Comments by "T Brown" (@tbrown3356) on "LADbible Stories" channel.

  1.  @anqistenning8558  I make no claims about lights in the sky I have never been to. That's what globies do. You can't see curvature at 40,000 ft. Your high priest Neil Degrasse Tyson even says that from 128,000 feet you cannot see curvature. "That stuff is flat." Lol.
    1
  2.  @anqistenning8558  Yes we have seasons and cycles and the earth is flat. I'm not going to beg the question for you and discuss latitude because latitude and longitude are positions on a sphere right? So physics student. Can you give me the dependent variable (natural observed phenomenon) and independent variable (assumed cause of Naturally observed phenomenon) of any experiment proving something about seasons is caused by earth being a sphere or moving? Go.
    1
  3.  @anqistenning8558  When it comes to your religion, I think him being a world renowned astrophysicist trumps your idiot claim of seeing curvature at 40,000 feet.
    1
  4.  @anqistenning8558  Here's your high priest himself. https://youtu.be/YSg2DLWNIKg
    1
  5.  @anqistenning8558  Science is not a concensus. It's a method validating cause and effect relationships in the physical and natural world.
    1
  6.  @anqistenning8558  Notice how I asked for you to give me a dependent variable and independent variable for any experiment ever done proving seasons are caused by a spherical earth or Earth moving; and you just went on a long rant about what your religion says?
    1
  7.  @anqistenning8558  Every photo you take with the ground in it is a flat Earth photo.
    1
  8.  @anqistenning8558  Your evidence is just concensus. You're missing the science. Lol.
    1
  9.  @anqistenning8558  Is your proof telling me that earth is too big to tell if it's a sphere? That's not proving it's a sphere.
    1
  10.  @anqistenning8558  I'm not asking you to make excuses for why no one ever observes or experiences earth curvature. I'm asking you to prove it is a sphere. It's ok to say you just believe it because that's what you were told as a child.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  11.  @anqistenning8558  Having weather doesn't prove a sphere. Lol. And earthquakes don't prove a sphere. Gravity has never been proven. It's currently being defined as curving or warping concepts. And we are not in any orbit. Was this your best evidence of the Earth being a sphere? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  12.  @algladyou  We've already agreed that there is no geometric horizon. Your model needs a physical edge obscuring objects not light bending and perspective. Are you trying to tell me you're a flat Earther now? So when globies believe boats have gone over the horizon, I expect you to tell them it's just how the light is bending. Has nothing to do with a physical earth curve.
    1
  13.  @algladyou  Do you have any more videos demonstrating that light bending and perspective is what obscures objects? Unfortunately, for you globies you need to show that the horizon is earth curve. Lol.
    1
  14.  @algladyou  You said "perspective has to have the same distance with the sky." What? I'm not sure what you are even talking about. Then you said the geometric horizon can be moved. Lol. That would make it no longer match the geometry. Do you even understand what you are saying?
    1
  15.  @algladyou  You've given up your earth curve. Lol. So now you have your answer to why we can't see forever. It's perspective and refraction (light bending). Why is part of the mountain or light house missing? It's perspective and light bending. Where does the sun go. It's obscured by perspective and light bending. Welcome to flat Earth buddy. Good to have you. I've been trying to explain this to globies, but you really grasp the fact that optics and light effects are what creates the horizon. Lol.
    1
  16.  @algladyou  You've already demonstrated how camera angling can produce obscuring with a flat plane. Nice videos. Loved the airplane one because it clearly shows how everything is level in the background, but still there is that line in the foreground that could cause people to think earth curve. But you're too smart for that now. Then your other videos beautifully display that refraction can create obscuring of objects moving the horizon closer and further. There are many globies that still believe the horizon iss earth curving away. Let's get the word out that the horizon is not geometric and earth curve. Lol.
    1
  17.  @algladyou  I never claimed to have the distance or size of the sun. But it seems you are saying that the distance to the horizon is caused by light bending and optics. But at the same time now trying to say it's geometric. Can't be both. I'm going to need you to decide.
    1
  18.  @algladyou  The distance to the horizon was your proof that the earth is a sphere. You demonstrated that light bending can change the distance to the horizon by over 9 miles. So we don't have a geometric horizon. Congratulations!
    1
  19.  @algladyou  Globies always ask why we can't see all the way across our flat plane. You're saying light bends and atmosphere. So that should answer the globies. I would add that objects shrink with distance. But let's not confuse globies too much.Lol. I'm not sure what you are asking about the plane and sun. You've already demonstrated how the light bends and obscures objects. Now you don't believe what you have been arguing about. So it's Refraction when it doesn't suit your model but earth curve when you feel it matches your model. That's cherry picking. Lol.
    1
  20.  @algladyou  And you don't get to say where perspective limits occur. I'm not even sure what you saying 2 miles top, bottom 5 or 6 even means. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  21.  @algladyou  I've shown you a video of the horizon being farther than 9 miles away from an observer at 1 foot height. You said the horizon is refracted (ie. not geometric). I say okay welcome to flat Earth where we know the horizon distance is not earth curve. Then you sent even more videos showing that the horizon is not physical earth curve. I think we are agreeing. Lol.
    1
  22.  @algladyou  Let's try it this way. If the distance to the horizon which is in your model earth curve is proof of your curve and you demonstrate that the distance to the horizon is not fixed, and the geometry doesn't work we still see a horizon. Haven't you just debunked your own model which held that the horizon was earth curve? You just proved that we can still see the horizon and it's not earth curve. Are you starting to get it?
    1
  23.  @algladyou  The plane video you sent is the camera man zooming in on the water in the foreground. Do you think the water was earth curve and then the hoses plane and everything in the background just decided to not follow the curve and be perpendicular and level to the water? You are an idiot. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  24.  @algladyou  This has dragged on long enough. You've disproven your own model but you're too dumb to get it.
    1
  25.  @algladyou  Pay attention. The distance to the horizon was your proof that the earth curves. You proved that the distance to the horizon is not geometric. Your model must have a geometric horizon, meaning a fixed distance to the horizon. You keep showing that the distance to the horizon is not fixed or geometric. I don't know how else to explain it to you. So I am going to wish you well. Maybe later it will sink in that you can't claim earth curve obstructing anymore because you debunked it yourself.
    1
  26.  @anqistenning8558  So now you are saying that there is no refraction while your slow globehead friend is saying that the horizon is refracted. Lol.
    1
  27.  @algladyou  I needed a break from your stupidity. Lol. The argument is this. Your model says the horizon is the farthest you can see before earth curves away. So we would see a line all the way across our view. Realistically things beyond that line wouldn't be perpendicular either as they'd be following the curve of the earth. We'll ignore that for now. That line has a distance based on the geometry of your sphere model's radius. From an observer at 1 foot height that line must be there at 1.2 miles away. It would always be in front of the both platforms if the earth is a sphere. In the video it's over 9 miles away and we know this because the second platform is 9.41 miles away. Your claim that refraction can move this line from in front of the platforms to behind the platforms means that the line is no longer geometric. It's also not possible to do as the same refraction would also move the platforms. We still see the horizon however (the line where the sky APPEARS to meet the ground. So we now know that the horizon we see is not dependent on earth curve as it's not geometric. You showing me objects you're putting in water or a propane tank with playdough being lifted slightly to show more of it does not change the fact that the horizon is not earth curve. We've proven that we can have horizons where earth curve can't be. Do you get that the line we see is not earth curve but in your model it must be always. One time that it's not, you can't ever claim again that it is what it's been shown to not be. Even worse, there has been many other videos showing that it's not earth curve because it's too far to be.
    1
  28.  @algladyou  And the horizon is not in question. The horizon is real. The distance to the horizon is what either proves or disproves your sphere.
    1
  29.  @algladyou  Not talking about the platform or anything else but the distance to the horizon. If it's behind the second platform then it's over 9.41 miles away. That means we're looking at a horizon that is not based on the geometry of where your sphere must be curving.
    1
  30.  @algladyou  I'm not sure what you are trying to demonstrate by dipping something in water. The video I sent you has a clear horizon behind the second platform. That horizon can't be earth curve. It's too far.
    1
  31.  @algladyou  And the video with the plane uses Atmospheric magnification effect. Here it is demonstrated. https://youtu.be/bbzfQ8v_JZk
    1
  32.  @algladyou  I'm not talking about your dumb water video. I'm talking about the airplane video. Where you think the water in front is earth curve. Lol.
    1
  33.  @algladyou  So what makes more sense Atmospheric magnification or the water being earth curve with everything in the background not curving? Hmmm. Lol.
    1
  34. You're dipping objects in water and trying to make sense out of it. Lol. Now you and I have both demonstrated horizons that are not earth curve. Only problem is your model needs a geometric horizon. We keep showing that it's not earth curve. I've shown a horizon being farther than possible. You've shown a horizon created by Atmospheric magnification. Neither are earth curve. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  35.  @algladyou  I'm not talking about any cup. We know a cup is curved. I'm talking about the distance to the horizon being geometric or not. I don't know what you are trying to prove with your cup. The Atmospheric magnification was in response to your video about the airplane. You keep wanting to talk about dipping something in water. It's not comparable to reality and what we see in my video. Unless you think we're all underwater. The horizon is clearly behind the second platform.
    1
  36.  @algladyou  If you put a flat object in water it will do the same thing. We're trying to prove that the earth is curving. That's done by using geometry to see if it curves based on the sphere radius. You're saying look I dipped something in water and the line moved. One, that's not the same as our atmo because we're not underwater. Two, it doesn't change the fact that the horizon we see is not geometric.
    1
  37.  @algladyou  I don't care about a cup. I'm not sure what you are referring to with a cup. Atmospheric magnification is what was happening in your airplane video. Why is that not registering with you.
    1
  38.  @algladyou  Your propane tank doesn't move the edge of the propane tank behind the playdough. And Atmospheric magnification is with the water being magnified to create a horizon line. Like in your airplane video. It's not actually a plane below earth curve.
    1
  39.  @algladyou  I give you a real world example of your globe being debunked and you start showing me objects in water. Now we all have to pretend that we live under water so you can hold on to your religion. Water is a different medium and will bend light. But our air is not placing physical barriers behind objects it should be in front of. You have some serious issues if you believe that. See how your propane tank video barely showed another color and just briefly. Are you dumb enough to believe that from that video physical barriers are being placed miles away?
    1
  40.  @algladyou  The tank is too small to see. I bet you hear that a lot. Lol. And I posted a video showing how Atmospheric magnification works. It's what is happening in your airplane video. I have not seen any lighthouse videos. It's likely perspective. Objects shrinking with distance.
    1
  41.  @algladyou  Here's the same debunking of your globe on a different day. Is it also Refraction? Were we underwater that day also? https://youtu.be/RAgbocvJYCA
    1
  42.  @algladyou  And more. Lol. https://youtu.be/U8rMbjcKS3A
    1
  43.  @algladyou  Are you seriously going to deny your own eyes? https://youtu.be/knXKKPeGZ3c
    1
  44.  @algladyou  Lol. Denial. It's all a refraction. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  45.  @algladyou  What am I supposed to be seeing in your video. He shows a day where he is higher up and had a better angle and can see more of the lighthouse. Then he goes down lower and he can't see as much of it. That's the same whether flat or curved earth. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  46.  @algladyou  I'm not sure what you are even saying. It's clearly not earth curve. The fact that the lighthouse is standing perpendicular (straight up) and not leaning back is proof nothing is curving. And you seriously don't know that going lower gives you less of a viewing angle? So when you zoom in it's going to magnify the water that's now in your viewing angle creating the line across the screen. I'm not sure what you are talking about with the lenses statements. I guess you have an inside joke with yourself. Lol. Why do you think the lighthouse is not leaning back if the earth is curving away?
    1
  47.  @anqistenning8558  I'm not sure why globies believe that there is an edge. You've been looking at too many models. The earth is the dry land we live on. It's surrounded by a lot of water. How far it goes is unknown. Is there more dry land out there? Who knows. My guess is that there is containment for the water and we know gas pressure requires a container. Funny that you don't demand there be an edge to the universe. It can go on and on without question.
    1
  48.  @anqistenning8558  Circumnavigating is going around the dry land. If I stay east using a compass I'm just making a circle. Because north is in the center and south is away from the center.
    1
  49.  @anqistenning8558  And earth is a plane we live on. It is our universe. We don't know if the water ever ends. You're just living on a model that has made earth a ball.
    1
  50.  @anqistenning8558  The Antarctica surrounding us is just a model also.
    1