General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

T Brown
Johnny Harris
comments

Comments by "T Brown" (@tbrown3356) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

Previous
6
Next
...
All

@globestrikeback1888 When you use spectroscopy for the sun, did it ever dawn on you that the light is shining through the gas we have here? You know the stuff you globies call an atmosphere? And who knows what ever else is out there before the lights gets to your spectrometer. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@globestrikeback1888 You might be shocked to know that helium and hydrogen are in the "atmosphere." 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@globestrikeback1888 Have you saw what they use for spectroscopy when using on things here. It's an aparatus that closes and keeps all light out. Now the aparatus used for astronomical spectroscopy is completely open and is looking through all the "atmosphere" and you believe that it is getting an accurate reading of the makeup of the sun is. Lol. You have suspended all disbelief to follow your model/religion. Lol.
1
@globestrikeback1888 Lol. You think you are winning this argument. Is the sun in your model a solid?
1
@globestrikeback1888 Do you know that gas does not produce a continuous spectrum? And the sun spectrum produced by spectroscopy is continuous spectrum. Lol.
1
@globestrikeback1888 "When solids are heated they emit all wavelengths of light (a continuous spectrum). ... When gasses are heated they emit only certain wavelengths of light (an emission line spectrum). Different gasses emit different wavelengths. A cool object (gas or solid) can absorb some of the light passing through it." www.as.utexas.edu › ... PDF Spectra of gasses and solids
1
@globestrikeback1888 Try to comprehend. Gases don't emit continuous spectrums (only certain wavelengths). Solids emit continuous spectrums. Your model says that the sun is a gas ball but with a continuous spectrum. Lol. That's a contradiction. "The spectrum of the Sun appears as a continuous spectrum and is frequently represented as shown below. ... In the case of the Sun, light is emitted at almost all energies in the visible spectrum, which is why you see all of the colors in the Sun's spectrum.May 5, 2016" NASA (.gov) › gsfc › imagine › yba More About Spectra and the Spectra of Galaxies - Imagine the Universe! - NASA
1
@globestrikeback1888 So maybe your model needs to decide if the sun is a solid or gas. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@globestrikeback1888 Sorry to debunk your model and spectroscopy. You are very gullible to believe that an apparatus can make out the elements of something claimed to be 93 million miles away and the results not changed by our "atmosphere" which has helium and hydrogen in it. Lol. You see a continuous spectrum which indicates a solid and still believe that you are making out elements of gas which emits only certain wavelengths. Your model and astronomical spectroscopy doesn't work. Later.
1
The size of the Earth is given in your model. Where and how much it should be curving can be calculated. Only problem is there is no curvature. Lol.
1
@GerardMenvussa The lights just look bigger with a telescope. I don't see spheres. And don't project your living situation onto me buddy.
1
@GerardMenvussa Here's what NASA has. Lol. https://images.app.goo.gl/uRtPZDurAp1Gnm93A
1
@GerardMenvussa Here's more footage of the lights in the sky with a telescope. Notice how they don't look like the CGI garbage NASA puts out? Just lights. https://youtu.be/JTsua0oHPZw
1
@GerardMenvussa You have never used a telescope. If you had, then you would not be saying lights in the sky are physical objects you can land on.
1
@650Max The Bible is a reality book. It never claimed to be science. Science is a method of validating cause and effect relationships in the natural world. Post a scientific hypothesis (independent variable and dependent variable) of any experiment ever proving we are on a spinning ball whirling through a vacuum chasing the sun. Lol.
1
@GerardMenvussa So you have no evidence. Just a false claim that you can't prove. Lol.
1
@650Max Perspective is the correct answer. The sky and the ground appears to converge with distance until reaching a vanishing point we call the horizon. That's where the sun goes (out of your field of view). The appearance of clockwise and counter clockwise rotation just depends on the direction the observer is facing. There is no hemispheres, just a plane we live on called earth. Your Models explanation for moon phases, seasons, eclipses and other phenomena can't be proven through science (experimentation) so it's just a story. The ability to predict these things are not based on their being a solar system as they were being predicted long before the Heliocentrism model.
1
@GerardMenvussa I posted links to the lights in the sky. You just said "my word against your." Lol.
1
@650Max The stars all arrive in the East and depart in the west. When they appear to be going left to right turn around and they will be going right to left. Lol. I don't mean to laugh at you but c'mon just turn around. 😂😂😂😂😂😂 "How did ancient people calculate eclipses? ... By 8 B.C. the Chinese could predict eclipses by using the 135 month period; and by A.D. 206 they could predict eclipses by analyzing the motion of the moon. By A.D. 390 they could predict how much of the moon would be in shadow." https://www.quora.com › How-did-a... How did ancient people calculate eclipses? - Quora "Allen Christenson, professor of comparative arts and letters and an expert on Mayan society, explained that although the Maya couldn't predict the exact day of an eclipse, they could predict eclipse seasons by noting when Venus rose above the horizon just before sunrise.Nov 10, 2017" https://humanities.byu.edu › the-ma... The Maya and Eclipses—The End of a World? - BYU College of ... "Though ancient astronomers wouldn’t have been able to monitor all iterations of a Saros cycle (eclipses can occur in the middle of oceans or uninhabited areas), they were able to figure out parts of the timing well enough to know when one might strike. But at this point in history, they just knew the when." https://www.popsci.com/people-have-been-able-to-predict-eclipses-for-really-long-time-heres-how/
1
@650Max Lol. Are you watching YouTube star trails videos imagining a southern celestial pole? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@650Max You have been watching YouTube star trails videos. 😂😂😂😂😂
1
@650Max Check out these spiral star trails. What shape do you think they make the earth? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😄😂
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Post your pictures of these spherical objects in the sky that you globies believe causes the ground we live on to be a sphere. Lol. The argument: Lights in the sky APPEARING round or spherical causes the ground we live on to be spherical. Lol. That's such a silly argument.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh The video you sent in the description says autostakkert and Photoshop was used for stacking photos. Here's a link to autostakkert imagining. In case you don't understand what I'm saying, let me make it clear the still photos in the video is not reality. It's created in Photoshop. Lol. The parts with the video showing lights are just that, "lights." https://www.autostakkert.com/
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Pay attention to the argument. Argument: Star trails videos prove celestial poles. I'm not saying you can't make star trail videos. People can make spiral star trail videos by stacking photos. In order to have a celestial pole, you have to have a geographic pole. The earth is flat and there are no geographic poles.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh The earth is noticeably and observably flat and the Bible also says so. The Bible matches our reality. Your model/religion doesn't match reality.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh There is no hemisphere. That's part of your confusion. Lol.
1
@elcross77 If you can provide ACTUAL information about the lights in the sky, then you can declare what the sun should ACTUALLY do. So far all you have is a NOT actual size of a light in the sky that you have never been to. Lol. Proof that God exists is the natural world having laws and intelligence. Nature has laws so there must have been a law giver. Your DNA and everything about our world has information and instructions. If you see a book with words in it that you can read and understand, would you think that the book put itself together? Lol. Finally, the second law which states entropy always increases proves that nature could not have always existed as entropy increases and we know there was a starting point. And nature can't make decisions so we know there is a God, creator, and something outside of the laws of nature that is eternal.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh No equator. You are using begging the question fallacies where you saying hemispheres and equator are unproven premises you need in order to draw your desired conclusion that we live on a sphere.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Stars can appear to rotate clockwise and counter clockwise from any location in the plane just depends on the direction you the observer is facing.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh I said you can see the stars appear to rotate clockwise and counter clockwise from any location. Don't change my words.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh So here's the debunking of your argument. If you are looking North as in towards Polaris stars appear to rotate counter clockwise (because they are moving right to left). If you turn around they will appear to be rotating clockwise because now they are moving left to right. This is the case from any location. So all you have to do is turn around. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Also don't claim flat Earthers believe something that is your belief. And then say that it makes no sense. That's called a straw man argument.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Yeah south on a plane, not down a ball. Lol.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Your argument is that you can only see clockwise rotation in Australia or other southern continents. But if you see clockwise rotation say from Alaska, your not on the bottom of the ball are you? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh The southern skies. Boy have you drunk the Kool aid. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. You think there are separate skies. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Flat Earth is not a model. It's reality.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Thanks for the laugh Fernando. Make sure the next time you are out star gazing you turn around. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. God bless you. I pray he opens your eyes.
1
@FernandoRodriguez-pj5uh Here's a video that can remind you of what you need to do. https://youtu.be/lcOxhH8N3Bo
1
oleyella85 Yes buddy. Because you can only see part of the sky from your perspective. So if facing north you see the stars move from right to left it appears to you as counter clockwise. If you turn around you see the stars going left to right appearing to you as clockwise. If you could see the entire sky you would see it is rotating the same direction always. But we all have just a sliver of the sky we can see because of perspective.
1
@SniperBlaster51 People in the Renaissance era are not here, so don't try to speak for them or declare what they believed, because that would be a consensus fallacy. What people believed in the Renaissance era doesn't prove the Earth is a sphere. Let your argument stand on it's own merits. Your argument: Other planets are spherical so earth must be. Debunking: You can't tell what the lights in the sky are. And even if the lights in the sky were giant Unicorns it would not cause the ground we live on to be a giant unicorn. Lol.
1
oleyella85 Try to listen. Might help if you just use one star for now. If you see one star going right to left from one direction in an arched motion it appears to be going counter clockwise. Now if you turn around and can still see another star going in the same direction but now the star you see is going from left to right in an arched motion it appears to be going clockwise. I can't help you visualize this any better. You just have to turn around. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
oleyella85 As I said earlier. You have to understand that you only see a sliver of the sky. In reality it is all rotating in the same direction. But from your small vantage point you are just seeing either left to right or right to left of one part of the sky.
1
oleyella85 I am not saying what the other guy said, because he is saying that you can only get clockwise and counter clockwise rotation from southern continents suggesting being on the bottom of a sphere. As you now seem to realize, clockwise and counter clockwise rotation just depends on the direction you are facing. Globies have reified celestial poles by not understanding how perspective works. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I appreciate your honesty on this though. Humility is a good thing to have. God bless you.
1
oleyella85 It's not just in Australia can you get clockwise rotation. It happens also in Alaska or continents farther north. That's the debunking of the argument. And there are no hemispheres. Lol.
1
oleyella85 What you are also confused about is directions. North is towards the center of the plane. South is away from the center. North is not towards the top of a ball and south is not towards the bottom of a ball. Do you understand this?
1
oleyella85 And there is no orbit. Just a flat level plane with the stars rotating above us.
1
oleyella85 No worries. I don't believe in the mainstream view. I expect people to be insulting. I thought flat Earth was dumb also at first. Thanks for the apology. God bless you.
1
@SniperBlaster51 Post the scientific hypothesis (independent and dependent variable) for any scientific experiment ever proving we live on a sphere or that the earth is rotating. You don't just get to claim science with me. I'm going to make you prove it.
1
@SniperBlaster51 You claimed science, now don't back down.
1

Previous
6
Next
...
All