Comments by "Andrina Websdale" (@andrina118) on "The Young Turks" channel.

  1. OK nut-nut
    2
  2. Hitting people is wrong and criminal period.
    2
  3. Liar Liar pants on fire
    2
  4. How do YOU know? People say "dead match" when it has been used. It is not hyperbole just English
    2
  5.  @zerog33k  We have suffered from conservative rule for 12 years. they are treating the poor as you would expect them to. It was all fine under Blairs era. I am 60 so I well remember the history from the 70s until now.
    2
  6. Suzanne Moore in The Telegraph. An extremely right-wing paper. She was told to write a good review. She is a feminist and no way does she like Peterson
    2
  7.  @darthbrandon2149  Dunning Kruger :) People seem to have forgotten that they can always register their own website for a pittance. That's the REAL freedom of the internet. But oh noes! they've been cancelled, deplatformed! Surely if they were so marketable the world would beat a path to their door?
    2
  8.  @darthbrandon2149  Yes 100% agree man
    2
  9. Adrienne Your headscarf is fabulously flawless!
    2
  10. You are an under-educated fool who knows nothing of UK politics. What would you have done of the corbynites won in in the '10s? would your head have exploded?
    2
  11. Golf is a good walk...spoiled - PG Wodehouse
    2
  12. He is a dog's dirty anus
    2
  13. 8 billion is enough
    2
  14. You are incorrect Ana
    2
  15.  @whodatking26  No, birthing people can be any gender, but have to have a functioning female reproductive system. OBVIOUSLY You can have whatever opinions you want and so can I What's your point? That you can't spell ?
    2
  16. Absent religion, marriage is merely a legal contract. Religion should be a private matter, period
    2
  17. NO KIDS HAVE BEEN MUTILATED unless they were abused by some sicko, who "just happens to be a far right bozo"
    2
  18.  @texasbama5729  Proof, like post a link to e.g. a news article or serious academic paper. The sort of things that any reasonable person would think was contributing some validity to your wild claims
    2
  19. The "real deep state" in other words. Crypto-fascist sleeper agents who burrow throughout the body politic like woodworm in an old dresser.
    2
  20. Satire I presume
    2
  21. On paper plates with mechanically reclaimed mystery meat
    2
  22.  @josephmaring  You were complaining about TYT getting the party's name wrong - then you ALSO get their name wrong lol
    2
  23. Yeah and what use are women except as baby-making machines amirite?
    2
  24. Obama is a class act, but far too right wing for my taste. A shame his words and actions didn't always match
    2
  25. He is for HIS people. CEOs, Big Oil etcetc
    2
  26.  @Zeretul90  Yes sorry I was referring to marriage. No fault divorce is a reflection of normal human behaviour. I'm just chipping in my 2p I'm sure that in many "no-fault" divorces, one partner IS at fault and it is easier on that partner to just call it quits rather than going to court and having their flaws paraded in public and STILL getting divorced for a lot more money. Lawyers must love the idea.
    2
  27. He fancies Kamala. Loves a strong woman
    2
  28. Pics or it didn't happen You are incompetent at trolling. OK boomer
    2
  29.  @dumpster_fiyah  I'm in the UK & even I understand what happened with Nixon's "Southern Strategy"
    2
  30.  @Mandalorebat007  I so want to see him do the walk of shame in an orange jumpsuit (or anything that humiliates him really)
    2
  31. they are sooo right. WOKE is a sub for their fave slur :)
    2
  32. You are sadly misinformed
    2
  33. And you have clicked "Don't recommend this channel" ? Do it EVERY TIME it appears. If it keeps recommending TYT you should complain to YouTube If you keep commenting on their videos that may well cause it to come up again. If you don't want it, don't comment
    2
  34. He is drooling for a fat wiener
    2
  35. They're smiling at how bad it is. How do you impersonate a clown? Either you are a clown or you aren't
    2
  36. I completely agree.Maybe Israel should have sorted things out when Arafat was there. People who call others "human animals" have lost whatever their argument is. Collective punishment and killing kids is against international law
    2
  37. O rly? What mechanism is that then?  You clearly have little idea of what opiate addiction is like.
    1
  38. Its not toxic though like most drugs. If you smoke heavily you'll get a rebound effect if you don't have any,maybe be a bit bad-tempered, but I'd say its nothing compared to alcohol or tobacco, which are legal.
    1
  39. KushPlants  They should seek medical help. I had a friend who did that. He had cancer it turned out. I've known many many people who smoke huge amounts & none of them ever vomited in the mornings. You sure your friends don't do any other drugs?
    1
  40. KushPlants How much were you smoking when you had the symptoms? It just sounds to me like there's another factor involved e.g swallowing a lot of smoke, just smoking silly amounts( in the sense that if you drank 5 gallons of strong coffee every day you wouldn't expect to feel too good) or some kind of hyper-sensitivity to cannabinoids. There are always edge cases.
    1
  41. thank*reason The "rock bottom" idea is a term associated with alcoholism not weed. No-one has died of weed because it has no LD50. Smoking is obviously harmful to some degree no matter what plant you're burning.
    1
  42. mattlaureys I meant there must be another factor involved in people vomiting every morning who smoke heavily. What you are talking about is a rebound effect. Its blindingly obvious if you do the same drug a lot for a long time there's going to be a rebound. That's just not the same as actual physical changes that result in it becoming very hard to abstain, eg like alcohol, benzos, opiates etc, you know symptoms like fitting, finding it impossible to function, DTs and so on.
    1
  43. KushPlants I'm intrigued - how much were you smoking approx? 
    1
  44. ***** "There is no God" is the null hypothesis - it does not require belief.
    1
  45. ***** Did you not read my comment even though you quoted it? Why not look up "null hypothesis".www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/science/item/what_is_a_null_hypothesis/ In the absence of any evidence at all for God the null hypothesis in this case is that "There is no God" - evidence for the alternative hypothesis(your belief that there is a "God") must be observed  If you want to descend into the realm of the mystical, your slain gods (Jesus et al) belong to the previous epoch, the age of Pisces, & now we have entered the famed age of Aquarius home.earthlink.net/~gnosisla/February5.html So all previous bets on slain gods are off :-)
    1
  46. ***** I see, so you're agnostic then, i.e you have not experienced or received gnosis
    1
  47. They're all cunts though so they have that in common
    1
  48. I fear those rules may be long gone
    1
  49. ***** Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! Heresy by thought has often been considered a crime by the Catholic church in the past.
    1
  50. hemn soll You
    1