Comments by "kokofan50" (@kokofan50) on "The Infographics Show" channel.

  1. I see many.
    83
  2. Particularly, when it’s Americans.
    24
  3. No, it goes: what have they been feeding those guys?
    23
  4. Because the film would spontaneously explode at random.
    14
  5. Russian soldiers are badly trained and would run out of ammo.
    11
  6. You were lied to.
    5
  7. Negligible, all the dangerous high grade waste in the world can fit into one foot ball field, and generation four reactors can burn that waste because it's mostly unused fuel.
    5
  8. Texas has everything you said except more of it at a fraction of the price.
    5
  9. Considering it takes more energy to split water than you get from burning hydrogen, that's not going to work.
    4
  10. Saying radiation causes cancer is like saying water causes drowning, while true misses the full context.
    3
  11. Every American territory needs to have some kind of us. We’re nice, but we don’t like keeping dead weight.
    3
  12. Only if you happen to be Muslim.
    3
  13. Plenty of other reasons for a space elevator.
    2
  14. Secondary units were still using Wildcats.
    2
  15. That’s some really bad fantasy you got there.
    2
  16. The Johnston was a destroy.
    2
  17. Texas isn’t nearly as dependent on oil as people think, and California is more dependent on fewer industries that people think.
    2
  18. Chinese weapons are thrid rate. People only buy their stuff because no one else would sell to them.
    2
  19. No, but we are the best.
    2
  20. A conservative estimate is that US citizens have 10 billion rounds of ammunition.
    2
  21. Molten salt reactors and liquid metal reactors are both a lot more efficient than light water reactors.
    1
  22. Ultimately all energy in the universe comes from either fusion or fission.
    1
  23. Nuclear produces 20% of US electricity with a little under 100 reactors. Solar produces 1% with millions of panels.
    1
  24. Fusion has been invested in for decades with little to show.
    1
  25. People are afraid of nuclear power because of a combination fear mongering and the trick of human physiology were we think large events are more dangerous than small events. Imagine there were people talking how dangerous flying is while being safer than driving people are afraid of it.
    1
  26. Those numbers come from the World Health Organization, not just the Soviets
    1
  27. Yes, it's as clean as wind, and depending on the source equal to or cleaner than solar.
    1
  28. I'm not really interested in owning any land in Ukraine right now with the low grade civil war going on. As for land in Fukushima, the Japanese government is starting to moving people, so low prices aren't really going to happen there, unless the families want to sell it for cheap just to leave. However, if those problems weren't there, I'd buy some cheap land and build a hotel to milk people like who have no idea how radiation works but are a little braver.
    1
  29. Wind and solar require mining, too, and there are several places around the world to store high level nuclear waste. However they were all blocked for political reasons. The Chernobyl exclution zone has become a de facto wildlife preserve, so apparently the little bit of radiation is a lot better than humans being around.
    1
  30. Who ever told you that was lying.
    1
  31. The one problem with videos about nuclear power are the retards who don't know shit about it screaming about everything dying.
    1
  32. Things like falling off roofs during installation.
    1
  33. All that waste constitutes a few thousand tons, and even that can be greatly reduced. Storage sites are built below ground water we use for drinking.
    1
  34. There are people living in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. As to why the Fukushima and and Chernobyl exclution zones are officially uninhabitable, is because most government's (all that I know of) use the linear no threshold model, which says that any amount of radiation is going to raise the chance a person with get cancer. The problem is that linear no threshold is based on one badly flawed study done on mice. Studies on people who have been irradiated show that one of the other models with a threshold is right.
    1
  35. Yeah, solar doesn't require toxic chemicals to make or require mining for minerals.
    1
  36. By falling off a roof when installing them.
    1
  37. The thing is reactors are currently built in the least efficient way possible. If we stared mass producing reactors, rather than bespoke, we can build hundreds of reactors a year from one factory. However, mass producing reactors will require we use a different kind of reactor than we're using now, but they're safer and more efficient anyway.
    1
  38. The earthquake didn't do anything to the reactor. Even the tsunami didn't damage the reactors. The problem was the loss of cooling, which could have been prevented in a number of ways.
    1
  39. There are not enough cow farts in the world.
    1
  40. Nuclear is better. Looks like we're tied. You care to support you assertion?
    1
  41. Aren't you, also, being a little disingenuous by including research not related to power generation? Furthermore, have you heard of skin cancer? Sunburns are a form of radiation burn.
    1
  42. Right now fuel rods only use about .5% of their fuel before being too damaged to use. If reprocessed we can get more energy out of the uranium. Although, I side with those who want to move to fluid fueled reactors that can burn closer to 100% of the uranium without nearly as more processing. Also, that's just talking about uranium fueled reactors. There are thorium breeder reactors. Thorium is hundreds of times more common than the u235 we use now with reserves that could last tens of thousands of years.
    1
  43. There is no nuclear smoke.
    1
  44. There is no smoke. What you see is water vapor from the turbines.
    1
  45. Wrong on both counts. Nuclear power plants produce no pollution out side the CO2 from the construction and curing of concrete. Solar, besides the CO2 from building and moving panels, there's the toxic chemicals used to make solar panels.
    1
  46. Significantly less waste than the already very small amount of waste and with much shorter lived byproducts.
    1
  47. I’ve had chicken biscuits plenty of times for breakfast, and chicken & waffles is a southern classic.
    1
  48. Dan Nguyen, Texas produces nearly 1/3 of the oil in the US and has most of the refineries. Day one of a Texas-California war would leave California cut off from oil. Another thing is Texas has a lot of defense contractors in the state, and a growing tech sector of our own. I can’t see a country intervening in a war over Facebook. However, making sure they get their guns is a different matter.
    1
  49. Too small. The armed Coast Guard cutters are the closest thing the US has to corvettes.
    1
  50. A couple might be made into museum ships. The rest are going to have everything sensitive stripped out then sold to a breaker yard.
    1