Comments by "nexovec" (@nexovec) on "ThePrimeTime" channel.

  1.  RaniaIsAwesome  Ideas are free.
    2
  2. They used a smaller model for this one hmm
    2
  3. I love how "javascript vs anything" always just boils down to "javascript vs first-class browser support for literally anything else"
    2
  4. 5:06 OMG Twitch chat golden Kappa. This is so fricking rare.
    2
  5. All of this is middle school math, what have we even watched here
    2
  6. This is a very interesting sorry where absolutely everyone is the main villain.
    2
  7. Why hack people's data when you can just subscribe to them
    2
  8. Porque Rust?
    2
  9. "Modern js development" sounds a bit like "modern horse riding" This is basically the stack I'm set on. I'm using gorm for now but I'm thinking of ditching it because it just takes too long to debug SQL with it. Thinking of using clover db for prototyping.
    2
  10. I mean if you tell someone their code is bad and they get angry at you, they're still a dork even if you're wrong...
    2
  11. Well this was a waste of time.
    2
  12. Learning C from this book is kind of flexing on beginners but OK
    2
  13. I implore you to change a single line in a low level game physics code somewhere. I really want to listen to you whining about how bad the code that is the pinacle of software engineering that has worked until you touched it is(or idelly you didn't touch it, just began to criticise bad variable names).
    2
  14. AAh my eyes are bleeding. Object.is(this_video, good) -> true
    2
  15. Every time you use multi-threading in python, one african child dies.
    2
  16. That's a VERY sexy product they got there. I really need my manual memory management and the syntax is still stupid, but it's a step in the right direction I think.
    2
  17.  @asteroidrules  Sometimes I spend like 12 hours coding and the result is -537 LOC.
    2
  18.  @rawallon  How does that make any difference?
    2
  19. The private underscores are superfluous, so in the spirit of minimizing the amount of information pumped into your head, that's actually an enforced mistake, not a convention. (69th like let's go)
    2
  20. You mean on the off-chance there are still people there in that completely made up scenario?
    2
  21. I think professional javascript is harder to write than other languages exactly for all the unfun reasons.
    2
  22.  @complexity5545  you think playtesters are programmers?
    2
  23. If you're not returning your strings as values, I'm done talking to you.
    2
  24. This is the most NPC article I've read in quite a while
    2
  25. should have put htmx instead of tailwind and make the right dude C instead for that extra area of damage, because then literally noone can disagree.
    1
  26. ​ @wondejaxus  Look, I've been developing in go for several years, and have been developing performance critical things for like 9 years now, so NO, YOU. But regarding this rewrite, I guess it is enough. It's just that maybe if you want fast go brr, then there are better options. Maybe they aren't geared up for C++ or rust or zig or something. You just don't have to be so impolite.
    1
  27. ​ @farrenh  You're almost competely right. Except for the automatic porting of code, that sounds like a terrible idea.
    1
  28. ​ @wondejaxus  I already put it in caps for you before, but it seems reading is not your strong suit. You are (the problem). Your comments contributed nothing. I don't mind harsh discussion, this is not that.
    1
  29.  @wondejaxus  It was a hyperbole. Come on. Did you mean Anders?
    1
  30.  @TheFeljoy  Oh god, that sounds terrible, because in go you'd likely write the program very differently than in what it is.
    1
  31.  @isodoublet  That's also not what I said. Simpler tool means it is easier to deal with the tool for the job, doesn't mean it's a more capable tool(also doesn't mean it's a less capable tool either, but you don't agree with this). You are probably the first person I've ever met with to say all the bad things in cpp come from C, almost all the other people write C-style C++, and use almost nothing newer than C++98 + smart pointers. I even know people who stick to C89, because all of the newer ones are "broken," literal quote. I guess my bubble just burst? Do people think this? No, go is not C at all.
    1
  32. ​ @farrenh  This is not an operating system or an aircraft control system or a bank, this is a language server, you couldn't care less about memory safety. If you get a memory related bug, you get a github issue and you fix it. It is kind of silly how much of a non-issue it is. Can you not have static analysis in C++ nowadays that guarantees reasonable memory safety nowadays? I thought that was a thing... That said, the amount of memory safety in go you do get, you get out of the box, essentially for free. Then you dereference a nil pointer.
    1
  33.  @isodoublet  On the first point I'd say you failed to read the entire sentence, as it means basically the opposite of what you assume it does. No, google up Eskil Steenberg, he is one of those people that uses c89, like I said. He is on the C standard committee iirc. JBlow and CMuratori also fit into the broader category. I didn't overemphasize smart pointers, that just happens to be the feature I've seen be used by these people. And there is nothing wrong with occasionally using smart pointers in C++. "C + syntax changes + completely different memory model + gc + goroutines + explicit error handling + modules + build system + standard library" sure sounds exactly like C. Why would you even write that if you know you don't know? Man.
    1
  34.  @isodoublet  the original response very clearly states "Simpler tool means it is easier to deal with the tool for the job, doesn't mean it's a more capable tool." Not only can I not make you google anything, but it seems I also can't make you read. Are you a bot? You are making it very difficult to be polite here.
    1
  35. ​ @isodoublet  But I NEVER SAID THAT. I never said that simpler tool = easier to deal with for the project. You completely made that up! Terrible discussion. I call AI slop.
    1
  36. ​ @isodoublet  Yes, that is exactly what I said. It is easier to use the tool if it's simpler. It's easier to use go, the language, than a more complicated language, like C++. You're complaining of fallacies where there are none, yet you straw man like crazy. I'm tired of you, this is a waste of my time, ending this here.
    1
  37.  @jeffreysmith9837  You are like the most sane person in this thread rn.
    1
  38. Turbo 8 deez nuts. Prime you don't have to let people bully you like that. You have probably worked in this field for just as long as all the guys that make these libraries. Unlike the 1% talent guy...
    1
  39. That's a very Honne article :D How do you write an article that has one half that's absolutely perfect, and an other half that is utter horsecrap...
    1
  40.  @hungrymusicwolf  It was a joke, of course it's an advantage to be curious if used properly... welp, if you don't manage it properly and you're bad enough of a case, it will give you depression and literally kill you, so it might just as well be one.
    1
  41. "There is something to be said about coming to a new language and being almost immediately productive in it." Yes, there is something to be said about go, yes.
    1
  42. 41K files is like my entire OS
    1
  43. Took the N out of FAANG... LOL. just LOL
    1
  44. dude, how are we learning this now?!
    1
  45. This is very specialized, yes.
    1
  46. I wouldn't know a tenth of what I know about programming today if it wasn't for me and all the other people around me sharing opinions, you guys included. Willful ignorance by means of avoiding discussion and/or persuasion is still just willful ignorance.
    1
  47. How is this new to you? What do you mean, "huh"? THE CARS LITERALLY BEEP WHEN YOU GO OVER THE SPEED LIMIT. HOW DO YOU THINK THEY KNOW? They must do this. It's EU mandate. It's not illegal, it's mandatory.
    1
  48. Imagine all the stuff he hasn't been frustrated by thanks to using linux.
    1
  49. How can anyone say that programming is the most internally hated job? Feels like you haven't been anywhere else.
    1
  50. Did you know that if you only make one application, you can actually attach a debugger to it and look at what it's doing, which massively speeds up debugging? Wow, brain explosions I know unbelievable right?
    1