Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Sargon of Akkad" channel.

  1. They caused this. Had they not gone after him like they did, this wouldn't have happened. His escape from death, I think, cemented his resolve more than anything else. He believes God saved him to do this, and he's not going to let them stop him.
    156
  2. 17:10 Why isn't it "common" anymore? Because ya'll decided to abandon it. Far too many powerful countries within the EU decided to abandon free speech and free expression to give the appearance of order. It's not true order as your citizens are attacked from within. You'd rather crush your own citizens than admit that magical soil isn't true. Violating the entire point of the existence of the government you hold so dear. The government exists to protect its citizens from outside forces. There's little difference between what you're doing and France during WWII, welcoming Germany in instead of protecting their people from an invading force.
    42
  3. This is a weird new age argument I’ve seen about the horrors Germany committed. Their souls wanted to go, they knew they had no future, etc. Meanwhile these same people will mock religion while creating a new one.
    32
  4. Yes. Right now, it's more focusing on getting everything in order and the audit done. The administration isn't even confirmed and in place yet. Once that's accomplished, I expect bills to start hitting the Congressional floor.
    26
  5. Yep. We've won this major battle, but the war rages on.
    25
  6.  @angelaharris53 I had a female friend boohooing in a bathroom while we were shopping for a dress for a funeral. An ex-boyfriend had died. She hadn’t gone out with him in years and she was acting like her husband had died. I’d finally had enough and told her to stop it. It’s not about her. His family were hurting far more than her and get it together. Basically calling her a drama queen trying to take attention from people far closer to him than she was. She immediately stopped and actually thanked me. Sometimes you just have to give them a reality check and swift kick in the bum. Edit: I’d had a guy I was dating die in a car accident and I was supposed to be with him and I didn’t act like that. To give an idea of the histrionics she was doing.
    25
  7. These are the same people that say “You value your property more than the life of the person taking it” instead of “The person taking my stuff values my property more than their life”. It twists responsibility onto the victim instead of the person victimizing.
    24
  8.  @sedoskovelha123  I see this online but not much irl. Both my sons and their friends don’t do that. They highly value family. I’m Gen X and raised them to think for themselves. To reject peer pressure and be who and what they wanted regardless of the world around them. I did strictly limit their screen time and encouraged socializing face to face by having their friends over constantly. Our house was always full on the weekends. I know their friends except one was raised similarly. So I reject this characterization of them. I think because we’re feed a loop of the others because it gets attention we’ve been conditioned to view them as the norm when I don’t believe it is. I do believe they’re lost. That they don’t know what they’re supposed to do, but I don’t believe they want it.
    15
  9.  @BLRodgers  This! I heard Millennials described as the 2nd family of Gen X parents. They’d felt they screwed up with Gen X by never paying us attention and went ultra hard the other way after their divorces and remarriages. That they had to make up for us. We were pretty much a feral generation and it’s really odd to see such a sharp turn in parenting with the following one. You’d see a slight shift starting mainly in the upper class that eventually trickled down, but never such an almost universal sharp turn. I do know a study about self esteem came out that turned things education wise drastically. As usual they failed to understand the findings. It said early success showed improved self esteem and high self esteem meant later success in life. That’s where everyone gets a trophy comes from. They thought they could artificially create self esteem. The education thing comes from the Department of Education becoming way more hands on in state education. Edit: I was one of the hardcore in Gen X. Partied like crazy in my teens, listened to punk and heavy metal, rejected conformity. Later studies showed we ended up the most well adjusted.
    13
  10.  @voomvoom4522  Women evolving to be best suited for child rearing and men forming culture around the protection of women being the ones that can give birth and necessary for survival isn’t genetics influencing culture? I understand the knee jerk reaction but it destroys science out of this desire to be PC. How other people choose to twist knowledge doesn’t make having the knowledge bad.
    11
  11. I’m Gen X. Even though I listened to heavy metal and mocked the protesters at the concerts I did not go down your path. My parents were conservative but not the crazy restrictive type. They allowed us to dress funny and make our own friends. We also were poor so we all worked as soon as we were allowed by law to buy things we wanted. Needs were met but wants were our own to provide. So we were all very responsible. I didn’t get married until 25, but that was 3rd engagement so it wasn’t a lack of offers. We immediately had 2 kids pretty much back to back and I was a stay at home mom which is what I wanted. I wanted to be there for my kids and do the things my mother couldn’t because she worked. I know she hated it too.
    11
  12. Again these people don’t take what they’re proposing to it’s logical conclusion. That’s the problem with these philosophers. They seem to think philosophy means throwing logic out the window.
    9
  13. Oh that’s another insufferable one. Especially when those “adults” act like overgrown children. A slave to their emotions.
    8
  14. Hopefully, the current revolution that's going on here in the US will inspire others like our first one did. It can be done. It's not instant and takes years of small movements coming together to create a big one, but it can happen. Eventually they'll go too far and the tide will turn.
    8
  15. ​ @huevote9474  I mean, they kicked Biden and slid Kamala right in. Like a well oiled machine. If they want that, fine. That's their choice. We just have to hope most don't feel the same.
    8
  16. ​ @grafvonscyth2928 ​ That's not what happened during the winter. The animals still needed care. In fact, much greater care, so they weren't lost to the winter, and then no new births for spring. Including guarded because preditors were very hungry as food was scarce. Every farm had some animals. Inside, clothing is being made and mended. Blankets crafted so the family doesn't freeze to death. I don't understand why people think winter was leisure time. It was just a different type of work being done. Vikings, for example, would join the women in making sails and ships would be fixed or made. Preparing for the spring when they'd set sail again. I come from many generations of farmers. It's not what you and others try to romanticize it to be. You have maybe 2 months when something isn't being done to the fields. That's occupied by feeding the animals with the hay you've stored and keeping them alive, stretching the food you preserved, drying seeds to plant in the spring, and fixing anything that broke or tore. There are still people that live just like back then and not just the Amish. Winter was just as busy as any other time of year. Just not outside as much.
    8
  17. He makes note that humans are considered the weakest race and easiest to corrupt. It was never grey morality. It was just humans are easily lead by their emotions which is what makes them so easy to corrupt. All of those were simple emotions, not a morality issue. Denethor was corrupted.
    7
  18.  @Friggsdottir They we’re led to believe absurdities. I guess we should ignore history to protect you from offense. I notice you didn’t attempt to defend the other atrocities committed by other groups. Why is that? Every single group listed loved their country so that’s completely irrelevant to the actions committed as a result.
    7
  19. ​​​ @newdivide9882 This is where men not understanding women comes into play. Women are naturally unconfrontational. We don't like to be attacked and will do almost anything to avoid it. It makes sense from a survival standpoint. We're smaller and weaker so not being confrontational, we survive. Which is also roundabout what Carl is saying. Attacking us isn't going to change anything. We'll simply retreat to where we're not being threatened. I have come under attack on social media by other women multiple times. We DO understand other women and know that most can't stand against it. I can, but I'm a tomboy so naturally have a few masculine traits. Most women can't and will revert to getting in line to get along. Edit: It's why socially women have been who keeps other women in check. It wasn't men doing the shaming.
    7
  20. It’s horrible. Even when it’s one you really didn’t want. I had 2 as a teenager. That I still remember them speaks volumes about it. Edit: The only good thing was because of them when I got pregnant after getting married (or the day before) it gave my doctor a heads up to watch for complications very early in the pregnancy. That helped save my 25 year old son. The issue was found early and precautions were taken to help prevent it.
    6
  21. Yes. They do. They see themselves as untouchable and divine. The disdain they have for regular people, especially the ones that dare not vote for them, is palpable.
    6
  22. Like it or not right wing men are going to have to figure out it takes other women to correct women. Our social groups are extremely important. Men can't fill that role. They can continue to attack right wing women and removing anyone that can cause other women to change and be aline and keep losing. Or they can stop and let the women do what we're supposed to and be the ones correcting and shaming other women. They want traditional roles while refusing to abide by them themselves. I see a bunch of whiny men in the comment section of this video. You don't deserve a lady like me. Make no mistake, I am a lady. I'm just as comfortable sitting around a bonfire as am all dressed up at an opera and I know what's expected of me in both places. I am a reflection of my husband and his ability to provide for me. I do a million little things everyday just to make his life a little bit easier. Every man I've ever known has told me "You're the kind of girl you marry. Not fool around with". At least 90% of you wouldn't even be worth my time because you could never provide me with what I'm worth. It's not money either or I would have never married my husband. It's a high level of kindness and respect that I deserve. We watch very closely how a man treats other women. So if you're running around being rude and mean to other women, you're never going to get one of us because eventually that'll be how you treat us. That's why traditionally men didn't police women.
    5
  23.  @habibishapur What “truth”? Do you think nihilism is new? Please. It’s fine to understand your place in the universe and how small you truly are. It’s weak to stay in it instead of understanding that just makes the impact you have on the other small parts of the universe that much more important. Our impact is through those we encounter and that’s enough because it has meaning to them no matter how small.
    5
  24. We did it! And he's doing it!!
    5
  25.  @racheljames7 My 25 and 24 year old sons are too. As are all their friends except 1. It’s why I don’t believe the hype. It’s obviously women are more susceptible to this and more and more of them are also rejecting it.
    5
  26.  @deleted01 Then obviously they shouldn’t exist ever. Whoops! End of the species. Oh look! They DO have “value”.
    4
  27.  @swaythegod5812  The same thing that makes me Native American. Are you daft? My bloodline makes me one. Do you not understand what indigenous means? Or do you think only darker skinned people are indigenous to a place in the world? Edit: It’s really confusing that you think it’s not okay for the tribes of a particular skin color to not recognize themselves as such while crying about the protection of mine.
    4
  28.  @DevastationMtrsports Things are not real just because you believe they are. That means there’s no such thing as hallucinations (which we can scientifically prove happen) and schizophrenia isn’t a mental illness. I’m seriously curious if people like you ever think beyond the single thing they want to be true to see and understand the full implications of what you’re saying.
    3
  29. Thank you for calling it that! That’s what it’s always been called and now it appears to no longer be so.
    3
  30. There's confusion because Tolkien never specified how they came to be. The one in the Silmarillion is the 3rd book, which Tolkien didn't put together. He published the first 2. The last was compiled by his son of his writings after his death. There are 3 different ways Tolkien toyed with and they're all in books published after his death from his writings.
    3
  31. ​​ @tonycooke8545  No. Both are submissive to each other. Because it's the woman saying that, it's obviously bad. Submission in this context means putting the needs of someone else above your own desires. For example, I could go out and buy something really expensive I'd love to have, but that will put a burden upon my husband to then work harder to replace it if it's not something we've budgeted for. That works both ways. If the husband does the same, it puts a burden on the wife when buying food and purchasing essentials for the family.
    3
  32. It was never that. It’s equality under the law. That’s even expressly stated. Equality by the government. It’s pretty clear in the Constitution since the document is just about government. It’s why they slowly shifted to equity. Now you hear equity instead of equality. Equity is equal outcome. Equality isn’t.
    3
  33. I’m the opposite. I moved from a black majority town to Oklahoma and never felt so comfortable in my life. I’m Native and yt and now surrounded by both.
    3
  34. Yes. I’m one of them.
    3
  35.  @totallynottitan126 As a nihilist from the 80s, it’s not new. Most people in my generation went through it. It’s why we partied so hard. We didn’t expect to live very long and had no expectations of having any impact on the world. What I took from it wasn’t to become psychopathic. Instead it was yes I’m tiny in the grand scheme of things. That means the only things I can have a lasting impact on are those around me. The other tiny, insignificant beings. So instead of becoming destructive I did the opposite and focused on how I treat those closest to me so that my impact is huge to them. When I’m gone, I will leave a huge mark for such a tiny insignificant part of the universe. That huge mark will be carried on by those close to me that saw the impact of what I did to those around me and chose to in some small way have a similar impact. It’s all about understanding what you can and can’t control and reconciling that.
    2
  36.  @xX_Kino_Xx If just doing whatever I want to make me happy is the only moral, then absolutely nothing beyond that in your long winded attempt to justify your position matters nor does it belong in anything beyond yourself. You’re attempting to decide what makes others “happy” based on your own idea of it. You can’t even explain what happy is because it’s just an emotion. It’s not an achievable state of being because like all emotions it’s controllable and involves choices. Conscious choices. I’m not sure why people seem to believe suddenly that emotions are this uncontrollable force. They aren’t. Every single emotion is controllable with enough practice and effort. If all I’m supposed to do is make myself “happy” than what makes me happy could be something extremely destructive to everyone else and according to you, that’s perfectly fine and moral. Morals are ethics. They are a set of guidelines decided on and enforced by a society and culture. They are based on what is most beneficial to that culture and society. They have nothing to do with the individual’s desires and in fact often go against them for the betterment of society. Edit: Even before civilization existed we had societies. Small societies, but they still existed because we are social animals. Groups animals. Just like every animal we adopt what’s most beneficial to the species survival. That’s what morals are based on and why they change overtime. What’s beneficial to my survival based on my limited knowledge during prehistoric times is completely different than what’s most beneficial to our survival as a species today. If I steal from my neighbor, it’s very likely to shorten my life and harm society. Therefore it’s not a moral good. It’s really not that complicated. You’re personal anything has no bearing on what’s morally acceptable in a society.
    2
  37. It was seriously disgusting and a prime example of circular logic and thinking.
    2
  38. The problem is we’ve lost the understanding of what that means. It doesn’t mean we’re blank slats. It’s means we’re equal in the eyes of God and government. We’re seen equal in how laws will apply and what rights we’re endowed with. That’s it. They’re currently attempting to apply it to mean equal outcomes or equity which was never ever promised.
    2
  39. If you don’t serve in the armed forces should you be entitled to the benefits as if you did? This is what you’re saying. My dog who hasn’t been through years of training, doesn’t serve the public, and just hangs out should have the same benefit as one that is all those things.
    2
  40. It’s a small percentage which is hopeful. Online they quickly can appear much larger.
    2
  41. Because it's not for US aid. It's not "aid" really at all. That's just the acronym. The I stands for international.
    2
  42. I don't think he'd write himself a weakling that's easily killed by orcs. That's what they've done to him in this show.
    2
  43. Write your own world for yourself instead of messing with someone else's. That's not how Tolkien's world works.
    2
  44. People are misunderstanding what submission means. It's being said by Christian women. It's directly from the Bible. The Bible also says the man must submit to his wife. It's not a one-way street. It simply means putting others before yourself. Which if both spouses do that, it means you're both thinking about how everything impacts the other person instead of only thinking about yourself as a child does. I'm a "trad" wife. I'm a Christian woman who fulfills her Biblical role. The man is the head and the woman is the neck. She controls where the head faces. Yes a wife should do what she can to support her husband's career because when he is successful, the family benefits. That doesn't include doing his work for him because that's fraud and against the Bible. This doesn't work if both don't understand their roles and what's expected of them. This is why if you want to enter into a traditional Biblical marriage, you both need to know what that means. It seems like her husband had no idea she wanted that role or expected that from her marriage. That's why I always dated a minimum of 2 years before even considering marriage. Even so, I was engaged 3 times, asked 4 or 5, but only walked down the aisle once. Her saying she didn't understand he was abusive means she never had any other relationship in her life and I find that very hard to believe. My husband understood what I expected before we got married and agreed to provide. Me wanting that and having the qualities I do, is why he wanted me to be the mother of his children. Not because of what I financially brought or my looks. My morals.
    2
  45. Gen X but same. For example my husband’s grandmother was Roma aka gypsy. So I make sure my children know some the traditions and carry them forward. I’m Native American, English, and German. More importantly southern. So I also teach them those as well.
    2
  46. Equality was never in outcomes. It’s always been under the law. Equal under the law and/or government. It’s why now you hear equity instead of equality. They want to replace the under the law part and move it to outcomes. Unfortunately for them equality is what’s clearly stated in every law. Not equity.
    2
  47.  @Charles.Wright Yes. When you no longer have something outside yourself to base your morals on they’re based on yourself alone. You’re now the god deciding for everyone else. I guess all those enlightened atheist claiming they don’t need religion to be moral have been proven wrong. If only they’d been warned.
    2
  48. They never were. We only are under the law. Everything else is up to us.
    2
  49. ​​ @randomhuman2595  Has absolutely nothing to do with Trump. He hasn't even made a budget yet that would require the money printer to go brrr. Just like the beyond stupid " the egg prices!" Yes. Because Biden's administration put down millions of chickens on their way out the door. They can't be replaced in a month. Chickens have to be hatched and grow to begin laying. Edit: The previous administrative was frantically doing last minute things and sending billions out the door to various favorable organizations to screw the incoming one as much as possible. I don't care if there's some pain for a bit. It HAS to get fixed or there will be nothing left to care about.
    1
  50.  @DevastationMtrsports Things are not real just because someone believes they are. If that’s true then schizophrenia isn’t a mental disorder and there’s no such thing as hallucinations. You can not manifest reality. No, people on the internet are not real life. They can eventually move into real life, I should know I met my husband on it. If I tell you I’m a 20 year old male that doesn’t magically make it true or reality.
    1