Comments by "Matthew Ingerson" (@matthewingerson) on "Демократия в Деле"
channel.
-
9
-
You must not have heard. "Me, me, me, Texas Tea" was too worried about supremacy and superiority to listen.
Women will choose a mate based on whichever perimeters they wish, should they are given the freedom to do so.
Lazy, selfish, and fearful men have been utilizing physical domination, psychological manipulation, spiritual and religious subjugation, and a plethora of other means to repress, suppress, and oppress women for the entirety of recorded history.
If men did not do these terrible things to women, then women would be free to make their own economic choices and, thus, to choose a mate in whichever manner they desired.
As for your question: Where does the kind of man like "me, me, me, Texas Tea" factor in this whole equation?
The answer is simple: Wherever you want to be, so long as it isn't where a woman doesn't want you to be.
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
Make sure to capitalize the "L" when discussing American Libertarianism. It is a political party and a movement which do not encapsulate the concept of libertarianism.
As a concept, libertarianism is a good thing. It starts with a lowercase- l.
As an American political party, it's just more right-wing (think Republican) extremism. It begins with a capital L.
The Republic-party is bought, bribed, corrupted, and co-opted by the wealthy-class, just like the Democrat-party is. Both parties are right-wing parties, and right-wing politics is wealthy-class politics. Right-wing Libertarians are just a more openly-extreme iteration.
The leadership of the Demlican and Repubocrat parties pay lip service to personal freedom, just like Libertarians do. But the shortsighted Libertarian-brand of individualism would only allow the wealthy-class individuals to more freely use their wealth to continue to oppress, suppress, repress, propagandize, and indoctrinate the working-class Libertarian voters and the rest of the voters in the working-class.
A major similarity between the working-class voters of the two major parties and the working-class voters of the Libertarian Party is that they all vote against their best interests by solidifying the power of the wealthy-class which controls those parties.
Of course, Libertarians also believe they have a right to arm themselves to the teeth and go around Kyle-Rottenhosing anyone they deem worthy, including wealthy people. That is how working-class Libertarians think that they would remedy any of the atrocities committed against them by the wealthy-class or anyone else for that matter.
Working-class Libertarians (right-wingers who support policies that solidify wealthy-class power) think that their individual, unorganized-militia freedoms allow them to act as judge, jury, and executioner.
These right-wing, working-class Libertarians think that individual, unorganized-militia freedoms are the ones they will use to control the undesirable actions of the right-wing, wealthy-class -- the wealthy-class that controls the media and political parties. And the gov't. And the very real, very free, and very organized military.
Riiiiiight. Okaaay. Good luck with that venture. (See January 6, 2021, to see how well that worked out.)
If you want to increase your chances of being maimed or encountering an earlier-than-necessary separation of consciousness from your body, go stand next to a Libertarian.
Know how I know that Libertarians are not... intelligent? Go watch one of the debates between Libertarian candidates. If you're repulsed, good. If you're enthralled, you're not intelligent.
Anyway... Yeah.
Understanding capital-L Libertarianism: good.
Denouncing capital-L Libertarianism: better.
Choosing lower case-l libertarianism: best.
Sorry for the long reply. I understand you may not have needed to hear/read it, but there are plenty who do.
Good day.
4
-
How old are you? Where do you reside? What are your working experiences and qualifications? These are rhetorical questions. The answers don't really matter.
What matters is that everyone is different.
Everyone advances and progresses differently, especially under the disparate and desperate economic conditions in which we live.
Harriet and her husband were born around the beginning of FDR's New Deal. They were born at a time when the government was acting in the interests of a majority of the people (the poor, debtor, and working-class) instead of acting in the interests of the minority of the people (the seller, financier, and wealthy-class).
Harriet and her husband are nearly 80 years old. Both of their careers have spanned five to six decades each. They are both well past retirement age, and they are both still working, contributing to society. Just because you are unemployed doesn't mean you can't also be a productive member of society.
The first couple of decades of Harriet and her husband's careers were during a time in America when there were relevant labor movements and organizations who worked hard to make economic conditions more equitable. Those labor organizations were comprised of the poor, debtor, and working-class Americans who fought hard, politically, for programs and protections for the majority of Americans.
Harriet and her husband started their careers before the wealthy-class, right-wing, economic-extremists took over the country. The wealthy-extremist minority used their wealth to infiltrate the government and the electoral process so they could deplete, demean, and diminish the protections which were for a majority of Americans.
The wealthy-class have used their wealth to put out propaganda to turn the working-class against each other, and you are proving how well that propaganda works by shooting off disparaging Youtube comments against an 80-year-old woman for having a second home.
You are trying to lay blame for your condition at the feet of an 80-year-old woman, who is a member of the working-class just like you are, just because she has worked within the inequitable economic system to achieve more than you have. What is your next trick going to be? Blaming ethnic minorities, immigrants, and children for your troubles?
Other, better countries have handled this pandemic and the subsequent economic consequences much more sufficiently and soundly than America.
Other, better countries still have strong labor organizations that have prevented the wealthy-class from infiltrating the government.
Other, better countries have poor, debtor, and working-class folks who stand together, rather than elbowing side-to-side at each other and looking for less fortunate people to kick-down at.
I could go on about other, better countries. But all you have to do is watch more of the videos on this channel to learn about America's substandard government and economic policies.
Harriet, her husband, their decades-long careers, and their second home are not your problem. Stop elbowing side-to-side at people who are most like you. Stop kicking-down at people who are less fortunate than you.
Wealthy-class corruption is your problem. Start punching up.
You know, some people believe that it's your own fault and that you're an invaluable person for getting into the position that you're in. Those people are wrong. The kind of people who would look down on you are also victims of wealthy-class propaganda. You are in the position you're in because of the wealthy-class and their corruption.
You know, there are other people who believe that no matter how different you are or what your socioeconomic status is, you're valuable, you're important, and you matter. Harriet and her husband are those kinds of people.
Good luck, and God bless you.
4
-
I worked at an internationally and historically famous 5-star hotel nestled in a right-wing, rural community. This hotel was owned for decades by a local family. It was, and remains, the largest employer in the county.
That local family had their own deficiencies, but they had a sense of geographical loyalty to the local employees. But the local family sold the hotel to a private equity firm.
That private equity firm subsequently fired many of the local folks who had made the hotel their career. The private equity firm then hired a management company to operate the hotel.
That management company even further decimated the local employees who were trying to make the hotel a career. After depleting the number of local employees, the management company increased the number of foreign student employees.
By firing and replacing the local workers with foreign students, the private equity and management companies decreased the solidarity among the workforce while simultaneously reducing wages and benefits.
The hotel became an increasingly cutthroat place to work. Friendships that had lasted for decades were destroyed by the increasing threat of unemployment, insecurity, and economic desperation.
The last general manager I worked under told me I better start lying for the company. The company used deceptive practices on the website to attract guests, then made up excuses to appease the guests when they arrived and complained. Not to mention a plethora of other terrible things they did to the employees.
But I refused to lie. I told the truth to these guests, many of whom were repeat customers who had been coming to the hotel for years.
Many of the repeat guests knew the local family who had owned the hotel previously. Those long-time guests knew the reasons for the decline in quality and service. But the first-time guests didn't understand the deceptive nature of the private equity and management companies.
So I told the newer guests about the cost-cutting measures which negatively affected guests and employees. I explained how service and quality were no longer a priority.
That general manager I mentioned utilized his friends to pose as irate guests. The general manager and his friends fabricated situations in which his friends would complain to the higher-paid employees.
They made it so that the higher-paid employees would fail. Then the general manager's friends would complain and lie about the employees and provide cause to fire those employees. I was one of them.
A few months before I got fired, I made the egotistical mistake of a young man by telling that general manager, "I was here before you, and I'll be here after you." I was wrong.
However, a few months after I got fired, he got fired when he was caught on video sleeping with an hourly employee who was also the girlfriend of a middle manager.
The middle manager saw his girlfriend's car in the driveway of the house that the general manager was renting. So the middle manager filmed himself with his cell phone camera as he walked into the general manager's house and found his girlfriend sleeping with the general manager.
The middle manager went right to the hotel and to HR. It soon came to light that the general manager was sleeping with multiple female employees who had husbands and boyfriends. That kind of thing doesn't fly around here. The community is too small.
Anyway, I'd like to say it felt good to hear about the general manager's demise, but I found his LinkedIn, and he has merely moved on to ruin other lives.
I've been unemployed for years now, living at the whims of right-wing family members who have made me homeless on many occasions and often threaten to do so again. I'm basically an indentured servant, stuck in rural America without an income or transportation.
Why do I tell this story? Because I am able. Because, as bad as my life is, I know that other people have it worse than I do.
I tell my story for the people who can't tell their own.
Take care of each other.
4
-
4
-
Long-story short: I realized, at quite a young age (8-9yo), just how terrible my upbringing was, and I knew lots of kids who suffered in "broken" homes/families like mine. I also realized, at a young age, that there was a very high-probability that I would end up continuing the cycle of suffering by unintentionally creating a broken home/family in the future. And I didn't want to do that.
I knew, even at a young age, that I didn't want any other innocent children to suffer through the things that I suffered through as an innocent child. And I certainly knew that I didn't want to inadvertently cause that suffering by unintentionally creating a broken home/family. I became fearfully-ill at the thought of accidentally creating another life that would surely endure suffering in the future.
So, to avoid any accidental-pregnancies, and to avoid causing the future-suffering of my unborn-children, I decided, at a young age, that I wouldn't have a family or procreate. And to spite my scared-sick feelings, I became dedicated to the avoidance of becoming the cause of more human-suffering. And, in pursuit of my decisions of avoidance & dedication, I remained a virgin until my thirties, and I've had sex fewer than a handful of times in my life. (Anyone who says, "sex is a human-necessity," is a liar, or worse.)
As I grew into my teens, alcohol became a big part of my life. Alcohol became the self-medicating replacement for the terrible family I already had. Alcohol became the self-medicating replacement for the family I decided I shouldn't/wouldn't have in the future. And alcohol also became the self-medicating replacement for my friends who disappeared from my life as they pursued families of their own.
Thankfully, though, I've since been liberated from my alcohol-addiction. But I wouldn't go back and change it -- I wouldn't undo the suffering I endured as a child, nor would I undo the suffering I endured throughout my self-medicating addiction that spanned my late-childhood into adulthood -- because those things shaped who I've become.
However, I was fortunate to come away from my suffering & addiction with an increased sympathy & empathy for other people. I say I'm fortunate because, in my experience, most people don't come away from suffering & addiction with greater sympathy & empathy.
Some people who suffer, think that everyone should suffer, and that suffering is a necessity or a virtue. But I'm not one of those people.
Even though I have suffered, and learned from that suffering, I do not hope for the suffering of other people. I hope for the liberation of all the people who are suffering.
And I hope for the liberation of people who are addicted, because suffering, precarity & loneliness are much better experienced in sobriety than intoxication.
Much love to you, @dylannaenzo9737 and to anyone who reads this.
✌🤟✊🙏
4
-
4
-
Libertarians -- 🤮-- the American political-party aren't Republican-light. They're Republican-extremists.
They want as few rules and regulations for the wealthy-class masters as possible.
And the working-class Libertarians aspire to be the wealthy-class masters themselves. But if they can't be the wealthy-class masters, they'll settle for acting as the brute-buffers between the wealthy-class masters and the working-class slaves.
American Libertarians are nothing more than the same-old, age-old wealthy-class patriarchal segregationists that have ruled over the working-class masses since the invention of currency.
They promote the 'do-as-I-say not-as-I-do' system of wealthy-class masters over working-class slaves.
For all of the societal problems that could be prevented or solved by a civilized, collectivist government of 'we, the people', Libertarians want the right to solve those societal problems barbarically by a tyranny of 'I, the individual.'
They want the right to murder people in the streets with whom they disagree. They want the most basic of court proceedings, so they can go into court and say, "I was afraid, so I had to gut them in the street,' and then walk out free. For example, murderers Georgie Dummerman and Kyller Rottenhoser.
The wealthy-class Libertarians, and the working-class fools who they have co-opted, don't want democracy and equality. They want autocracy and supremacy.
They don't believe in the rule of law by the working-class majority. They believe in the rule of mobs by the wealthy-class minority. And they will do anything to maintain their economic and societal positions of power.
The working-class dupes will murder their families and friends, and they'll sabotage their own communities if their wealthy-class overlords tell them to. They will elbow side-to-side at the people most like them, and they will kick-down at the least fortunate, all for a few extra crumbs from the masters' tables.
Some people just want to be the daddy-minority, telling the family-majority how to live. And if they can't be the daddy, then they'll find a daddy to tell them how to live. For example, the working-class individuals who sign up to be cops or join the military, knowing they may have to kill their own working-class brothers and sisters.
Good working-class people denounce the military and the police when they leave those institutions. Bad working-class people defend those institutions of imperialism and supremacy and bring the worst qualities of those institutions back into their communities. For example, the working-class insurrectionist-children who did the invasion on January 6, 2021, because their wealthy-class supremacist-daddy told them to.
Personally, I don't condone caging humans. Caging humans is not rehabilitating. Caging humans is confinement, and confinement is torture. Libertarianism is the product of humans who are the products of different kinds of torture. Libertarians are the way they are because they experienced some kind of torture at some point in their lives which made them turn out this way.
Oh, and if you don't think that confinement is torture, lock yourself in your bathroom until you feel tortured. Some people -- the worst kinds of people and the people who are already broken --, can't last a day.
But even though I don't condone caging them, the terrible wealthy-class and working-class Libertarians would let good collectivist-humans rot to death in a cage.
I find it difficult to come up with ways to deprogram them from their learned behaviors of toxic individualism and tainted supremacy, especially knowing that they wouldn't find it difficult to do worse things to better people.
And as much as I may not want to cage the Libertarians, they are exactly what makes good humans believe that caging bad humans is necessary. Whether they are wealthy-class knaves or the co-opted working-class fools, the Libertarian-minority's way of life is exactly why good people collectivize and unionize into majorities to undo the mob-rule of the individualist-minority.
Just because I don't want to cage Libertarians, that doesn't mean I can stop the good people of the working-class collectivist-majority from doing so to protect themselves from the individualist-minority.
However, I do believe in giving choices and chances. So my choices would be as follows: individual-cages or collectivist-contributions.
They can either go to the for-profit cages they were so happy to put other people in, or they can become part of society and contribute the kinds of labor they tried so hard to avoid by creating a corrupt system in which they didn't have to work.
They can choose to contribute their labor toward the creation of necessities, or they can choose to go in the cages which they created.
They can choose to be equals among the working-class majority, or they can choose to continue acting as the wealthy-class minority of individualist supremacists and saboteurs in the cages of their own creation. I would even give them a choice outside of the caged option.
If they don't want to be caged and provided for, they can choose to be dropped off on one of the newly created Libertarian-islands with other like-minded Libertarians. On these Libertarian-islands with other like-minded Libertarians, they will be able to live out the individualist-fantasies of their unilateral wet-dreams.
They can choose to act right, help take care of each other, and be part of the majority of humans who have to work in life, or they can choose the cage or the island. But they can no longer live their lives of economic and social supremacy as a wealthy-class minority living at the expense and off the backs of the egalitarian working-class majority.
But, for now, this is the Libertarian society in which we are stuck; controlled by the trash-can wealthy-class and the garbage-bag working-class dupes who have been co-opted by the wealthy class.
They are the weakest individual links among the lowest common denominator of humans.
I wouldn't leave any children or elderly humans in their care. I wouldn't leave a dead and decomposing goldfish in a bowl in their care.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
I'm sorry to hear that story, Christian. There should be laws codified as "economic-terrorism laws."
These laws would specifically pertain to people in positions of leadership within society.
The wealthy-class employers, the professional-managerial class, elected officials, public servants, appointed jurists, law enforcement officers, military members, and other persons in positions of leadership within society would be subject to these economic-terrorism laws.
These laws would apply a higher standard to persons who CHOOSE to pursue leadership positions in society -- particularly regarding already-existing crimes.
Leaders who force workers to commit, or leaders who commit against workers, any of the actions that the majority of the population has already deemed unethical, immoral, or unlawful, would face more severe punishments than citizens and workers who are not leaders.
For example, harassment: Any leader who commits harassment against a citizen or worker would receive more severe punishment for committing that crime while acting in their leadership position.
Furthermore, any worker who admittedly or evidently harassed another worker, with knowledge of the harassment going unaddressed by leadership, would be a punishable offense by the leader.
Another example is individual ethics: Forcing workers to do things that go against the worker's ethics and morals would be a punishable offense for leaders.
Of course, personal morals and ethics can reach "gray-areas" for some people. But, I say, if a task requested by a leader isn't immoral or unethical, then that leader should have no problem finding another worker to perform the task willingly.
The current system of minority-rule by society's leaders is absurdly detrimental -- no, antithetical -- to a majority-rule society. It is indisputably undemocratic.
The current system allows leaders to force workers by implying or saying, "Do what we say, when we say, how we say, without hesitation, or you don't get to eat food, drink water, live in a shelter, clothe your body."
At one point, I found this system to be terrifying. Even before I become homeless, I found the system alarming. But I couldn't explain why. As I learned to cope with homelessness, it became less terrifying.
Then I got lucky. I was able to become rehoused, and I began to educate myself about the even-greater terrors inflicted on other people who hadn't been able to cope as I had.
My experiences with being terrified and homeless, coupled with my ability to cope, then supplemented by my knowledge of other humans' inability to cope with the terror, really caused an evolution in how I felt about the mob-rule of the wealthy-class minority.
I realized that the wealthy-class perpetrators of this system were willing to let me die. I have since come to understand that they rely on people like me dying as a form of population control.
I have even further realized that the wealthy-class is willing to manufacture economic desperation from which working-class people are coerced into signing up for militaries to inflict pain and suffering on other working-class people.
I digress...
To me, leaders forcing workers to sacrifice their inner-peace, personal-spirituality, or economic-security under the threat of removing the worker from their source of livelihood is nothing less than committal of economic-terrorism by leaders.
The wealthy-class addicts are nothing less than economic-terrorists.
Because of my willingness to call out the wealthy-class and society's leaders -- I am under no disillusions -- I fully expect to become homeless again, in chains, or in a box.
I hope you never have to suffer under their mob-rule again, Christian.
3
-
3
-
YouTube Censors Do all of your full-time employees get to work as much as they need to work, so they can make ends meet?
Do your part-time employees get to work as much as they want to work, so they can supplement the substandard wages they receive from their other jobs?
Or do you lord over your employees and make all of those decisions for them?
Do you employ enough people so that your full-time employees get to take time off from work for personal endeavors, and do you pay those full-time employees for the time off they choose to take?
Do you provide your employees with benefits or perks of any kind, whether it be insurance, employee-ownership or company-stock options, fuel reimbursement, travel-time pay, company parties (which, personally, I hate), reimbursement for college tuition or further training, paid meal breaks or coffee breaks, paid vacation time, paid sick time?
Or do you keep all of your employees just below full-time status to avoid having to offer these incentives?
Do you provide incremental increases on any of those benefits or perks for the employees who remain loyal to your business? If not, perhaps you should consider that you are not operating a business that is worth being loyal to.
Do you perform the same kind of physical labor that you require your employees to perform, proving to them that you don't think that you are above doing the work you require them to perform, further proving that you value them, not just as employees, but as human beings whom you are no more valuable than?
Do you sit in an office all day performing intellectual labor, or do you perform no labor for your company at all and simply collect the monetary surplus that is created by the physical labor your employees perform?
All of these questions are important, but you need not answer them.
What I am most curious about is the following.
How much money do you make per year from the business and how much do your employees make per year, versus how much labor-time you all put into the business?
Are your employees making $15 per hour, 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year, for a total of $31,200 per year before taxes, for performing the manual labor which provides the real value to your company?
Are you making double what they make, or more, for performing less work?
Do you think that you're the only person smart enough to start the kind of business you did?
Do you think that your "grand idea" makes you worth more than other humans?
Do you think that you are the only one taking a risk by starting and owning a business?
Do you think that your employees aren't taking a risk in working for you, while you make more money than they do?
Do you think that your employees aren't taking a risk in trusting you to no screw things up so that they can continue to have work and wages?
Again, these are all questions that I don't need you to answer, but if you want my sympathy or my praise, you don't have it.
The U.S. government is bought and paid for by the corrupt wealthy-class minority. They are little more than labor-exploiting, private-property knaves who scream about individualism, even though they wouldn't be anything without the communities in which they live. They couldn't care less about the working-class people who make up the majority and perform all of the meaningful work in this country.
You seem to be right in tune with that minority of wealthy-class, labor-exploiting, private-property individualists.
You're unique because you're you -- we're all unique -- but none of us is more valuable as a human being than anyone else, even though some people imply otherwise.
The world doesn't need you to be the owner of your businesses. The world needs the people who do the work.
If you went out of business tomorrow, the world would still need workers, and it would still have workers.
There's a difference between a living wage and a slave wage, and $15 per hour isn't a living wage. Not in most of the country, and especially not for a family. We live in a country with plenty of people who are smart enough to understand that.
We live in a country where a majority of the population are making sacrifices to provide necessities -- forget about having any sense of financial or future security, or having time to one's self to refresh, rejuvenate, or reflect.
If you can't sacrifice a little of your above-par lifestyle to help increase the lifestyle of your employees, then maybe it's time you went out of business.
The working-class majority doesn't need you to be their owner. You're the minority who needs the majority to do the work for you.
You would have no success nor profit without communities or workers.
You'd be nothing without them.
The only reason it is so hard to start a business is because of the self-aggrandizing, wealthy-class exceptionalists who have manufactured the system to work that way.
3
-
@JohnT.4321 I see little to no value in placating working-class class-traitors who have fallen prey to the mental-illness of addiction. The addictions of these working-class class-traitors have been delivered by the wealthy-class who are also mentally-ill with addiction.
The wealthy-class maintains all of the addictions they want. But they feed SOME of the addictions to the working-class in hopes of turning some working-class dupes into class-traitors. It works like a charm.
The working-class class-traitors think that if they get enough brown on their noses and boot-polish on their faces, the wealthy-class knaves will let the working-class class-traitors into the club. These working-class addicts are all for the mob-rule of the addicts in the wealthy-class minority.
These are the working-class fools who fall for wealthy-class pyramid schemes. These working-class class-traitors will sell their families, friends, and communities for a few extra crumbs from the masters' tables.
They will commit violence, murder, and genocide against their fellow working-class mates to maintain their addictions, especially if their wealthy-class Trumpian-Reaganite masters tell them to do so.
I mean, come one, that one working-class class-traitor addict-fool said that "class" was a made-up word. It's as if the fool doesn't understand that racism, sexism, genderism, ethnicity, nationality, misogyny and misandry, femininity, and masculinity, along with many other segregationist words, were also made up by the wealthy-class minority to further divide the working-class majority against itself.
I'm non-violent, but the people you're wasting your time communicating with ARE violent. They have no problem forcing all of the wealthy-class white-supremacist structures of violence, which, in turn, forces working-class people into violence.
Greeting these devious class-traitors with gladness for their presence and addressing them as "good people" is as foolish as Bernie Sanders referring to wealthy-class right-winger Joe Biden and wealthy-class right-winger Mitch McConnell as "good friends."
Some, most, or even all, of what you say may be true -- I do agree with the bits of your historical, political, and socioeconomic analysis that I have read. I just don't see the point in reapplying failed-tactics against people who would sooner have you in steel chains, a concrete cage, or a wooden box than ever concede that you MIGHT have a good point somewhere.
But, I guess your efforts make you a better human than I am -- you're definitely a better human than the class-traitors you're trying to teach.
You do you.
3
-
3
-
If you don't like the way that the majority of the people of this country have decided and voted to operate national monetary and fiscal policy, just leave.
If you don't like the way that the majority of the people of this country have decided to tax the currency, just leave.
If you don't like living in a majority-rules system -- if you would rather live under minority-rule and mob-rule -- just leave.
If you don't like equity and equality -- but prefer ignorance, fear, anger, hate, violence, murder, genocide, and addictions to materialism, pillaging, hoarding, manipulation, exploitation, social status, substance abuse, promiscuous pursuits -- just leave.
I don't hate America.
I hate lazy wealthy-class people, and lazy working-class class-traitors, like you.
I don't hate America.
I hate class-traitors who help to uphold the wealthy-class system of inequality and inequity in hopes that someday the wealthy-class will welcome you into their club.
I don't hate America.
I hate that the wealthy-class works to dumb-down the working-class and succeeds.
I don't hate America.
I hate that the wealthy-class
has co-opted the worst & dumbest working-class people, having tricked the worst & dumbest working-class people into blaming their troubles on the better & smarter working-class people.
Instead of blaming the wealthy-class people who are responsible for the system of inequality and inequity under which we all live, the worst & dumbest working-class people blame each other.
I don't hate America.
I hate that the wealthy-class has corrupted EVERYTHING.
I hate that the wealthy-class has corrupted national governments, international markets, and entire groups of working-class humans, including you.
I hate that I have working-class friends and family members, like you, who are so stupid that they would murder their own working-class friends and family, or other working-class humans in foreign countries, if some wealthy-class addict or jarhead addict in a uniform told them to.
I don't hate America -- I don't even hate you -- I pity you.
At the very least, shut the fuk up while better and smarter people try to clean up after you and the rest of the addicts.
3
-
Propaganda and indoctrination.
The wealthy-class who kidnapped, bought, and sold Africans, also prevented those working-class Africans from learning. The wealthy-class, which controlled the government, propagandized and indoctrinated that working-class group back then.
The wealthy-class, who did those things to Africans in the past, is the same wealthy-class which has co-opted the government in the present. In doing so, the wealthy-class has championed the defunding, deregulating, and destandardization of public education, thus preventing Americans from learning.
The wealthy-class, which controls the government, has propagandized and indoctrinated the working-class of today.
The wealthy-class knows, and has known for generations, that stupid people make better working-class slaves.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Here, in this edition of the comments section, we have a bluewater-identifier, in way over their own head, and forgot their arm-floaties.
The point is, in other, better countries, where they have a true sense of solidarity among the working-class majority, the governments of those countries have handled this much better.
Here is a loose explanation of how some better countries took better care of their people.
1) SHUT DOWN ALL NON-NECESSITIES. (This means the majority of the people have a more cohesive agreement of necessities versus wants.)
2) Utilize the peoples' public-government to pay the people within the working-class majority who don't do necessity-jobs so that those working-class people can continue to obtain necessities. (This means the majority of the people comprehend the differences between 'public non-profit government' functions and 'private for-profit business' functions.)
3) DON'T utilize the private-businesses of the wealthy-class minority to act as the private-middle-man between the working-class majority and the peoples' public-government. (This means the majority of the people understand the inherent greed of for-profit private-employers versus non-profit public-servants.)
4) PUNISH private-businesses and wealthy-class minorities who corrupt and/or sabotage the working-class majority and/or the peoples' public-government.
Oh, yeah...
5) You're a giant set of deepblue clownshoes, drowning in your own yellow-brown water.
🚽
People here are trying to throw you a 🦺
But I suppose the floofy-hair and the pencil in the bum prevent you from being any less like a troll.
3
-
@bluewater454 Almost a great job, btw. You were SO CLOSE to getting it when you mentioned your own luck. That's exactly what Crapitalism is:
The wealthy-class uses their wealth to manufacture "luck" for themselves.
Then, while you're swimming in their toilets, waiting to get a little brown on your nose, you end up with a little bit of luck trickling down all over you. (It's so warm, isn't it? You like that, don't you?)
Then, like an adult-sized brain-child, you pee, poo, and spit all over your family, friends, neighbors, and community.
Whether you're a fool who doesn't understand how your way of life causes the despair of others, or a knave who pretends not to understand, neither is anything to be proud of.
3
-
3
-
3
-
Hmmm, let me see here...
Would I rather live under mob rule, as you call it, where everyone gets some sort of a vote or a voice?
Orrrr...
Would I rather live under the authoritarian systems of minority rule, which have been the predominant systems that have controlled majorities throughout history, where only a select few get a vote or a voice?
Yeah, "F" off with your boot-licking propaganda.
Just because you need to be ruled by a minority, or you want to be one of the minority rulers, that doesn't mean everyone does. Hence, the fall of slave societies. Hence, the fall of feudalism.
Smarter humans don't want to be ruled by the lazy, manipulative, and exploitative wealthy-class minority. Hence the rise of Democracy and Socialism.
The real definition of mob-rule is the following: when the wealthy-class minority has their addictions threatened, they will hire a "mob" -- usually, a mob made up of working-class rubes, dupes, and class-traitors -- to come to your house, your town, your city, your state, or your country, and they will direct that mob to "rule" you.
Mob rule is not whatever nonsense you stated.
You're either the result of wealthy-class propaganda and indoctrination, which makes you a rube or a dupe, or you're paid by the wealthy-class to be here in the comments section, which makes you a class-traitor.
Neither is anything to be proud of.
2
-
@bluewater454 You're completely foolish or incredibly knave-ish. Do you not know that mortality means deaths? Do you not understand that being higher on the list is a bad thing?
Being 33 out of 36 means 32 other countries had FEWER infant deaths.
Being 33 out of 36 means that only 3 countries had MORE infant deaths.
That means the US was nearly the WORST. (Right, Galt? Huh? Eh? Who's ""willfully ignorant, functional illiterate"" now? You shite-gibbon. Lol)
The OECD has the information right on their website, in writing, and in picture format for the literately-challenged.
The most recent date they have for the US is from 2018. In 2018, there were 5.7 deaths per 1000 live births. That put the US at 33 out of 43 listed countries -- 32 countries did better, and ten countries did worse.
In the same year, Slovenia and Iceland tied in 2nd and 3rd places with 1.7 deaths per 1000 live births. That means only one country did better, and 40 did worse.
I knew you were dumb. I just didn't think you thought everyone else was as dumb as you are. It seems to be a commonality among wealthy-class knaves and foolish, working-class class-traitors.
Oh yeah, again for you right-wing extremist, one-way pieces of human-excrement, void of morality and compassion:
EVERYONE IS NOT YOU. And thankfully so. I hate clowns.
🤡🤡
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Just call it what it really is. It's called Corporatism. Corporatism is simply the result of unregulated Capitalism, just like Fascism is the result of unregulated Corporatism. It would be foolish to refer to Fascism as "Crony Corporatism", and it's foolish to refer to Corporatism as "Crony Capitalism". Call it what it really is.
Under ALL of the systems of RW-politics -- such as Monarchism, Feudalism, Mercantilism, Imperialism, Neo-Conservatism & Neo-Liberalism, Republicanism, Capitalism, Corporatism, & Fascism -- the wealthy-class OWNS the working-class as slaves.
It would be more accurate for ALL of the RW-systems of politics to be referred to with the suffix of "slavery" -- like Monarchist-slavery, Capitalist-slavery, or Fascist-slavery.
Thus, it would be more accurate to refer to Corporatism as "Corporatist-slavery" or "unregulated Corporatism" than "crony Capitalism". Even calling it "RW-politics" would be more effective at messaging.
I'm certainly not going to refer to Fascism as "crony Corporatism" & I'm not going to refer to Corporatism as "crony Capitalism".
Educate yourself & call things by their name, instead of making up bigger, longer phrases to make yourself sound smarter.
Corporatism is not called "crony Capitalism" or "pre-Fascism".
Just call it what it really is. Corporatism is called Corporatism.
2
-
@thomaswikstrand8397 Thanks for your reply. I kind of answered my own question as I analyzed it further after sending it.
It comes in waves: First, a lot of B. Then a lot of A facilitated by the wealthy-class. Then a lot of B to expose the A that the wealthy-class facilitated. (I hope that explanation makes sense written that way.)
We have had some recent union-wins here in the states. (If you're unaware of them and wanted to hear about them, I could type something up for you.)
The recent union-wins seem big to many folks, but that's because union-power has been so depleted. (In my opinion, the recent wins have been blown out of proportion.)
I don't think it will be long before the labor-push by the working-class will wane and subside. There is such a low sense of working-class solidarity here. People will sell out their families, friends, neighbors, and communities for a few more crumbs.
But, it makes sense when you consider that the wealthy-class has caused the defunding, deregulating, and destandardization of public common-education, thus, eradicating public common-sense. People can't even comprehend who their oppressors are.
When you combine A, B, and the dumbing-down of the working-class citizens, then add on top of that a manufactured-desperation by the wealthy-class against the working-class, and it becomes pretty clear why the working-class majority elbows from side-to-side and kicks-down.
It's all by design.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2