Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
Duck there is so much wrong with everything you say its tough to know where to begin but I guess I'll try...
"Sanders lost fair and square" Do you really believe this? Are you really so blind? Ug. I'm one sentence in and I'm already questioning why I'm bothering. If you don't already realize the system is rigged and not fair I have to wonder why I'm bothering.
Superdelegates biased the game before it began. I could be willing to accept superdelegates and their role in the process if, and only if, they would keep their fking mouths shut during the election process. To have
nearly 500 superdelegates pledge their support to Hillary before any of us mere peasants were allowed to vote is completely unacceptable. It biases everything going forward and corrupts the entire election process tipping the scales of all elections to follow. It allows corrupt and lazy newsmedia to report Hillary as having an insurmountable lead, creating a sense of inevitability and suppressing voter turnout... AS INTENDENDED AND COMPLETELY UNFAIR to anyone but the willfully stupid such as yourself. There are more reasons why the system is unfair but why am I even bothering with you really. I'd rather save the wasted effort.
"by which she lost to Barack Obama in 2008." Arguments such as this have always been the idiots way of justifying injustice throughout all of history. Just because something has been does nothing to justify its
existence or fairness. You may as well be a confederate arguing slavery is fine because, "that's just the way it has always been."
"Why must he incite volatile people and provoke useless rage?" The only person inciting rage is you. Stupidity, lies, and muddying the waters by people like you piss me off. Unless you would like to be more
specific about why you claim he incites volatile people when he time and again denounces violence. Don't bother it's rhetorical. We both know you are liar like your queen who has absolutely nothing to back up your BS claim.
"he still can’t manage to disagree with people without being disagreeable." You need to look at yourself in the mirror and think about what you see before you say things like this. I admit that I can be quite disagreeable because morons like you piss me off and I have no problem telling you that you are a fking idiot. But I also don't go around and tell others how they are being disagreeable because I am not a complete fking hypocrite like you.
"The parties are private organizations. They get to set the rules, " Every now and then you say something that isn't complete BS. The problem with this statement is that you say it as an effort to justify injustice.
Just because they get to set the rules does not mean that the rules are inherently fair. They have nothing to do with one another. For example let's talk basketball since it was just in the news. Let's say the NBA decided to change the rules and that from now on Cleveland gets to start each game with 10 points (the NBA dubs them superdelegate points). That is within their power. They too are a private organization. Some teams would even be able to win some games against them. Would it be fair though? Obviously not... unless you are dumb as duck.
"lies about her." Have I lied about her at all? You might want to consider that she is called a liar because she is a fking liar. It isn't just a right wing conspiracy. And her being corrupt is also not a right wing
conspiracy... she just is corrupt as fk. She has no principles. There is nothing she wouldn't say or do to be President. She just says what she thinks people want to hear.
"You, however, want the rules changed because your guy isn't winning." No. I want the rules changed because the rules are unfair. I, unlike your queen, have principles that I hold regardless of how they might affect me or my candidate. I am willing to accept losing but I am unwilling to accept cheating and unfairness.
"Maybe you should stop blaming the DNC," and "It's not the DNC's job to help Bernie win." The DNC on May 26, 2015... "Our goals in the coming months will be to frame the Republican field and the eventual nominee early and to provide a contrast between the GOP field and HRC." THAT'S ON MAY 26 2015! They go on to say, "Use specific hits to muddy the waters around ethics, transparency and campaign finance attacks on HRC." Yup, it wasn't the DNC's job to help Bernie win... it was the DNC's job to help Hillary win. And that wasn't according to me... that was according to THEM you ducking idiot. I suspect you might be one of their paid operatives. This also isn't just some conspiracy theory. POS David Brock thinks that this is good politics and has spent over a million dollars paying trolls like you because he, like the POS he works for HRC, have no ethics. For your sake I hope that you are being paid for your willful ignorance and are not really so ducking stupid.
"Sanders supporters suggesting that polls point to him as the best nominee - is ridiculous." The only thing that is ridiculous is you. We are talking about EXIT POLLS. Do you know what those are? Are you smart enough to know the difference? They aren't polls conducted a week before an election or something. They are polls taken where people are voting the day of an election. They absolutely should be in line with election results and when they are not something is terribly wrong. Go to trustvotedotorg to learn more. From them, " when exit poll data varies more than 2% from electronic vote totals, the electronic vote totals are questionnable. If fact, 2% is used as the boundary by the US government when determining that the election in another country other than the US has possibly been stolen." Discrepancy in favor of Clinton from exit polls on March 1, 2016; Georgia 11.9%, Virginia 4.3%, Vermont 1.1%, Mass 8%, Alabama 13.9%, Tenn 8.3%, Oklahoma -6.1%, Ark 5.2%, Tex 6.4%. That is what we are talking about. Something is clearly wrong with this picture unless you are a blind moron who either actually thinks we are talking about polls conducted before an election, or more likely the more I think about it, just a POS muddying the water so that hopefully others won't be able to see the truth.
Duck you. You suck at life. I've wasted so much more time on you than you deserve. I'm done caring what you think or have to say. You are a lost cause and not worth any more of my time. Good luck with your POS candidate. You deserve each other.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1