Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. It also gears men towards discipline and productivity. It increases T levels and athletic endurance. Moreover, it helps young men maintain a more realistic perception of normal sexual relations and behavior. The instant gratification and normalized dehumanization in modern porn leads to measurable social ineptitude and bizarre sexuality. Also, it is a way of boycotting an industry that promotes all kinds of degenerate behavior and exploits young women, often ruining their chances of ever living a normal life.
    464
  2. Horrendous Spanish. He can barely communicate, I would wager.
    97
  3. It's rare to see a lefty who even understands the difference between equity and equality, but it's even more rare to see one who admits they do instead of lying and conflating them as a form of chicanery.
    65
  4. itshiho That's very nihilistic and selfish and that mentality is everything that's wrong with this society. Life isn't just about moving from one feel good experience to the next. It's about deferring your gratification sometimes and saving it for your posterity. If you want to be a degenerate, go ahead. But don't promote that behavior. Some of us actually have a purpose beyond pleasuring ourselves.
    60
  5. He's so full of shit. Postmodernists always try to twist things into a stew of incomprehensible nonsense to try to divert critics. But basically what he argued is that acknowledging a person's biology is the same as making a deterministic conclusion about that person's ability or potential based on their biology. The two are not the same. So by pretending that gender doesn't exist and is a social construct, it liberates people from what is societally or culturally expected of them based on their biology. But here's the thing. That doesn't mean that gender is actually a social construct. It means that he believes that mainstreaming that lie is worth it because it promotes what he considers positive social change. This is the whole point of postmodernism and why it is so despised. Postmodernists have admitted as much that social change is more important than the truth.
    57
  6. Also I guess the little midget is supposed to represent a Black person or something. Black people are not disabled FFS. Equity implies that they need additional help just to succeed. It's actually kind of racist. Soft bigotry of low expectations.
    40
  7.  @josephmeeks5657  She is probably partially indigenous, but being indigenous is not something into which you can just "enroll." Ancestry is a biological reality, which is why her whole take on genetics being irrelevant to tribal membership is ridiculous. The push to trivialize or deny the ancestral/ethnic criteria for indigeneity or membership of an ethnic group will eventually be the thing that makes indigenous and ethnic identity rootless and undefinable. Her position (that genetics are irrelevant to tribal membership) is probably a neurotic defense mechanism that is rooted in her discomfort with having her indigenous identity questioned or trivialized because she is half European. Your position is rooted in a false and unpragmatic sense of moral virtue.
    31
  8. @Doug Lucas: It isn't so much the frequency, but the instant gratification and exposure to unrealistic sexuality i.e. porn is not an accurate representation of normal sex. It also increases young men's tendency to subconsciously objectify girls. Guys that are old enough remember times before internet porn. It was not the same. If you're old enough to remember those times, you can't deny it.
    30
  9.  @mac_mcleod  No one turns people away for being women or being nonwhite, you cvck. They hire women and nonwhites even if they aren't as qualified or talented as their male and/or white peers. That is the whole point you fool.
    27
  10.  @jonm7888  Not in terms of economics. Equity means a doctor makes the same wage as the guy working a night shift at Jack in the Crack. You call that fairness? I call it authoritarianism and communism.
    25
  11. The Source and the Eschaton I don't worship anything. I don't moralize either, I simply denounce people who try to spread toxic viewpoints and behaviors. Think of it this way: someone who promotes something toxic and unhealthy like porn (or denies that it is toxic and unhealthy) is like a person who willfully promotes people smoking cigarettes or denies that cigarettes are unhealthy. Impulsive and detrimental habits should not be promoted. I don't really care if people want to ruin their own lives, but I don't tolerate people that try to drag others down with them. Does that make sense?
    22
  12. They do. It's called diversity hires. Welcome to 2020, where feelings matter more than reality.
    20
  13. Leftists deliberately overlook sociocultural trends as a possible reason for why there are more of these events occurring. This is because leftism is the prevalent sociocultural trend, so they refuse that their own ideology causes more mental illness. Their denial is causing a lot of death and pain.
    19
  14. Nobody seemed to give a fuck when Obama's administration was doing the same thing.
    15
  15. Just goes to show that "tolerance," much like "diversity" or "inclusivity" is not always an inherently good thing, even though that's the narrative the Left always peddles. Tolerance (in most contexts that its used in political discourse) just means moral and cultural relativism. People often forget that a culture or civilization is defined just as much by what they DON'T tolerate as they are by what they tolerate.
    14
  16. Just goes to show that "tolerance," much like "diversity" or "inclusivity" is not always an inherently good thing, even though that's the narrative the Left always peddles. Tolerance (in most contexts that its used in political discourse) just means moral and cultural relativism. People often forget that a culture or civilization is defined just as much by what they DON'T tolerate as they are by what they tolerate.
    13
  17.  @WhereAmEye2187  Bullshit. He probably speaks broken Spanglish pigeon. Overpronunciation. He tries too hard.
    12
  18.  @mnichols2011  I think the point is that they deny and attempt to subvert biological reality because they think social change is more virtuous and important than truth. They think deception is a valid way to create equal outcomes. But it would all be artificial.
    12
  19. Paleoarcheology and genetics too. lol
    12
  20.  @michaeltravis3562  The name India comes from that Sanskrit word "Sindhu," which is also where "Hindu" comes from through the Persian language. The name Indos was used by the Greeks and Romans used Indus to refer to the general region and the Indus River. It was present in Romance languages and Old English too and was used by Albert the Great. The term "Indies" was derived from Latin and was almost surely the name used by the Latin world during the time of Columbus. It had nothing to do with the Latin word for God. If you're going to go around calling everyone ignorant who uses the term, you might want to get your own facts straight.
    11
  21. "I'm Polish and Choctaw" >Has Irish name. Ok.
    11
  22.  @daveb606  That is not a fact at all. All archeological, genetic, and historical evidence points to Amerindians having an Asian origin.
    11
  23.  @corinnesalazar2720  Haven't you ever thought about where the prefix of the word "indigenous" comes from? Lol
    10
  24. Joe's either totally uninformed/misinformed about that incident, or he's simply a moron. The cops were more than respectful and tried to reason with that guy for over an hour. He was passed out drunk in a drive-thru with his car running. When they confirmed he was DUI and tried to place him under arrest, he attacked them and tried to use a tazer against an officer. They did what they are legally obliged to do in that situation. He was not a victim of brutality. He was a moron who play a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
    10
  25. ​ @jahmeekmorgan3235  Your thinking pattern is obviously nonexistent and even further warped by neo-Marxian grievance theorem. You American Afrocentrics are possibly the most sad and delusional bunch in the entire world. You act apophenic, trying to find patterns between totally unrelated things in a desperately transparent attempt to prove that all of history is a white supremacist conspiracy.
    10
  26. It's funny that nowadays we give praise to liberals for simply accepting reality.
    10
  27. ​ @michaeljorgensen790  My job involves reading people, and I had the same thought just by reading his body language here. You were just able to put it into much more concise language. There seems to be an arrogance in Eric that might be rooted in some kind of feeling of inadequacy and/or envy of greater minds (vulnerable narcissism) or maybe, as you said, he does simply have a gross overestimation of his own abilities that is rooted in basically thinking he knows everything because he doesn't realize there is so much that he doesn't know (Dunning Kruger).
    10
  28.  @bayron45  Singapore is extremely authoritarian and to quell ethnic conflict, they mandated that English be spoken as a universal language. I have been to Singapore when I was in the military, and it's the only place I've ever been that has signs at the airports saying the penalty for drug smuggling is death. And I've been to some horrible countries. We shouldn't have to live in an authoritarian dictatorship just so we can be multicultural/multiethnic. They are arguably not even multicultural, only multiethnic. Multiethnic states can exist, but only if there is a dominant uncompromising monoculture that incoming groups willfully and even joyfully embrace. Multiculturalism doesn't work, and America's dominant ethnocultural majority is under outright hostile attack. Most new immigrants do not want or need to adapt, and more and more people and cultural institutions either do not expect them to adapt or outright discourage them from adapting. The obstacle of having a multiethnic state is that every ethnicity has their own culture that they instinctually desire to preserve. If aspects of that culture are incompatible with the host culture and adaptation is discouraged, it will cause serious problems. In earlier waves of immigration, the expectations were totally uncompromising and there was way more social and economic incentive for migrants to adapt. There was no welfare state. The schools and cultural institutions did not adapt to the migrants, the migrants adapted to them. And those migrants were far more similar (racially, culturally, religiously, etc.) than the newer groups that are immigrating now. Some groups are just way too different, and are even hostile towards the West as a whole. How can we expect those people to be positive additions to our countries given all these circumstances? So our countries are not just failing at integrating migrants, globalists (who hold basically all the power) are deliberately undermining the possibility of immigration even being a potentially positive thing. They are weaponizing it and making it totally destructive for the nation state, and that is the whole point. They don't want nation states to exist. So really, the problem is more complicated, and is due to a series of globalist lies. Globalist/leftist lies will be the undoing of this experiment. Their cultural relativism, their attacks on integration standards, their attacks on traditional culture...all of it is designed to destroy the United States as we know it.
    9
  29.  @UniversoulSMOOV999  Just because it seems common sensical does not mean it is accurate, historically or otherwise. Joe probably didn't argue with him because it is a waste of time to argue with someone so divorced from reality.
    9
  30. @Richard Stylez: You're correct that a period of ~three months of not ejaculating will actually decrease your T-levels. The idea is to have sex, obviously, and the amount that makes men maintain the highest average T level is once every two weeks or so. But there is scientific research to prove short term abstinence increases T-levels. Why don't you research it before you claim there is no science behind it? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788 http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/chemistryofattraction/download/Oberzaucher_Poster.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alonso_Fernandez-Guasti/publication/6536830_Relationship_between_sexual_satiety_and_brain_androgen_receptors/links/54b6c2970cf2e68eb27f0321.pdf
    9
  31.  @johannpopper1493  ​ The U.S. has explicit values that theoretically should be accepted by all residents, but are not. They are not even universally accepted/shared among native born Americans. Among foreign people, they are usually only reluctantly accepted (if at all), and are constantly being tested and framed as a form of oppression. Inundate the country year after year with millions of people with totally different values, and the system collapses. That's the whole problem with importing culturally incompatible population groups. Cultural relativism is moral relativism. Open borders equals open values. Culture and values are linked, and culture is strongly correlated to ethnicity. Hence, ethnicity is NOT arbitrary at all when it comes to migration. It is only in the West that we pretend it doesn't matter for fear of social repercussions. Also, the idea of "reasonable" tolerance is subjective. My version is likely far different than yours.
    8
  32.  @WhereAmEye2187  Habla Español amigo?
    8
  33. The VA will take care of his medical, psych, etc. and he'll get disability for his entire life. It could be more, but it's something at least. :)
    8
  34.  @ts8404  Yes, yes...let's start circling the semantic deconstruction drain and arguing about the definition of crazy.
    7
  35.  @Bean-vj1lf  "Don't speak when you have nothing smart to say." Doesn't that mean you should basically STFU for all eternity?
    7
  36.  @ChillyChav  Yeah I think it's the other way around. I believe the traditional narrative which is based upon mountains of archeological and historical and genetic evidence. You believe a narrative which is not supported by the vast majority of research, and yet you say my understanding is based on propaganda. Sounds like projection to me.
    7
  37. ​ @jahmeekmorgan3235  Because there is archeological evidence that the Norse reached North America, as well as historical text affirming it. There is also mountains of archeological evidence and historical documentation detailing the voyages made by the European powers. There is also genetic tests of both modern humans and ancient skeletons that confirm there was no sub-Saharan African influx into the Americas (pre-Euro colonial period). There is also the issue that advanced seafaring technology had not been developed and implemented in pre-Euro colonial sub-Saharan Africa, perhaps because they didn't feel a great need for it. Most of the seafaring technology they had came from the Arabs, and they were not particularly good seafarers either. I don't think people ignore the possibility, but all logic and evidence points to the contrary. And the Natives are not thought to be light-skinned, but brown skinned, similar to indigenous Amerindians who still exist today. Dark skinned or even black skinned does not mean Sub-Saharan African in origin. There is some genetic evidence that Polynesians reached South America, but it was a very small influx. They are also great seafarers and explorers because they are an oceanic people. So it makes sense.
    7
  38. ​ @allahuackbar396  Aqueducts were not a Roman invention. Aqueducts were arguably perfected by the Romans though, which is evidenced by how successful and extensive their aqueduct system was. The Assyrians, Egyptians, Greeks, Harrapans etc. all built aqueducts, some before Rome was even founded as a city.
    7
  39.  @jonm7888  I didn't "get the definition" anywhere. Like I said it's fairly common economic knowledge and self-descriptive, so FFS, why don't you go confirm. Prove me wrong. Do you even internet, bro?
    7
  40.  @E0572-e1n  To an Afrocentric halfwit, a simple picture of people who appear Black are definitively Black.
    7
  41.  @j.psimon3056  It doesn't matter if he's white, his views are still totally fringe and are purely speculative. As I've said already, the vast majority of archeological, historical, and scientific evidence point to Amerindians having an Asian origin and Sub-Saharan Africans never traversing the Atlantic to the American continents.
    7
  42.  @Bean-vj1lf  Stop plaguing humanity with your existence.
    6
  43.  @joshuawright9852  You can't require a license for a right that is deemed unalienable by our Constitution. That's like having a license to speak.
    6
  44.  @jahmeekmorgan3235  Your knowledge runs deep, or your indoctrination into pseudohistorical Afrocentric dogma?
    6
  45.  @allahuackbar396  "the aqueduct was a Roman invention" -You one month ago. Are you really going to lie about this? The comment is right there for everyone to see.
    6
  46.  @allahuackbar396  ​ False. If you want evidence of a Roman-style elevated aqueduct that was built before Rome was even founded as a city, look at the ruins of the aqueduct of Nineveh, the ancient capital of Assyria. Ironically, much of the site was destroyed by Islamic fundamentalists in 2014 as an act of iconoclasm. Allahu Akbar, eh?
    6
  47.  @Kyle-hq2rm  Right. All those cunts that push that shit just happen to be socialists.
    6
  48.  @fearless798  Name the scientific evidence that proves Sub-Saharan Blacks traversed the Atlantic and populated the Americas. There is none. Most point to the Luzia Woman, but genetic tests proved she was not African. That "other researcher" was probably the quack Graham Hancock, who is also a well-discredited pseudo-theorist.
    6
  49.  @Dremac5  That Black Africans reached the Americas and are the real Native Americans. There would surly be some genetic legacy or paleoarcheological finding, but there is none.
    6
  50. Joe's either totally uninformed/misinformed about that incident, or he's simply a moron. The cops were more than respectful and tried to reason with that guy for over an hour. He was passed out drunk in a drive-thru with his car running. When they confirmed he was DUI and tried to place him under arrest, he attacked them and tried to use a tazer against an officer. They did what they are legally obliged to do in that situation. He was not a victim of brutality. He was a moron who play a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
    5