Comments by "Randy Schissler" (@randyschissler5791) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
@raymond3803 "Bullshit! NASA admits all the moon landing telemetry was destroyed. Bill Nye admitted we can't leave earth. There's no place to go."
NASA never said telemetry was destroyed. You don't even know what telemetry is. Astronaut Don Pettit, not a spokesman for NASA, no one of any authority for NASA, said the technology was destroyed to keep going to the moon. When the Apollo program was cancelled in 1972 after six landings, everything associated with it went bye bye. That meant any left over parts, infrastructure, engineers, manufacturing contracts with contractors, everything. That's what Don Pettit was referring to.
Bill Nye is simply saying that we are not going to go off and live on another planet when the earth becomes a polluted wasteland, so take care of it and protect it for generations to come.
I suggest you quit taking little snippets from conspiracy theories, that get twisted and taken out of context, in attempts to manipulate into thinking that those little snippets mean something that they don't.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
That's quite a load of blather. Anyway, here is a partial list of some of the best photos of the earth from space. Not CGI, Photoshopped, or composite. All shot on celluloid film.
AS17-148-22725 to 22751, that's 26 photos.
AS08-14-2383 to 2394, that's 12 photos.
AS08-15-2535 to 2580, that's 46 photos.
AS08-16-2588 to 2609, that's 22 photos.
AS11-44-6668 to AS11-44-6696, that's 29 photos.
AS11-36-5293 to 5309, that's 17 photos.
AS11-36-5317 to 5381, that's 65 photos.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Thought_Criminal_13
NASA didn't lose all the telemetry tapes. A few backup tapes were recorded over, because they were considered redundant and copies were made of the relevant data. If there are copies, nothing is lost!
NASA didn't lose any technology. You obviously have no idea what old astronaut Don Pettit was talking about. When congress canceled already scheduled moon missions after Apollo 17, everything associated with it went bye, bye. And yes, it is difficult to build it back again.
False on saying astronauts couldn't see stars. They couldn't see them while looking at the solar corona. Pay attention to the question by Sir Patrick Moore : "Could you actually see stars when looking at the solar corona, in spite of the glare?"
No astronaut or member of NASA has ever said it was impossible to travel through the Van Allen belts. Probably referring to the video clip that conspiracy theorists love to use, with NASA engineer Kelly Smith? Kelly never said anything of the sort. in that video.
A conspiracy theorist showed you a video that supposedly showed one bubble, (more likely a piece of debris or water) and you think that means they filmed underwater in pools? Are you really that gullible to believe such nonsense?
Buzz Aldrin never admitted he didn't go to the moon. Maybe you should watch the whole 17 minute interview with little girl Zoey, instead of the edited conspiracy theory version. Notice the question Zoey asks: "Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?" Long time means from the last time since going to the moon. Buzz answers appropriately, "We didn't go there" during the long time since the last time going to the moon. Please pay close attention to what he said immediately after, as it's very telling as to why no one has gone back to the moon since the last time going to the moon. It's not that hard to understand. Also, if you watch the first part of the interview he talks about going to the moon. And at the end of the interview, he still talks about going to the moon. With all that talk about going to the moon, he went to the moon.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@danielswish41 "So tell me, what is the reason, no flat earther hast ever done that!? "
Because flat earthers are cowards, and their flat earth leaders are nothing but huckstering cons! The only videos you will see from flat earthers, about movement of the sun, are grossly overexposed, with lens flare that show the sun only as distorted giant blobs of blurry light. Nothing like the sun you would see in reality. Yet, they fool someone like you, into thinking that's a credible view of a flat earth sun, being zoomed back into full view.
If it really was perspective that you claim, the sun would get smaller, and smaller, and smaller as it moves away from you on your flat earth. So small, that it would eventually become a tiny pinpoint of light in darkness, but still visible. Yet, we don't see that in reality do we? Instead, throughout the course of a day, the sun maintains the same size, whether it be sunrise, mid day overhead, or sunset. The fact it stays the same size, proves the earth is a rotating globe.
PS. There is no official globe math, only false flat earth math that skews reality, and fools people like you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@peppersrestaurant1462 So, you've never watched the sun during the course of a day then. Try it sometime, and notice how it stays the same size, whether it be sunrise, mid day overhead, or sunset, when it rather abruptly slides down over the horizon. On your flat earth model, it would have to get smaller and smaller and smaller, as it moves away from you, until it was just a tiny dot. But, that's not what we see in reality, is it? What we see in reality is impossible on a flat earth, and only works if the earth is a globe.
Also, level doesn't mean flat, and level requires gravity.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lcx1876 Not sure if you deleted your post to me or not, but I'm answering anyway.
The Earth doesn't spin, it rotates. It makes one measly rotation in a 24 hour period. You know what an analog clock is, right? watch the big hand, and realize that it moves twice as fast as the earth rotates! That's so slow, it's hard to imagine that can be referred to as spinning.
Water sticks to the Earth because of gravity. Now, I know that since you are a flat earther, that you are required to think that gravity is fake, but try and be open minded. The Earth is much bigger than you think, and mass creates gravity. Gravity is pulling water and everything else to the center of the earth. The Earth is so big, that the water on it may look flat, but it's not. The water in your bathtub isn't flat either. Remember, level doesn't mean flat. Level exists because of gravity. A tool level, the long thing with a bubble in it, works because of gravity.
Here is something else you don't realize. If the Earth was the size of a basketball, the depths of the mighty oceans would only be a quarter of a millimeter in thickness! Now, a millimeter isn't much, but imagine only a quarter of a millimeter! That's not much water to stick to a basketball is it? Remember when I told you that the Earth is much bigger than you think? That's why the vast oceans aren't much water to stick to the Earth, either.
An "experiment on this Earth where you can have a large body of level water with no container," would be impossible, because the Earth's gravity would override it. It would be like pouring water on a basketball and watching the water fall to the ground. Some of the water would stick to the basketball, but most of it would fall to the ground because of Earth's gravity pulling it down.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@flint20001 "We can see cities and islands100 miles away"
A curvature formula that ignores elevation, ignores line of sight, is not a valid formula. Were your eyeballs on the ground, looking outward, when you made that assessment? Likewise, seeing a city skyscraper skyline, or mountain top on an island, is not valid. Could you see the very base of the city, or the beach on the island? No!
"a spinning ball going faster than a speeding bullet"
The earth isn't spinning, it rotates. It makes one measly rotation in a 24 hour period. That's not exactly what I would call spinning. If you were looking at an analogue clock, the hour hand on the clock would be moving twice as fast as the earth rotates. You still think that is faster than a speeding bullet?
2
-
2