Comments by "User 2C47" (@user2C47) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1. Probably game files or a timer.
    1
  2. i could edit the .cfg file, changing the category from "none" to "utility" and the parts appeared on the list, but did not work, it was a result of using a 1.2 mod on 1.0.5, and it worked perfectly on 1.2.1
    1
  3. No.
    1
  4. Probably game files or a clock. He said it was world domination plans.
    1
  5. That doesn't seem like a very good investment.
    1
  6. could this be similar to warp .1?
    1
  7. Or just fire the energy. With today's technology, the weapon would have to run off the ship's power through a capacitor array.
    1
  8. I'd worry a lot more about making sure all the science instruments are covered up.
    1
  9.  @nikmcintosh1275  Aren't those two rockets reserved for when a structure on the far side of the moon starts broadcasting an extremely powerful signal using neutrinos?
    1
  10. Didn't he also say this about SN8? And that managed to do everything perfectly except the landing burn.
    1
  11. "Things KSP doesn't teach you: Fuel Tank Pressurization"
    1
  12. "The Kraken." This is a joke, as "Kraken" is often used to refer to KSP physics glitches.
    1
  13. Probably the 14th option.
    1
  14. Not a chance.
    1
  15. And falling from orbit.
    1
  16. You think they plan on sneaking a nuclear weapon onto the ISS?
    1
  17. What about Piper Kerman, or Magte Kerman?
    1
  18. Could be another satellite in a similar orbit, potentially even another Starlink satellite.
    1
  19. Use the dogfight competition button in the BDA configuration window.
    1
  20. ​​ @HlormarCloudcleaver If the Shuttle was all CG, then why am I able to go to the James S. McDonnell Space Hangar and look at it with my own eyes? What incentive would they have had to waste many billions of dollars building fake flight hardware, launching giant rockets to nowhere, and making up data? If the hoax is made by the government, why is SpaceX a thing? If space wasn't real, would their Falcon 1s have not all crashed into the sky or whatever? The last thing to consider is that CG back then sucked. How is someone going to make convincing, faultless video of spaceflight on machines that would have struggled greatly to make the original Toy Story?
    1
  21.  @burp2019  Yes, but very large and very slow. Minecraft uses 1m tiles, and the refresh rate of redstone is limited to 20Hz. I was able to come up with 4 solutions: Option 1: RedPower (or another mod with 1x1 logic gates), a tiny blocks mod, and a mod that increases the tick speed. Option 2: Emulate the AGC using RedPower's 6502-based computer. Option 3: Perform the AGC's functions using command blocks. option 4: Best Option Write an Apollo mod.
    1
  22. They would also rediscover memes.
    1
  23. My preferred method would be to just have a few retired Starships on standby. It costs next to nothing and we can hurl one at the target on very short notice.
    1
  24. Little more than a dented fin.
    1
  25.  @Mr2winners  Some flat earthers so they can disobey the instructions and get their heads torn off and burned by the atmosphere.
    1
  26. The gaps are wide enough that it shouldn't really matter.
    1
  27. ​ @zyeborm Agreed. If things have gone so horribly wrong that the automated controls don't work, there's not the slightest chance a manual system is going to.
    1
  28. While satellites are generally designed to last a long time, it is inevitable that they will break or run out of propellant.
    1
  29. It should add better loading routines for those with slow hard drives.
    1
  30. The plasma would stream into your face, causing instant death by heat and drag. This does not mean that orbital skydiving won't happen (illegally) in the future when one can get to orbit cheaply in what is essentially a Space Cessna.
    1
  31. The answer is zero. No seat, no suit, no ride. Cosmonauts that have been in space for months likely can't handle more than 0.6 G outside of their seat or a stretcher without dying. Sitting on the floor of a hot, bumpy spacecraft at multiple G with no seatbelt is going to result in a cosmonaut that is broken, broiled, and very much dead. But taking this risk may still be preferable over certain vacuum exposure.
    1
  32.  @anthonypelchat  Flat Earth talking points: - The government (rather than corporations) wants to spy on us and keep us in the dark. - All orbital views are CG. - Any object, such as a piece of debris, seen flying by in an orbital view is a UFO or an "obb," despite the orbital view supposedly being CG. - All rockets are suborbital and designed to be a distraction. - Chemtrails. - Those who question these theories are sheep or members of The Party.
    1
  33. Another reason not to mess with a part from an exploded rocket is that it's probably hot.
    1
  34. ERROR: missing "sarcasm" tag
    1
  35. Can we get one of these dishes pointed at SN11?
    1
  36.  @shieldmate7444  Mine is only ~8Hz.
    1
  37. Clearly someone hasn't discovered the probe core yet.
    1
  38. Space exploration space suits.
    1
  39. We also need suits that work more like springs than balloons, as the latter is very vulnerable to leaks.
    1
  40. No. Many engines use a 2 axis gimbal.
    1
  41. How would this be performed? Would this giant fairing hinge open somehow?
    1
  42. And heat. Exploding parts tend to get hot.
    1
  43. Debris is from the pad and not the vehicle, and thus is out of scope.
    1
  44. Did you make a video about why we don't use single stage spaceplanes?
    1