Comments by "TJ Marx" (@tjmarx) on "MGUY Australia" channel.

@justsomeguy934 So why haven't you provided evidence for your claims then? 🤔
1
@jamesf3683 Isn't that interesting, there was an exchange with a sock puppet account, and a different sock puppet account responded. 😂 You don't prove a negative. Challenging a claim only requires the claimant to be more studious in their evidence. It asks nothing of the challenger. Your claim was not that of the possibility. Your claim was that it is all that is necessary. It isn't. Telling me to call a random business isn't evidence. Demonstrate insurers being ok with replacing individual cells (which are 18650s) in a damaged battery. You can't, because they aren't. Because that's not something you can safely do. Because there is no way of reliably knowing whether other cells are partially damaged. Please remember that spreading misinformation with the potential to cause serious harm is a criminal offence in both the UK and Australia. Telling people to just replace cells in a damaged ev battery absolutely counts as potential serious harm, because it substantially increases the risk of future fires the occupant(s) cannot escape.
1
Zero chance net zero gets swept away this election if either major party form majority government and the crossbench isn't in control. Coalition are on board with net zero. Remember net zero isn't actual zero. It's just an accounting scam to justify the introduction of carbon credits as a new commodity. In yankville as part of the 30 x 30 project they're creating "natural process credits" which are just a new tax on landholders to eventually steal their land from under them.
1
Why is BEV, Hybrid BEV/ICEV and ICEV only given consideration here? The future is H-FCEV.
1
About 50% of all cars in my neighbourhood are BEV.
1
@oldbloke204 Vehicle loans, including fleet loans, are secured loans against the vehicle itself. Many companies (and individuals) will realise it's cheaper to just default on the loan and update their fleet with vehicles that hold their value better, than it is to keep paying down the loan. Thus the banks will get stuck with the BEVs and be unable to recoup their loan amount. This will trigger their fiduciary duties and they'll cease issuing loans for such vehicles. Dealers and manufacturers issuing in house loans will find themselves in a similar position.
1
New greens are socialists. It isn't about the environment. It's about taking away your access to a private vehicle. It always was. If owning an ICEV becomes illegal "for the environment" and you can only buy BEVs that you can't insure, you won't be able to own a car.
1
I don't know where in Sydney you live but the overwhelming majority of Australians, including in sydney have off street parking via their garage/carport &/or driveway. Even most apartment blocks, flats and townhouses have carparks for residents. Does that mean BEV is a good idea? No. But it does mean your opening premise is nonsense. Edit: H-FCEV refueling requires a tank in the ground that has a surface mounted cooling unit, and a pump. An existing petrol station can selectively retrofit pumps within an hour. It refuels in the same amount of time as petrol, and extends range to 1800km per tank. That's Sydney to Melbourne on a single tank. Oh, and it costs half as much as petrol and has even lower fire risk than ICEV.
1
How else will the big donors make money?
1
5:22 "if built" If If If This isn't a serious project. This is a joke press release to get some publicity. They knew the news media would take it seriously and report it with a straight face. That's what they're counting on. It'll never happen. Remember, BlueOrigin and SpaceX already sell tickets into space. Bigalow Aerospace are planning on selling tickets into space to stay in its space hotel by the end of the decade. The wealthy don't care about the environment. H-FCEV for planes is feasible. Not for ships, or long haul flights. But domestic short haul flights, plausible. There are no batteries in H-FCEV.
1
@rexrocker1268 No one knows who you're talking to, learn how to @ properly
1
@rexrocker1268 👈 You think I typed that? Learn how to use yt.
1
Remember when the eastern states, and eventually Standards ANZ, where banning chinese made "hover boards", electric scooters and electric bikes because of the poorly made battery charging circuits? Now they're trying to import millions of larger devices that use the same tech. Edit: The ford patent about listening in isn't new. EFF does an annual report on what information popular manufacturers collect. Some of it is insane. If your car has an associated app, 9/10 manufacturers are listening in when you have "relations". The report is worth a read.
1
Dutton is clear, he has no plans to end the BEV and net zero insanity. My wife and I are looking at leaving Australia and taking our investments with us.
1
@annother3350 So is war. Yet here we are. That's what "net zero" means. Have you heard about the newest racket in yankville where they're trying to allow the mega rich and the government to own the sunshine and the oxygen in a plot of land, and charge the owner of the land to use those things? If you can't pay, they get your land instead, and you don't get a say in it? It's called "natural asset companies". Look it up, it's part of the 30 x 30 policy.
1
H-FCEV has no battery, no combustion and refuels in the same amount of time it takes to refuel an ICE vehicle. Existing petrol stations can convert pumps to hydrogen on the cheap and in a phased pattern with demand. There's no range anxiety because they can do 1700km on a single tank. BEV is stupid. It isn't the future.
1
How long do you think it is before some clever sod with a beef decides to weaponise an EV fire against some kind of public infrastructure or building?
1
Oh mate they know there isn't enough copper, cobalt and lithium. They know. That's the whole point. This isn't about the environment
1
I never understood how anyone could claim we a straight face the wind or solar were cheaper. It was only a decade ago they were talking about subsidising them to make them competitive with coal. Coal is by far the cheapest way to generate electricity. That's why China and India are going gang busters opening up more coal fired power stations. You think Australia with our 1% contribution to global emissions switching off coal is going to impact climate change while China and India, two of the biggest contributors are increasing theirs? 😂😂 We should just turn coal back on and get on with competing in the global market. We should worry about our energy system impact on climate change after China, India, Yankville and West Africa do something about theirs (which will never happen)
1
Nah. Net zero is an accounting trick. It's part of a finance scam. They're trying to set the stage for carbon credits, which is the entire point. It's NET zero, not Gross (ie. Actual) zero. Net is when you take the gross output and subtract modifiers. Ie. You can pump out as much carbon as you like, you just need to buy carbon credits to "offset" those emissions. That's the whole scheme.
1
@Trumpisafool 👈 this agenda driven sock puppet account again.
1