Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  So why did AOC and the squad vote for her?
    1
  2.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  You just showed how joe manchin had power and leverage because of his deciding votes. AOC and the sqaud had it here. What did they get for it? Manchin got the world.
    1
  3.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "kevin mccarthy" He couldn't be speaker unless dems voted for him. Sam is just lying by suggesting he might have been speaker.
    1
  4.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "There weren't other other Democrats to challenge Pelosi" They could have wrote my name if they needed to. Stop with the excuses. " is a coal baron millionaire," LMFAO Is that why he's powerful? And not because of his deciding votes? What is this? How about an answer to my simple and direct question... what did AOC and the squad get for their votes for nancy as speaker?
    1
  5.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  So what did AOC and the squad get for their deciding votes? Oh right... nothing. They sold you out.
    1
  6.  @scruffopone3989  I thought the story you sedar clowns went with is that he talks about force the vote too much? Try to keep your BS stories straight at least.
    1
  7.  @scruffopone3989  "they're not the same" LMFAO Force the vote is literally about universal healthcare. You can't be anymore intellectually dishonest if you tried.
    1
  8.  @scruffopone3989  "anti-vaxx and anti-mandate are effectively the exact same thing" I don't understand how anyone can buy your BS. It's remarkably transparent.
    1
  9. Isn't this channel here to manufacture consent for a corrupt "democratic" party? They must not be very good at their job.
    1
  10. Yeah he's the grifter... not the controlled opposition making excuses for corrupt politicians.
    1
  11.  @GR-wf2ig  "what does that have to do with him being an obvious grifter?" I'm saying you are projecting and that the only grifter is sam. Maybe you watch too much of sam and his grift. But at least I think he has done enough to keep access to AOC whereas I doubt she will be talking to jackson anytime soon. "You realize logically that they can be both be grifters, right?" Yup. But only one is and the other actually cares about the things sam should care about but doesn't,
    1
  12. "he would probably support a US coupe." LMFAO When you have to make up your smears you don't have a legit gripes.
    1
  13.  @davidowens2067  I get it. You have no intelligent argument to make whatsoever. You have ad hominem, nothing else, and talking to you is an epic waste of time.
    1
  14.  @davidowens2067  Dore has always been against war and you are just a tool spouting BS.
    1
  15. "he would probably support a US coupe." FYI that is you making shit up even if you aren't smart enough to realize it or intellectually honest enough to admit it.
    1
  16. Sam Sedar, "I'm tired." You are. You also suck.
    1
  17. Tell me again how you don't care that sam want's joe ro gan censored with your handle. It's forever funny.
    1
  18.  Culture Warrior Alert System  "BEEP BEEP BEEP" What is that even suppose to mean? Is that all you have to say about sam's support of censorship?
    1
  19.  Culture Warrior Alert System  Are you ok? Fun fact: typing in all caps is a sign of mental illness.
    1
  20.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  " we're heading to the shelter" Is that what you call your safe space where you can ignore the substantive point I'm making?
    1
  21.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "the shelter" Hopefully they censor joe rogan there. Because I know you don't actually care about free speech.
    1
  22.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you think if you're not a free speech absolutist" LMFAO Is that how you want to rationalize your hypocrisy on the topic of censorship? "you've said absolutely nothing of substance" LMFAO I'm fine with you thinking this. It's funny. "bad faith" I don't rule out the possibility that this describes your hypocrisy on the topic as well. Either way it doesn't speak well of you.
    1
  23.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "it makes you "pro censorship"" If you think that joe rogan should be censored, like sam does, then yes of course that makes you pro censorship. And nothing you can say changes that fact.
    1
  24.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "shadow banned" Nothing you can say can defend the type of censorship sam advocates for when it comes to rogan. You are lucky if your words aren't being shown. They are doing you a favor. That said I support your right to say it. Because I, unlike you, actually support free speech.
    1
  25.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" Sam thinks that spotify should censor joe. That's the fact whether you realize it or admit it.
    1
  26.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" No doubt that's what youtube says to rationalize their censorship.
    1
  27.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" But youtube isn't responsible for bad info? But that censorship is bad and spotify censorship is good, or at least that what's you think if you are a hypocrite.
    1
  28.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "culture warrior alert was correct" Maybe you think youtube is correct? Maybe they should be censoring me huh?
    1
  29.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Because you don't actually care about censorship. You clearly think that spotify should be censoring joe. That is so funny. Thank you.
    1
  30.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Sam is not a free speech absolutist." Sam supports censorship. And so do you.
    1
  31.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 instance" That's all it takes to support censorship. You either support free speech or you don't. Sam doesn't. And clearly neither do you. Which is why your handle is so funny.
    1
  32.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 instance" "So what if OJ killed people that one time. It doesn't make him a murderer." -f youtubecensorship, probably
    1
  33.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "repeated patterns of behaviors prove larger conclusions, cherry picking data like you proves exactly the opposite of what you claim" Do you use this to try and argue that OJ isn't a mur derer? Because it's just as meaningless here.
    1
  34.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Me: "Oj is a mur derer." ilovecensorship: "1 iNsTaNcE proves nothing!" CWAS: "BEEP DERP BEEP"
    1
  35. "They live in a bubble" LMFAO Look in the mirror. And tell me again how you don't care that sam wants to censor joe rogan with your name.
    1
  36.  @Damacles9  Dems are corrupt warmongers who would veto m4a if it made it's way to the presidents desk. If you think they are the "left" you are a dupe.
    1
  37.  Nicholas Time  "he doesn't want Rogan arrested he wants his platform taken away" Yup. He wants joe censored. He wants his corporate overlords to censor him. "wanting the market to decide" LMFAO he wants the market to censor. "I personally want Rogan lined up against a wall, denied a cigarette, and then ****" LMFAO Seek help.
    1
  38. "Once you have dehumanized a group of people, you can justify all sorts of atrocities committed against them." You mean the way sam and company dehumanize conservatives? And republicans? Even while he votes for people that belong in that party?
    1
  39. "Once you have dehumanized a group of people, you can justify all sorts of atrocities committed against them." Like one of the top comments right here, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens." It proves your point. It also proves this is a place of hypocrisy.
    1
  40.  @christopherweise438  "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens." That's what's getting upvoted right here by sam's sycophants.
    1
  41.  @christopherweise438  I thought you should know because you claim to care about that sort of thing.
    1
  42.  @angie99656  You are missing my point and making the point of the OP but not about "christians." It describes sam and his audience, like you.
    1
  43.  @angie99656  "I genuinely hope Karma comes back to her in a huge and very unpleasant way." Very "sam" of you.
    1
  44.  @paffles6696  "doesn't make OP's comment wrong" I agree with the OP's statement. It's spot on. And I'm pointing out how sam's audience is filled with hypocrites. "pretend that both sides are the same" Both sides can be hypocrites without both sides being equal. But you will pretend that it is. "Candace Owens" I'm not a fan of owens. This isn't about her. It's about sam and his crowd who all prove with their actions that they are hypocrites. And you prove you don't care about it. You will always find a way to dismiss it no matter how silly.
    1
  45.  @CerebralPugilist  English and simple concepts aren't for everyone.
    1
  46.  @CerebralPugilist  "a question triggered you so bad" I concede that people like you, who make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy, frustrating. "I will attribute that to your acknowledgement/admission that English and simple concepts aren't for you." LMFAO Of course you would. "when asked for clarity." Forgive me for not take you seriously. Or don't. I don't care.
    1
  47.  @CerebralPugilist  Tell you what I'll take you more seriously than I should and try to explain this to you like you are a child...
    1
  48.  @CerebralPugilist  I agree with the OP. My point is that the audience here, who gives the OP a thumbs up, are the same fanboys who gave the comment, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens" a thumbs up as it's also one of the top comments here. And it shows that the fanboys here are nothing but hypocrites.
    1
  49.  @CerebralPugilist  Although I'm not sure why you would understand that when it was all perfectly clear the first time I explained it.
    1
  50. ​ @CerebralPugilist  Sam has dehumanized people. That's why, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens" gets all the love that it does here.
    1