Comments by "David Ford" (@davidford3115) on "TheQuartering" channel.

  1.  @Defensor314  Actually, there is. Namely, you are not being blatant about your partisan and biased actions which IS an objectively measurable metric. If it could be considered an "in-kind donation" under FEC rules for example. Don't make excuses for indefensible behavior.
    1
  2.  @Defensor314  "Cite authority" That is the logical fallacy of "appeal to authority". Disregard me all you want, but it only shows you are throwing a temper tantrum like a spoiled little child. Learn to debate and code. Touch grass while you are at it.
    1
  3.  @Defensor314  WRONG. Law is NOT always correct. That is why we have the appeals process. By your logic, the law says Trump is guilty simply because the law as passed deems it so. SCOTUS disagrees. For someone who is obsessed with the law, you sure are ignorant of it. Your interpretation of the Law is Fascistic.
    1
  4. Klepto Kamala.
    1
  5. Which is why voting in November is important. If we want this ruling enforce, we want an administration that is hostile towards Google.
    1
  6.  @gogereaver349  On their platform, sure. But that is the same argument that Microsoft made in their case with Netscape. The fact that the courts specifically pointed out the previous example is telling. The fact that the Netscape ruling didn't change much in practice gives the court motivation to be HARSHER in this case so as to reinforce the Netscape ruling.
    1
  7. @jormungand72 "Give up all the land" basically means a denial of Israel's right to exist. It means finishing the Holocaust. Your proposal is NOT sincere, but a dishonest call for extermination.
    1
  8. Which is why punitive damages exist.
    1
  9.  @gilbertcouto8537  The point of punitive is to increase the penalties so as to discourage future behavior. You are only thinking of monetary damages. It isn't punitive if it doesn't create the disincentive to continue doing it.
    1
  10.  @gilbertcouto8537  And that is the kicker, it remains to be seen what the punitive damages are.
    1
  11. Indeed. It is as if they don't know that adding an "X" is Anglicization.
    1
  12. It is more convoluted than that. They want to pretend Spanish isn't gendered so they can apply their standards of gendering to it. They don't realize that the process is Anglicization which is a form of whitewashing.
    1
  13. Funny how they are always blaming Iran, as if they WANT John Bolton's War in Persia.
    1