Comments by "" (@colby25) on "Piers Morgan Uncensored" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6.  @tancdiscovery9432  Genocide is what happened on 7th october. The deliberate close range targetting of civilians. Israel is allowed under international law to defend itself and respond to that atttack. The military strikes on hamas are not genocidal by themselves. The geneva convention mentions proportionality. As hamas continues to fire its rockets indiscriminately at civilian targets, which in itself is a war crime, then the need to knock out command centres and those rocket launch sites are paramount to the safety of its own civilians and would need to be taken into consideration. The convention also mentions that the parties involved in the conflict must try to warn civilians and attempt to prevent civilian casualties as best they can. Israel has been leafletting, warning and telling palestinians to head south of the wadi gaza for 3/4 weeks now.. They are also sacrificing their own soldiers in a land invasion to try and limit civilian casualties..Its still a bloodbath as wars always are. Its always the civilians that suffer the most. Thats why civilised people will do their utmost to avoid them. This is now the 4th time israel has been invaded by its neighbours in the last 75 odd years. So there is going to be resentment on their side as well as the palestinians. Thats why negotiation is crucial to any kind of peaceful solution here. And that is never going to happen with hamas on the scene. Not even a ceasefire that so many seem to crave. Israel dont want it and neither does hamas. They want this to drag on as long as possible to draw in other arab/muslim nations and terror groups into this conflict with them.
    1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11.  @cave__troll  He is part of their past. Some see him as a freedom fighter first. There are far right nationalist and neo nazis minority groups in every country. Ukranians need peace to build and educate all its people to reject nationalism and question the past. That takes time. Especially in wartime were nationalism thrives.There is no chance of EU/NATO access for them if they dont change. They know that. As for nazi azov they were depoliticised long ago. Heres a better description of azov. Their commanders now are regular UAF Officers who were assigned to command after the SNP political leadership was removed. Out the 73 founders of Azov in Kharkhiv. Only 14 were from the SNP. The Myth of Nazi Azov was just that, a myth promulgated by the RuZZ Fascists & their Red Fascist Stalinist Allies. Most of Azov were originally formed by Football Ultras & grew from Kharkhiv to include Ultras from many of the FC's of east & south. Yes a large Minority of the Ultras had been affiliated to various Far Right outfits but not all. A large Minority also came from Far Left Outfits as well as Anarchists. All those Ultras used to fight each other ...now they fight side by in Azov. Azov grew beyond the Ultras too though as many non-Political & non-Ultra civilian volunteers joined Azov after invasion & it grew from Battalion size to Regiment. Also some existing regular soldiers were transferred in, new recruits to UAF also were added to build it to Brigade size. Azov now is nothing like Azov of 2014.
    1
  12. 1
  13. If those tunnels have been there since the 80s then why havnt hamas used all that extra spare time and cash building bomb shelters for all the civilians they supposedly represent? So there are far left marxist/trotskyist jews or even pacifist jews. So what. Religion is no barrier to misguidedness. Israels government is a unity govt now with political opponents from the left ,of netanyahu, within it. Hamas was created in 1987 along with many other islamic funamentalist terror groups like al queda. They are also affiliated to the muslim brotherhood. Another terrorist group. Because they have no other choice and hamas knows this. They want a colateral bloodbath to draw other muslim/arab states and terror groups into the conflict with them.The israelis have been giving warnings for 3/4 weeks for civilians to head south. They are using special ops as well as a land invasion which will cost them lives as well. They have saved one hostage. The rest i would assume are being kept well safe as there are nationals from other countries aswell and hamas dont want bad publicity. I would say yes as they dont seem to me, to give a damn about any of them, as they fire off their rockets knowing darn well that a retaliatory strike is going to be coming straight back at where that rocket was fired from and so endangering all the civilians around them. The food and water stoppage was an attempt to use in exchange for the release of the hostages. Your hypocrisy i would argue is also on fire and you need to call the fire brigade..
    1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. Regarding the bengali famine. There was actually a war cabinet. Churchill wasnt making those decisions alone. Labours clem atlee became deputy pm in it. Bevin, Chamberlain, Eden, Halifax, Greenwood, Beaverbrook, Wood and Anderson who replaced chamberlain when he died also.. So to blame churchill alone is just nonsense imho. Also the official 1945 enquiry found the national indian and local bengal governments foremostly responsible along with the viceroy at the time Linithglow. With the imperial government(war cabinet) also criticised. Tbf the local indian government and national officials had used their famine relief methods on previous famines and they had been successful. This famine though was far worse than previous and needed much firmer action. Confiscation of all grain/rice and rationing needed to be introduced immediately which wasnt as they used the other economic style methods which had worked previously. By the time the newly appointed viceroy wavell intervened with help from the british army one and a half million had starved to death. Even after rationing another one and a half million died after as people were too weak to fight off disease. A terrible tragedy. The uk government/cabinet has to take some share of the blame too. Way too slow in reacting or maybe not realising how bad the situation really was? No social media/world news in those days remember. Plus you have to take into account that there "there was a war on". Bengal is where the japanese were coming through. The uk was preparing for d day. The japanese had occupied all the coastline and land to the east. Which previously supplied bengal with their grain and they were now bombing the bengal bay from where the aid had to come. Plus there was a huge storm on the western coast of india which destroyed a huge grain storage there which exasperated the problem.. This lady,s views on the bengal famine are reliant on a book written by a modern day indian lady who understandably hated the british empire and wanted to rubbish a major part of it. Just like a lot of modern day indian nationalists like modi, now hate the uk along with its past imperialism too. This lady has obviously done her research in the left leaning media only. As the independant did an article 10 odd years ago which was heavily reliant on that book. And of course the independant would never rubbish a conservative icon would they?
    1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1