Comments by "T Brown" (@tbrown3356) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

  1.  @ghz24  They go to the moon. Just like NASA right? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  2.  @ghz24  A skip zone is where a radio transmission cannot be received. Let me guess, that's because of Earth curve too right? It's always earth curve. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Even though we have disproven the radius by showing that the earth is not curving where it must based on that radius. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  3. https://youtu.be/RAgbocvJYCA
    1
  4.  @vikingslayer34  The Bible says the Earth is what we live on. Hell is below and heaven is above. The Bible says there is a Firmament separating the waters above from the waters below. In that Firmament there are lights including the 2 greater lights, which are all there for signs, seasons, time, and light for us. It also says the Earth is immovable and stationary. Modern day Pseudoscientists say we are on a spinning ball whirling through a vacuum chasing the sun along with other spheres and can never experience or observe any of this. We have to just trust that a select few people have been to a region that defies a natural law and gas laws. Lol. Now when I travel the world the earth is never curving from ground or plane. I never feel any movement outside of earthquakes. And I look up and see lights that have patterns to their movements. And lo and behold there are 2 greater lights. Then as I am breathing And looking at the oceans, I am reminded that our air and oceans are not leaving so there must be containment (Firmament). My reality matches what the Bible says, not the Pseudoscientists.
    1
  5.  @trekkeruss  do you realize that you are saying don't trust what you can observe in reality but instead you are asking for me to draw you a picture or give you a model? You are conditioned to seek poor evidence.
    1
  6.  @ushikiii  Are you joking? I can't figure out if you're being serious or not.
    1
  7.  @Cornwall1888  don't try to change the subject. You need to decide if planes dip their nose or not. I'm trying to help you through this cognitive dissonance.
    1
  8.  @Cornwall1888  Planes fly with their noses up. Thank you for making up your mind. Now planes fly with their nose up because the ground below is flat. Down is always the same direction and not curving. So planes can fly a straight path without ever having to nose down. See how easy it is when you are not using double speak? Have a nice life.
    1
  9.  @raywhitson290  Picture, imagine, conceptualize the sphere. Lol. You can never see it in reality, but if you have a great imagination you can reify one. Lol. Have a good life buddy. Go do some moon bouncing. Let me know if you want to buy that moon rock. I might have a deal for you on some space time also. 😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  10. @Miro Mato You must be another MSU (Make Shite Up) graduate. Did you imagine that? Lol. You all keep forgetting that your sphere earth has a claimed radius. So we can calculate how much the earth should be curving. It's not infinitely big. Planes never have to account for curvature or rotation because neither exist. Planes can fly level straight paths and never dip it's nose to reorientate because the earth is flat. Your religion tells you that you can fly around the world eventually traveling antipodal and never dip it's nose or have to reorientate itself in relation to the earth. It's not reality.
    1
  11. @Miro Mato Elijah explained why things fall. Hint: It's not your current form of gravity, which is mass warping space time. Which weighs more? A box of space or a box of time? Lol.
    1
  12.  @stuartgray5877  You guys really need to make up your minds. Do planes dip their nose or not? Double speak. Lol.
    1
  13. @Miro Mato Online pilot. The argument is not about how planes fly. It's about where the ground would be. Planes fly straight level paths and down is always the same direction, not curving away. Earth is flat. Now good luck getting your pilot license. Lol.
    1
  14.  @stuartgray5877  A gyro is not science. It's technology you knucklehead. Lol. Science is a method that validates cause and effect relationships in the natural world by first observing a natural phenomenon and then manipulating or varying a pressupposed cause to see if it causes the effect. You can't manipulate earth curve and you damn sure can't observe it. Lol. Report back to the 5th grade and learn the scientific method. Lol.
    1
  15.  @stuartgray5877  Moving forward is not the same as dipping the nose. Stop the double speak and answer the question. Do planes dip their nose. Yes or no?
    1
  16.  @stuartgray5877  So Planes do dip there nose to follow the claimed earth curvature now? Do all you globies agree with that? I've heard it doesn't and now it does. Lol.
    1
  17.  @stuartgray5877  There's the double speak again. Lol. It must be difficult trying to hold two different beliefs at the same time. Lol.
    1
  18.  Miro Mato  Lots of technology is created by using science. That doesn't mean technology is science you knucklehead. Lol. Later globies, I will leave you amongst yourselves to keep going back and forth about planes dipping their nose or not. Lol. Just for your information. Planes don't dip their nose as they fly over our flat level plane. Peace.
    1
  19.  @brendenlim2158  No you didn't misunderstand what Miro is saying. He's just using double speak, trying to hold 2 positions at once. You picked up on it.
    1
  20. @Miro Mato So now the plane doesn't have to dip it's nose because earth is rotating underneath? So what if the plane flew the other direction away from the rotation? Lol. Are destinations on Earth now coming to the plane? Lol. Can a drone or helicopter hover and have destinations come to it. Lol.
    1
  21. @Miro Mato It's actually funny to me how you all keep flip flopping on whether a plane dips it's nose or not. Now your new claim is it doesn't have to because earth rotates to it. Lol. Then that would mean a helicopter or drone could hover and have destinations come to it. A flight from Charlotte NC to Los Angeles California would be an hour and a half. But that doesn't happen does it?
    1
  22.  @stuartgray5877  When were you in a region that violates a natural law and gas laws taking pictures? Lol. Outerspace is fake buddy. Can't have gas pressure without a container. The sky is not a vacuum. The gas here on Earth would disperse into the vacuum. Lol. Would you like to see my pictures from Narnia? I can show you the talking lion. Lol.
    1
  23.  @stuartgray5877  Here's your gravity. From your own pseudoscientists. Lol. https://youtu.be/ZonZ4PshKIY
    1
  24. @Miro Mato So you just used an analogy that doesn't apply. Double speaking at it's finest. Lol. Give an example of Earth turning underneath a plane but then say that doesn't actually happen. Lol.
    1
  25. @Miro Mato Abstract means to exist in thought or idea but not have a physical or concrete existence. And you only offer more double speaking. Now your claim is that Earth is a closed system. Lol. Then how are people going to outerspace and coming back? Lol.
    1
  26. @Miro Mato Closed system means matter can't come in or out. But energy can. And if course you can't use real concrete examples for your model. It's all abstract.
    1
  27. @Miro Mato I'm bored with this conversation. You bring nothing to the debate. Just double speak.
    1
  28. @Miro Mato No, I just pick up on when you are trying to claim 2 separate positions. Your latest is earth is a closed system. Your model says earth is an open system surrounded by an ever expanding vacuum. Before that you claimed earth turns underneath planes but when realizing that would mean helicopters could hover and have destinations come to it you said no that's not what you meant. And you are trying to hold the position that planes do and don't dip their nose to follow earth curvature. Lol.
    1
  29.  @stuartgray5877  Your own high priests disagree with you. They say gravity is not a force. And here's another one saying Einstein may have been wrong also. So don't attack me personally for your religion's confusion. https://youtu.be/9XjS4I4oQDY
    1
  30. Later for now globies. Maybe if a good argument comes along from you guys I'll jump back in. Try to pick just one position in debates. The double speaking is killing you guys. Lol.
    1
  31.  @admiralcat3809  That is a straw man argument. Nobody here has claimed that planes levitate. The argument is not about how planes stay in the air. It's about how planes don't dip their nose to follow earth curvature because they are flying straight level paths over a stationary flat plane. Try to keep up. Lol.
    1
  32.  @admiralcat3809  Thanks Columbo for telling us that planes can fall from the sky (sarcasm). Lol. The argument is that planes fly in a straight level path as you stated (the air is lifting its underside to keep a straight line). And there is no need for a nose dip, because the ground is also straight and level and down remains the same direction, never curving away.
    1
  33.  @admiralcat3809  Stop using straw man arguments and stereotype fallacies. You're on a comment thread and nobody here has claimed planes don't fall. Now again, you miss the point and don't understand that the argument is about planes flying straight and level paths, and the ground remaining the same underneath and never curving away. Given that you acknowledge planes don't dip the nose the ground obviously is not curving.
    1
  34.  @henrivandesign4526  Lie Man Dan is your hero. Lol.
    1
  35.  @admiralcat3809  I heard you the first few times. Planes go straight. Earth's flat. Thanks again.
    1
  36.  @admiralcat3809  https://youtu.be/jDHls64L-YE
    1
  37.  J Calhoun  https://youtu.be/jDHls64L-YE
    1
  38.  J Calhoun  Lol. Just an ad hominem attack and no rebuttal. Lol.
    1
  39. @Big AL 311 Sunsets don't disprove the earth being flat. Lol.
    1
  40. @Big AL 311 It's your argument. How about you explain how? Lol.
    1
  41. @Big AL 311 You just said sunsets disprove flat Earth lol. That makes as much sense as saying trees disprove the globe. Lol.
    1
  42. @Big AL 311 Out of your field of view as I have said several times. Lol. The problem is you still don't understand that the horizon you see is not earth curve. Once you get that there is no geometric horizon, you'll understand that the earth is not a sphere and the horizon is the line where the sky APPEARS to meet the ground. It's how our vision works. It's called perspective. Read below how vanishing points work. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vanishing%20point
    1
  43. @Big AL 311 It's always in the sky. When it leaves your field of view, you just can't see it anymore. Others west of you can. It's now in their field of view. Did you click on the link about vanishing points?
    1
  44. @Big AL 311 Here's another video about vanishing point showing you how parallel lines appear to converge. What you are believing is the sun going over Earth curve is just a lack of understanding about how perspective works. https://youtu.be/AkKx2DN6kyo
    1
  45. @Big AL 311 You clearly just want to believe in your model. There is no geometric horizon and earth curve has been debunked. Sunsets and sunrises are easily explained by perspective.
    1
  46. @Big AL 311 I'm not trying to argue with you. Believe what you want. You asked how sunsets and sunrises work. I explained it to you. And provided you with links to explain it further. If you are honest you won't keep going around saying flat Earthers can't explain sun sets. That's not true. You just won't accept the truth because you believe in your model.
    1
  47.  @globestrikeback1888  Not going to address you saying you personally measured earth curve. Lol. In regards to the sun not changing it's angular size. Your argument: The sun's angular size should shrink as it moves across the sky. Debunking: You don't know the actual size, actual distance, actual position, actual speed, and what the sun actually is. How can you make any actual claims about what a light in the sky should do when you don't have any actual information about it? Lol.
    1
  48.  @globestrikeback1888  So you just made declarations. The geometry proves that the earth is not curving away where it must if it is a sphere with a radius of 3959 miles. So whatever you are personally doing is wrong. Seeing a light doesn't mean it's physical. Lol. Are shadows physical? And declaring that the sun is helium and hydrogen is just a claim by your model. And saying that the not actual size would change as it changed its not actual position in the sky is nonsensical. Lol.
    1
  49.  @globestrikeback1888  You are way too triggered about me not believing in your model/religion. Lol. Your high priests tell you it's a model. They even say it can change if someone comes along with a better model. Lol.
    1
  50.  @globestrikeback1888  Spectroscopy. Lol. Helium was discovered on the sun before being discovered on Earth. 😂😂😂😂😂
    1