Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "Styxhexenhammer666"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's not "globalism" that wants worldwide serfdom, rich people do. All words are encapsulations of ideas and relationships between/among ideas. "Globalism" is the latest in a long line of terms used to indicate the relationship between the rich and powerful, the "elite", on the one side and everybody else on the other. One man's "slavery" might be another's "security"...the matter of DEGREE is crucial to the terminological choice. "Globalism" is fundamentally the idea that technology has enabled the dissolution of the "border" mentality and its hold on a people's economic viability. "Dissolve the borders and free people to be more productive" is the sentiment. "Dissolve the borders" is the rub, and this is where "globalism" receives its "taint", for, doing so is necessarily coercive. There's too much nationalist water gone over the dam to allow such coercion. People won't sit still for it. Witness, BREXIT. The direction of evolution is toward globalism, but forcing the schedule is counterproductive to that end, and produces an aberration of conception of the meaning of "globalism", imbuing the term with the emotional charge that is the hallmark of the "buzzword".
1
-
1
-
All your news is third-hand: three news producers, one of which is Reuter's, create ALL the news you hear/see. FOX packages it one way, CNN another, etc. These three operate practically anonymously, their ownership, associations, and procedures obscure. Knowing, as we do, the proclivities of the various intelligence agencies to "embed" themselves, I suspect lots of influence from that element operating through these three news founts.
1