Comments by "Tim Trewyn" (@timtrewyn453) on "1420 by Daniil Orain" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16.  @donalexey  My understanding is that Crimeans, like other island peoples, develop a loyalty to their island culture and would prefer autonomy from the adjacent mainland powers. In many cases, such as Taiwan, they can only obtain a measure of this autonomy by aligning with a larger power. In Japan's case, the island nation is actually powerful enough to secure its sovereignty. Crimea is not well situated for this kind of autonomy. It does not have a large population and the adjacent powers can too easily build bridges to it and control it. The powers move in and manufacture the consent of the islanders. This same geographic vulnerability preceded Catherine's acquisition of Crimea in the 18th Century. The Ottomans and Tatars had a long run of control of the island. Looking at a map it is easy to see that Russia will always be in a strong position to control Crimea. That does not mean Crimeans, in their heart of hearts, prefer the steady stream of enforcers from Moscow. Provincial identities are common. Here in Florida, a sense of community arises out of common responses to the geography and to such events as hurricanes which bring out community spirit in recovery. The rest of the United States may have their differences with who Floridians elect to office, but Washington does not send enforcers to dismiss locally elected officials (our Governor Desantis has dismissed certain elected district attorneys, shame on him and I am free to say that) and hand pick new state legislators and then intimidate residents into expressing favorable opinions. Crimeans' charge that they were "neglected by Kyiv" is rather odd in the light of the foregoing explanation of island culture. They should be happy to be neglected by a federal power because that only increases their autonomy and freedom! I would think part of Crimea's appeal to tourists would be to get away from the negative aspects of Moscow or St. Pete for awhile. In Florida, we have the informal "Conch Republic" in the Florida Keys. It's not so much defiant as it is a celebration of getting away from the usual authorities for a break. As long as positive federal services provided align with taxes paid, the relationship between the federal and the provincial can be sustained. But that is more of an American perspective. Russian administration is funded more by resource sales than by taxes. Crimeans probably do not feel overtaxed. Russia is in Crimea for what now appear to be archaic naval reasons and to deny Ukraine resources it might have used in competition with Russia in the European market, i.e. offshore oil and gas. And Russian tourists should perhaps ask if they would prefer Crimean or Russian jurisdiction when they are on vacation. (Why would Russians tour in Turkiye so much? Is there a plan to annex Turkiye so Russian tourists will be more comfortable there?) The grievance that is likely to develop in Crimea is the same as that underlying the comments of these Russian residents, that is, they have no say when it comes to their sons and husbands and neighbors being conscripted into the Russian imperial project. They want the right of quiet enjoyment. They are not getting it with Russia's war on Ukraine.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1