Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1.  @Rud37Hsd  Running engines while spinning isn't going to get you to orbit, so yours is an odd comment.
    129
  2. There's an error @ around 10:30 where the video gets stuck on a repeating pic of the two towers.
    90
  3. Darca1n Speed of light delay would make remote controlled, high speed space dog fights difficult and would still give an onboard human or computer the edge.
    39
  4. 9:42 Oh, what's that double flash a few miles away? Better look with my telescope.
    32
  5. Dekareen The same applies to atmospheric dogfights, yet human pilots are still superior.
    20
  6.  @papalaz4444244  So just pure ad hominem then? We all noticed you entirely side-stepped his readily verifiable observation of reality that destroyed your point and instead attack his playlist and character. That's the kind of rebuttal either a child who doesn't know a better way uses or someone who knows they are wrong, if you rule out lead poisoning.
    18
  7. Those aren't just badges. Toyota is designing it.
    14
  8. Here's a hint; his name is Scott.
    11
  9. Just knowing how cameras work proves them wrong.
    11
  10. The hydrological cycle and food web is much, MUCH less direct.
    10
  11.  @davidwebb4904  Seems like incel-only "knowledge."
    9
  12. Baffles exist.
    8
  13. Eden Blecher Your neck bones would almost certainly fail before your head ruptured, plus your eyes would have come out before then.
    7
  14. It's a real shame most people won't see space x launches anymore.
    7
  15. The 747 is pretty darned good.
    7
  16.  @RenoDancesOnTheSand  Billions of safe flights are totally overridden by you knowing some dudes. Wow. Do you even see what you wrote? How did you not laugh at it while writing?
    6
  17. Seriously. He's reached 3/5 Sagans at least.
    6
  18. Top sex offenders list.
    5
  19.  @grandelDR  Why would you think that? What do you think that big space ship they're building is for? Are you the exec at Arianespace we're talking about?
    5
  20. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone claims that Harry Potter is a wizard.
    5
  21.  @r0cketplumber  That's what the reaction wheels are for, not the gyro. The reaction wheels dump their energy into the Earth's magnetic field using the magna-torquers. 6:28
    5
  22.  @michaelchadwick8261  NASA's entire budget is 1/1000th that, so you're pretty bad at math. No wonder you hate smart people.
    5
  23.  @debott4538  "Close" only counts in horse shoes and hand grenades.
    5
  24. Not even a millionth of a percent.
    4
  25. 0:06 Oh damn, I legit thought it was February still. Thanks Scott!
    4
  26. Debris? No.
    4
  27.  @glantani2842  They WANT to be there, they LOVE that they are "stuck" there, and they are not being harmed. You seem VERY confused and misinformed.
    4
  28. +TAPE Gaming We would not be visible as a civilization in the 6th century. They could likely see that there is life though.
    3
  29. The gravity well of Mars makes it far harder. No, we cannot make a laboratory that could automatically do everything one here could due to mass and cost constraints.
    3
  30. I've read your comment 5x and I can't makes heads or tails of it. Total gibberish.
    3
  31.  @ham4eo  You tell 'em Cletus.
    3
  32.  ꜱᴄᴏᴛᴛ ᴍᴀɴʟᴇʏ  Who do you think you are fooling with the crap?
    3
  33. Why not use chlorine to burn silane instead of oxygen? Sure it makes SiCl4 and HCl, but at least they aren't solids.
    3
  34. You seem to have a great number of misconceptions about NASA and the cost to literally travel to other worlds. It's not going to be cheap to invent ways to do things no one else has ever done, but NASA still costs less than 1% of the Federal budget. It's about the cheapest thing there is in government.
    3
  35. B.D.B. Exactly, it should only occur if you're looking through a camera in game.
    2
  36. They freeze then sublime to nothing.
    2
  37. What data do you expect to collect after the ship exploded? That's why the lost coms.
    2
  38. Ion engines only work in the vacuum of space and cannot take vehicles through the atmosphere because ion engines do not work in the presence of ions outside the engine. The ions can't fly away from the engine because there are ions in the air blocking them and you get no thrust. So step one is removing the Earth's atmosphere. After that it's pretty easy.
    2
  39. It would be nearly useless.
    2
  40. RADAR triggered artillery shells have been in use for like 80 years.
    2
  41. Why? Did SpaceX sue?
    2
  42. Scott needed some decaf 😂. He kept cutting the guy off.
    2
  43. The probe is less dense than water.
    2
  44.  @treelineresearch3387  NASA is not a business. Business are run for profit and that is not the point of NASA.
    2
  45. Those aren't solely soviet attributes. Also seems to be a pointless observation since it's being developed by a private company. The opposite of communism.
    2
  46. fr
    2
  47. Armchair expert>>>>actual rocket scientist
    2
  48. How would a temperature difference lead to anything burning off? If they both remain a liquid it won't matter.
    2
  49. Couldn't you just shape the film like a cup or headlight reflector?
    2
  50. I find that having a periapse of 20-25km directly over the point you want to land usually works, but if you're entering very quickly this might not work.
    1