Comments by "David Ford" (@davidford3115) on "TheQuartering" channel.

  1. Because it is Anglicizing the language.
    1
  2. LIBERATE JUDEA!
    1
  3. Because these idiots don't realize that putting an "X" on the end is Anglicization or white-washing of the culture. They lack any understanding of history or linguistics.
    1
  4. Remind people that by putting an "X" on the end, they are basically Anglofying it. In essence, the wokistas are white-washing Latin culture when they use that epitaph.
    1
  5. White savior indeed. Some people don't want their words Anglicized (ie white washed).
    1
  6. The media is gaslighting as usual. Take anything that "official" sources such as Rolling Stones say with a hefty dose of salt.
    1
  7. Breaking them up under the Sherman Anti-Trust Laws would go a long way.
    1
  8. Because they don't know that putting an "X" on the end is how you Anglicize a word. They don't realize it is white-washing.
    1
  9. It is up to us to make sure that Tony Fauci is remembered as the Jospeh Mengele of the 21st century.
    1
  10. All of Asia? Surely, we can spare East Asia?
    1
  11. More like Anglicization than demonization, but the point is still valid.
    1
  12. Italian is vulgar Latin.
    1
  13. "War is the continuation of politics by other means," -Carl von Clausewitz.
    1
  14.  @ethandtheangryenglishguy8253  What alternatives are not under financial attack? That is the kicker, Big Tech gets their friends in the "Finance Industry" to blatantly discriminate when it comes to banking services and loans to nuke conservative and libertarian alternatives.
    1
  15. The "X" comes from anglicization of words. They don't realize they are white washing.
    1
  16.  @19TheFallen  No disagreement. First thing on that road to do is completely repeal the "consumer protection" act which helped to create this situation.
    1
  17. All the more reason why copyright protections are way too long. Ironically, Public domain is the ONLY way to protect them as when was the last time you saw Dr. Frankenstein (and his monster) or Dracula as an ethnic minority and not Eastern European?
    1
  18. Making Aragon black is simply modern-day blackface. It is the same racist caricature of the past, but with a new spin.
    1
  19. Anglicization, and they don't realize it. Or they do and they don't care.
    1
  20. She is the typical narcissistic high school bully and drama queen.
    1
  21.  @bmacaulay18  The irony is that T.E. Lawrence had the best solution, but the Brits refused to listen to him. Take a look at his map which was released around 2004. It would have divided the region along historical tribal boundaries which had more or less stabilized by then.
    1
  22.  @bmacaulay18  Agreed. That is why the globalists who look down their nose at nationalism will always repeat the same blunders. Ironically, they promote that very ethno-nationalism when the push grievance culture with the Marxist "oppressor-oppressed" argument.
    1
  23. Monopolies stifle creativity and innovation, even "natural monopolies". Hell, even the term "natural monopoly" is an aberration because those are often created under government interference.
    1
  24.  @derrick_v  Again, a strawman argument. Every "natural monopoly" had a beginning and hence can have an ending, often as a result of technological innovation. Case in point is the "natural monopoly" regarding communications, whether mail, phones, or now internet, those "natural monopolies" only exist so long as government protects them.
    1
  25.  @derrick_v  One transmission line. Whether power lines or analogue phone lines. More recently, it is about fiber optic lines for cable and internet. That is the argument of the "natural monopolies" crowd. And as far as all of them, the government is who choses when and where those are allowed to be installed. Many could be built, but government often forbids it. As far as analogue phones, the advent of cellar phones have busted the "natural monopoly" of Bell Telephone (now called AT&T). Confession through projection? How am I projecting when I don't own one of those companies? How about you actually argument the merits instead of engaging in logical fallacies.
    1
  26.  @derrick_v  Debate the merits instead of engaging in ad hominins. You have not once refuted my points, only engaging in attacking the messenger. "When your argument is weak, abuse the plaintiff," -Marcus Tullius Cicero.
    1
  27.  @derrick_v  That isn't an argument, it is an emotional outburst. Refusal to debate is tacitly admitting that you have lost. BTW, pointing out logical fallacies to knock the legs out of a flawed argument is the second highest virtue in debate. The highest virtue is quoting a well-known source such as Cicero or Magaret Thatcher. "I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left." -Magaret Thatcher, UK's Iron Lady.
    1
  28.  @derrick_v  I encourage you to read the Netscape-Microsoft lawsuit. That is more perinate to the situation in this video than a discussion about how monopolies worked in the 1920s-1940s. Again, time and recent developments have provided counter examples to refute Mr. Rothbard's contention on "natural monopolies". His is THEORY, while I am talking about practical application (ie devil in the details).
    1
  29. They don't realize that they are engaging in Anglicization.
    1
  30. Funny how they don't want to acknowledge that French, Italian and a few other Romance languages are also derived from "Vulgar" Latin.
    1
  31.  @Grinchy123  And with that you proved otherwise. People who voted for Trump know that he is unfiltered and accept it as part of who he is. Only the TDS nevertrumpers that have never voted for him who obsess about what he is about to say. "Trump's supporters take him seriously, but not literally. Trump's critics take him literally, but not seriously," -The Atlantic, September 23, 2016.
    1
  32.  @Grinchy123  No you didn't. People who voted for him know that he is unfiltered and so come to expect it rather than fear it. Only the TDS and nevertrumper crowd obsess about what he says or is about to say. "Trump's supporters take him seriously, but not literally. Trump's critics take him literally, but not seriously," -The Atlantic, September 23, 2016.
    1
  33. It is an attempt at Anglicization (ie white washing). I'm not surprised that it is not well recieved.
    1
  34. Agreed. My medical discharge doesn't mean crap to any company.
    1
  35. Slow down there, Amigor. Latino culture is the result of Spanish colonization of the new World. That being said, using the "X" IS Anglicization of the culture which you are absolutely correct that it is an "gentrification" of the culture. In effect, they are "white-washing" it.
    1
  36.  @TimeFadesMemoryLasts  I WORKED in fast food, specifically for a local McDonalds. I KNOW first-hand because I listened to what the store managers talked about, and it was often about corporate leadership choices for which they had little say in the matter. While I agree with you on capitalism, your knowledge of franchise is clearly lacking, perhaps because of personal experience in the subject matter.
    1
  37. More like it is Anglicizing (ie white washing), but the point about it being cultural appropriation is still valid.
    1
  38.  @zerotodona1495  And if you go back far enough, all of us came out of Africa.
    1
  39.  @Defensor314  Big tech is already an organ of the DNC much like the legacy media is. You worry about nationalization and yet we already have that under this fascistic system that is already in place.
    1
  40.  @InvincibleSol  What have you even argued? Seems to me like you are just trolling.
    1
  41.  @InvincibleSol  How can I dishonestly respond if you are not even making an argument. You cite some "essays" yet don't give specific sources for looking up and reading. That is classic appeal to authority logical fallacy and is tacit acknowledgement that you can't debate the merits..
    1
  42. I'm surprised the grammar teacher didn't point out that it is an attempt to Anglicize the language.
    1
  43. Count your blessings. I have wanted to wash that abomination of a word of of my ears for two years now.
    1
  44.  @thisguy5017  The way they contort themselves to claim forced labor is NOT the definition of slavery is cringe.
    1
  45.  @thisguy5017  I'm not sure if your first paragraph was sarcasm or serious. I took your previous post to be sarcasm. I do agree with your second paragraph. While SOME volunteered service for travel to the new world, that was hardly the norm. And what the wokeistas refuse to acknowledge is that most of the deaths during indentured servitude occurred during the very last year of their service. They were often LITTERALLY worked to death. Slaves don't get worked to dead because a dead slave has no value; it is a lost of investment.
    1
  46. LIBERATE JUDEA!
    1
  47. High Latin may be a "dead langugage", but Vulgar Latin still exists in the Romance Languages of French, Spanish, Italian and a few others.
    1
  48.  @dabombdawg3033  Again, English is NOT a derivative of Latin. While it may borrow words and some phrases, its structural and grammatical arrangement is Germanic. At best, American English is a creole language, but one that is still Germanic at its core.
    1
  49.  @dabombdawg3033  You clearly don't understand what the root word DERIVE actually means, because you are misusing and misapplying it.
    1
  50.  @dabombdawg3033  The vocabulary, sure. The grammar, which is the heart of the language, not at all. Vocabulary is what makes it a creole language at best, but not a derivative. Again, you are misapplying the definitions and contorting meaning just so you can sound smarter than you actually are. "When words lose their meaning, people lose their lives," -Confucius, author of "The Analects".
    1