Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Secular Talk" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3.  @meowy4720  You're touching on a very touchy subject but its a subject that needs discussing and some have tried in the past and some of those people were WOMEN. Sorry for the long reply but I think you'll find this interesting. Years ago I came across 2 articles 1 is about a book written by a woman and the other was a news paper article written by a woman. Circa 2010 I read this odd book review in the Sunday paper in Perth Western Australia. I've tried to find it with no luck. It was about a book written by an American Psychologist. SHE had so many female patients with the same issues she wrote a book about it. They were all well educated, career orientated, successful types BUT with a description like the female version of an incel. She said the main problem was they judged men from the glass half empty view. It wasn't about what any man was or had or did. Their judgement was based on what they weren't. They all had these insane lists of things a man HAD TO BE and if just 1 thing was missing they were rejected. This psychologist said these women were all demanding a man that has never existed. They were all miserable and frustrated and complained about why their demands weren't being met. But that was one of the main tenements of feminism - be demanding. I'm sorry I can't tell you the book title or author. One day I really have to track it down. Circa 2005-06 Australian journalist Virginia Haussegger wrote an article titled "The sins of our feminist mothers." Its easy to find via google. She still has it as a pdf on her own website. BE WARNED that article caused a nuclear level shitstorm when it was published. Even years later you need to be careful who you wave that article at because it can be like throwing rocket fuel at a blazing fire.
    4
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 4
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. As an Australian who's just watched Sagaar Enjeti completely botch this story and Kyle make a bad mistake (at one point) THANK YOU for getting the distinction right Kyle makes a pretty bad mistake at 6:15 when he says Sky News doesn't have the connections. They are part of the Murdoch Empire and they certainly have the connections. For anyone interested I go over all the things Sagaar got wrong on that page in the top (pinned) comment. What he and Sagaar both screwed up is that Alan Jones was forced by Sky Management to correct himself on air. That's the first time I have ever seen Alan jones apologize for anything. For the Americans Alan Jones is our equivalent of Sean Hannity and he NEVER APOLOGIZES. The other thing they both missed was that one of the others banned by both Twitter and YouTube is a sitting member of our Parliament Craig Kelly. He's the equivalent of a Congressman in the House. He's a far far far right winger who has been in trouble several times over recent years for climate change denial and other conspiracies. He'd be right at home as Australia's US Ambassador if Trump wins in 2024. For anyone else watching we have a program called Media Watch. Its on Australian ABC our equivalent of PBS so don't be confused by the ABC it has nothing to do with the American ABC. Here's their report on this starting at 3:21 -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnPgDf8RFR0 This is the original story presented 2 weeks ago starting at 3:29 -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df1Fnw2M6f4
    4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. ​ @pipz420  I'm Australian but went to college in America. So I know American politics and issues reasonably well. PLUS since America is our most important trading and security partner there's a real interest in having America FUNCTION properly which it simply isn't. You are 100% right on medical costs and student debt. We've managed to control out medical costs but are blowing the student debt issue almost as bad if not worse than America. But those a longer stories to explain. You are 100% right on foreign policy America needs to stop funding wars. It also needs to stop funding psychotic maniacs because its convenient. That's also a long story. You are 100% right the Military Industrial Complex needs to be reigned in and this is a major issue in Australia because we are drinking the Pentagon Kool Aid by the bucket right now. AUKUS is just 1 part of a much larger issue both our countries face. FYI - I'm an aerospace engineer (U. of Illinois) and the problem isn't the stuff our governments buy whether its military hardware, infrastructure or other stuff ITS THE COST. As a profession engineering has been hijacked by a collection of economists and lawyers and charlatans who have become incredibly adept as rorting projects in both the Government and Private Sectors. That's a really long discussion and I hope to be on an economics podcast shortly to explain it. So you are right on the problems BUT Sadly I don't think RFK is going to be able to solve any of them. He's already tied himself to big tech with his VP candidate and Big Tech is as much of a problem as anything else on the planet. But then Biden and Trump can't do the job either. America needs a generational change away from where it is AND SO YOU KNOW so does Australia and many other countries.
    4
  29. 4
  30. 4
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. It gets way, way, way...... way worse than that. Here's 3 points I have made several times in recent months. POINT 1: Only 3 times in the last 4,500 years has anyone successfully invaded Persia (Iran) - Alexander the Great, Mohamed and Genghis Khan. Without doubt its one of the greatest homefield advantages on the planet. POINT 2: Go and look at the basic geography of Modern Iran. In the North East Mountains and borders with Iraq, Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan. In the North The Caspian Sea with direct link to Russia. In the North East Mountains and borders to Turkmenistan and Afghanistan. SOUTH OF THAT is desert, desert and more desert and that's the only place that an invading force large enough to subdue 88 million people could land and set up a base of operations. POINT 3: The population of Iraq was 25 million when America FAILED. The population of Iran is 88.5 million more than 3 times the population of Iraq when America invaded. There were experts (including Eric Shinseki) who told congress they'd need a force of 400,000 or so to SECURE (as in subdue) the Iraqi nation and its people. That was ignored and look what happened. Based on Shinseki's estimate (who was an expert) you'd need a force of at least 1 million to land and then subdue those 88.5 million Iranians. How many jets and ships would it take to move 1 million soldiers and support staff? How would you feed those 1 million soldiers and support staff? How would you provide fuel for all the Jets, Tanks, Trucks, Gensets and everything else you'd need? Just the basic logistics makes invading Iran almost impossible and that should be obvious to anyone.
    4
  45. I'm an aerospace engineer who's spent 30+ years in industrial control systems and automation. Over that time I gained formal qualifications in safety engineering including the second highest any engineer can get for what we call Functional Safety. I can tell you for a fact those qualifications have NEVER GOT ME WORK (contract or permanent). Pointing out that I was qualified got me into trouble on numerous occasions and even licked off projects or off site. The simple fact is that when you are QUALIFIED in safety engineering you do get sacked and there is no support or mercy coming from anywhere. This is how this stuff happens and things like the Boeing Max-8. In Australia where I am there are a couple of rare areas where formal qualifications are required by law. Most notably in structural engineering. I actually went to the Institute of Engineers in Australia to try and get them to lobby for rules requiring QUALIFIED people to approve of high risk installations. They and the other professional organisations were simply NOT INTERESTED. We have never needed more engineers across the developed world. Due to the neoliberal economics massive amounts of infrastructure everywhere is either so old it needs replacing or its so badly maintained by cost cutting it needs replacing AND YET I can't think of a worse profession to be in right now. Engineering degrees are NOT Easy there's a lot of math because engineering is fundamentally a profession of applied math. Structures, thermodynamics, aerodynamics,... is all applied math. WORSE our careers and job paths are dominated by Human Resource clowns. I have ACTUALLY DEALT with so called professional recruiters who could not tell the difference between an electrician and an electrical engineer or a mechanic and a mechanical engineer or a chemist and a chemical engineer. I have heard things from from other professions but can't really comment, but I can assure the entire Human Resources industry has been a disaster for STEM fields.
    4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. I'm Australian and before that shit he pulled at the UN he had a decent reputation from the first gulf war. Maybe not perfect, but Gulf War 1 was over and done in a month and then everyone was out. Instead of it becoming Vietnam 2.0 the US and its allies were out. Saddam had is ass kicked, Kuwait was back in the hands of Kuwait and no one was bogged down in some endless disaster. So by about 2003 EVERYBODY WANTED TO KNOW how Gulf War 2 had become the disaster it was. Everyone wanted to know how the same people who did Gulf War 1 screwed up so badly with Gulf War 2. America's own PBS delivered and in 2004 gave the world the documentary "Rumsfeld's War." I first saw it in Australia in either 2005 or 2006 when it was televised on free to air by SBS Australian one of our 2 public broadcasters. Here it is on YT -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPEWIDBrKyM So yeah a lot of people KNOW and have KNOWN for around 16 years, (I have known for at least 14years) that: - Powell LIED to the UN and knew he was lying. - Powell told Bush in a private dinner NOT to go into Iraq and that Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and others were wrong. - Powell, Shinseki and others were shut out of the planning by Wolfowitz on Rumsfeld's direction. Before any of you tell me (an Australian) to F--K off let me tell you something. The Australian Prime Minister at the time John Howard is/was a lawyer, which means he knew the basics of International Law and that its a crime to invade a country that has NOT committed an act or acts of war against you or your allies. The invasion of Afghanistan was legal as the Taliban Government by supporting Osama Bin Laden had attacked Australia's ally on 9/11. But Iraq was NOT legal and our PM knew it wasn't legal and we helped destroy that country and and played our part in the deaths over over 100,000 innocent civilians including the 14 killed at Nisour Square by the Blackwater 4 that Trump just pardoned. So before we all go condemning Colin Powell for his part in the Iraq clusterf--k, just know that a lot of other people were involved and very few have ever been held accountable.
    4
  49. 4
  50. 4