Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1.  @glen7228  "I still think it is odd that you seemed to know what I said in my posts that you claimed you weren't seeing." Sometimes youtube sends a notification but not always. I still think it's odd how little you understand the world in which you exist, unless you are being intentionally obtuse.
    1
  2.  @glen7228  "never my job to figure out that posts were missing" Is that how you rationalize your LIE? It's your job to not lie if you want to be taken seriously.
    1
  3. Speaking of crap team and out of a job.... joe biden.
    1
  4. Sam seder is controlled opposition.
    1
  5.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "says the guy who can;t logic his way out of a paper bag" I can't tell you how funny this is coming from you. Thanks.
    1
  6.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Pretty please tell me again how you don't care about sam calling for censorship with your handle.
    1
  7.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "outliers being irrelevant to valid conclusions" I've asked you this before but you ignored the point. Would this be a way to not call OJ a murderer? Because it's just as meaningless when you do it here.
    1
  8.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spreading covid misinformation" So do you think corporate media should be censored for their covid misinformation? Or just joe rogan? FYI your argument is the same nonsense youtube uses to try and rationalize their censorship. You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  9.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Killing people" LMFAO You are misinforming people and accusing joe rogan of "killing people." If what you say is true, and it's clearly not, then charge him with murder or manslaughter. As it stands it's just misinformation being spread by you.
    1
  10.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Killing people" This is funny because you misinforming people and claiming that joe has killed people. If what you were saying is true, and it's obviously not, then he should be charged with a crime, not censored. And you could arguably be charged with slander. Imagine accusing joe of killing people like you are.
    1
  11.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "the line is causing harm to people" Causing harm to people is already illegal. You only censor because you want to. "you refuse to understand that because this is a religion to you at this point" LMFAO Projection much?
    1
  12.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "causing harm to people isn;t remotely illegal" It is. That's why when you slandered joe and said he killed people it's illegal.
    1
  13.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "causing harm to people isn;t remotely illegal" It's why rape and murder is illegal. Or do you live in an alternate universe?
    1
  14.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you have a real problem with understanding scale." LMFAO What a silly "argument." "Can you provide a single compelling reason why anyone should ignore the 20 years of Sam clearly not being "pro censorship" to replace all of that information because during a pandemic he advocated that Rogan be held responsible for using his platform to cause harm?" Let's try this "argument" but change a couple words and see how it does... "Can you provide a single compelling reason why anyone should ignore the 20+ years of OJ clearly not murdering people to replace all of that information because one time he went out and killed some folk?" Do you really not understand why your argument is terrible? "Stop with the emotional lashing out and explain why 1 time trumps 20 years of evidence of the contrary." LMFAO Stop with the emotional lashing out and explain why a person advocating for censorship means they don't advocate for censorship again? It's funny. "If Lebron James has a bad game and only scores 2 points and fouls out then by your logic Lebron James is a terrible basketball player, which is absurd." LMFAO A better analogy would be to say that if lebron threw a single basketball game that would always make them guilty of it. And not amount of games where he didn't throw a game would change it.
    1
  15.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "if your argument is covid misinformation doesn;t cause harm, that 2 is ridiculous" LMFAO Never do I say, "covid misinformation doesn't cause harm." You are a very tedious person to talk to. You would rather strawman than address the things I'm actually saying.
    1
  16.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  My comments are being censored. The irony.
    1
  17.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "if your argument is covid misinformation doesn;t cause harm, that 2 is ridiculous" Not once do I say that. Maybe address the things I actually say.
    1
  18.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you're a very tedious person to talk to" This is funny when combined with a strawman argument from you.
    1
  19.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "If Lebron James has a bad game and only scores 2 points and fouls out then by your logic Lebron James is a terrible basketball player, which is absurd." That's not my logic. I understand that people have off days. They can't control that. But they can control their actions. A more apt analogy would be to say that the black sox will forever be guilty of throwing games for one series. And deflecting to talk about all the games they didn't throw doesn't change that fact.
    1
  20.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "by your logic" By your logic OJ isn't a murderer because it's only once. And people who bring up that one time are "cherry picking." Even you should realize on some level how silly that is.
    1
  21.  @Bickle121  I'm going to address your BS as if I take you seriously. I do not. "when asked about specific people they say “I can’t answer that” because it may involve an ongoing trial but when asked generally they say no." You are full of it. You are claiming that they can make a general statement like "no" to everyone but they can't do it for individuals? And that is suppose to make sense? "may involve an ongoing trial" What BS. If anyone knows if there were feds there it should be the freaking fed right? And despite you BS claims they absolutely HAVE NOT denied having anyone there. "increased funds," I wish I were able to fail my way into more money like this. Is there even a situation that you think calls for less cops? Because I suspect it doesn't work like that for you. But there's always a reason for more cops am I right? Maybe if they get more money then they will be able to afford more of their own to send in there. And then it can be an actual coup instead of the glorified riot/protest. As a US citizen I'm well aware of what an actual coup looks like. We do it all the time all over the place to other countries afterall. This wasn't one.
    1
  22.  @MichaelAronson  Did he? Sounds dumb. Shouldn't you be defending sam instead of deflecting to talk about jimmy?
    1
  23.  @MichaelAronson  "Why do I need to defend anyone?" Because you are only here because I'm talking about your man crush sam.
    1
  24.  @MichaelAronson  "Oh I just told you why I'm here." Actions speak louder than your meaningless words. You are only addressing me because I'm telling truths about sam you don't like. Try not to lie to yourself about it.
    1
  25. Meanwhile, in reality, dems have the presidency, house and senate but yeah... mitch is the one with all the power. /s
    1
  26. Sam seder is controlled opposition and sheep herder for the "democratic" party.
    1
  27.  @ThePanMan11  They pretend to care about things like corruption and war it's all an act meant to get you to vote for POS like Biden.
    1
  28.  @ThePanMan11  Sam will act like joe manchin and people like him make him mad but he will tell you to vote blue no matter who when it really matters.
    1
  29.  @ThePanMan11  Can you explain in your own words why you listen to controlled opposition like sam?
    1
  30.  @ThePanMan11  Can you explain in your own words what controlled opposition is? Or do you listen to too much sam and have no idea?
    1
  31.  @j0j0dartiste21  "why you should abstain from voting" I don't say this. Can you explain why you aren't addressing what I actually say?
    1
  32.  @j0j0dartiste21  "voting for the Republican" I don't say this either. Not even close.
    1
  33.  @j0j0dartiste21  "a dead end third party?" Why should you vote for good people? Who actually deserve the job? Who aren't corrupt? Who aren't terrible? Who actually represent people like me? And not the elite? Do you really not know why you should vote for good people and not for corrupt POS?
    1
  34.  @j0j0dartiste21  You listen to too much sam if you don't know the answer to your own question. It's obvious.
    1
  35.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do you really need me to explain to you why you shouldn't vote for evil?
    1
  36.  @j0j0dartiste21  Even what you think is a "lesser evil?"
    1
  37.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do I really need to explain how a "lesser" evil is still evil?
    1
  38.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do I really need to explain to you why you should vote for good?
    1
  39.  @j0j0dartiste21  You don't even attempt to deny that the dems are corrupt and warmongering.
    1
  40.  @j0j0dartiste21  If I need to explain obvious things like that it's only because you are being brain washed by too much sam.
    1
  41.  @ThePanMan11  "I don't think you know what controled opposition is..." I know that this is ad hominem and not an argument. You don't even attempt an argument while answer your terrible questions that you should already know the answer to. Go back to sleep. Go back to voting for evil. I know you will.
    1
  42.  @ThePanMan11  "I suspect this won't be a fruitful conversation" I answered your question knowing that you are insincere. You walk away because you know you got nothing.
    1
  43.  @ThePanMan11  You: "your hostile tone" Also you in the same paragraph: "incel on tinder"
    1
  44.  @ThePanMan11  Thanks for saving me from more hypocrisy from you.
    1
  45.  @MichaelAronson  "he's against the existing third parties. They're awful." This is funny because sam tells you to vote blue no matter who. Because they aren't awful am I right? Are people still buy your guys bullshit? It's remarkably transparent.
    1
  46. Sam sedar is controlled opposition.
    1
  47.  @ZERO_O7X  Is he one of the several billionaires sam gets a check from?
    1
  48.  @ZERO_O7X  Do you think that controlled opposition is just some crazy conspiracy theory that doesn't actually exist or do you merely think that your favorite clown isn't one?
    1
  49.  @Regenmacher175  "when he feels the need to criticise them." He doesn't care about them giving the state department a raise because he's a hack. He doesn't care that they waste the leverage they have because he's a hack. And you don't care that sam isn't holding them to account because you are a hack in a cult. Sam is sheepherder leading you to slaughter but you are too stupid to see or too intellectually honest enough to admit it. But at least he has maintained his access to AOC. She will keep talking to sam while she will NEVER talk to a person like jackson because jackson is willing to call her out while sam makes excuses and rationalizations for her failures. "fixation on the Squad, and AOC" Is clearly born out of the fact they are suppose to be different than the average corrupt dem. Pelosi didn't say she would be different but they did. I hold them to a different standard than people who don't pretend to be on my side yes. Of course that's how it works. If you can't understand that or comprehend that it's only because you don't care about things you should be caring about... just like sam.
    1
  50.  @Regenmacher175  "I might disagree with their votes but I know their overall intention is to fight for left-wing ideas" Their votes are inexcusable. It's easy to see if you aren't watching propaganda like this. Action speak louder than words. Even trump has said things akin to "everyone should have health care." Action speak louder than meaningless words. You are being pandered to and lied to and their ACTIONS make it clear while you and sam focus on rhetoric instead of action. George carlin knew it in a time when it was far harder to see it. "They don't give a fuck about you." It's not apathy or self defeatist to recognize the reality in which you live. It's empowering. But you would rather be deluded into thinking that people making inexcusable votes are actually on your side because you don't like what it means to admit the fact that they aren't. You are a deluded cultist as much as trump supporters are.
    1