Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. Me neither but then I think I might have been caught on this one too, because its a very fine line between 2 almost identical examples and unless you get BOTH questions up front it could (not would) be easy to jump on a simple answer like JP did and then get caught out. I'm Australian and really proud that Jim Jefferies has asked such a brilliant pair of questions. The British lawyer Jeffery Robertson used to come to Australia and do these hypothetical discussions with panels of people and this was his stock & trade. Ask the first question with the aim to get a simple straight forward answer and then flip it on its head with the follow up question. If you take that first question in isolation and say forcing (through law) a business to serve a particular person is authoritarian. Being honest its the government asserting its authority to make and enforce rules. So such a rule is authoritarian, but the point Jim makes is that Governments can make rules & laws that are good for everyone. This something people on the Right and especially Libertarians can't grasp. When they make a rule or law its NEVER authoritarian because in their mind they are preserving liberty and WILL FORCE that rule on everyone as they are doing in America with the abortion laws (and yes that's a big deal around the world). BUT WHEN other people make rules and especially rules or laws they don't like then Right Wingers scream foul and Libertarians being even further to the right go off their rockers. JUST SO YOU ALL KNOW - American Libertarians are pushing their agenda's across the world right now. Here in Australia we just failed to pass a referendum that (in part) would recognise that Australia's Aboriginal peoples (First Nations) in the constitution. The No campaign which was straight out fee mongering, was lead by people (including Aboriginal people) who are involved in Australia's Right Wing Libertarian Think Tanks and those Think Tanks have links to America's Right Wing Libertarian Think Tanks. FOR PROOF - go and look up the Institute of Public Affairs here on YT. The IPA is Australia's most prominent and vocal and well funded Think Tank. If you scroll down their home page to "Other Organisations" you'll see the links to Heritage, CATO,.... etc.
    2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. ​ @taranullius9221  Careful because although you are right about many things and that fact our immigration camps left a lot to be desired they were never close to concentration camps. I'll agree any day of the week we could have done better and should have done better. Many years ago when there were similar issues with Ethnic Vietnamese fleeing southern China, by chance I met a lawyer who handled some of those cases. She couldn't tell me anything about any case but I asked the general question of why these cases take so long. I think at the time they were taking 3-5 years. She basically told the single biggest problem is these people carry no identification. The first thing they do when they start to their journey is destroy everything that might link them to anything. That way they can't be sent back to anywhere because NOBODY knows where back is. This is why they get caught in limbo. They can't prove their claims and nobody else can prove or dis-prove anything. I also just checked what I could and Statista has a graph showing that at 2000 the number of displaced people in the world was less than 25 million. By 2014 it was over 50 million and by 2018 it was over 75 million. Its a gigantic global problem that nobody can fix because there's too much money for various people. From the corporations who pillage the 3rd world by supporting dictators to the arms traffickers who supply those dictators to the smugglers transporting people. THEY'RE ALL MAKING TOO MUCH MONEY to want to do anything.
    2
  10. AUSTRALIAN HERE: Sorry for the length of this comment. YES - we sadly have these types here too, but please note he is basically saying EXACTLY the same sort of nonsense that Larry Summers told Jon Stewart a few months ago and EXACTLY the same thing the new head of the Reserve Bank of Australia (our equivalent of the US Federal Treasury) Michelle Bullock also said her first day in the job, which is we need to RAISE the unemployment rate to counter to inflation. YES - we also know that inflation is being driven by supply chain issues, but just like all over the developed world economists and business leaders like Tim Gurner, Larry Summers and others DO NOT WANT TO ADMIT that the economic policies they pushed for the last 40 years (like off shoring production) lead to this situation. YES - Australia runs very similar economic policies to America because America got very good at exporting its ideas and this is most evident in economics. I'm actually an engineer and have been informally studying economics for a couple of years so that I can make better arguments regarding project management decisions. One of the things I have found is that Chicago School Neoliberal Economics has become the core of all economics curriculums across the developed world. Even at universities that teach some alternative ideas (like MMT). They have at the core of their curriculum Neoliberal Market Fundamentalism and its narratives that government is incompetent, that unregulated markets are the best decision making processes, outsourcing is brilliant, privatisation is best practice and consultants need to run governments rather than governments governing their nations. In various countries these issues manifest in different ways but they all come from the same school of ideas which is America's robber baron based Libertarian movement. NOTE - Chicago School is a reference to the University of Chicago where James McKinsey, Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, Ronald Coase and others all taught. That university was in part founded by John D Rockefeller the biggest of America's robber barons and an ardent Libertarian. YES - America does export things and among them some of the WORST ideas in human history. Right now in Australia our major issue is consultants who have cost us over AU$20 Billion in fees that we know of and badly messed up our government institutions as they have done it. At the core of the current scandal is PwC who while advising our tax office on closing corporate loop holes were selling that information to their corporate clients so they could avoid tax by other means. Basically we are looking at the Australian equivalent of a RICO case against PwC. So far the enquiries into the consulting industry have heard of endemic fraud among the major players including KPMG, Deloitte and EY. McKinsey and Boston Group have so far avoided allegations. SO YOU ALL KNOW - property developers like Tim Gurner are considered among the lowest life forms we have in Australia. When driving a car we might swerve to avoid a snake but always plant the right foot for a property developer. We've had so many scandals in this industry news reports of "another property developer goes bust" are a cultural cliché. They all operate on business models that would make America's Sackler family (Purdue Pharma) proud and just like America is yet to reign in the Sackler's, Australia is also yet to reign in the property developers despite all the things they've done.
    2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. ​ @janecreek681  I though it sounded Orwellian. As an Australian kid who went to high school in the 80s I studied BOTH Animal farm and 1984 and hated both at the time. NOWDAYS I want to go back and thank my teachers for making us understand how democracy dies. Interestingly even though I did engineering (U. Illinois) a bunch of my friends were pre-law and they used to drag m into their discussions. I think it was because I could be relied on to put in odd or unusual ideas. One thing I used to always argue (mainly because it was all I had) was the Orwellian idea that ANY democracy could fail. They used to argue back that America could NOT fail because of how it was structured under the constitution. There are the 4 pillars (The House, The Senate, SCOTUS & the Whitehouse) and as such it was impossible for anyone of them to gain enough power to overrule the others. So I have had the American system of "Checks & Balances" explained and argued by a bunch of people many of whom are now practising lawyers. *What we never discussed, because it was never considered possible, was what would happen if a Mitch McConnell type simply refused to do his job like he did with BOTH Trump impeachments. the first impeachment was more obvious that Bill Clinton's penis being in Monica Lewinsky's mouth. The 2nd Impeachment was even more obvious than the first and BOTH time McConnell simply refused to do his job and Merrick Garland has since refused to step up and do his job as well. On Jan 6th. If anybody tried that in any other country they would have been in prison that day and in many countries executed shortly after the very short trial. So these days I am pretty amazed because the one argument I used to make and always had shot down is now what's happened.
    2
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. Scott Galloway had this great comment a couple of weeks ago. "The only thing Biden is owed is to be buried in the same hole as Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Diane Feinstein." he went on to explain how these selfish geriatrics and their supporters did damage that will take decades to recover from. Remember Ginsberg was replaced with Amy Coney Barrett who was 48 when appointed. Barret is not only a nutcase member of a fundamentalist Catholic offshoot but she could easily be on SCOTUS for another 30+ years. The whole Feinstein case should have resulted in criminal charges for elder abuse and impeachment for the officials involved in covering up her state. More importantly going forward the Clinbamas need to be given their marching orders. If you look at the early days of the Kamala Harris & Tim Walz campaign it said more than anything else "CHANGE." This is the change form the old guard to the next generation. THEN the Clinbamas stepped in and hijacked the campaign doing things like bringing the Cheneys onboard AND THAT SCREAMED LOUD AND CLEAR - there will be no change, we're still in charge and it will be "More of the Same." They all forgot that Hilary lost in 2016 with "More of the Same" as her campaign theme. This is the real appeal of Trump to his voters. Even though the hard core of them are deranged many of them are just fed up with "Status Quo" economics. They are so tired of getting nothing and having no hope of change that they will vote for the Orange Gorilla and his wrecking ball. The real question is: What comes after Trump tears the system apart?
    1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1