Comments by "리주민" (@user-nf9xc7ww7m) on "DW News"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Not to be a downer here, but you can attend classes remotely without an internet. My friends parents did that back in the 70s and 80s. Syllabi, books, and lessons were hard copies and sent via the mail. You read the book, followed the lessons, and replied to a professor's question or statement. For open book testing, you could do at home. For closed book testing, a non-relative could sign a form as witness and watch you take the test (this could be done in lockdown too if the person watches from the glass window).
As for elementary school, yes, a parent would be needed to stay home with the kid, but don't online schools require that too? Sure they advertise about the ease and time management, but they expect parents to be home which kinda defeats the whole point of private school (parents need to work, otherwise why pay for a glorified homeschool?).
As for movies, well, we had movie rental businesses. Stores still sell them at least. And, you didn't have to worry about speed of internet or buffering as the entire movie was on disc/cassette.
Magazines were the websites of the day and many had comments about the last week's articles (with many replies). Of course, it was big company censoring the trolls back then so the trolls today would be crying for loss of employment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
15:40
Just mandate all news broadcasters who use the radio waves (which are under control of the FCC) to give equal time to all parties who can get signatures to get on the ballots for their respective office. Failure to do so would mean fines, suspension of television license, or even the taking of license and reselling to a (potential) broadcaster who will follow the rules. Local elections and debates would be shown as well.
Also, all news, be it Fox, CNN, OAN, NBC, etc would have to have neutral media and commentary would have to state such (eg "this is my opinion, but..."). Also, commentary would have to show all sides (imagine bill o'reilley coming on right after Lawrence O'Donnell). News panels should show contrarians and not just those that agree 99% with the host. I have seen countless times, regardless of the channel, that all the commentators say the person they are talking about is guilty without a question and they are instead discussing how such a thing could happen and his punishment.
The FCC already has mandates for broadcasters and the airwaves have been considered public. This would in no ways mean a takeover.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Not to be a downer here, but you can attend classes remotely without an internet. My friends parents did that back in the 70s and 80s. Syllabi, books, and lessons were hard copies and sent via the mail. You read the book, followed the lessons, and replied to a professor's question or statement. For open book testing, you could do at home. For closed book testing, a non-relative could sign a form as witness and watch you take the test (this could be done in lockdown too if the person watches from the glass window).
As for elementary school, yes, a parent would be needed to stay home with the kid, but don't online schools require that too? Sure they advertise about the ease and time management, but they expect parents to be home which kinda defeats the whole point of private school (parents need to work, otherwise why pay for a glorified homeschool?).
As for movies, well, we had movie rental businesses. Stores still sell them at least. And, you didn't have to worry about speed of internet or buffering as the entire movie was on disc/cassette.
Magazines were the websites of the day and many had comments about the last week's articles (with many replies). Of course, it was big company censoring the trolls back then so the trolls today would be crying for loss of employment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1