Comments by "Travis Cutler" (@traviscutler9912) on "Zeteo"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1
-
1
-
I was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was a Liberal shill. He defended the "squad" and soft pedals the vote blue no matter who narrative that enables the Democrat party to use the Republicans to get away with war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's family (The 1st one, not the second when he realized that he was going to be Right of wsj, New York Times, haretz, and the liberal media establishment ) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange to push the security apparatus agenda. He is only on the right side of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the establishment's propaganda water.
And yes, I do think Medhi is a sellout BUT he must have got a pretty good payday from MSNBC, so I'm hoping he'll use his new found financial Independence to actually report accurately all the news, not just the stuff that benefits him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1
-
I really like Owen BUT..........
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one, once he realized that he was going to be to the Right-wing of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the general liberal media establishment) he was dismissive & condescending, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange, as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' smear campaign against Assange. Medhi is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still refused to apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience."
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concern yourself with the relevance of this argument, consider what happened to the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason, despite the fact that Corbyn had a better electoral voter turnout than Starmer?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive. 17:47
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again or at the very least apologize for journalistic malpractice.
Lastly, I'll add that had people like him and James O'Brien along with all the other people who pretend to be progressive Liberals actually stood up for the fact that there was no evidence against Corbyn and had Jeremy been allowed to stand for this last election instead of Starmer, there could in fact have been a politician who stood up for Palestinians and also LED the charge for making britons utilities public again with a bold plan for the future that wasn't designed purposely to fail so that it would all fall back in the hands of the conservatives again, just like Starmer and his elk prefer (If you don't believe me, just look up how his team purposely sabotaged Corbyn in favor of PM Johnson. Could you imagine had Labour actually helped Corbyn win instead of purposely working against him?!? Could you imagine all the peoples who lives could have been saved? Or how much less damage the conservatives could have done to Briton or maybe no Liz!? Nope, unfortunately people like James O'Brien and Medhi put their own careers first and threw veryone else lives under the bus.) as they were all profit from the same corruption ?!?!?!?
1
-
1
-
Let's always remember people like Medhi were more than comfortable to ingratiate himself with corporate media by throwing people who were actually brave enough to stand up against the Israeli propaganda way under the bus, people like Jeremy Corbyn. That's why he still supports the Democratic party despite its overwhelming support of genocide, or his overwhelming support of the Labour party in Britain who also supports the genocide in Gaza. Medhi supports both of those governments whole heartedly. He does that because he wants to be on the side of money and influence in the establishment. He's a sellout and is exactly as Norm Finkelstein describes him.........
MEDHI the OPPORTUNIST!!!
LOL! I just watched an amazing video from Norm Finkelstein who called Medhi "a sack of s***" for smearing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-semite with no evidence just to ingratiate himself with the corporate media establishment.
I originally was a fan of Medhi at first but eventually I suspected he was just a Liberal shill in Lefy clothing. He soft pedals the "vote blue no matter who" narrative that enables the Republicans to get away with war crimes BUT more importantly, giving the Democrats cover to be complicit in those same war crimes. Still, I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt ........however, if you look at his interview with Julian Assange's brother (The 1st interview, not the second one once he realized that he was going to be to the Right of WSJ, New York Times, Haaretz, and the liberal media establishment) he was dismissive, brought up CIA talking points and totally ignored evidence of the illegal activity towards Assange as well as Assange's lawyers, family + other legal Representatives) to push the security apparatus' agenda. He is only on the "right side" of these issues when it affects him personally or the establishment gives him permission, otherwise, he's perfectly fine with carrying the Establishment 's propaganda water.
I hope he has changed BUT he's got a lot to make up for and has still never apologized to Corbyn or Assange for his obvious journalistic malpractice and until he does, I will assume he's a "Justice warrior of convenience"
Medhi continues to profit from being able to play both sides of the establishment for clout and profit.
If you want to concernedyourself with the legitimacy of that argument. Consider the fact of the people he smeared, Assange spent a decade in prison under the harshest possible conditions OR Corbyn who was stripped of his leadership role and thrown out of the Labour Party he had supported for 40 years with no provable reason?!?!
Medhi on the other hand has now established a multi-million dollar company after enjoying access to corporate media for acclaim and profit while both Corbyn and Assange suffered for telling the truth............
Clearly, Medhi is a great attack dog and I'm glad that he is setting his sights on the people who are perpetrating these atrocities, however, The reality is that anyone who can so casually blow in the direction of the corporate wind, can't genuinely be trusted and is ultimately dangerous as they can never, ever, under any circumstances to be trusted not to do it again once defending the truth becomes inconvenient or expensive.
Until I see Medhi actually sacrifice anything to help anyone other than himself, I will never trust him again.
1