Comments by "RiteMo LawBks" (@ritemolawbks8012) on "Bloomberg Television" channel.

  1.  @grosuciprian  This US is still the global-reserve currency, and there's not an actual replacement yet. Are you sure you're understanding the economic indicators you're trying to use to support an argument?
    2
  2.  @imranchaudhry9381  Britain is part of Nato and has freedom of navigation to travel in international waters. If you want to question the crew, then stop one of their war ships and ask why they're in close proximity to Russia.
    2
  3.  @imranchaudhry9381  I'm not wasting time explaining international law to someone who doesn't recognize it. Go stop a Nato ship then, and see what kind of response you get.
    2
  4.  @-a-s-a-s-  If he's stealing so much, go learn how to do it and stop randomly tagging people with these weird remarks. I'm trying to watch Mike Tyson's fight on plane, and you're bringing up this stuff that even you know is BS. Please don't tag me again or get blocked.
    2
  5. He looks the same. Just more gray hair.
    2
  6. The government shouldn't negotiate with cult-like crazy terrorist.
    2
  7. The CIA that has no domestic jurisdiction, and reports directly to President Trump removed their own boss? Right....
    2
  8. If were popular, Trump would have won on November. So many people motived to vote him out of office.
    2
  9. What part of the country is closed?
    2
  10. In November 2020, what was that?
    2
  11. As an American, I get offended when they compare Boris Johnson to President Trump. Boris is a patriot, a skilled politician who won in a landslide, and a supporter of America's global leadership. Outside of crazy hair and being overweight, they have nothing in common.
    2
  12. Do you have any evidence supporting that, or are you still spreading campaign propaganda?
    2
  13. The stripper pole in the cabinet room. I was there for the Anaconda Party during the UK-Brazil trade talks.
    2
  14. Wrong speaker and wrong legislature. The Brits like her more than Trump, so good luck with that.
    2
  15.  @xoamare8650  No one wants war, but China is hostile adversary. The only requirement should be open dialogue among the US, Moscow, and China regarding nuclear issues. I understand most people opposed US imperialism, but the US security agreement require us to treat Japan, Australia, NZ, Philippines, and South Korea like part of the US. The Taiwan issue can be resolved by giving assurance of what the US will do if China attacks Taiwan (Which is officially part of China). All the military, Intel, and economic tools of the US and our allies should be focused on containing China.
    2
  16. That last sentence is so true!
    2
  17. Do we have a house of un-representatives now? What are you even talking about?
    2
  18. Lmao
    2
  19.  @johnnytiger7580  The EU is supposed to be democratic, so just give a referendum on NATO. That way you can confront Moscow and the CCP, without having to be subordinate to US and UK.
    2
  20. You don't want an injection of Trump?
    2
  21.  @skydiver1013  Good. That still won't make Trump anymore appealing.
    2
  22. He gave that 🐂 💩 excuse that no believed except his base.
    2
  23.  Straight out the suburbs With the tool  I'm sure you were hoping you had a platform to display your Fauci Derangement Syndrome, but we need to know why a Gay bot is working for Russia. Is it because you want to help Sputnik V sales?
    2
  24. How old is Wilbur Ross again, commerce Secretary?
    1
  25.  Mike K  They have to sign it first, and then wait for the US response.
    1
  26. Maybe she should've bent. They're going to ruin her reputation.
    1
  27. As a fiscal conservative, a board member is not really that big of a deal. The Fed controls interest rates, money supply, and stabilizes inflation, which is a huge deal globally and could cause a recession during an election year; but it's hard to distinguish between a Republican and Democratic monetary policy. Love him or hate him, Sen. Joe Manchin is one of those powerful and influential politicians in the country. With today's political gridlock in Washington, DC, it's nearly impossible to get any new spending or legislation through Congress and to the President's Desk, without Manchin's backing. Biden should probably seriously consider winning over more Mitch and GOP senators instead of appeasing Manchin.
    1
  28.  @paladro  They still voted for him. Until one party gets a supermajority in the Senate, nothing will pass without Manchin.
    1
  29.  medusa little  They can get unemployment even if they didn't have a previous job. That was part of the extra $600 stimulus.
    1
  30.  @Phokenlaomouth  Who pays for unemployment? As of now, mostly the Federal Reserve.
    1
  31.  medusa little  Google "gig workers unemployment." It's essentially pure fiscal stimulus. There isn't even a work-search requirement because of the pandemic emergency.
    1
  32.  medusa little  The unemployment funds come from employers who pay state taxes, and federal stimulus that extends benefits and keeps supplements state benefits. It's similar to how Medicaid + CHIP is run by the states, but funded by federal and state taxes.
    1
  33.  @yehimstone5492  That's got nothing to do with the topic. You're trying to bring up domestic US politics, which has nothing to do with this post. Do you think enemies of the US gives a damn that you're a Trump supporter?
    1
  34. That's been known since the Reagan Administration. If you're not familiar with the history, why are you randomly mentioning Trump as if no one else noticed?
    1
  35.  @sl1237  The President of France (J. Chirac) was the first one who notified the Reagan Administration and CIA in the early 80s. They started the first Soviet pipeline sanctions in the 80s.
    1
  36.  @-a-s-a-s-  Your timing is suspicious. We had this homeless problem under the last administration as well. When there was a massive corporate tax cut in 2017 that added to the budget deficit, were you proposing plans to end the homelessness in America? I think you're disingenuous and just using the war in Ukraine to distract and address an issue that you don't even care about. When has Congress or the federal government ever started building houses? How is that done? That doesn't even make sense. There was money for COVID-19 related housing issues and evictions, but that has expired and there's no support for the government to expand its role to address homelessness. This easily passed by executive order because it's bipartisan and Congress approved up to 10 billion dollars. It's bipartisan because it's the government purchasing weapons from defense contractors and supplying them to an ally at war. It creates jobs throughout the country, so no politician will oppose them. That's the type of stimulus and functioning as an arsenal of democracy that America has done WWI.
    1
  37.  @-a-s-a-s-  I seem triggered because I know you don't give a hell about the homeless. Just like there are random posts about abandoned Afghans who people could care less about. A better way to describe it is "pawns." This is an election year, so you're using pawns that you won't even remember after November.
    1
  38.  @-a-s-a-s-  I'm far from perfect, a hyper partisan, and have a tendency of ranting. If what I said about you is wrong, it shouldn't matter. It's what you think of yourself that matters.
    1
  39.  @-a-s-a-s-  Due to the cluttering, I had to use the YouTube mute feature. You can continue the conversation with my online ghost.
    1
  40. That first stimulus bill was nice.
    1
  41. The kind that got them sanctioned.
    1
  42. No. This is a major win for him.
    1
  43. Where are your sources?
    1
  44.  @Bryan-ge1pt  Who knows what you're talking about, but can you keep that with your fellow crazies? Call for an orderly at the psych facility or nursing home you're in because I don't change adult diapers.
    1
  45.  @Bryan-ge1pt  Stop randomly tagging people you know aren't remotely interested in anything you have to say. If I wanted to hear from a Maga intellectual, I'd ask my dog. He voted for Trump and has been barking about the Great Replacement and the FBI raid too. I love him, but he's just as dumb and ignorant as you are. He caught on quicker to the fact that the YouTube Maga Mute Feature works.
    1
  46. Since the GOP and his supporters are contributing the funds to pay his legal expenses, you'd think they'd advise his slow down on his crime spree. A lot of these charges and investigations could have been avoided had there been an adult in the room to tell him, "no!" At this point, a presidential pardon and/or executive clemency of state charges would resolve the legal uncertainty. The lack of remorse and constant lying makes any leniency and prosecutorial discretion unlikely.
    1
  47.  @Bryan-ge1pt  Also, look up the legal definition of "charge" because it sounds like you thought you landed a knock out blow. All you're doing is giving me more material to work with.
    1
  48.  @Bryan-ge1pt  Yes. He's been charged. That's an accusation. That's why I recommend you use Google. I've got a law degree and wouldn't have used that word if I didn't already know the meaning. Anything else you want to point out, so I can dumb it down and explain why you wrong and uninformed?
    1
  49.  @Bryan-ge1pt  I know it sounds hostile, but you're neither smart nor informed. All you're doing is making Trump look worse. You keep inviting yourself into discussions and adding input that's cryptic and irrelevant. Trump spends millions of dollars on his legal defense team. Let them speak for him. They at least know what the word "charge" means. They charged him with incitement of an insurrection in his impeachment trial. The keyword you're looking for are indictment and conviction.
    1
  50.  @Bryan-ge1pt  Are you done yet because now you're saying I've already convicted him? I know the simple MAGA talking points. It was someone like me who simplified them so you could use them online. Regardless, as I originally said, the charges and investigations are due to the stupidity of him and his associates. If there were no charges, no accusations, and no investigations, he wouldn't need to spend millions of dollars on lawyers. It's embarrassing that a former president doesn't know when the next time he'll be raided or possibly arrested. I'm definitely not one his supporters, and even I don't like the situation he's put himself and the country in. I have more respect for the office than he ever did.
    1