Comments by "TJ Marx" (@tjmarx) on "The Jimmy Dore Show" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 0:51 This take is false. It kind of gets some parts right but it doesn't really grasp what zionism is. Zionism was NOT started by Jews, it wss started as an antisemetic movement by european christians. Later, when the secular, non-religious descendants of Jews earned their fortunes in Europe they wanted to join the European aristocracy but they were denied on the basis they were Jews. That is, despite not being Jews the antisemetic aristocracy counted them as Jews because their parents were. So they joined Zionism. At its core Zionism is antisemetic. The ideas of a certain austrian painter were born from zionist beliefs prevalent across all of europe at the time, particularly across the aristocracy. That's why everything zionists do is ultimately harmful to actual Jews. There is no such thing as a Jewish race, it's only a religion. But the aristocracy in Europe took it the same way an austrian painter did and so you got this dysfunctional bitterness amongst the secular descendants of Jews who wanted into the aristocracy that they weren't able to be admitted, mixed with a desire to please. "You won't let me into the ruling club so I don't like you but also I still really want into the club and look up to you" Israel as a project solves two problems for the european aristocracy at once. It creates a strategic colonial outpost in the region and it creates a means to expel Jews from the western world. The whole thing is deeply antisemetic. That's why there are no Jews who are also Zionists. Remember, 74% of Israel self IDs as non-religious. The highest rate by far in the world. It isn't an accident, those are all the zionists.
    2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. @operator9858  What do we call what things? Normal government functions? We call them normal government functions. Infrastructure doesn't exist for you and me. It exists for production. An economy is just a set of circumstances whereby a geographic area has an economic output. There are various different configurations on how that economy and its resources can be executed. • It can be in limited private hands based on birthright, such as under a monarchy or feudalism. • It can be under unlimited private hands based solely on the market, such as under capitalism. • It can be under collective ownership but limited access such as under socialism • It can be under collective ownership and unlimited access such as under tribalism Etc etc. But under all circumstances the configuration still exists for the economy first. Those roads exist because it facilitates the transportation of the means of production. Hospitals exist because they get workers back to work faster. Police exist to keep society orderly and workers feeling safe so they're productive and reliable. Mandatory schooling exists to prepare you for work. Etc. Etc. It's all for the economy because the economy is the lifeblood of the nation. Definitions of words are objective, we have these books called dictionaries which give us short meanings and others called encyclopaedias with expanded explanations. Amazing right? From UTMs IEP encyclopaedia "Socialism is both an economic system and an ideology (in the non-pejorative sense of that term). A socialist economy features social rather than private ownership of the means of production. It also typically organizes economic activity through planning rather than market forces, and gears production towards needs satisfaction rather than profit accumulation. Socialist ideology asserts the moral and economic superiority of an economy with these features, especially as compared with capitalism. " From Britannica "socialism, social and economic doctrine that calls for public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources. " Do I need to go on? You could just look this stuff up. Base governmental function is not socialism. Capitalist societies still need to coordinate the economy for the good of the producers, that's what governments are for. Please see Socrates
    1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. This accounting is naive to an extreme. Look this is very simple and always was. The European elites were promised oil and gas profits from the donbas and minerals profits from Zaporizhzhia. A peace deal means the donbas, which has trillions of dollars of oil and gas, will be out of the hands of Burisma. They won't get the money they wanted. They won't get the control they wanted and their socialist bloc project won't get the injection of minerals it needs for its ESG programs. Sure the arms dealers won't be happy either, but that's not what this is about. They funded a dictatorial coup when Ukraine voted to become neutral. They enable a vicious and brutal dictatorship with connections to actual neo-nzis and organised crime, to stay in power and provide him with the resources to murder civilians. You think that's just about third party arms dealer profits? It's not. It's part of a larger plan to enrich themselves and build their own empire. They talk so much about Putin wanting to rebuild the USSR, but they are in the midst of the EU Bloc project which is led by unelected officials who cast their will on the people and are set on turning the EU into a sovereign federation. They are quite literally building the equivalent USSR 2.0 only this time in the west. Free speech in europe is over. Thought crimes exist. But they want a proxy war in Ukraine to push Russia into china's arms? 😂 no. They want to enrich themselves and progress their agendas. That's why they're pushing back, they don't want to lose their payday.
    1
  50. 1