Comments by "Randy Schissler" (@randyschissler5791) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chrisbr1969 "And the fact you don’t know there are NASA documents STATING the earth is flat "
Totally false, you let yourself get fooled. NASA Reference Publication 1207: Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model, is a prime example of how flat earthers like yourself, cherry pick a couple words to try and say that NASA and the military state that the earth is flat and motionless. This document and others like it, don't say that at all. 1207 is a reference document for a computer aircraft flight simulation model written in 1988. In order for the computer to crunch the numbers more efficiently, they left out all factors which had a negligible effect on the model. Such as the curvature and rotation of the earth. If the earth was in fact flat and non-rotating, they wouldn’t have had to make note of this. But it is in fact spherical and rotating, so they included the fact that the computer program did not take these factors into account, because they are insignificant to the model. Notice how the document also states that the equations that have been derived based on the assumption of a “rigid aircraft of constant mass.” Which doesn't happen in reality either, as aircraft have flaps and ailerons, and burn fuel while they fly thus changing mass. Just like “flying in a stationary atmosphere,” which also doesn’t happen in reality, as there is always wind. So, the equations in the document are based on the assumption of an ideal craft that has no flaps to change position, burns no fuel, flying in air that has no wind, over a non-rotating flat earth.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@timid3000 Seeing land masses and city sky lines 50,60,70 miles and more doesn't prove anything. Notice how you said sky lines! Land masses and city sky lines are much higher than 100ft. The bottom of those sky lines and land masses aren't seen though, right? They disappeared. Oh, that's right, perspective... You haven't explained anything! Your head bobbing in the water so you can't see above the waves, and the van above your eye level that blocks your view, don't prove anything except you can't see above something that is above your eye level. If you are looking at the horizon and see a 2ft wave, it's still a 2ft wave. It isn't a 100 ft wave, it's a 2ft wave! Sit down with a piece of paper and diagram a 6ft person standing at shoreline, a 2ft wave, and a 100+ft ship in the distance. Show how that 2ft wave obliterates that 100+ft ship. It can't be done, unless the ship is on a globe.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2