Comments by "RiteMo LawBks" (@ritemolawbks8012) on "NBC News"
channel.
-
661
-
161
-
77
-
48
-
47
-
44
-
41
-
39
-
36
-
33
-
31
-
29
-
27
-
24
-
21
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
I can respect the judge's legal determination and credibility, but it's unusual following a potentially high-profile criminal case during the pre-indictment phase.
If the government failed to meet its burden of proof in support of a contempt of court charge, then the judge had no other option that to rule against the government.
I haven't read the court's ruling yet, but unless there's a new revelation calling into question this court's impartiality, moral character, and/or legal competence, then I see no reason to question the legitimacy of the ruling.
In spite of the fact that I will never vote in support of Trump holding public office, he's still entitled to his rights of due process, fair trail, and protection against vindictive and politically motivated prosecutions (AKA "Deep state witch hunts").
All public official should be held accountable and investigated when there's even the appearance of corruption, criminality, and abuse of official authority; but just like we often need reminders that Trump is "NOT ABOVE the law," it's also true that Trump is "NOT BENEATH the protections of constitutional law."
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8