Comments by "Sarcasm Unlimited" (@sarcasmunlimited1570) on "The Electric Viking" channel.

  1. Competing against China is very difficult. They are able to master every technology the West produces, and bring it to market faster and cheaper. It's kind of like the quartz watch technology. The Swiss invented it, but Japan's Seiko brought it to market years before anyone else.
    15
  2. The reason experts said these batteries may rival Lithium in 5 years is because it will take that long to charge them. Besides, they want to keep their jobs for at least that long.
    8
  3. ​ @justinr9753  But people saved a bit of money on electricity during the brownouts.
    4
  4. False. People will happily accept change if they believe it's for the better.
    4
  5. That's because China wants its economy to grow, not stagnate.
    3
  6. It doesn't convince anyone from the "Show me state."
    3
  7. This is nothing compared to that guy who claims his car runs entirely on water, no batteries needed.
    2
  8. The proof, as always, is in the pudding. That's why it's always messy to get it out of there.
    2
  9. Battery-powered vehicles are a zero-sum game. The greater the range, the greater one or more of related factors become prohibitive. All of the following factors come into play, in an and/or scenario. If you (want to) increase the range, some combination of the following will have to happen. Either the initial cost the battery will be too much, or the replacement cost of such a battery will become too expensive, or the size and weight of the battery will be too much, or the charging time will be too long, or the charging will become too expensive.
    2
  10. China is betting on the wrong horse. But they will probably retool and manufacture and ship something else after death of EVs (except for a few makes like Tesla who might survive).
    2
  11.  @trythis2821  And you are saying this because you have some special insight into BYD's design and marketing abilities, and also know about competitors' competencies?
    2
  12.  @michaelputnam2532  You are overgeneralizing. Sure, some of their buildings collapse, but that is only because China is not going to be left behind in corruption. They will do it faster and cheaper. You will appreciate their skill in making corruption profitable. To be fair, most of their products actually work and are reliable. There is one thing that China lacks, and that is a Swiss style hygiene and cleanliness. If you go to a 5 star hotel in Beijing, you will find that most surfaces that are touched by clients are covered by a patina of sticky oily veneer. They simply don't do a "deep" clean. It's the same stuff you will touch on the back of a chair in a Chinese restaurant in the West.
    2
  13. When the wind isn't blowing, they can use batteries to make the turbines spin.
    2
  14.  @TheEvilmooseofdoom  Yes, and no, depends on how you understand what I mean.
    2
  15.  @kuno-genshinimpact8943  But didn't you appreciate the humor of it?
    2
  16. Why not nuclear?
    2
  17. Only EV owners are EV haters, at least those that have experienced the downside of owning and operating an EV. The rest of the people are EV skeptics. And those who park in EV charging bays are not doing it because they don't like EVs. Frankly dear, they don't give a damn. The reason they park in EV spots is because they couldn't find another parking space. It's ridiculous to call them EV haters.
    2
  18. Come back when Cybertruck sales surpass predictions. Production in and of itself can be good or bad, depending on demand for that product.
    2
  19.  @KP-xi4bj  The proof in the pudding will be when CT as an enterprise is shown to be profitable.
    2
  20. This is a bad idea. Battery-powered heavy things will not be economical for many reasons. And forcing this transformation by icing ICE vehicles will crash the economy.
    1
  21. The Viking is selling snake oil. Do you think there would be any EVs today if it weren't for the hoax of Climate Hysteria? There would be zero EVs, because without a threat that distorts the natural reasoning about transportation, there is no objective rationale for wanting EVs rather than ICE vehicles. Simply, EVs don't make any sense if you remove the Climate Change blackmail. Without faith in Climate Change, no one in their right mind would want an EV.
    1
  22. Someone who understands these things, does Cybertruck actually have a rust problem? You would think that the Internet has someone who knows.
    1
  23.  @danharold3087  Geez.,I really appreciate your response. If I were to rate you at the Intelligence scale, you would be at the top of it. This leads me to the next question. Why would Elon Musk choose that particular surface? What marketing idea would do that?
    1
  24. I'll believe it when I see it!
    1
  25. Again, it's meaningless until it happens. For now it's just speculation and hope (for some). The truck may be cheaper, but you will have to buy the battery separately, and the battery will cost more than the truck.
    1
  26. Someone is financing the would be Viking. But we must keep watching his show to understand where the Globalists want to take us. If this guy awashed on the shores of Scotland somewhere along with his Vikings, he would be the first to get speared right through the next two attackers. This will be especially meaningful to those who read Erik Linklatter's "The Vikings."
    1
  27. Didn't indigenous tribes eat all the dodos to extinction?
    1
  28. I rest my case. Humanity must be based on analogiic technology, and not electronic. Electronic civilization can be wiped out by a single blast of sun's bursts. To survive, we absolutely must make everything analogic, meaning mechanical.
    1
  29. Some English people would call the author nob, for some reason omitting the "k".
    1
  30. Not so fast! The facts of operating EVs are so onerous, that the poor people who could afford the buying price can't afford the running costs (this includes insurance and replacement batteries).
    1
  31.  @NonConformist-ys4wr  Wasn't that "Simple Simon..."?
    1
  32.  @Michael-1337  You can't blame China for doing what is best for China. It's up to everyone else to figure out how to deal with it, and I recommend making China manufacture in countries where it hopes to sell stuff. That way the Western working class will have jobs, and the product will not be as cheap and outcompeting everyone on price.
    1
  33.  @daweigo6851  Do you think that I am about to argue with you about something as nebulous as who is ahead in some technology. Where the rubber hits the road is who can continue to sell whatever product globally. And in that regard, the winner is China. There are niche markets that can be dominated by specialized businesses like Tesla. But it's only a matter of time before bigger players figure out the game, and will take over. There is a saving grace for Tesla, as many global manufacturers are backing out of EVs, leaving any residual demand for Tesla to take advantage of.
    1
  34. You can breathe the O2, and burn the H2 in a hydrogen car.
    1
  35. EV car makers should provide distance ranges for conditions typical by country, and not the range you get driving downhill from the mountains into Los Angeles in June.
    1
  36. They just discovered it!? Obviously they are lagging behind. I already discovered wireless charging something like 20 years ago.
    1
  37. I've got another one... "Stuns scientists..." But I prefer "Try not to laugh"
    1
  38. It means absolutely nothing until it's actually sold and on the streets at that price. If it ain't Scottish, it's crap.
    1
  39. Don't upset the apple cart.
    1
  40. Yes, but only in cold countries.
    1
  41. What you say is nuts, and I am not able to figure out who is feeding this nonsense.
    1
  42. I can't believe Tesla would hire someone like you to promote its product and brand.
    1
  43.  @sdpryce  OK. I accept your argument. There is just one thing. Celebrities who buy a Cybertruck are not really buying it for its attributes like economy, practicality, or even environmentally friendly features. They are buying it for a meme that Musk successfully created. And Musk gets marketing. I don't believe anyone about anything until I have done as much as possible to verify whatever the source is spewing, and I am unable at this time to find valid and reliable information about the alleged rusting problem on stainless steel on the Cybertruck. Can you offer some impartial information on this?
    1
  44. All we know is that when it arrives, it will be arriving fast.
    1
  45.  @mateokovac2642  Are you aware of that song "500 miles" from home?
    1
  46.  chillfluencer  What's wrong with where it is stored now?
    1
  47. That car might be not only mind-blowing, it could also turn out to be brain blowing. I don't know what effect that kind of acceleration can have on a human brain and blood pressure in the skull.
    1
  48.  @nickv8816  I considered that. But people who drive dragsters are most likely healthier than an average person. Then again, you might say that the average person is not going to buy this kind of Tesla.
    1
  49. You are gaslighting and brainwashing people. Why don't you just openly make promotions for Tesla? Side note: I want Musk to succeed for as long as he promotes free speech. Car dealerships are business people. They do what makes money. It's that simple. No one wants a car that cannot reliably and repeatedly get you to and from your desired destination. And it doesn't matter if most of the time you make mini drives to your office or the grocery store. It's the time you go on vacation outside of recharging stations, like driving to Yellowstone Park. In order to do that in the absence of a sane vehicle, you would have to rent an electric one. EVs are a tool for Globalists to corral us into ghettos, where they can control us so we don't gather and don't exercise the "right of free assembly."
    1
  50. Central Australia is mostly rain-free, so that is favourable for Cybertrucks.
    1