by whom Mr Wootton was formerly employed – and the MailOnline’s publisher have said they are looking into the allegations. Contacted by The Independent following the publication of the Byline Times report, Scotland Yard said: “In June 2023, the Metropolitan Police was contacted with regards to allegations of sexual offences committed by a man. “Officers are assessing information to establish whether any criminal offence has taken place. There is no police investigation at this time.”....... So there is no police investigation at this time in mid july after recieving the complaint in june.......Multiple alleged victims as in 2. The report goes on..... Mr Wootton’s name has been trending on Twitter frequently in recent days, with posts on social media that make accusations against him gaining millions of views. Shortly before Mr Wootton’s Tuesday night show, The Guardian also published a report which made similar allegations against Branning. The paper reported that it had not been able to independently establish a link between Branning and Mr Wootton. So after 3 years they could find no link? Also just discovered that byline times is a left wing journalist group funded by activists who regularly go after prominent people with opposite political views to their own.
2
Agree with most of that but hamas didnt organise a coup, they were elected and then won a small civil war in gaza against fatah who were the previous encumbents. Also the main reason for the 2005 withdrawal from gaza was due to israel not being able to control the area due to the ever increasing population of palestinians in the gaza strip. They decided to withdraw for strategic purposes. The good thing was that they showed that they can evict their settlers, thousands in this case, to new areas if they have a good reason too. Something pro palestinian supporters need to take into account when they criticise israel for allowing their settlers into palestine territory.
2
Tatchell was on a channel 4 programme debating bringing the age of consent down to 14 back 10 or so years ago. Guess which side he was backing? He was also accused back in the 70s of providing an article in a paedophile PIE newsletter when it was being supported by others in the left leaning community as part of the gay rights movement. From memory i think he claimed it was used without his permission. Both founder members of PIE paedophile information exchange were gays and part of the 70s gay rights movement when they founded it. I also remember reading an article from pink news after gay marriage laws were passed, about them campaigning and targetting the reduction in the age of consent next. I can also remember the 2 PIE founders emphasising about a deep "love" between the adult and the child when describing their attraction to paedophilia. They seem to think that the words love and sexuality are the same thing. Let kids be kids.
2
You could say the same in 1967. On 19 June 1967, Israel offered "to give up Sinai and the Golan in exchange for peace," an offer that was rejected in September 1967 by the Arab States by the Khartoum Resolution, which became famous for the "Three No's": "no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it..." Israel did give up the gaza strip in 2005 evicting thousands of its own settlers whilst doing so. Then a year later hamas took over in there and started their 17 year terrorist campaign. Plus their terrorism in the 90s was responsible for the breakdown of the oslo peace accord between the PLO and israel. Hamas is the problem here.
2
So why hasnt the ICC brought charges then? Also that 12000 is from hamas sources. You know, that proven and recognised terror group that uses civilians as a human shield. Isnt that a crime against humanity by the way?. Funny how they never mention any of their own losses. Just the civilians. Anybody would think they have an agenda. You know like trying to use civilian colateral propaganda to draw in other arab states and terror groups to join in with their holy jihad. No negotiations for them. Its all in there charter.“Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea” — i.e., the annihilation of Israel. The charter says: “The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight Jews and kill them.”.
2
@AthelstanEngland Yep i and many others, including from the left, voted for brexit as the EU has a democratic deficit. Unelected commissioners deciding on policies and the elected meps just rubberstamping them through. Nothing whatsoever to do with racism. Typical remoaner.
2
Agree about the EU. So if it aint the conservative and the labour party or the social dems, greens and liberal party. Who does that leave politically? The extremes. No way am i voting far right or far left. Democracy is far more important than political parties. Extremes dont do democracy. Want some proof look at russia and venezuala. Once supposed peoples democracies..
2
The reason for the huge influx of immigrants from north africa across the meditteranean came from angela merkel calling on all immigrants that you are all welcome in germany. Without discussing this with other european leaders or how they were all going to get there. She was heralded like a saint at the time but the real reason was to aid the german economy as it had an aging workforce. So the many drownings in the med as well as the political reaction in countries affected is indirectly down to her. A lot of the immigrants coming across the english channel at the moment are there because of that reason too, as the med crossings still continue to this day. Also if they werent coming via libya they would be coming via elsewhere.
2
@sajid14 If we are so lacking in health and education. And we are all so poverty stricken then why are so many risking their lives every day to try to come and live here?
2
@thetruth9210 There was a referendum to join the EEC european economic community back in the 70s mate. It changed its name and its path forward in the 90s. Thats when brexit started as it became more federalised than economic. Why do i have to keep correcting you. Anybody would think you aint british.
2
@MichaelSmith-mc8bd When the veterans stop supporting the british legion then i will. A Savings account keeps regular money coming in too. Especially as their main fund raising happens only once a year. They need a constant flow of money, i would have thought, to support all the initiatives they do all year round.
2
@Emily-ou6lq Anti semite.....or what?
2
At least the PLO were negotiating and are not a state recognised terrorist organisastion.
2
Or thousands of palestinian children being forced into a war zone by hamas making it into a war zone.
2
Or the invention of islamic fundamentalism in the 80s which spurned hamas along with many thousands of other undesirable, uncivilised terror groups.
2
@edaleman2758 Warsaw ghetto didnt target civilians
2
1. Anybody who has worked under hamas control for 20 years would deffo be under some kind of hamas control by now imo. 2. its horrific but its still colateral. Israel have been trying to avoid civilian losses. Been giving 3 weeks of warnings now to civilians to move south of the wadi gaza plus they are sacrificing their own soldiers with a land assault to try and limit civilian casualties. What else do you expect them to do? They could flatten it like putin did to grosny after muslim chechnyan rebels did similar terror attacks on his civilians. Nobody from the west or middle east batted an eyelid back then. I wonder if it would have been different if the jews had done it? I know 90% of your type are the extremist hard left and abide by the corbyn code of conduct. That israel is always to be in the wrong and hamas and their no negotiation ethnic cleansing ideology is never to be criticised. As ethnic cleansing is seemingly just a slightly harsher form of marxism to him.
1
@HarunalRashide123 If the iron dome hadnt begun in 2009 then israels civilian casualties would have been just as high. Tho likely this war would have started some years earlier for it. The bottom line is that hamas could have stopped this never ending cycle of violence . Like maybe stopping the firing of the rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas which then brings the understandable miliary targetted response with all its colateral civilian damage. Or the continous suicide bombings that hamas organised from gaza causing all the checkpoints and security that has been put up since to prevent it happening again . Or the biggest close range mass murder of jews since the holocaust. Then maybe you take a look at their ideology as well. You know. No negotiation. Just destruction of israel and seemingly after oct 7th the ethnic cleansing of all jews in the region as well. Also dont forget what jihaddis like to tell us in the west. You may love life but we love death. So that means they dont give a toss about their own lives or the lives they are supposed to be representing in gaza They are all just other potential martyrs on their way to heaven in support of their holy jihad..People dont understand that hamas wants this war.They want all the other arab and muslim states and terror groups to join in with them and your just propagandising the anti israel narrative they want you to spread. Israel is not going to just disappear. They also have nuclear weapons. So there aint going to no region left over after, never mind a nation. As for the ceasefire hamas will not want one especially if it involves negotiation. They may agree to short pauses for humanitarian aid so they can reorganise and strengthen defences but a peaceful negotiated ceasefire i just dont see it. Sorry. .The only way i can see tthat might prevent the continual colateral from this bloodbath is for refugee camps to be set up in the sinai. The UN and egypt should already be organising this right now imho.
1
Neither is the EU. Thats why i voted brexit. How can you claim another vote should be done on a democratic principle when the result could be rejoining an undemocratic institution? You do realise policIes are made in the EU by unelected commisioners.
1
@s6edge706 Nah. Military targets are getting blown up. Colateral civilian damage is then caused by hamas using civilians as human shields and building all their military command centres and rocket launcher sites where civilians reside. The United Nations (UN) has called on Hamas to “cease immediately” these violations of international law. Hamas has also had 3 weeks to evacuate civilians south of wadi gaza. The jews in nazi germany were pretty scared too. Were they snowflakes as well?
1
Yep. Thats easy. Democracy. Our elected representatives can now actually enact the policies we elected them for. Unlike before when an unelected EU commisioner quango decide for us. With our so called MEP representaives just there to rubberstamp them through.
1
@kevinwake8789 Victoria armstrong was and probably still is a beautiful sexy woman. Trans hardly existed back then. Promoting trans ideology in schools didnt happen back then. Promoting trans ideology in theme parks didnt happen back then. You are comparing a real woman with a wannabee woman. Thats the DIFFERENCE.
1
Maybe their traditional conservative and not far right like you?
1
Nah you wouldnt be tho would you. As your either one of putins state funded trolls or support the same exteme far right bollox that putin espouses to.
1
Well considering it was remembrance weekend then probably those far right viewers were just a tad worried that all those far left marxist corbynistas and extreme religious islamists amongst the demonstrators would try to wreck a great and much loved british tradition by doing what they had been doing in whitehall the previous weekends..
1
From google.....According to the Hamas-run Ministry of Health, 8,805 Palestinians have been killed since 7 October, including at least 3,648 children and 2,187 women, and some 22,240 have been injured, UN humanitarian coordination affairs office OCHA said....... Important bit "hamas" run ministry of health. So how do we know thats the true figures?. We certainly know there is bound to be colateral civilian damage. But the hospital bombing lie is an example of how hamas might use inflated figures to fit their narrative. Which is to use the death toll to rouse other arab/muslim states and terror groups to join in with them in their holy jihad to destroy israel
1
@SimonBailey-qr3kz Again where is the evidence. Private banks are not public entities there to investigate, prosecute and punish members of the public. Behavioural procedures for business,s are there for its employees .Not its customers.
1
@SimonBailey-qr3kz For the third time. Where is the evidence? Also refusing custom by a business would be based on exceptional circumstances, like verbal threats of violence or physical violence etc. I dont see a vicar capable of doing that. This is also not a singular case. Its happening too often now in our so called democracy where it seems people are convicted and punished without trial. Not even being notified of why they have been convicted and punished. As for the ombudsman. Why should they have to decide on moral issues?
1
@thetruth9210 The 3 (of the 13) points in the minsk agreement putin refused to recognise. 4. To start a dialogue on interim self-government for the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, in accordance with Ukrainian law, and acknowledge their special status by parliamentary resolution. 9. Restoration of full control of the state border by the government of Ukraine. 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment and mercenaries. Plus the biggest peace deal game breaker of course......invading the very nation the peace deal was with, and with it a UN recognised sovereign nation.
1
@thetruth9210 So how were they suposed to do that if putins proxy merceneries were still there and the ukranian borders werent under ukranian control. Plus minsk wasnt about granting independance. It was about more autonomy within ukraine for those regions. There was no civil war during those 8 years after minsk. Dont you think the UN monitors on the frontlines those 8 years would have noticed it?. Nearly all the deaths occured pre 2014 minsk. Thats why the peace deal was arranged. Also you are correct about somebody using minsk and the 8 years after to strengthen their military. As that is exactly what putin did. From google just 2014 to 2016 russian defence spending......"Russian military budget as being US$68.9 billion, US$78 billion in 2014, and predict a rise to US$98 billion in 2016. IHS described this as a rapid increase in spending which will result in the defence budget increasing from 15.7 percent of federal expenditure in 2013 to 20.6 percent by 2016". Imagine another 6 years of that increase in defence spending. Anybody would think they were planning an invasion.
1
You will only ever find that out if you ar at least willing to negotiate. Hamas will never negotiate.
1
Exactly. If the country is such a disaster then why are so many risking their lives to come and live here.
1
In the geneva convention its all about proportionality which is always open to interpretation.. Colateral damage has always occured in wartime. And its always been the civilians who suffer it the most . Thats why most civilised people go out of their way to avoid wars. Hamas started this war. They want this waer. They want this war to be a bloodbath. They want all this colateral. So they can drag others into their jihad with them. Thats one side of this tragedy. The other side is a nation looking for justice after 1000+ of its civilians have just been deliberately mass murdered by hamas. What do you expect them to do? I expect them to go after the instigators whilst at the same time trying to limit the colateral damage. They have spent the last 3 weeks warning and airdrop leafletting for civilians to move south of the wadfi gaza. They are also sacrificing theirsoldiers in a ground invasion to also try and limit civiliasn the casualties. Hamas are not going to be interested in a ceasefire same as they are not interested in the welfare of the palestinians they supposedly represent. The presenter is right to be critical of lineker, as he like you only see that first side of this conflict and not the other.
1
Usual putin state funded, propaganda trolling bollox there ivan.
1
The 2 state solution is still the only way. Preferably not as intertwined as they are at present. Both sides need to cede territory tho to achieve that. The religious places could then be nuetral sites administered by the UN. Until in time, with more peaceful conditions, it might then allow some kind of normality to return to the region. Not that this region has ever had any kind of normality mind.
1
Exactly. Why would hamas want a ceasefire when their ultimate aim is to make this a bloodbath and use the colateral civilian losses in gaza to rouse other arab/muslim nations and terror groups to join in their holy jihasd with them. They might agree to small cessations for humanitarian aid so they can reorganise and reconsolidate their defences but ultimately they aint interested in no permanent ceasefire.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All