Comments by "American Plague" (@American-Plague) on "Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell" channel.

  1.  @max_kl  "...[in the meantime] we could just use renewables...". Yes. And batteries which cause even more harm. The sun isn't always out. The wind doesn't always blow. Tides fluctuate. Rivers freeze. Etc., etc. Which 100% guaranteed, 365 days per year, reliable, renewable resource (one that doesn't require batteries) do you know of? You deserve a Nobel if you've figured that one out. Why don't you have one?
    1
  2.  @max_kl  But batteries aren't currently totally recyclable. They cause serious harm because of mining needed to produce them. A simple Google search would show you this.
    1
  3.  @max_kl  They are not 100% recyclable. You should probably read that article instead of talking out your ass. You do not recover all of the rare minerals. Mining is still needed.
    1
  4.  @max_kl  Which article? The one I sent you. There's the problem: you already have all the answers and refuse to listen to what professionals are saying.
    1
  5. I can tell from most of the comments here that almost every whiny millennial here is from America or at the very least a developed country by key words you're using. Maybe if what everybody has done to you is so terrible and you've been handed nothing more than a huge pile of shit you should find somewhere else to live. I'm sure there are a lot nicer places to live.
    1
  6. The only reason anti-vaxxers have ANY argument like "MY kids (or I, the speaker) weren't vaccinated and they are fine!" is exactly because of vaccinations. Because everyone ELSE (the majority of people) has been vaccinated and therefore don't carry whatever disease it may be. If NOBODY got vaccinated and things were like they were a few hundred years ago I bet their ass would be getting to a doctor very quickly.
    1
  7. 3:53 was quite disturbing....
    1
  8. I would think the answer would either be no or it would be self correcting because if you started losing consciousness you would no longer be able to provide readily available food, thus bringing back the need for consciousness in order to find food.
    1
  9. I'm sorry....did you just say your father treated you with HIV? Am I missing something here?
    1
  10.  @Miguel92398  Dextrose cures measles? (No sarcasm intended. Serious question here)
    1
  11.  @eisigerwurfel7164  No...you are lying. Don't lie. God or Allah or whatever you want to call him/her/it didn't "send down" any book. Even if Islam was for SURE the correct religion out of all religions, it's well known that the Quran was actually WRITTEN by Muhammed and/or other scribes. The only time that I know of where anything was supposedly actually written by God's own hand was the original 10 commandments...which Moses immediately threw down and broke.
    1
  12.  @eisigerwurfel7164  What a stupid argument. That's some circular reasoning if I've ever heard it. "Allah can't lie because it says so in the book and Allah wrote the book therefore it must be true." Also I never claimed to be a professor in Islam and that's why I wrote "Muhammad AND/OR other scribes". Before it was written it was orally passed down. I DO know that. You think no mistakes could've been made over that time? Plus, you're finding faults in another obviously faulty book that I also don't believe in to prove your faulty book to me. You're just brilliant aren't you?
    1
  13.  @eisigerwurfel7164  And I don't care what Allah said. I'm talking about WHO ACTUALLY WROTE IT. Allah did not. So once again as I stated: the only thing I've ever read that was actually written by the hand of God was the original 10 commandments..which Moses immediately broke.
    1
  14.  @eisigerwurfel7164  Ahem...you are either lying too or you don't know what you're talking about. Allah never wrote anything. Where did you get this information?
    1
  15. Loved the spinning door in the twilight zone! 😂
    1
  16. Right....
    1
  17.  Gary Owens  Yeah....milk chocolate tastes better though..except the chocolate syrup. Dark chocolate tastes better there.
    1
  18. ​ @zenmkultra I DO get to explain them parasite. PTSD has a very clear definition. Whining and looking for an excuse to complain and do nothing to contribute to society does not fall under PTSD.
    1
  19. ​ @catwithshades7577 Of course he/ she does. There's no question about it. They are very obviously a woke af loser who will never amount to anything because it's too much work. Much easier to believe the nonsense that lets them off the hook for any responsibility for anything whatsoever in their life.
    1
  20. ​ @zenmkultra Hey, I hear Ghana is looking for you. They have invited ALL blcks in the Western World to return to Africa where you don't have to live under this terrible oppression of Whites anymore. I wonder why people like you don't want to take them up on their generous offer? It's weird: Whites are the cause of EACH and EVERY ONE of your problems in life but at the same time, you want to live as close to Whites as possible. Why is that?
    1
  21.  @catwithshades7577  Every word I said is 100% accurate. Go fuq yourself.
    1
  22.  @Miquelalalaa  AGREED!
    1
  23.  @thevideogamearchive.  Who sprays stuff in the sky? Airplanes or Looney toons conspiracy theorists? Airplanes don't SPRAY anything. It's called contrails and is made by condensation building on the wings. You can watch this happen for yourself if you ever go on a plane and get a wing seat. Conspiracy theorists on the other hand (if that's what you meant) spray VINEGAR into the sky with a spray bottle, pointing it towards the "chemtrails". Somehow, from miles away, this vinegar dissipates the "chemtrails" and stops the heavy metals from controlling your mind.
    1
  24.  @thevideogamearchive.  I'm telling you though that it's a well-known fact that they aren't SPRAYING anything. Who knows? I know. Along with billions of other people. Again: you can watch it happen for yourself when you're on an airplane. There are no spray nozzles or anything. It comes directly off of the wing. And I'm telling you what causes it: condensation of water. I've seen it too. It's not a SPRAY.
    1
  25.  @thevideogamearchive.  Because it depends on the atmospheric conditions. I'm not a meteorologist so I can't tell you EXACTLY why but I'm guessing the drier the air is, the more quickly they dissipate, while the more humid the air is, the longer they hang around and expand. Just like how steam from a pot of boiling water expands. It doesn't just stay in a column of steam the same size as the pot as it leaves the pot. For the last time: IF YOU GO ON A PLANE, YOU CAN SEE THIS HAPPEN WITH YOUR OWN EYES. There's absolutely no questioning it. You can SEE it happen right in front of you. Or are you thinking I (and billions of others) may have been hallucinating when I saw this, NUMEROUS times?
    1
  26.  @misslonewolf04  r/whoosh
    1
  27.  @RubenKelevra  I thought it was 10,000 years but I could be wrong. Either way, it's a ridiculously long time. Solution: don't store it on Earth. Dump money into researching cheaper Space travel. Send the waste straight into the sun.
    1
  28.  @Shuizid  "We could probably store it for the duration...". Uh huh. So you've solved the problem scientists are having with writing a warning sign that can be read TENS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS from now (which I specifically mentioned)? Well let's hear about it....
    1
  29.  @Shuizid  "Though I do not know...". So you aren't a certified nuclear scientist? AMAZING! Maybe you shouldn't make condescending comments then when half of the problem lies in your basic English comprehension, nothing to say of your atomic knowledge.
    1
  30.  @Shuizid  "Do you have even the slightest idea how much it would cost...?". Do you have even the slightest idea how far technology has come through studying it and making better technology which is cheaper? Which is kind of my point about researching a way to make it cheaper. It's not a difficult concept to understand.
    1
  31.  @Shuizid  Yes, we may find technology to mage nuclear waste harmless. However, that's not in question here. What's in question is what to do with harmful nuclear waste.
    1
  32.  @Shuizid  "It could always be dug down...". You mean like what they already do? SURELY future archaeologists (which was already mentioned) wouldn't also dig down to see what's down there in order to solve a mystery/study history, like archaeologists do today, would they? I mean it's JUST a little yellow cake uranium. No need to worry about it TOO much. That'd just be silly and paranoid.
    1
  33.  @bobdobsin6216  I just sent you a link describing the problem from actual scientists' mouths. Perhaps read it? That's what people who are actually intelligent do: read up on all available information before making yourself look like a jackass in front of the entire world.
    1
  34.  @blitzer561kad6  I don't give a flying shit what percent it is. That's not the point being discussed here. LEARN COMPREHENSION. THAT goes to show how uneducated YOU are "at" [in] a basic, child-level education.
    1
  35.  @RubenKelevra  Show me your math on how you came to your exact figures: how do you know how much waste needs to be gotten rid of? Is this every year? Every day? Everything humans have used to date? How did you come up work these numbers? What exactly does "450 Falcon heavy rockets" mean? You sound REALLY intelligent and have been THOROUGHLY clear so obviously so I'd like to hear all about it.
    1
  36.  @RubenKelevra  "Putting 3.5 tons of highly radioactive waste in the atmosphere with one launch failure is unacceptable." How did you reach this exact number of 3.5 tons? How long did it take to create 3.5 tons? Is this global? What's mind boggling is someone of such a high IQ as yourself is stuck in a box thinking that the ONLY solution to get it out of the atmosphere is a rocket. Before your highly intelligent self condescendingly asks "How else would we get it off the ground?", again: MORE MONEY/STUDY SHOULD BE PUT INTO SPACE TRAVEL. If you're as intelligent as you THINK you are, you'd realize there are other viable options besides rockets to get things off the ground were enough time/money devoted to them.
    1
  37.  @RubenKelevra  "... just to send that off to Pluto." I can see you're HIGHLY intelligent with your condescending remarks but: you do realize the sun is closer than Pluto I hope?
    1
  38.  @blitzer561kad6  And again: I couldn't give 2 shits about "a nuclear physics" because that's not what's in question here.
    1
  39.  @blitzer561kad6  That's right. I don't care to research exactly how nuclear physics works as that's not what's at question here.
    1
  40. I mean seriously?! I can comment "FUCK YOU YOUTUBE, YOU CENSORING MOTHER FUCKERS", but I can't leave an adult comment without obscenities because their algorithm thinks I typed something "unwoke" (or whatever term you prefer)? Wtf...
    1
  41.  @blitzer561kad6  Sorry. I can't respond with the response I want because YouTube are some CENSORING MOTHER FUCKERS. (Weird that THAT'S ok, huh?)
    1
  42.  @blitzer561kad6  This was nothing like that. It's horse shit. I want a platform comparable to YouTerd where we can say what we want no matter how ridiculous it is (even though my comment wasn't). Fuck YouTerd. Maybe we are least agree on that. 😂
    1
  43. They said that this may be how dark matter is formed. IF dark matter is real and this IS what forms it, then no, we wouldn't have witnessed it yet as we don't yet know how to even see dark matter, much less, see it being formed. Even something as "common" as a super nova was VERY infrequently witnessed until very recently. Only once before the invention of telescopes so far as I know.
    1
  44. Of course not. It's all a government conspiracy! Vaccines are dangerous, chem trails, flat Earth, fluoride poisoning....all part of a government conspiracy. Well...not a GOVERNMENT conspiracy as all intelligent people agree these things are crazy....and things like flat Earth have been disproven for thousands of years...the end goal of these conspiracies has never come to fruition after thousands of years (when will it and what is the end goal?) But still.....these things ARE a part of a huge, thousands of years ongoing pointless conspiracy! Period! End of story! (When I say "period" and "end of story" that means it's written in stone and there is no arguing it)
    1
  45.  @dayalasingh5853  I was being sarcastic 😐. Unfortunately for us both there are people (quite a few of them too) who DO actually believe all this insanity.
    1
  46. Nobody ever said measles will kill you for certain. Just because YOU are ok doesn't mean everyone will be ok. It isn't like a common cold. It has a high mortality rate which increases with a decrease in living conditions. So it's easy to sit in a developed country and gloat about how useless/harmful vaccinations are.
    1
  47. HORSE SHIT 🐎💩! It's MUCH more plausible that some guy rolled up balls of clay and dust and "breathed air into their nostrils" and every species was created as is!
    1
  48.  @purplelemon3987  Oh I agree with that. It is a better explanation than monkeys suddenly turning into humans. You see...what you've done here is provided an incorrect definition/explanation of evolution and then claimed it makes no sense. There was nothing sudden about it. If it was sudden we'd call it REVOLUTION, not EVOLUTION. It was a millions of years long process.
    1
  49.  @purplelemon3987  Basically what you've done here is provided a classic example of what is called a STRAWMAN ARGUMENT.
    1
  50.  @purplelemon3987  And I take back what I said. I don't agree. I would think a monkey suddenly turning into a human is much more likely than a ball of dust or clay suddenly turning into a human....although both are absurd.
    1