Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "Piers Morgan Uncensored"
channel.
-
@RC-qf3mp
Every single word Finkelstein said. How about the opening statement, when he claimed that no one knew about the carnage for four days? How about his bullschitt explanation about why he kept up his article despite it being based upon a lie? Piers didn't ask why Finkelstein didn't amend it with a note afterward explaining his supposed shift in thinking.
Piers left a lot of questions out, actually, such as:
* If Israel wanted control of Gaza, why did they hand it over fully in 2005?
* If Hamas terrorism is a response to Israeli aggression the last 17 years, then why did Hamas establish itself, and dedicate itself to extermination of all Jews, in 1988?
* If Hamas cares about their own lives, why does their founding document promise to exterminate Jews?
* If Hamas cares about their civilians, why do they hide behind them?
* If Hamas cares about their civilians, why did they stop civilians from moving south by shooting at those civilians?
* If Gaza is a concentration camp, why do they measure their lives in decades, not days or hours such as in 1940s Germany?
* If Gaza is a concentration camp, then why do you see Mercedes Benzes on the street? Why do they receive billions in aid packages? How do they build hundreds of miles of tunnels?
* If Hamas had attacked Egypt instead of Israel, would the notorious anti-Semite Finkelstein have similarly celebrated? Egypt has a border with Gaza, with a stronger separation than Israel does. Why does the anti-Semitic Feinkelstein focus on Israel instead of Egypt?
* Israel gave over Gaza in 2005, but only erected the fence in 2007, after Hamas won power and began attacking Israel. If Israel was out to get the Gazans, why did they wait a couple of years to erect a fence?
There's a start for you, based off what I remember of Finkelstein's lies. If Piers doesn't know enough to counter Finkelstein's lies, he shouldn't have him on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Cenk's answer once again demonstrated that he's never left his bedroom: "Why should they go to Egypt or Jordan? They're "Palestinians!" (paraphrasing) Oh, Cenk, there you go again. No, they are not "Palestinians", a fake name made up by the PLO terrorists in 1970s. They are Egyptians and Jordanians. Gaza was part of Egypt - Israel tried to give it back, but Egypt steadfastly refuses to take it. The "West Bank" was part of Jordan - Israel has tried to give it back, but Jordan steadfastly refuses to take it.
Walid Shoebat, a former Muslim terrorist who at that time lived in the area that became known as the "West Bank," (another invented term) said "how can I go to bed as a Jordanian one day, and wake up the next day as a Palestinian?"
Then-PLO Executive Committee member Zahir Muhsein, in a 1977 interview, said: "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality there is no difference between Jordanians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for our political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since the Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people,’ to oppose Zionism.”
And those are the facts.
1