Comments by "T Brown" (@tbrown3356) on "LADbible Stories" channel.

  1.  @Adamklo  So no 15 degree per hour drift (earth turn). Thanks. But drift was supposed to be what globies claim is observable with the gyro or pendulum. Thanks for clearing it up. There's no drift.
    1
  2.  @Adamklo  Gravity is not even a force in your own religion. Read below: George Musser PhD Astrophysics Dr. Georgy: “We can, We do, We must, consider Newtonian Gravity as a force. Now that doesn’t really mean it is one, but we don’t necessarily have to work on the REALLY IS level.” https://youtu.be/SK9-gYCKKqA Dr. Georgy: “Gravity is NOT A FORCE but you can think of it as A FORCE“. https://youtu.be/SK9-gYCKKqA
    1
  3.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  The horizon from an observer at 1 foot height can be no more than 1.2 miles away. It's geometrically impossible for the geometric horizon (earth curve) to go from 1.2 miles away to over 10 miles away at 1 foot height. This observation and many others proves earth is not a sphere.
    1
  4.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  You're not operating on the really is level. Gravity is not a force but you the globe zealot can think of it as a force, because globe zealots don't have to operate on the really is level do they?
    1
  5.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  The horizon distance in the observation is known because the second platform is 9.41 MI away. So the horizon being behind that second platform must be over 10 mi away.
    1
  6.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  The distance is known by the platforms. The second platform is 9.41 miles away. And again the height of the observer can be 20 feet up. It still will only give you a horizon of 5.28 miles. Do the math. 1.23 times the square root of the observer's height in feet.
    1
  7.  @marvinmartinsYT  That was completely incoherent. Models are not science. Science validates the cause of an effect in nature through systematic experimentation. That has nothing to do with being able to use a computer.
    1
  8.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  The distance to the horizon is all we're looking at. It can't be farther than 9.41 miles away from an observer height of 1 foot. Not even 20 feet. That's a geometric impossibility. Earth is flat!!!
    1
  9.  @jackevans7665  Can you show us this view you have of the golden gate bridge ends not being parallel to each other? Image below looks parallel to me. https://images.app.goo.gl/cDjnLaXNRxQNikiBA I didn't make any argument about seeing below the horizon. Try to comprehend. The distance to the horizon being farther than geometrically possible is what debunks the globe. Your model claims that the horizon is earth curvature. So then it must match with the claimed radius. Equation below for the distance to the horizon and following the maths is the argument and observations killing the globe: "√2Rh = √41807040h = √41807040 5280 √h miles ≈ 1.22459 √h miles . For example, if our eye is 5 feet about sea level, then the horizon distance is about 1.22459√5=2.738 miles away." https://sites.math.washington.edu › ...PDF How far away is the horizon? https://globeterminator.com/the-black-swan/
    1
  10.  @jackevans7665  "For a six-foot tall person, the horizon is a little more than 3 miles (5 km) away. Geometry tells us that the distance of the horizon – i.e. the farthest point the eye can see before Earth curves out beneath our view – depends simply on the height of the observer.Sep 12, 2012"  Live Science › 32111-how-far-... How Far Away is the Horizon? | Live Science
    1
  11.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  You're not doing anything physical. Your entire model is abstract. No physics (physical) to it.
    1
  12. He's wrong because of his dental work? Lol. Now that's just dumb. Lol.
    1
  13. We're all already contributing to 52 billion dollars a year to NASA and nobody can go to a region defying natural and gas laws.
    1
  14.  @algladyou  "By 8 B.C. the Chinese could predict eclipses by using the 135 month period; and by A.D. 206 they could predict eclipses by analyzing the motion of the moon. By A.D. 390 they could predict how much of the moon would be in shadow. ... One of the most important events to predict were eclipses."  https://www.quora.com › How-did-a... How did ancient people calculate eclipses? - Quora
    1
  15.  @mynameray2320  Don't just handwave dismiss your sphere not matching with geometry. There should be earth curvature obstructing objects but it's not there. Lol. Your model/religion must have a geometric horizon (earth curve) but it's been debunked. So now that it's been proven that the horizon is not earth curve, you can become a flat Earther where we know the horizon is caused by perspective. Address this and then I will address your stars question.
    1
  16.  @algladyou  Do you see the edge of the propane tank? I need you to show that edge magically be moved behind the object. Lol. Refraction can't move a physical barrier behind an object that it is in front of. Lol.
    1
  17.  @algladyou  Refraction can loom objects from below the horizon, sink objects from above the horizon, stretch and stoop objects. But it can't move the horizon from in front of objects to behind objects. Lol. In your model the horizon is earth curve and is a physical barrier obstructing objects. Lol. We did the geometry and oops it's not where it must be. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  18.  @algladyou  So unless you can show a physical barrier behind moved from in front of an object to behind it, you don't get to claim refraction can do magic. Good luck 👍
    1
  19.  @algladyou  There is a horizon. That's the line where the sky APPEARS to meet the ground. If the earth is a sphere with a radius of 3959 miles it would be there at 1.2 miles away using geometry. It's farther than 9 miles away. That's a geometric impossibility. So if you are saying that the horizon we see is refracted then it's not geometric. Your model must have a geometric horizon (earth curve). We only have one horizon and you are saying it's optical. Welcome to flat Earth!!!
    1
  20.  @algladyou  In my video the observer height is 1 foot. That means the distance to the horizon must be no more than 1.2 miles away. If it's ever more then we don't have a physical geometric edge of a sphere as the horizon. Once it's been debunked as geometric it can't go back to being geometric. The horizon we see is not geometric as you admitted when you said it's refracted. Lol. Unfortunately, it's supposed to be your sphere edge. Thanks for the assistance with debunking the globe. You can show me as many videos from different days as you like but we proved the horizon is not earth curve.
    1
  21.  @algladyou  I'm not sure why you are talking about lighthouses missing something. We know that the horizon is not earth curve. Now when you see the sun go over the horizon, remember it didn't go over Earth curve. Lol. You have no choice now but to study up on perspective. Good luck 👍
    1
  22.  @algladyou  So you are saying that the lower we get to the ground, the farther the distance to the horizon is? You're a moron. Lol. One last time, I will try to help you understand. If the horizon we see is farther than where the geometry places your claimed earth curve then the horizon can't be earth curve ever. It's been disproven. That's the end of the globe which must have a geometric horizon. I know you won't get this. Lol.
    1
  23.  @algladyou  Almarjyou 2020 "You can see farther the lower you are to the ground." That's the most moronic thing I've ever heard. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.
    1
  24.  @algladyou  So if you know you can see farther higher up, then explain why you are arguing that an observer at 1 foot height can see the horizon over 9 miles away. Why was your sphere edge missing from 1.2 miles away? Also, what is your basis for saying we should see everything on our flat plane? Please don't tell me it's a simulation or drawing.
    1
  25.  @algladyou  I just watched the video you made and left you a nice comment. I'm embarrassed for you. You literally used a pillow and some blocks and declared what refraction would do on your pillow models. Then ended with "explain this", like you did something. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  26.  @algladyou  So if the horizon is earth curve, how can it be behind the platform on one day and in front of it on another? Do you realize you are saying your physical sphere edge is moving?
    1
  27.  @algladyou  Just one argument at a time. You're bouncing all over the place. So if the horizon is earth curve, how can it be behind the platform on one day and in front of it on another? Do you realize you are saying your physical sphere edge is moving?
    1
  28.  @algladyou  Is the horizon earth curve?
    1
  29.  @algladyou  Can you answer my question? Because we're talking around each other. Is the horizon earth curve?
    1
  30.  @algladyou  I asked if the horizon was earth curve. Yes or no?
    1
  31.  @algladyou  Just calm down. You're freaking out. Lol. Is the horizon earth curve? Simple yes or no.
    1
  32.  @algladyou  Sounds like you are saying that the horizon is earth curve. Yes or no?
    1
  33.  @algladyou  Is it starting register to you why your globe is debunked. Answer the question. Is the horizon earth curve?
    1
  34.  @algladyou  Let me help you out. Here's what your model/religion says. "The old saying turns out to be just about true. For a six-foot tall person, the horizon is a little more than 3 miles (5 km) away. Geometry tells us that the distance of the horizon – i.e. the farthest point the eye can see before Earth curves out beneath our view – depends simply on the height of the observer.Sep 12, 2012"  https://www.livescience.com › 3211... How Far Away is the Horizon? | Live Science
    1
  35.  @algladyou  Do you agree with your model/religion?
    1
  36.  @algladyou  Are you conceding? You won't answer me. Lol.
    1
  37.  @algladyou  If the earth is a sphere with a radius of 3959 miles, there is a set distance where it must be curving away (geometric horizon). If that distance is ever farther than geometrically possible, bye bye globe. Your globe can't grow and shrink. At least that hasn't been made up yet. That will be the new theory. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  38.  @algladyou  In reality, on our flat plane the horizon is the line where the sky APPEARS to meet the ground. It's how optics work. We see with perspective. Things in the distance get smaller and parallel lines appear to converge creating a vanishing point. There's also angular resolution effects. We know that boats don't go over Earth curve. And now that I have shown you that the horizon can't be earth curve you don't have a sphere.
    1
  39.  @algladyou  And until you can demonstrate refraction moving a physical barrier from in front of an object to behind it you don't have an argument. I don't care what you believe refraction can do. You have to prove it. Good luck 👍
    1
  40.  @algladyou  That is the point my special friend. Do you believe that is earth curve moving closer and farther or are you ready to concede that the horizon is not earth curve? 😂😂😂😂😂😂. You just debunked yourself. Keep showing that video. Then show it on different days. It all just proves that the horizon is not earth curve.
    1
  41.  @algladyou  A flat plane going in front of something. Lol. That's what happens you moron. Lol. The parallel lines converging is the horizon. You see it everyday. The alternative was that the horizon is earth curve. Well we disproved that being the case. Unless people still believe that refraction can magically grow and shrink the size of the earth.
    1
  42.  @algladyou  Refraction made you look a further curve? Lol. So you saw past the earth curve to another earth curve? Lol. I guess you can just make this stuff up as you go. Lol.
    1
  43.  @algladyou  You're delusional. I have to go. You're just making things up now. "We saw over the curve to the second curve because of refraction." Almarjyou 2020.
    1
  44.  @algladyou  "Of course a curve is also on top of the atmosphere making it can be seen." Almarjyou 2020. Lol.
    1
  45.  @shayandatta408  Nobody really cares what you think. It's been proven that heliocentrism is a lie.
    1
  46.  @anqistenning8558  Funny how you don't know that. Even funnier you think the lights in the sky causes the ground we live on to be a sphere.
    1
  47.  @anqistenning8558  Bruh round is not the same as spherical is it? Bruh, how does your telescope looking at round lights in the sky prove the ground we live on is a sphere? Bruh it's been proven that the ground we live on is missing a key quality to be a sphere. Curvature. Lol. But keep playing with your telescope imagining things you can't prove.
    1
  48.  @algladyou  Yes the sky and ground (which is level plane) converge with distance to give us the horizon which obscures objects. You already admitted that the horizon is not geometric. If it's light bending, then that's optical effects and not physical earth curve. Your religion must have a geometric horizon not a refracted one. We only have one horizon and you admitted it's not geometric. Thanks!
    1
  49.  @algladyou  Are you that gullible to fall for a video that has used an angle of view that zooms in on the water in front to create the horizon? Lol. Is that the earth curving to you? But the things behind the horizon all being perfectly level and perpendicular didn't tip you off that nothing is curving. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  50.  @algladyou  Your video just demonstrated how the horizon has nothing to do with earth curve. You can position your camera and zoom the right way and create the horizon (line where the sky meets the surface) to look like a plane is below the sea. And you just showed level water (flat plane) obscuring objects. The very thing you don't think is possible. You really are special. 😂😂😂😂
    1