Comments by "Travis Cutler" (@traviscutler9912) on "Zeteo"
channel.
-
32
-
11
-
4
-
2
-
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
1
-
Sorry Butch, if "Bernie Sanders had ran as a Green Party candidate he'd be President." Hmmmmmmm, uhhhhhhhh, NO. Bernie would be DEAD if he got anywhere near the podium as the Establishment wouldn't EVER allow a socialist President under ANY circumstances. Also, coincidentally if you didn't notice Dad in 2020 once. Bernie had got screwed by the DNC for a second time. He could have easily morphed his coalition for a third-party status with the greens or any other number of things. But then all of a sudden he just rolled over for the DNC and has continued no matter how many crimes the DNC commits, no matter how many times they ignore them, no matter what humiliation comes next, he never says a thing that would actually jeopardize power, why? Personally, I believe they brought them into a room and showed him the real JFK dossier and said unless you want to get your ass MLK'd, I suggest you're allowed to tinker at the edges BUT if you fuck with the Billionaire donor money we will end you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
1
-
Also, let's not forget that people like Medhi for a very long time made space for the vicious attacks against people who actually had the courage to stand up like Jeremy Corbyn.. .......
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the vote blue no matter who narrative that enables the Democrat party to use the Republicans to get away with war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's family (The 1st one, not the second one when he realized that he was going to be to the Right of wsj, New York Times, haretz, and the liberal media establishment ) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange to push the security apparatus agenda. He is only on the right side of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the establishment's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for.
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
Let's keep in mind that Biden's 2023 deposition under Robert Hur, from the DNC's DOJ, wasn't in the middle of the night, it was while he had had plenty of rest and was preparing for it for months?!? Clearly, he was totally incapable of forming coherent sentences, let alone thoughts?!? If anyone in his inner circle, the DNC, had witnessed more than a couple of these events let alone SO MANY OTHERS, then they were actively risking the lives of every single American, for their own personal benefit as Biden would be wholly unprepared to deal with any major decision at night or day, like deciding whether the country should risk being reduced to a smouldering pile of rubble in a nuclear Armageddon you know.........or not?!?
How these people can defend that choice, tells you the kind of people who were running your country?!? Anything short of implementing the 25th amendment (or at the very least, a cognitive test by a neutral third party?) at that point was a complete & total abdication of duty, pure and simple by Biden and ALL of the DNC who lied to Americans for their own personal interests.
The sad reality is that they're no better than the Republicans, just better liars......(Yes, the RNC are clearly EVIL BUT this type of behavior shows a complete indifference to average Americans as they are clearly more committed to the DNC than even beating Trump?!?)
Clearly, we've entered the Weimar Republic 2.0
I'm so terrified that the DNC is more concerned with their own wealth & status, rather then the continued survival of the human race?
Seriously, WTF?!?!?
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s*** " for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
1
-
1
-
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was a Liberal shill. He defended the "squad" and soft pedals the vote blue no matter who narrative that enables the Democrat party to use the Republicans to get away with war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's family (The 1st one, not the second when he realized that he was going to be Right of wsj, New York Times, haretz, and the liberal media establishment ) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange to push the security apparatus agenda. He is only on the right side of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the establishment's propaganda water.
And yes, I do think Medhi is a sellout BUT he must have got a pretty good payday from MSNBC, so I'm hoping he'll use his new found financial Independence to actually report accurately all the news, not just the stuff that benefits him but his record doesn't suggest anything other than total self-interest.
1
-
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s*** " for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s*** " for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s*** " for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
1
-
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
1
-
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s*** " for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s*** " for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
1
-
Let's address this NOW?!?!?!? VOTE 3RD PARTY! OR: WHY I'M NOT AFRAID OF TRUMP'S SECOND TERM and why I'm more afraid of being complicit in the genocide of Gaza, rather than all the horrible stuff that Trump will probably do BUT that the DNC will also likely do, even if its slightly less. (let's remember that Biden ran on an immigration policy that wasn't barbaric but then completely changed and supported laws that are not legal under international law the moment things became inconvenient)
I'm starting to think a second Trump presidency might be in everyone's best interest?!?! Seriously. If Harris is elected then everyone gets to go back to brunch and pretend that democracy is ok. A Harris presidency would reward the DNC for being corrupt, breaking all its promises to the Left, people still in cages, refugees dying at the border, failure on climate policy, failure on green infrastructure, failure on voting rights, failure on a public opinion for healtcare, failure on police reform, failure on $15 min wage, failure to hold Saudi Arabia accountable, failure to not drill for Oil on federal land, failure in Gaza, failure on Lebanon, failure not to reinstate the Iranian nuclear deal (could you imagine had the USA actually done anything that they promised, the actual leverage America would have over Iran because of the economic implications, rather than the empty promises and dead bodies across the Muslim world!?!? ), failure in Afghanistan, failure to not escalate hostility with China, continuing to promote the proxy war against Russia, FAILURE ON VICTIMS OF HURRICANE HELENA THAT FEMA "MIGHT" GIVE $700 FOR GROCERIES, WHILE THERE'S ALMOST 200 CONFIRMED THAT AMERICANS AND HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS MORE MISSING NOT TO MENTION THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO CONCEIVABLE PLAN THAT WILL MAKE THAT REGION HABITABLE AGAIN FOR THE MILLION PLUS AMERICANS DISPLACED BY THE DISASTER . ALL WHILE HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ARE SENT ABROAD TO SLAUGHTER INNOCENT CHILDREN BECAUSE THEY'RE BROWN MUSLIM'S AND THEREFORE HAVE NO HUMAN RIGHTS. etc.....
However, if Trump is re-elected everyone will magically remember that children are still dying in detention, democracy is under direct threat, the world's climate is still burning and at least Trump says he would try to end the war in Ukraine (obviously Trump would nuke Ukraine for a nickel but the fact he even suggested peace is better than the DNC's current pro WW3 stance).
The reality is that we can boil the climate frog slow or fast but it's going to fry either way. HOWEVER, if the fire is stoked purposely by the actual Left, it would tell the Corporate Democrats that breaking almost every promise has consequences or if we are really lucky, public awareness that the duopoly will not only not save us!!!! BUT IS ACTIVELY WORKING AGAINST ALL WORKER'S INTERESTS (Even if you make $100,000 a year) and force regular people to understand that after the Palestinians/LEBANESE, it WILL EVENTUALLY BE the country their families are from next. Not to mention the fact, that they're also in the same boiling pot of climate change & that the next climate catastrophe is going to be the pretext for ushering in boots on the ground fascism or disaster in their region that will ALSO have to be ignored in order to PRIORITIZE the ongoing slaughter of the middle East's Muslim people to satiate the blood lust and regional hegemonic intentions of Israel's elite, it's co-conspirators in the American security establishment and of course the ultra wealthy Israeli lobby groups that are more concerned about regional domination than its own people that are ignored along with thier families, THE HOSTAGES!?!?!
The system works. Let's stop supporting it.
Vote third party, knowing full well that it will more than likely elect Donald Trump and that you are proud of it because it's better than voting for Kamala's kinder, gentler genocide.
Lastly, always remind Liberals when they say that Donald Trump will be worse, that genocide is already the WORST and yet the DNC is currently supporting it with 2000 lb bombs as it expands across the region. Yes, Trump will more than likely increase the rate of Palestinian deaths, which is unbelievably horrific BUT if the clearly stated goals of Israel's political leaders are to be believed, then tragically everyone in Palestine will eventually be dead, regardless of the timeline. This is unacceptable on every possible level, there's no lesser of two evils when f***ing genocide is concerned!?!
Kamala is an empty vessel to be filled with the military industrial complex's murderous interests for not only Gaza BUT obviously the broader region & the next place they intend to invade once they've executed every last Muslim man, woman and child. (Sadly, I originally wrote this previous to the Lebanese mass murder campaign of Netanyahu BUT iT WAS COMPLETELY PREDICTABLE IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE AS THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT HAS TOLD US THIS WAS F***ING PLAN.)
Vote for ANY 3rd party that doesn't support genocide, if the DNC doesn't lose based on this issue, then they will understand that Americans literally support genocide & will continue to act accordingly.
I'm not saying that the Trump presidency is good in any way and will NOT ONLY be a tragic loss of life but will also threaten everything we hold dear as people who care about our ENTIRE community not just our demographic ❤️. What I'm saying is that once we accept genocide as the lesser of two evils, we are no longer human beings but animals who are willing to do anything to survive and I would rather die as a human being defending the dignity of all people, rather than as a Savage animal, killing everything instinctively in its path as an excuse to ignore the humanity of others.
The system works, let's stop supporting it.
Vote Green 💚
1
-
I was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was a Liberal shill. He defended the "squad" and soft pedals the vote blue no matter who narrative that enables the Democrat party to use the Republicans to get away with war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's family (The 1st one, not the second when he realized that he was going to be Right of wsj, New York Times, haretz, and the liberal media establishment ) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange to push the security apparatus agenda. He is only on the right side of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the establishment's propaganda water.
And yes, I do think Medhi is a sellout BUT he must have got a pretty good payday from MSNBC, so I'm hoping he'll use his new found financial Independence to actually report accurately all the news, not just the stuff that benefits him.
1
-
1