Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "KING 5 Seattle" channel.

  1. This company needs a top down clean out. Instead, they'll all continue to get their bonuses and pensions
    12
  2. But they've been telling us ever since before the crashes and afterwards that an hours PowerPoint presentation on an ipad was all the training pilots needed. So they have been lying through their teeth.
    8
  3. chamberlin1 don't think you're convincing anyone here pal. This is 50 year old technology retrofitted with engines too big and in the wrong place for the legacy airframe design, and as a cheap hack to avoid proper pilot retraining and FAA certification they employed a cheap 3rd party Indian offshore subcontractor to write a piece of code that was supposed to correct the inherent instability of their bodge job in an effort to make it fly similar to previous 737s, but failed to build any redundancy into it, failed to test it properly, failed to tell anyone about it and removed a previously standard safety feature that would have told the pilots there was a problem, and didn't tell the airlines or pilots of this either. You trust Boeing and the max if you want, in fact feel free to keep giving it chances and riding on them until one crashes with you on it, but a lot of other people won't.
    6
  4. GH1618 Yeah they said it was safe last time, even after the first flight they said it was safe. Why should I believe now?
    6
  5. Hopefully they'll stay there for good and turn into a boneyard
    4
  6.  @norml.hugh-mann  what I don't want to see is flying coffins in the air. Boeing will create a lot more jobs by designing and building a new aircraft properly than doing some half assed rushed bodge job with a 50 year old legacy air frame with faulty parts and a shitty bit of code outsourced to the cheapest offshore Indian subcontractor and hidden and not tested
    4
  7. So they're claiming they've fixed the thing that they said wasn't broken and didn't need fixing in the first place, the thing they didn't tell their own test pilots about and removed the previously standard warning light for, and they're going to certify the plane themselves like they did the last time? I'm not convinced. I'll think about getting on on one if a Boeing executive is on every 737 max flight for a year. Until then, if it's a Boeing max, I'm not going, facts
    4
  8.  @Racko.  you don't think 350 completely avoidable deaths isn't quite obnoxious?
    4
  9.  @Racko.  I can think of 350 very good reasons. No one will be held accountable for their deaths, because its Boeing. If these were American citizens that had died on two airbuses, the cio would be up before Congress and in court already
    4
  10. And there they should stay, in the world's most expensive boneyard
    4
  11. Arun Mani mcas wasn't the world's safest plan was it. Nor was outsourcing the software to HCL India and paying them $9 an hour to write it
    3
  12. Reach41 nothing like a few grand to resolve the grief of losing your family
    3
  13.  @wynn_explorations2543  for a start guiness isn't a beer, it's a stout. And if you don't think the wto and the imf are just tools of American foreign policy I feel bad for you son. You probably believe that Iran attacked those oil tankers that just happened to empty in the Persian gold with mines above the waterline, and that saddam had wmds, and that the gulf of tonkin incident wasn't a false flag in order to go to war. Pearl Harbour and the lisutania ringing any bells?
    3
  14. corbin steele then it had the reverse takeover by MD executives who separated themselves from the engineering heart of Boeing by moving the hq from seattle to Chicago and ran it like a bunch of mob accountants, and now the 737 max is just another dc10
    3
  15.  @Racko.  yeah you're right I don't get the point of what you're saying. Try and explain it a bit clearer. Clearly you don't believe in negligence or corporate manslaughter, there was absolutely no way anyone could have predicted or prevented this or any other accident, right?
    3
  16. It will be if they don't fix those engines problems
    3
  17. MR Boduke all of them. Every day for 5 years
    2
  18. Wilbur Finnigan with all that crap in the fuel tanks?
    2
  19.  @02WIFE  we all now know that the testing Boeing and the faa did on the max was woefully inadequate
    2
  20. Reach41 and yet they won't do it. Funny how that works
    2
  21. Reach41 so they would, but they won't. How convenient for them. You sound like a paid shill. Do you work for Boeing marketing?
    2
  22. Reach41 so because it's the middle of the night where you are I must be a limey? Does that make you a limey too? Maybe I'm on a different coast to you? Maybe there's other countries other than the UK outside the US? Maybe I'm just an American who likes Guinness because of my heritage? Do you even know where Guinness comes from? And you've clearly never heard of Guinness extra cold. And it ain't beer, it's stout. You know as much about geography and alcoholic beverages as you do about planes. Another product of the great American education system. Did you learn your history from our president's state of the Union speech too? Tell us about the aeroplanes he talked about being used in the war of independence, that's right up your street
    2
  23. There's a storm coming If it's a Boeing max, I'm not going, facts.
    2
  24. Go Lightly yeah there's a lot of them all over the comment sections of any 737 max YouTube video or social media post, they copy and paste stuff from one to the next. Not sure if this guy is one but there definitely a lot out there spreading lies so it's a possibility
    2
  25.  Bobby Brady  patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. Do you also think American is right to invade Iran and Venezuela?
    2
  26. Reach41 if Boeing are compensating the families how will airlines insurance premiums increase? Airlines aren't paying it and Boeing won't be passing on the cost to them either
    2
  27.  @wynn_explorations2543  yeah like the wto isn't the American government's poodle
    2
  28.  @underwaterdick  Boeing certified the max themselves. The faa didn't go near it
    2
  29.  @underwaterdick  partially removed? The cuts to the faa and the deregulation allowing Boeing to carry out the certificatuon on their behalf effectively removed them completely. It was also one of the major incentives for mcas a software to mimic the max's handling to earlier 737s so it could be cussed as the same type rating and therefore certified by Boeing.
    2
  30.  @Racko.  since the cuts to the faa and deregulation allowed them to. Well, Boeing certainly. Did you not know?
    2
  31.  @Gamerboy-gy1rl  use my brain? Why don't you explain it to me
    2
  32.  @Gamerboy-gy1rl  how many passengers a year dies the md 11 carry?
    2
  33. Kenneth Ngan yeah I won't be getting on one of those flying coffins, ever. If it's a Boeing max, I'm not going, facts.
    2
  34. Malamute Aerospace yeah instead of throwing the plane in the trash they've been throwing trash in the plane
    2
  35. DreamFlightPro incorrect. Airlines and booking companies already have an option when booking flights not to fly on a 737 max, and airlines without them are going to fall over themselves to provide alternative options for routes flows by max's and advertise on that fact because they know they will be able to change an extra 20 bucks or more and people will pay that not to fly on this flying coffin
    2
  36. DreamFlightPro 150 times ha ha ha dream on son you wouldn't be saying that if you'd been on one of the ones that crashed would you ha dumb f*@k
    2
  37. tiffsaver unfortunately the us government will bail them out
    2
  38. Brian Buckmaster except it is a design problem. The aircraft is inherently unstable during take off. Boeing really need to get better pr people because you're not doing a very good job.
    2
  39. Brian Buckmaster I'm afraid you're not in possession of the full facts, or you're choosing to ignore them.
    2
  40.  @charlesjones6487  think the airbus 380 waa made of a brand new composite, I the 380 has never had a crash or a fatality and it is an amazing aircraft to fly on.
    2
  41. JackMack Boeing shill
    1
  42. Reach41 off you pop then, let us know when you've done it
    1
  43. Reach41 you've said you would, but you won't 😂 my point exactly. Do you work in marketing by any chance? Sounds like it
    1
  44.  @wkdravenna  so why have they all been grounded for over a year if they're so safe? Why are they by far the most deadly passanger plane ever flown and why have the faa found multiple major problems with them they are stopping them getting their recertification, including mcas, inadequate pilot training, inadequate documentation, missing mandatory safety systems, sensors, non functional system checks, inadequate cpu capacity, faulty and non compliant wiring, wing fork cracks and fob in the fuel tanks? Explain to us how this plane is safe to fly with all this?
    1
  45.  @wkdravenna  I'm afraid it's your spelling and grammer that are inadequate. Perhaps you're still at school. What's stopping you learning pal? Perhaps you're young and niave and will believe any corporate propaganda thrown at you without actually bothering to learn the facts.
    1
  46.  @wkdravenna  so you'll be flying on a 747 not a 737 max? Not too confident in it are you. It was supposed to be safe the first time and now we find out that there's over a dozen serious flaws all of which are keeping it from being certified, problems that were all there when it was flying. And you think it was safe
    1
  47.  @wkdravenna  lol you're dumb not brave but still not dumb enough to fly on the max, you said yourself you'd only fly on the 747 ha ha ha dumbass
    1
  48.  @wkdravenna  the max has been grounded over a year, v when do you think it'll be flying commercially for passangers worldwide again?
    1
  49.  @wkdravenna  no answer huh. Full of bluster you mate
    1
  50. wkdravenna so you've not got a date in mind then? Bring certified by the faa ain't gonna cut it internationally any more buddy, it's gonna need certifying by Europe and China at the very least
    1