Comments by "FiveLiver" (@FiveLiver) on "History Debunked" channel.

  1. What a belated eye opener for 'I've got nothing against Islam' Simon. is wrong about Afghanistan being the trigger for a refulgence of Islam - it was the creation of Israel. The so-called Arab-Israeli conflict is, in fact, part of the perpetual Jihad and nothing to do with the so-called 'Palestinians'. The civil war in Lebanon in the 1970s was also part of it. Robert Spencer has written a book, 'The History of Jihad: From Muhammad to ISIS', you might want to read that too.
    10
  2. Two tier policing is the result of two-tier governance, two-tier politics. Aggressive minorities now, as Enoch said, 'hold the whip hand', over the native majority.
    10
  3. Complete and utter drivel.
    10
  4.  @tonymccaul7159  No Christianity is a religion a personal faith it is not a set of laws intended to govern the world. Islamic law (Sharia) applies to all; Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
    10
  5. I said it! SImon was a student lefty. I got that feeling when he made comments like "the British did such a thing" instead of "we did such a thing". There an undercurrent of disdain for the Empire and Britain's role in the Second World War that peeps through every so often.
    10
  6. Would you care to tell us the 'exhortations to violence and bloodshed' that are contained within Christianity? 2:10
    10
  7. I fail to see what exactly it is you are trying to say. It's another one of your 'we bombed France' retreads. You cite General de Gaulle, and nobody else, as 'hating' us.
    10
  8. Hear hear
    10
  9. Who cares?
    10
  10. You are excusing the core tenets of Islam by using examples of times when Christians behaved in an unchristian way. In the medieval period (until the Enlightenment) Church and state were tightly bound together in a way not supported by scripture. The original Christians were persecuted pacifists; the followers of Islam after the occupation of Medina were most certainly not. Your parallels are spurious. They were expansionist and supremacist, and always will be, that is their scripture.
    10
  11. It's just a word used to prevent criticism of Islam.
    9
  12. Simon's knowledge if Islam is limited to what Muslims have [t]old him about it.
    9
  13.  @EdMcF1  I'll add that when I was summonsed to the Crown Court for jury service, my identity didn't appear to be in any doubt at all - though I was searched by an African immigrant on entering the court building!
    9
  14.  @bowserheadteacher  I don't think Nige would go for that.
    9
  15. Good work here Simon. This fellow of course won't tell us that child abuse is transgressional in Christianity, while it is normative in islam. Nothing about the grooming gangs from him then.
    9
  16. Two different religions if one is Islam.
    9
  17. It's not just disastrous outcomes for them, it has a negative knock-on for everyone.
    9
  18. You are pointing the finger and accounting for Nazi atrocities happening in the open by blaming one religious group or another. Wouldn't it be cleverer to assess the numbers of the victimised people in these places, and the negative impression they had on the indigenous population? There are more factors in play here than the religion of those countries and the homogeneity of their population. Your assessment can only hold water if the numbers and social status of theJews was equal across all examples.
    9
  19.  @lenclark3639  Thanks Len.
    9
  20. They attack from all sides, and inconsistency and hypocrisy are not breaks on their anti-white agenda.
    9
  21. Simon mischievously suggests here that the war started because Britain and France sided with Poland against Hitler (not Poland's neighbours as Russia was not involved). The Chamberlain quote was referring to Czechoslovakia, (not Poland) which is NOT a far away country, especially to GB with a global Empire. 'It didn't turn out well' says Simon disingenuously implying 'for the allies of Poland' - when it didn't turn out well for Nazi Germany. It turned out well for Poland, who were saved from erasure as a country and a people. Sometimes Simon gets so twisted in snark it's difficult to know what he's on about.
    9
  22. Box tickers and Nagamanshushy types.
    8
  23. Yes there were Marxist infiltrators in the US govt and Hollywood.
    8
  24. Unbiased? 🤣
    8
  25. Simon refuses to acknowledge the inherently political nature of Islam, and how it, and not a few 'Islamists', asserts its authority over all mankind.
    8
  26. Where does it say in Christianity to wage perpetual war against the unbelievers? Why do people feel the need to make comments even when they know nothing of what they comment about?
    8
  27. 1:35 Simon believes, 'it goes without saying', that women are 'every bit as intelligent and capable as men'. Really? Tell me of one female of the same stature as Mozart, Da Vinci, or Newton. In matters of creativity, women are not on the same level as men. Women have been going to university for 100 years, and yet no female geniuses have arisen, despite the educational level playing field. Simon needs to make the final few yards here to be a true debunker.
    8
  28. This report may appear to be about class but it is about white people - it is antiwhite. Whenever you hear complaints about 'racism' it is actually about white norms and white people. You have almost got it: "[cricket] is being attacked because it is so typically English, and as such causes offence to those who would like to see the face of England altered out of all recognition."
    8
  29. Because Germany launched a war of conquest against its neighbours. Did you miss that? The irony of Hitler trying to take more land was that if he had been content with Germany's borders, East Prussia and Konigsberg would still be part of Germany.
    8
  30. @@Darius-_ From the Turks who occupy it.
    8
  31. But it is not a requirement of Christianity to forcibly convert. The Crusades for instance was not a project of conversion.
    8
  32. Has this got planning permission? I thought they were turned down a couple of years ago.
    8
  33. 'The Arab Spring' was really the 'Muslim Brotherhood Spring' which even the Muslims didn't want and so failed - that's why the media don't talk about it.
    8
  34.  @ShanghaiRooster  Jesus said those who live by the sword will die by the sword. The 'sword' in your verse (a kitchen implement) was a metaphor for division, between those who would accept Christ and live in paradise and those who would not. Mohammad was a war lord who waged war on unbelievers - you imagine you can whatabout that?
    8
  35. 'I always laugh when I hear people complain about a man in his fifties marrying a girl of six'. Are you seriously claiming that this was happening in our country? I welcome the change in the law, as it is targeted at foreigners - unlike most new laws which are targeted at the indigenous population.
    8
  36. Correct. Simon of Arabia is disingenuously suggesting here that something new happened in 1979 and it's all Iran's fault (because they are not Arabs). Islam had a decline without a fall, and the resurgence of Islam has happened because we have lost the confidence, that was once taken for granted, to say our culture is the best and defer to it at every opportunity.
    8
  37. Simon stop it. It's not that blacks should be shown, it's that whites should NOT be shown. It's antiwhite programming.
    7
  38. Yes diversity is an end in itself, and that end is white erasure.
    7
  39. "If [only] Britain hadn't stolen part of Palestine.." who from exactly?
    7
  40. Simon up to his usual mischief; digging up unconnected matters to justify Russian aggression and war crimes. Does he have Russian publisher for his penny dreadfuls I wonder? There has to be some explanation.
    7
  41. But why is the Conservative government using the term? And the security services? There's more to this than just criticising the Tory govt. It is an INVENTED concept used by the left and the so-called centrists to discredit their opponents. During Hitler's era there's hardly any mention of it. If it was a term meaning 'Nazi 'or 'Fascist' then that would be peak use. Simon conveniently skated past this.
    7
  42. For 'with it' read 'anti-white'.
    7
  43. Islam means 'submission', and that means everyone. We need politicians with the balls to say no.
    7
  44. These lies aren't told to persuade us of the benefits of a diverse society, but to give us notice that out days are numbered.
    7
  45. What Russian channels has Simon been watching? When he leaves the metaphorical shores of England he does have the habit of falling on his face. 2:34 Does not mean NATO would 'not be moving east', as German (part of NATO) forces would be allowed into East Germany following reunification, and Germany still remains under the US nuclear umbrella. Simon, making his case for Russian defence, forgets that Russia has been an aggressor nation, invading Poland 1918-21 and 1939, Finland in 1939, Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968, and that NATO is a defensive alliance to prevent this kind of thing happening again. Simon may be sympathetic to Russia wanting a 'buffer zone' (i.e. an area of Russian control) on their border, but that would mean having jurisdiction over the internal affairs of sovereign nations - why should that be allowed? The Russian attitude toward their place in the world - 'Ruski Mir'- does not mean the buffer countries would be 'neutral' Simon, but satellites. Putin said it himself, the dissolution of the Soviet Union (that is freedom for Eastern Europe and former occupied soviet territories) was a 'disaster'. There is only one factor, one person, responsible for the invasion of Ukraine and that is Vladimir Putin.
    7
  46. Islam cannot change. Mohammad has the last word. His example is final.
    7
  47. What actually is going on? The Great Replacement.
    7
  48. TR says he wasn't required to be present in court on the contempt charge in July. The harassment by the police was a separate matter.
    7
  49. So Mohammad was one of those who had more insight into the wishes and intentions of God than the rest of us? Surah 9 of the Qur'an is obviously nothing whatever to do with the wishes an intentions of God. You keep trotting out Islam's view of itself to unbelievers as if you have never actually studied what it is all about. Converts to Islam actually HAVE studied that, which is actually why they 'appear rather loopy and extreme.' As a great man says, 'misunderstanders of Islam always misunderstand it in exactly the same way.' Before you make any more statements about Islam, I ask you to please read the scriptures and laws that spring from it and not just make silly liberal assumptions that all religions are all benevolent.
    7
  50.  @MarkHutchinson-ry9sz  How is speaking the truth 'controlled opposition'?
    7