Comments by "The Esseboy" (@TheEsseboy) on "VICE News" channel.

  1.  @jesussandoval8756  By that logic you would be considered to commit murder if you have a period, since you didn't fertilize the egg...it's a possible life, not A life...a living human is supposed to be able to sustain itself outside another human...just like I cannot demand to crawl inside another human to survive, neither can the fetus demand to stay inside that human if the host disagrees.
    1
  2. Maga is a cult yes.
    1
  3. ​ @tbird-z1r Hamas murdered babies, not Palestine...
    1
  4. They are showing how unprotected they are against their attacks, it's not like it was that hard to find a weak spot...
    1
  5. Liberal? I think Vice is a news channel, not a political group. This was about Trump, and his supporters. There is more evidence of Trump supporters being racist, you know that, we all know that!
    1
  6. The US army and police is very strong, they have tanks, helis, Tomahawk missiles, they can take them any day they want to...unless you have a 156 cal autocannon you won't even face them, and even so a missle will get your sorry ass.
    1
  7.  @25percentdumb62  They do have the right to call in the national guard if they feel like it, and when you loose your job, get a fellony and get thrown in jail after, you quickly think twice about "defending" your "right" to "bear arms". Guns are not essential, guns are just tools to kill people, they should be heavily regulated and controlled, unless you want 600% higher murder rate...like in the US.
    1
  8.  @jeannesandner1918  Then just have a buy back program, and with proper regulation teens and young adults won't have acess to mail ordering these guns...it's literally just about regulation and upholding it, but he republicans block any federal regulation on guns.
    1
  9. Islamic? Where does it state anything about guns in the Koran? This is just logical thinking and reasoning, I know it is hard to spot as you only govern yourself by emotions and funny one liners.
    1
  10. No, the white people gave people guns and gold to catch their own people and hand them over to White people...White people did this...there is no other reason whatsoever. Imagine if say people from Greenland came to the US, and gave people tanks, gold, attack helicopters and missile systems, and return they caught people there and handed them over to them....what do you think would happen?
    1
  11. I think you confused him for Trump.
    1
  12. Well, they are by all reports THE group who does 90% of all these crimes, and in certain categories 99%...should we not name them when they are so over represented?!
    1
  13. Look at Europe, it works, 90% less gun deaths, and 87% less homicides. It just works...and if you want to know how to get guns back, buy back programs, put 25 billion into it for 10 years, you will see that 60-90% of all guns end up sold back to the state, cause 40% of americans live paycheck to paycheck, one month that glock looks really sellable. Vice cares, Fox on the otherhand, they have been caught again and again openly stating behind closed doors that they just act on the news, and do not think the same way the speak. Gang crime and stuff is due to racial discrimination, the prison system being used to create criminals and earn money, the poor not getting help to get educated and finding jobs (cause they lack money to move and to look for them witout getting to the point of homlessness, at which point they cannot get a job cause of stigma)
    1
  14.  @NotSure109  Nope, abortion is a bodily right, just like no kne cam force you to give a kidneybor blood, no one can force you to be a baby factory...
    1
  15. Yes there would, but the lazy mine owners won't lift a finger to protect the drinking water, rivers, forest and lakes...what good is it if we destroy the beutiful nature just to earn a buck today? Hopefully the US will be around for thousands of years...not just today.
    1
  16. All good guys with guns, they have the smalles balls, guns shrink balls.
    1
  17. Well, people died of it, and a lot of properties got damaged! Wouldn't you complain?!
    1
  18.  @Jay-bw3fl  Your point being to belittle Californians? I got that, makes you look like a childish Trumpanzee
    1
  19.  @Jay-bw3fl  And you went straight to climate change denial like the childish Trumpanzee you are. Go back to watching Fox News grandpa.
    1
  20. But who wields the power? Who lynches people? Whites...not blacks...that is the issue...blacks do not kill whites if the stray from their area, not just because they are white...
    1
  21. The constitution doesn't say anything about private gun ownership, only about private militias... Oh, so that is why the pro-gunviolence people say that there is nothing to do but get more guns? Because they care more about lives than guns? They literally think guns should have more rights than human beings.
    1
  22. Bernie 2020
    1
  23. Because they also report on them too, you missed the BLM segments? This is a clear whataboutism, stick to the topic or be quiet.
    1
  24.  @JChang0114  No, they are not, the most common mass shooter is a white male against a public building, why? Cause they are the only young people with easy acess to guns. Not even gangsters would do such a low crime.
    1
  25. Congo is a country with close to 100 million people, 1 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket, Finland with 5 million inhabitans have a budget of 6 Billion...and they are a stable country...For real progress they would need at least 10 billion, if not more! To educate their troops and employes better, build infrastructure etc.
    1
  26. Trump cleaarly lost by a lot.
    1
  27. The USA have emitted more CO2 than China historically... Gas still emitt NOx, still emitt CO2. Buy a downhole geothermal heater, they use 9-10 times less energy than heating with electricity alone. Then install some solar panels, a couple wind turbines and a battery system. It's not free being a farmerz if you don't have money, maybe sell and move to town? Cheaper to live closer to the stores and services.
    1
  28.  @zytrik1  I do not care about their thoughts, it is what they spread to others and what their actions tell. Sexist speach is illegal in my country as so far as publicating it in public news sources. As it is seen as hate speech and aimed att offending a group of people.
    1
  29.  @zytrik1  How does your country compare in Human development index, world happiness report and Press freedom? Mine is ranked at the very top
    1
  30.  @og_tokyo  Do you ever speak to women as friends thou?
    1
  31. Not idiot, they are just naive, poor naive people who bought into lies and now can't change their mind because that would hurt :(
    1
  32. Nope, a fetus is not a human yet, it cannot survive without being attached to another human, which you cannot morally force someone to do unwillingly.
    1
  33.  @travisjohnson7065  So you also count sperm and eggs as humans then? They also have human DNA. Explain to me how you can force a mother to host a fetus inside of her and make her belly swell by a cubic foot and risk damaging her body and have her also suffer emotionally and economically.
    1
  34.  @CodyBarton-vp8do  If they are living inside of your body and removing them means that they die, then yes. No one can claim your body as a place to live.
    1
  35.  @Daniel-oj5jf  No, it is a fetus, and there is no proof god excists so your soul and heaven theory is very shaky. The fetus doesn't have the right to demand a womens body...
    1
  36.  @travisjohnson7065  The force being stopping her from visiting a doctor to have an abortion and imprisoning her. That is forcing her to be a fetus incubator. You are not listening are you?
    1
  37.  @travisjohnson7065  Well, poor people kinda are in many parts of the world cause the rich hoard all the wealth, then blame poor people for stealing of them to get food on the table. You see how it is intrincly linked together? If you force a woman to not get an abortion, you are indirectly forcing them to be baby incubators, as you value the fetuses rights more than the womans rights. I do not understand how this is so hard for you to understand. You cannot kill something that is not yet a developed organism, that is like saying you killed babies by not fertilizing the eggs and sperm you wasted, they could all be human individuals.
    1
  38.  @travisjohnson7065  So the woman has the right to the fetuses body then? Then it cancells out, and the woman still has the right to not consent to the development of a fetus inside of he and evict it. It's not the womans problem that the fetus cannot sustain itself outside of the womb...doen't give it the right to be in hers. You still refuse to see how this is giving the fetus more rights than the woman... Do you have children? Do you know what it's like to be pregnant? It is not a dance on roses like you seem to put it when you gloss over it like it's nothing. You are not defending the fetus, you are forcing women to keep fetuses inside of them when they do not consent. Which is making them into rightless baby factories. And women will find ways, illegal or not to do abortions, the numbers won't drop, only the health of women will drop, as will their mental health and social security. Like before Roe vs wade.
    1
  39.  @travisjohnson7065  The 1 yearold argument doesn't work as you can get other people to help with that, and the child is not living inside of your body. The fetus is still not a developed human, and the mother does suffer way graver consequences going through a pregnancy than just caring for a child that is already born...if you don't believe me you should really do your research on what it is like to go through a pregnancy. You are clearly delusional and do not subscribe to logic, parhaps you need to do more research to understand why your religion is based on circular arguments and other invalid logics for you to understand why. You are clearly emotionally attached to fetuses, and value their well being more than womens. Women are not baby incubators.
    1
  40.  @travisjohnson7065  So then it would be perfectly valid to force a person to give a kidney or have a fetus implanted into them from a dying mother?
    1
  41.  @travisjohnson7065  How will you stop a women from having an abortion? By attacking them or just using the magic? If the right to live as you said is higher than bodily autonomy, then we should able to force people to donate kidneys, pieces of their liver etc. to make other people live. And if a mother is severly ill a fetus could be forcefully inserted into another women to make her be pregnant with it. You still make no sense, just like your blind religion. All religions are based on lies and faulty logical arguments that are clad in clothes of "common sense", when it in reality is delusion.
    1
  42.  @travisjohnson7065  The fetus is dying of natural causes though, as it naturally cannot live outside of human. And naturally a woman who doesn't consent to a pregnancy will have it removed or in early cases flushed out with the induced period. The argument still holds, in that case shouldn't we stop all healthcare? And forbid all unnatural remedies? If "natural" (whatever that is) is the only metric on what whe should do. You are grasping at straws... Does a woman have the right to choose what to do with her body or not? What's next? Will you advocate for stopping heart surgeries because there is nothing in the bible about it?
    1
  43.  @travisjohnson7065  So the Fetus then owns the mothers body?
    1
  44.  @travisjohnson7065  Does the fetus have more autonomy over the Womans body, which it needs to be able to demand a space inside of her.
    1
  45.  @travisjohnson7065  The fetus still apears when the woman didn't cosent, so it does demand a space inside of her body. Hence it has bodily autonomy over the woman by your logic, which would mean they could demand another womans body if the woman they reside in dies.
    1
  46.  @travisjohnson7065  No, it's more like when you put the seeds in sand and protect them from sunlight and them still sprouting, then a total stranger comes along and tells you that you cannot remove the carrots! Well, if someone wanted to be put inside of you to survive, they would need your consent, so human life does sometimes require consent if it conflicts with another persons bodily autonomy.
    1
  47.  @travisjohnson7065  Still doesn't give the fetus bodily autonomy over the woman. It's the womans body, it is her choice! You are basically advocating for forcing women trough fines, jail time and harassment to not be able to choose weather she goes through a pregnancy or not. That is forcefull, and not at all a passive stance. If bodily the importance of life thrumps bodily autonomy of the woman, then we should all be making as many children as possible? That makes no sense at all...and you know it, you just ignore it and don't value logical thinking, you merely value traditions and upholding the past.
    1
  48.  @travisjohnson7065  A fetus is not yet a human being, it is just like a sperm or eggcell just potentiality a human life. So why does a fetus have the right to demand a woman to be forced to carry it?
    1
  49.  @travisjohnson7065  So because it is natural, the fetus can demand it? Then we should demand all smokers and alcoholics to not get treatment and die naturally no? Treating them is unnatural and bad...do you not see how you have one messuring stick for fetuses, and another for everyone else? Find one biologist that claims a fetus is the same as a full term born baby....or even a pre term one who would survive outside of the wombbwith medical assistance...what is next? Next you will claim egg cells have the same right to be fertilized to live, and naturally any man can naturally ejaculate into her, and she should just accept it. You are a hypocrite.
    1
  50. Well, god is dead so get over it.
    1