Comments by "Nerdlin Geeksly" (@nerdlingeeksly5192) on "Institute for Justice" channel.

  1. I still think civil forfeiture should be allowed for things like large drug busts but not for small thing like like a single person carrying an ounce of Meth for personal use. Take the money from the big fish who make a profit off crime I'm not the everyday small fries
    1
  2.  @paulcrumley9756  yes that's what I'm saying civil forfeiture should still exist but only be executed after everything's been settled in court. I'm not advocating for the police taking your things without due process
    1
  3.  @maebandy  I would give that order too, if you run into drug or human traffickers you want to copy all information they have
    1
  4. This is really fucked up why doesn't New York rebell against this why don't they hold the NYPD and the City of New York accountable for actions like this
    1
  5. The judge should be disbarred
    1
  6. Dumb is right, this cop is all throttle and no breaks.
    1
  7. Making citizens prove their innocence to get their assets back from a situation they were never involved in is one thing, trying to keep the assets of innocent civilians who had nothing to do with the business' crime through civil forfeiture is plain robbery.
    1
  8. The man literally adopted a flawed movie concept as a policy
    1
  9. If the federal government becomes immune to legal prosecution for criminal acts this will be the catalyst for a second American Civil War against a tyrannical government
    1
  10. I would be extremely shocked and disappointed if the politician isn't thrown in prison for this there's no way he should be able to get away with this.
    1
  11. This is a clear violation of the first amendment, you don't have to be a professional to talk about engineering and there are plenty of people without engineering degrees giving their advice online and you don't see them being sued. Even if he doesn't have a license he had a career in engineering that gave him experience.
    1
  12. They needs to be a bill stating that just because something is not clearly established that does not mean the court can choose to not address a case instead it should be moved up to the state supreme court with the ability to appeal in to higher federal courts so that this case can become the one to clearly establish future cases
    1
  13. This old fuck just doesn't like kids, if he doesn't like noise then maybe a mob should go have a party outside his house
    1
  14. Those cops are nothing more than bandits, a gang of their own. No government body should be immune from compansating families when they made the wrong call and refuse to listen to reason.
    1
  15. Nobody can get Federal immunity for violating the 4th Amendment of the Constitution
    1
  16.  KELLI2L2  source?
    1
  17. rich established monopoly's like the owners of that cardiology hospital are using the government to maintain their monopoly.
    1
  18. The courts are basically saying you're allowed to point your gun at children for no reason
    1