Comments by "Ash Roskell" (@ashroskell) on "Rebel HQ"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
That’s so spot on, it hurts! It’s the only time in his life that he gets personal time with the president, press coverage, and sweet suites at the trump hotel. He’s totally milking it, and the best solution? WIN MORE DEM SEATS AT THE MIDTERMS. Make sure Biden gets a clear MAJORITY, and then we can make this Quisling GOP operative in Dem Clothing as irrelevant as he deserves to be. Sir, I love your concise, impassioned, honest delivery. Thank you for your, ongoing, service. Seriously! 👍
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Her Tweet is submissible as, “Evidence of Motive,” and in my fantasy, her judge says, “You openly stated that, among your motives for committing these offences, was the expectation of collusion by the state, and this court in particular, with your crimes. You did these things, BECAUSE you expected to evade punishment, counting on MY individual complicity, corruption and collusion. By your own words you have directly challenged the legitimacy of the American justice system. You have forced this court to respond to your statements, by setting an example, and by making it clear to ALL potential insurrectionists that they CANNOT count upon state collusion, or deliberate dereliction of duty, In favor of a white suprematist’s childish expectations of government racism and collusion in serious offences against the state. I am therefore, compelled to give you the maximum sentence, so that America knows Justice is blind . . . especially to race. You talked your own way into your fate. You will serve 30 years, without the possibility of parole. Take her away.”
That’s my fantasy, at least. ✌️
3
-
3
-
Just ONE PERSON, right? Just ONE grown up in that room, could have stood up and said, “Clearly, NEITHER of you have EVER looked up the term, ‘defund the police,’ or if you had, you would both AGREE!” Then bang their empty heads together and make them READ a definition, right? So they would both say, “Oh look? Turns out we both want exactly the same thing! We want cops to prevent crime, detect crime and catch bad guys, with well funded, staffed and equipped departments. And we want cops to do less social work, psychiatric nursing, body guarding of corporate goons and debt collecting for the banks! Who knew?” To which that guy would say, “Everyone! We ALL KNEW! The only people who don’t know, and who NEVER EXPLAIN IT, are cops, politicians and Alt-Wrong Hacktivists!”
The dumbest political disagreement since the, “You’re Retarded! No! You’re Retarded!,” Wars of 1973. 🤦♂️
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
“Cheap”? Are you kidding? Those phones will be bristling with all the latest, up to date, top of the line, Chinese Spyware, hacking programs, Trojans, tracking tech and so much more! They might as well have President Xi sitting on their lap, every time they make a call or Tw@ at each other! Hwawei all over again . . . 🙄 . . . And they claim to hate, “Chiynah,” while they PAY to import their secret services into their, “parlour.” 🤦♂️ . . . ✌️👍
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
This has to be a conspiracy between left and right? HAS to be! They both want the same thing! “Defund,” sounds like just, “taking away money.” Neither the politician nor that cop, nor sheriff Buzzcut, nor the anchor interviewing him KNOWS what the term ACTUALLY MEANS. Literally EVERYBODY wants the cops to fight crime, detect crime and prevent crime, right? Literally EVERYBODY would prefer it if cops DIDN’T have to be social workers, psychiatric nurses, body guards for corporate goons, or debt collectors turning people out of their homes for the banks, right? They can’t ALL NOT KNOW what, “defunding the police,” actually means??? They HAVE TO BE FAKING IT??? 🤷♂️
3
-
3
-
Agreed. But tell me? Are you not exhausted by the fact that both the left AND the right actually AGREE about, “Defunding the police,” but only about 10% of the right actually knows what it MEANS? We HAVE TO come up with a NEW NAME for it! If you asked Sheriff Buzzcut there, “Would you prefer it if your deputies NEVER had to be social workers, psychiatric nurses, corporate goon’s body guards, or debt collectors for the banks? Would you be happier if they were well funded, well staffed and well equipped, to fight crime, detect crimes and catch bad guys?” What would he say? No? Obviously not.
And then, follow that with, “Did you know that THIS is what we mean by Defunding The Police?” He would tell you that’s not how it’s been explained to him! To which we would ask, “And that person who, ‘explained it to you’ . . . Was he called Ben Shapiro, or Alex Jones, by any chance?” And after Sheriff Shoot’em’up twists in his chair, turns red and says, “Maybe? . . .” We can explain that the left and right BOTH WANT THE SAME THING FOR ONCE! “The right LIED TO YOU, because it’s a dumb name for an obvious solution to a problem that a SIX YEAR OLD could have solved by now!”
The dumbest political disagreement (and embarrassment to America) since the He Who Smelt It Dealt It Wars of 1783! 🤦♂️
3
-
That is a really powerful argument. The hypocrisy of actually dealing with Carlson behind the scenes, a racist and an anti-American agitator of the type that would make Lord Haw Haw blush, is stunning. They need to cut him off. Talk about him in the context of, “Fox,” and the messages they’re broadcasting, without ever specifically identifying which, “personality,” is using any specific talking point, and refuse to show their propaganda at all; for the very reason that it is propaganda! I would love to see you debate these issues with people like Brian Stelter. Anyway. You speak perfect sense, and a moral truth that needs acknowledging, and soon! Thank you. ✌️👍
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
He would have saved the airports that hadn’t been invented yet, maybe? Then he would have surrendered. But, trump has picked the right general as his own reflection. They’re both racists who surrendered, so there’s that, right? Trump surrendered to the Taliban, quite literally. That’s why Mike Pompeo and Stephen Miller are the only two people from trump’s administration (who were actually involved) who still back trump’s moves. Mikey, because he signed the surrender, and Stevie, because he blocked all the migrant visas for our allies, and is the one responsible for all the red tape keeping them out now. Everyone else from trump’s presidency OR Biden’s presidency, ALL AGREE that Joe did a great job! Funny that? 🤔
3
-
3
-
3
-
@johnassal5838 : To be honest, I see some potential fixes, but I suspect that all politicians must be beholden to someone or other, or they’d have done them by now? I am interested to see what Biden could do if he won a clear majority at the midterms? But, I doubt even then that he would fix things root and branch? For example: Compulsory voting laws, with fines for those who don’t vote, and a felony record for repeat offenders? Like Australia? That way, you simply can’t get away with vote rigging of the type the GOP is doing currently, and you take their stick from them? And gerrymandering could be rendered useless with one single reform of the Electoral College; if they were forced to count votes, not points, for National Elections? The EC is an anachronism anyway, making a nonsense of the notion of, “one nation under God,” when they can disenfranchise the votes of over three million Americans to put the Dems out in favor of a child-man?! I’m genuinely surprised that no team of crack lawyers has not challenged the EC as being Unconstitutional? You wouldn’t even have to dissolve the EC either? Just reform its function for NATIONAL elections, where each vote SHOULD carry equal weight, with each voter already having an established equal stake in the outcome? But no one does, which leads me back to lobbyists, I guess? . . . ✌️
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3