Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "MSNBC" channel.

  1.  @WinterGK  Except for the fact that a considerable portion of the population of Donbass and Crimea are of Russian heritage and prefer to be ruled from Moscow, rather than Kiev. Furthermore the very substantial mining and steelmaking industries in these regions were created by and financed by Russia and staffed by Russians. The inclusion of these areas in the newly-created country of Ukraine was a mistake which could have been corrected peacefully, but foreign interest in the mineral wealth has prevented this and led to a bloody and needless war.
    3
  2. It's one last vestige of proper legal procedure left in this travesty of justice.
    3
  3.  @eaman11  This isn't a trial. It's showbiz.
    3
  4. I wish someone would tell me one specific lie Trump told. As far as I can make out a "lie" is merely saying something the Dems disagree with.
    3
  5. Don't use the word "justice" please. You don't know what it means.
    3
  6. Name one lie.
    3
  7. Traumatised toddlers who were in no danger whatsoever from the disease?
    3
  8. If only Obama and Biden had done this instead of starting a war to get them.
    3
  9. It scarcely matters since the country seems to be run by faceless figures in the background anyway. But at least Trump has the balls to defy them.
    3
  10. I would imagine the FBI will be very relieved that their highly suspect case will now not face the embarrassment of public scrutiny.
    3
  11. What will he do with your husbands? And why have you got more than one?
    2
  12. "Promoting American values" is just a euphemism for economic warfare. USAID has been instrumental in deliberately creating instability in countries all over the world. Indeed, if it wasn't for the activities of USAID and other CIA-backed organisations the war in Ukraine would never have happened, and nor indeed would many other wars.
    2
  13. In fact being tried by a jury which cannot be impartial will provide still further grounds for appeal.
    2
  14. More Liberal tears!
    2
  15.  @Stephanie-bl8je  You really don't understand this game, do you?
    2
  16.  @lisal9829  Utter bollocks. He has accomplished nothing.
    2
  17. No. It just means you have to prove it first.
    2
  18. Abusing the judicial system in order to try to defeat a political opponent has demeaned the Democrat party, and the US generally, in the eyes of the world. And still you persist.
    2
  19. Would you?
    2
  20. Thank God there are some legal representative left in America who are capable of halting the rot in the judicial system. SCOTUS is standing up for liberty, freedom and justice in the face of political corruption.
    2
  21.  @Doomskay83  Have you heard of gain of function research?
    2
  22.  @anniejuan1817  Because it would be impossible to find a jury whose members are not prejudiced either for or against him.
    2
  23.  @porecemusnox8805  I really don't know. Perhaps not bringing the case at all would be the best answer.
    2
  24.  @porecemusnox8805  I think every case should be treated separately. A famous film star, for instance, although people may admire him or not, can be expected to have his criminal behaviour separated from his activities as a film star in the minds of a jury. Politicians come into a different category, and politicians aiming for the highest position in the land come into an even further category. To stick to the case at hand it is clear to me that this case has been bought for political reasons, in order to reduce Trump's chances of becoming President. It has nothing to do with seeing that the law is respected. This immediately undermines the proceedings. If you maintain this is not so, and that Trump is just an ordinary businessman caught out in a bit of minor creative accountancy, then the case could proceed. But he is not. He is in a special category and if his activities are considered to be heinous, then the only charge that could justifiably be brought against him would be one of treason. Which is clearly ridiculous. Whoever wins this case, one thing is certain - the law has lost.
    2
  25.  @porecemusnox8805  This scarcely applies if, for instance, the judge was shown to have political affiliations contrary to those of the defendant. The judge in this case faces the same difficulties as the jurors.
    2
  26.  @porecemusnox8805  The Declaration of Human Rights is an interesting document, but one which suffers from close examination. All very worthy - but is it all practical? But, once again sticking to this particular case, Trump is not nor ever can be Mr or Mrs Smith. He is in a category of one. It really doesn't matter all that much if he is guilty or not. What matters are the reasons for the state bringing the prosecution in the first place. They could very well be more reprehensible than the crime itself - so where does that put us?
    2
  27. NATO is defunct.
    2
  28.  @CarreraTrack  Ukraine and South Korea might be slightly worried. But they're only foreigners, so it doesn't matter.
    2
  29.  @michaelrowsell1160  And nor for venal greed and hypocrisy either.
    2
  30.  @busterofcoviddeniers  Haven't I already answered you?
    2
  31. It's odd, isn't it, how every cheap trick used to bring Trump down just backfires?
    2
  32. ...to distort their words, as this channel would undoubtedly have done if it had access.
    2
  33.  @petermartell568  Which no longer exists as a feature of government in Russia.
    2
  34.  @emsleywyatt3400  Absolute rubbish.
    2
  35. Joe Biden is little more than a Deep State puppet who uses the word "democracy" to justify a career of personal advancement. How anyone can fall for this blatant hypocrisy defeats me.
    2
  36. Democracy isn't a competition, though it might sometimes seem so.
    2
  37. This is faked evidence, planted by the FBI. Is there no limit to their wickedness and your gullibility?
    2
  38. People are at last starting to think for themselves instead of believing the crap churned out by channels like this one.
    2
  39. Name one lie.
    2
  40. Ukraine addiction withdrawal symptoms can be quite severe at first. Truth is both a substitute and a cure.
    2
  41. The man's a disgrace to the bench.
    2
  42. This makes so much sense. No point dragging the war on with more and more people getting killed. The US already bears a huge responsibility in this tragedy.
    2
  43. Ha it ever crossed your mind that having much closer relations with Russia could be a very good thing for America?
    2
  44. No. He just hasn't been conned rotten in the way you have.
    2
  45. Hi there!
    2
  46.  @vercoda9997  It tells me that the British, on the surface at least, still have some respect for the judicial process. It is not proper to comment upon court cases that are still in progress. If the case was happening in the UK it would actually be illegal- or at least extremely dangerous - to do so.
    2
  47. I admire his spirit in standing up to this biased judge and his kangaroo court. This case is bringing Donald more votes every day.
    2
  48. Yes. Several million times yes.
    2
  49.  @ltho5616  Where's the treachery? We are not at war with Russia.
    2
  50. So America has a judge who isn't suffering from TDS? Who's have thought it?
    2