Comments by "" (@tgear77) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1. Wrong. Police officers will do their jobs. And if someone like CSATexan uses his AR after a ban, then he is no longer a lawful gun owner.
    1
  2. "So why would you target Mengele for killing children...". That is what you posted moron. You need to read what you write.
    1
  3. Hurts to be proven wrong, doesn't it, moron? Rudy can't stand it that his figures are wrong so his response is to call me a liar. I guess that means that the FBI is lying as well.
    1
  4. Hey, moron, you were the one who stated that my posts were filled with more grammatical errors than yours. It's amazing that once I started pointing out how you mangle the English language each time you post, you can't back up your claims. Once again, your defense of your usage of the word 'dribble' falls flat. If you were using the verb form 'throwing up' as akin to 'tossing out' then 'dribble' would not fit as well. One can not 'throw up' a slow flow of saliva. You are just too stupid.
    1
  5. Except that I knew what happened at Wounded Knee. Smarter than you all around. As for Hitler, my two choices are to kill him before he takes on the world or take him as an infant and give him to a childless couple in California. Never would have talked him out of his delusions of grandeur as an adult.
    1
  6. I live in the Northeast and not in a metropolitan area, so the odds are in my favor, moron. If I lived in the South, where the worst odds are of having a home break-in by a white male, then I would have to start locking my doors. The rarity of having someone enter the house while my family is home is not worth putting my children at risk. You might want to enter reality sometime, asswipe.
    1
  7. Then you obviously do not have small children. Or if you do, you don't care about them. As for Lanza, he was nuts. There could have been a SWAT team at the door and he still might have tried to shoot up the school.
    1
  8. The school has posted armed security for decades and is the preferred school for the political elite in D.C. The guards are there to provide protection from terroristic threats and possible abduction. As for the Secret Service protection, that goes to all children of Presidents. Pull your head out of your ass.
    1
  9. Since the police are not part of the Federal Government, they can not have a Constitutional obligation to protect the populace. What they do have is a legal obligation to do so under the contract they sign to take the job. The ignorance just flows from your mouth like dribble.
    1
  10. Your choice. Took a pellet from a shotgun in the calf years ago. Luckily I was at the edge of the spread pattern. Trip to the ER and seven stitches but it was like the worse bee sting ever times 100. Took 3 rounds to the vest from a .32 once. Was like being hit by a Cadillac. Depending on the distance, I'll take the shotgun.
    1
  11. You do not know that. Lanza did his damage by spraying the rooms with bullets. All of the children were hit multiple times, some as many as 11 times. That is not shooting, that is just opening fire. After shooting the principal and the school psychologist, Lanza would have had to reload. Who knows how many children could have escaped while he fumbled with his clips? Who knows if he could have been tackled at that point? You are such an idiot.
    1
  12. "You're a child" LOL! This from a man whose only defense has been "Liar, liar, pants on fire" for the past several days. I am glad that you are running away with your tail between your legs now, crying in shame.
    1
  13. Yes, it has. Sorry if you can not accept reality.
    1
  14. Bullshit. For all you know, Myrick would have been the first one shot. Had the 16-year old walked into the school with a Bushmaster, many more would have been killed and Myrick would probably have been found hiding in his office. You tried to pass it off as if Myrick took down the shooter when that was not the case, moron.
    1
  15. No, I was never a police officer. If I was, I would have to be afraid of you killing me because you have already expressed on this thread how much you want to kill cops.
    1
  16. The extended mags will get passed because that is what GOPers are hinting at and there is no argument to be made for them. The ARs will as well because people can make the argument that we did it before and no one came to take all your guns.
    1
  17. Let's take you at your word and assume that you never will purchase an assault rifle. That's wonderful. But the shooter's mother bought a Bushmaster legally and look how that turned out. Taking those types of weapons off the shelves and off the streets does not deprive you of anything. So what are you complaining about?
    1
  18. It is the same as owning a gun except for the fact that driving is a necessity to most and guns are an indulgence. You must have a license for both. If you violate the laws, you can use your right to operate either. Yet we have to pay insurance in order to drive as a precaution against whatever damage you might do. Nothing like that for guns.
    1
  19. More bullshit from you. There was slightly over 1.5 million burglaries in the US in 2010 (that is what we are talking about here. A robbery is something different as defined by the FBI). Of those, less than 10% have occurred with people in the home. So you were only off by 850,000. Pull your head out of your ass, moron
    1
  20. You do not know that the entire force was crooked. My way saves everyone. Yours is just a fantasy where you get to kill cops.
    1
  21. Personally, I don't believe that there is a huge difference between them all. Were it left up to me, all rifles would be single load bolt action and civilians would only be allowed to own revolvers. But the issue on the table is Assault rifles like that used by Lanza in Newton. He simply sprayed two classrooms with bullets. Every child killed was hit multiple times, two were hit with 11 bullets each. I have a 6 yr old daughter. I look at her and imagine what 11 rounds would do to her at...
    1
  22. Yes, sadly it does. Since the Democrats are the party that tries to protect people.
    1
  23. It is not illegal to say anything against the President. You can speak out against him 24/7. What you can not do is make blatant threats against his life.
    1
  24. If my mom was 70 and you were claiming I was 56, that would mean that my mom gave birth to me at the age of 14. Maybe that is how things are done in your family, but not in mine. That is how your math is fucked up. Any racist comments can be reported to YT as harrassment. Stop dancing around the facts and admit to the truth: there was no such comment and you are a liar.
    1
  25. If I can travel in time, I take out Hitler in 1932. World War II as we know it never happens. I am not avoiding anything, You are making up fantasies. I can tear apart how stupid they are at any time.
    1
  26. The GOP is a mess. They can't even agree with their own members. They are disliked across the board by the general public. Texas will be a Democratic State by the end of this decade as will Arizona and New Mexico. They continue to alienate Americans all across the demographic spectrum. The fact that Bobby Jindal is of Indian descent is a happy accident for them but it won't win them any votes. Turning off women and Latinos at the rate they are going will kill the Party.
    1
  27. So now you claim that the FBI just makes shit up?
    1
  28. No, I don't. But I don't want anyone and everyone being able to deny others their rights just because they feel uncomfortable around that person. Gotcha!
    1
  29. That is what I said. There was always security at airports (the larger ones such as O'Hare or LAX having their own police departments). But since 9/11, that has grown. I never said that airports did not have security.
    1
  30. No, I only saved the family. You just like to kill cops.
    1
  31. I know all about Mengele, far more than you. Given the choice between killing him or killing Hitler, I would kill Hitler. But it would be a narrow call. You only referred to Mengele killing children. Stop trying to backtrack now.
    1
  32. Did your parents have any children who actually made it past the third grade?
    1
  33. Still waiting for you to present a reasonable argument as to why such weapons should not be banned.
    1
  34. With a slug. Yes, With flechettes and sabot, yes. Buckshot, not necessarily. If the gun was fired right next to the wall, yes, there is forceful penetration. From across a living room and through a thick wall, once the shot came out the other side, it would be no worse than BBs.
    1
  35. No, you did not. That is just another on the ever-growing list of words that you do not understand and can not use correctly. I have already won the gun debate with you and now am just kicking your ass on everything else. All you can do now is hurl gay insults at me, as if that matters to me at all. Loser.
    1
  36. I go back in time and I am on a bridge and I see the police pull up and call for the people to 'Freeze!" And when things turn ugly I am supposed to know immediately that these people are innocent? Exactly how does that work? How do I know that the police are not just doing their job and this family is not a band of roving serial killers? Give it up.
    1
  37. "Every time you posted...made you ignorant" .. Is English your second language? As for the AKs, you were the one who said that they were the most reliable weapon and were given to gangbangers by drug lords and were all over Chicagoand you knew this because you watched rap videos. I deflated all of your claims. When you couldn't prove that they were all over Chicago, you backed up the goalposts to say that they were all over the world. You are the fool here, shithead.
    1
  38. Wrong. Mental health issues have nothing to do with what you have listed. The reason we have so many is the size of our nation and the availability of the diagnoses. I am sure that India and China have more such cases, but they will never be defined as such due to lack of treatment.
    1
  39. You are talking cities, I was talking states. I am just dealing with the facts. As for Alaskan suicides, is that not a gun-related death? I also enjoy how you demonstrate your ignorance by not understand what the word 'rate' means in this matter. Stop being a moronic asswipe.
    1
  40. Funny, these video games are available worldwide and yet we don't see other countries having the outbreaks of mass murder that we do. Japan has a far more invasive video game culture yet these episodes do not take place there. Even Switzerland which allows all adults to own a gun, even insists upon it during their mandatory military service, has a thriving video game culture yet none of the attacks that we have. LaPierre is talking out of his ass and so are you by repeating it.
    1
  41. I used to be one of them, moron. With a little time on the range, I would outshoot you any day of the week and twice on Sundays. It still doesn't change the fact that this fantasy of yours of illegal AR factories sprouting up after a ban is nothing but pure bullshit.
    1
  42. We pass laws against potential dangers all the time. We pass laws to keep companies from dumping waste chemicals into waterways. We pass laws to keep explosive materials from being sold to just anyone. Keeping dangerous weapons with no useful purpose is no different. Again, you have no defense against banning such weapons.
    1
  43. So we could put you on the list until a hearing and you wouldn't think that was wrong?
    1
  44. No it is not. If ARs are banned and you break the law by using one, the confiscation of said weapon and your arrest would be legal and Constitutional. You would have due process when you appeared before the judge. Again, your ignorance is glaring. Yes, but your little game about the shooting is nothing but a fantasy.
    1
  45. Not since the '80s.
    1
  46. Yes, a wrench can be dangerous if used improperly. A car can be dangerous if driven drunk. But that is not what either is designed for. A gun is designed to damage and kill. It can be argued that some have other purposes such as hunting rifles. But there is no such argument that can be made for as Assault Rifle. If you were truly one of the "good guys" you would want them gone.
    1
  47. Oh, so we don't want him to be treated to see if he may have a problem, we just want to strip his 2nd Amendment rights away. You were the one who said "temp entry". Where on earth does that translate to be put on the No Guns list? Temp entry sounds as if it means entry into a mental health facility. You fucked it up.
    1
  48. Are you really this stupid, or are you joking? By your own logic, technology has not made the world 600 times safer, but it has made it 600 times more dangerous. Now a nutcase like Lanza can step into a classroom and kill every child without re-loading. People like you are an insult to law-abiding gun owners everywhere.
    1
  49. If you say so. Remember, shithead, it is you that came up with this scenario. It isn't my fault that I play the game better than you.
    1
  50. Once again, shit-for-brains, repeating your pathetic little insults does not make them true. I have defeated you on every point and you can not stand it. So your only rebuttal is immature cheap shots. Run away now, moron. You are only embarrassing yourself.
    1