Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. I "take offense" at being lied to, to my face, every damn day!
    29
  2. Why are we seeing this just now?! The recording is over 3 years old! 👿
    23
  3. Her lack of awareness bespeaks a dearth of competence sufficient to discount her expertise entirely. She should be assumed to be lying by omission continuously.
    15
  4. Can the Rs against censure logically explain their position without lying?! I'd like to hear them try.
    10
  5. Another girl senator weighs in to absolutely no effect. If you're not getting any respect, DON'T GIVE ANY!
    9
  6. Government money always comes with strings attached! Accepting government money is a deal with the devil.
    9
  7. Donalds: "Help me understand..." Chopra: "No."
    6
  8. As usual, KJP's take is dripping with condescension: "You are confused. Your question is ridiculous. I've been clear about that a million times! Why can't you people remember anything!"
    6
  9. It's not the business of the Smithsonian to "help us grapple with racial issues"! If they spent less time trying to engineer society they'd have, perhaps, enough time to do their jobs right!
    5
  10. Rules have value to the extent they are enforced. Lack of enforcement yields poor compliance. But the facts never matter as much as the politics.
    5
  11. In the woke lingo, "sustainable" means having no impact on the environment. The use of undefined terms can range so widely as to render those terms meaningless. It also allows for the most flexible interpretations, even to the point of self-contradiction.
    5
  12. "Don't engage in improper censorship..."! So, what is "proper censorship"?!
    4
  13. If Congress is issuing "subpoenas", it should be able to enforce them! The Capitol Police should be able to arrest Hunter, to force compliance with the subpoena. Otherwise, the "subpoena" is nothing more than an open invitation!
    4
  14. It only took two and a half minutes to get an unequivocal response from KJP! She's losing her touch! 😆
    4
  15. Get it right, Forbes: they are NOT "migrants"--they are "interlopers"!🙄
    4
  16. Intelligence Community: "If we're accountable we can't do our jobs." 🧐
    3
  17. "When he has private meetings they are...uh...private." What clarity! What concision! KJP's ability to communicate is peerless!
    3
  18. He always likes to say how "border security is our highest priority"! That's quite a bad look, given the failed state of border security! If you fail your highest priority, how can we expect your lower priorities to be accomplished at all?!
    3
  19. "It's not MY fault--my lawyers told me to do it!"
    3
  20. Perry Mason: "Move to strike as unresponsive!"
    3
  21. KJP has replaced Shirley Temple as America's Moppet! <song>"Animal crackers...in my soup"...
    3
  22. Somebody has the responsibility to know this stuff was going on, by virtue of his position in the hierarchy. Talk to the person charged with supervisory responsibility. If he doesn't know, fire him for gross neglect! That would amount to some degree of accountability.
    2
  23. The government has no "right to a fair trial"!! Citizens do! Smith's perverted legal basis indicates his degree of desperation! He's grasping at straws...
    2
  24. The Constitution prohibits "questioning the national debt", interestingly...I always wondered about the point of that...
    2
  25.  @crystalrogers5145 <--Correct, it WAS taxpayers' money! If it was still taxpayers' money, taxpayers could SPEND IT! Can they?!? Uhhh...No, they can't.
    2
  26. OMB director can't define "inflation"! I'm unsurprised, yet appalled...
    2
  27. If the president is not immune to everything, it's pretty much the same as no immunity at all, since he can't know what he might not be immune to--later. It's a funny odds game: if one of every hundred cops is bad, there's still a 50/50 chance that any PARTICULAR cop is the bad one, so the conservative position would be to assume any particular cop you run into is bad. The president would be wise in assuming everything he does could be prosecuted later.
    2
  28. So, he's Pakistani, by admission...not a clue about American values from childhood. Why do we think foreigners should should adjudicate our laws! Foreigners understand their own laws, not ours.
    2
  29. Incorrect. @BruthaVIII 
    1
  30. Congressmen like to campaign with their meager five-minute allowances. But maybe once in a while, one of them could ask for the fullest explanation of precisely why the question cannot be answered! The other day, Garland deflected a general question because he thought the questioner had an ulterior motive for asking it that related to a specific current event that Garland insisted was an ongoing case! I'd like to see five minutes spent on exactly why you can't comment on an active case--we're not asking for a full accounting! Just some ENGAGEMENT! There's no reason not to acknowledge public information about the case! But secrecy is the intoxicating scent of power..."the more the merrier", "the less said, the better"..."dead men tell no tales"...
    1
  31. Maybe, they "loved their son" TOO much--spoiled him rotten, and raised a counter-productive human.
    1
  32. Raskin reeks of narcissism! She'll never be a good psychopath unless she reigns in her goofy condescension! Smarmy!
    1
  33. "Our focus..." should be multiple! That's what YOU are FOR! To correlate the various foci! "We can only do one thing at a time" is BS!
    1
  34. "We have access controls..."? Who DOESN'T! Have "access controls" prevented cyber attack! hahaha...Vanessa is tip-toeing through a minefield, the English language. That's her job.
    1
  35. They want to know who's deviating from their norms, because it's the deviant that threaten the norm.
    1
  36. John Adams once wrote, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and a religious [Christian] People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
    1
  37. Snakes SQUIRM!...it's just about all they do...
    1
  38. Yeah, the hemming and hawing is relentless with this one! @mrdeebo313 
    1
  39. "It would be hard for me to be sure about that." "Hard or impossible? If it's just hard, go ahead, we'll wait." 😏
    1
  40. She should "plead the fifth" instead of pleading stupidity! 🤣
    1
  41. Hmm...Hostile witness! Seems all the White House witnesses are hostile! Why the adversarial posture?!! It doesn't help anything, except the Executive branch's secrecy--a disservice to the country.
    1
  42. How do you get sued for exercising your rights! Immediately counter sue for a violation of your civil rights, at least on harassment grounds.
    1
  43. The government has NO Constitutional rights! Only human beings can have "rights". @MikeW-dz7ij 
    1
  44. As clearly as you haven't understood what you, presumably, read? @MikeW-dz7ij 
    1
  45. The notion of noncorporeal, "corporate", personhood is the 150-year old legacy of sloppy jurisprudence. I chose my words to avoid that quagmire. Please read more carefully. @MikeW-dz7ij 
    1
  46. Nadler skirted the police defunding issue by claiming the federal government was not defunding, but funding, "the police" of the states and cities who are facing "shortages", stopping just shy of recognizing the cause of those shortages as states and cities defunding police! I guess that's how they "serve" the American people, with lies of omission--it's the political way!
    1
  47. "I think you're missing the point: I'm not going to answer your question." 🙃 Dumb Doocy.
    1
  48. "We ask you the same question repeatedly to see if your answer remains the same!" And that's why she deflects repeated questions!
    1
  49. Definition of admonish: To remind (someone) of something forgotten or disregarded, as an obligation or a responsibility. How severe!
    1
  50. Jake's sentiments are widely shared in government: the ruling elite reserve the whole truth to themselves, depriving the people of it under the guise of national security--the validity of which concern is never explicated. Government is invested in the ongoing ignorance of the American people! What could possibly disincentivize such investment?
    1