General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Clint Holmes
Useful Idiots
comments
Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Useful Idiots" channel.
Previous
10
Next
...
All
@skeeveskeeve "bloodless coup" That is an oxymoron. For it to be a coup there needs to be violence. Not according to me but according to the dictionary.
1
@skeeveskeeve "ignorant on an issue" You are the one mischaracterizing what happened.
1
@kellielaine5848 Both parties are corporate tools aka fascists.
1
@rcarmisin3465 "Open your mind to the bigger picture." This is what you say to try and deflect from a murd ered journalist. "A dead journalist?" No. A MURD ERED journalist. "looking what's been going on there for decades, centuries." Is there something about it that makes the murd er of a journalist ok? Oh wait... "Is that how you rationalize things?" LMFAO What? FYI you are deflecting. Because you don't have anything intelligent to say about a mur der. "You got a small view chum" What about your big view makes that mur der ok? Oh right... nothing. And you know it.
1
@rcarmisin3465 F
1
@rcarmisin3465 U
1
@InfoForYou8 "libertarianism " That's what happens when trump is potus right?
1
They don't fight for democracy.... they fight for US hegemony.
1
@InfoForYou8 "policies" Doesn't he support corporations mandating vaccines for their workers?
1
@InfoForYou8 "left libertarian" You make words meaningless with the way you use them.
1
@InfoForYou8 "Dore lied" What EXACTLY did he lie about? Are you sure he didn't tell the truth? But you just don't like it?
1
@InfoForYou8 "100% true" Translation: what I said was 100% percent true and this is how you try to deflect from oliver's transparently terrible policy positions.
1
@InfoForYou8 "What I said here is 100% true." Translation: what I said was 100 percent true and you are going to do this instead of addressing the true thing I said.
1
@InfoForYou8 "error" It's telling that you don't even attempt to address his terrible policy position but instead do this.
1
@InfoForYou8 "100% true" I'll ask again... what EXACTLY did jimmy dore lie about when it came to oliver?
1
@InfoForYou8 "not government policy" Of course it's government policy to decide what corporations can and cannot do. What a dumb thing to lie about.
1
@InfoForYou8 "propaganda" This is funny coming from someone spreading it. What exactly did jimmy dore lie about?
1
@InfoForYou8 "Saying corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all. 100% true" Governments decide what corporations can and cannot do with policy. Just writing "100 percent true" after a lie doesn't make it true.
1
@InfoForYou8 "Saying corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all. 100% true" This is such a transparent lie it could only be funnier if you followed it up with, " Climb out of the propaganda. It’s seriously negatively affecting you on these issues. I told you how to correct yourself" Too funny. It's called projection. Thanks for the laugh!
1
@InfoForYou8 "Use critical thinking" I will... talking to you is a waste of my time. I'm done with it. What exactly did dore lie about? Oh right... you have nothing. Thanks for proving it repeatedly.
1
@InfoForYou8 "Re-read it." Take your own advice..."Saying corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all." Yes. It is. If you are a government you can have policy that says corporations can do what they want... or not. "corporations can do what they want" you are literally describing government policy affecting corporations. Sorry I can't help you understand your own words.
1
@InfoForYou8 "Saying corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all" Who gets to decide if corporations can do what they want? Oh right... the government. You are describing GOVERNMENT POLICY affecting corporation. Even kindergartens get it.
1
@InfoForYou8 "Dore lied" The liar here is you.
1
@MRGRINCH323 "MAGA GRIFTERS" Dore never told anyone to vote for trump. I voted for jill stein. I don't think you know what the word "grifter" means. Fun fact: I'm only seeing this comment now because of censorship and shadow banning that the other guy would be fine with because it's being done by a corporation (working with the government) and not done directly by the government.
1
@InfoForYou8 Good call. We both know you have no lies of dore to cite and saying, "corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all," make flat earthers look smart by comparison.
1
"Biden would have cured covid and cancer by now if it weren't for manchin." -some shitlib, probably
1
Your soul wasn't worth whatever they were paying.
1
@timwalsh6283 If there was ever a time this last election was a time to support libertarian principles... instead dave told his listeners to vote for trump. He is a sheepherder for the duopoly.
1
@timwalsh6283 "I don't remember" Well he did anyway whether you remember it or not.
1
@timwalsh6283 "he was voting for Trump" That's waaaaaaay different. I'm just kidding. We all know why he would say something like that.
1
Speaking of "oppressive government" whoever made the second reply it can't be seen. Isn't sen sore ship like that the type of thing that is suppose to make china the bad guy?
1
@kdnick8584 Do you also think it's unimportant to know that biden is a neoliberal? That the squad are frauds? I'm not a fan of labels but as long as they are being used correctly they are important and serve a purpose even if you don't understand why knowing who you are dealing with is.
1
@kdnick8584 "I just don't think it's important." You don't think it matters who is doing the interviewing? "interesting and informative. That is what is important." It always matters where your news is coming from and what their biases are. I hope you think about it when taking in things from CNN, MSNBC, or FOX. Because it matters in ways that seem transparently obvious to me.
1
Everything you just said can also be said about corn pop. You are just buying joe biden propaganda.
1
@twatts1523 My point is that anyone who tells you to vote for either major party is "part of the problem." Pun intended.
1
@twatts1523 My point is that anyone who tells you to vote for either major party is "part of the problem." Pun intended.
1
@twatts1523 My point is that anyone who tells you to vote for either major party is "part of the problem."
1
@twatts1523 My point is that dave is "part of the problem."
1
@joeschmo1194 I don't need more than that. If you support the duopoly... and dave supports the duopoly... then you are part of the problem... not part of the solution. Are you dave's burner account?
1
@joeschmo1194 I don't need to do more than point out that dave supports the duopoly and that makes him part of the problem and not part of the solution. Did dave pay you for this? Or are you a burner account for him?
1
@joeschmo1194 "What else you got?" I don't need anything else. If you support the duopoly, and dave supports the duopoly, then you are part of the problem and not part of the solution.
1
@joeschmo1194 "did Dave..." Are you dave's burner account?
1
@joeschmo1194 "what else" I don't need anything else to prove that dave is part of the problem and not part of the solution.
1
@joeschmo1194 "What else ya got?" I don't need anything else to prove my point that dave is part of the problem.
1
@joeschmo1194 "What else you got" I don't need anything else to prove my point that dave is part of the problem.
1
@joeschmo1194 I don't need anything else to prove that dave is not part of the solution. And that he is part of the problem.
1
@joeschmo1194 I don't need anything else to prove my point. You deserve each other. You are both part of the problem.
1
@joeschmo1194 My point applies to you to. Maybe try being part of the solution next time.
1
@joeschmo1194 The point I was making about dave applies to you too... obviously.
1
It's worse than that.
1
Previous
10
Next
...
All