Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Sargon of Akkad" channel.

One tiny problem with your belief. You’re better off than Gen X was at your age. We did not have this massive prosperity. We created an entire new economy because the previous one had been given away to other countries. You’ve had one crash. We’ve been through 3. Who do you think was losing their homes in 2008? It wasn’t y’all. Most were still in school. It was us. You’re trying to say a bunch of 20 year olds owned their own home to lose? The youngest were 12 the oldest 22. THIS is why we don’t like you. You lay claim to what didn’t happen to you. I grew up with inflation and interest rates so high nobody could even buy a car and with oil shortages and you who grew up with unbelievable luxury want to claim it was like the Great Depression where people were dying of starvation. You hit a single bump and act like the world is burning. You’re freaking drama queens and weak and it’s annoying as hell. Edit: It’s also hilarious y’all think y’all figured out there was corruption. Look at the Church hearings, the IRS having to be slashed in the 80s because it was a freaking power hungry force, look at the PMRC, etc. Don’t put your nativity onto the rest of us.
1
I grew up in the 80s and early 90s. When everyone wanted to be like us. Even though it wasn't great economically, we refused to be down and instead had a blast. People couldn't wait to come here even just to visit to enjoy the excitement that was everywhere in the air. Just an enjoyment of life. I wish we could get that back. I want that for the future generations.
1
Then you need to find somewhere else to be or realize that you may never own a home in exchange for the other things you have. Not owning a home has never been something that prevented people from having families, and I don't understand why people are making it one now. In large cities, children were born to people who lived in apartments forever. This isn't new, and I don't understand why people are acting like it is. We didn't have our own home when we had our children, and our families didn't help us purchase one. Living in a city or living in a more rural area, it's understood you're giving up certain things in exchange for other things. You don't get to have everything because life is a compromise. Edit: Home ownership rates for young people have only decreased, like 1% from previous time periods. It's not what it's being made out to be. You've just been led to believe that it was different and easier for previous generations when that's simply not true. We're only slightly below the highest home ownership percentage in history.
1
Not just Europe. There's a guy in the US in federal prison right now for a meme in 2020. It said don't forget to vote for Biden! And gave the date as the day after the election. He didn't want a pardon because he wants to take it to the Supreme Court.
1
 @megaham1552 Douglas Mackey, Count Dankula.
1
@megaham1552 "Over blown" Once is too many. One case creates a precedent that is then used to justify many more. Either you don't understand how the loss of freedom occurs or you're intentional playing dumb.
1
@pipgang8566 That's not what the comment says. He's a bad storyteller because he can't let a hero be a hero so will never be able to finish it. If you can't finish your story, you're not a good storyteller.
1
The thing is, Trump can win without PA. That's what I'm hoping. PA will just be the icing on the cake but we win without knowing it's results.
1
Oh no! YouTube errored my comment. Hmmm now for creative writing and coded bs because it was a really great comment. The reasons for the topic is the lack of things to prevent pregnancy and deal with one’s that are the result on people being victimized. The first reason was solved by technology decades ago with birth control. The second with other medication that prevent it implanting. Meaning the only current reason is medical emergencies. Since technology did what technology is supposed to do there is no longer any moral or ethical reason for it outside emergencies. Therefore it should no longer be a thing outside that very limited medical reason. Edit: Before somebody goes “it’s not 100%”. Nothing is. We don’t base anything on outliers. Seat belts don’t save you 100% and can very rarely cause death. So should we remove all requirements based on the very rare occurrence?
1
@kamaeq That is not what settled law means. It means there's a ruling by a high court already or several court cases that have the same ruling. The job of the judiciary is to interpret the law. Including the Constitution. Just because you disagree with their interpretation doesn't make it unconstitutional. Only a court decides that. Even settled law can be overturned, it just requires profound evidence that it was misinterpreted. Edit: Roe v Wade is a good example. It was considered "settled law" due to how long it had been around and how many challenges it had withstood. However, 99% of lawyers and judges knew it was based on an intentional misinterpretation of the law, but it required the highest court to deem that.
1
@MCC17011 Truth but the real problem with that group is they don’t believe in truth. They don’t believe in objective reality. Everything is a social construct. Meaning the science that they use to argue they don’t even believe. It’s just a useful tool.
1
They don't. They're currently pretty despised. Approval rating at a near historic low for Democrats. They're floundering around like fish out of water flopping on the ground. Their many "protests" have pathetic turnouts. The tide has turned against them, and I'm not sure they'll be able to recover this time. At least not anytime soon.
1
So the heroes don't all fall short? Aren't flawed? Pretty sure they all are.
1
They're two men.
1
It's a threat. A threat for what nobody knows, but that's what it is. He would not put US citizens in such a dangerous position.
1
So you want to what? Attempt to selectively target those that do? How? We can’t read their minds. We can’t even communicate with them. So we hope by the time we’re able to there’s a human left that can deal with them? Edit: What about the humans right to life? Screw that?
1
@methane1027 It's been far more concentrated throughout history. It has nothing to do with wealth. It has to do with reducing the requirements, in a way, to be considered an "expert." An expert used to be someone that studied something intently for decades. They did or didn't go to school, they wrote many books and papers on the subject that increased understanding of the subject, they contributed to the scientific advancement of the subject, etc. We've decreased the standards to get into higher education, decreased the standards to move past a basic degree in many subjects, and we now have so many doctorates in almost every subject (now considered experts) that they've run out of real and important things to research and write their thesis on because your thesis has to be something new or that you can prove has changed in the subject. Which means people that haven't actually contributed anything have reached the highest degree of education in these fields and as such is considered an expert based on their education on the subject. They haven't contributed to the field in any meaningful way, but because of their degree can decide the direction the field needs to go. That's the problem. When everyone has degrees, they become no more significant than a high school diploma.
1
@HarrDarr They weren’t blocking a road. They took over a building. Just like they did during Kavanah hearings and during the Women’s March. In my state capital protesters have jumped onto the chamber floor and chased lawmakers. Nobody screamed about an insurrection or an “assault on the Capital”. Edit: It was BLM protesters so I guess the media considered them the right kind so they didn’t smear them.
1
We're not taking over Gaza. I can't believe people are falling for that. Did you also believe in his first term he was going to go to war with North Korea? It's the big ask. It's a threat because something we don't know about is going on behind the scenes. The rebuilding is a promise if whatever is going on is resolved. Rebuilding will be investments from companies. Most likely, he wants Hamas completely out of power in the region, so there's a real chance at peace.
1
@MCC17011 ummm the right is already liberal. I don’t even remotely understand what you’re attempting to say. Are you one of these that believes the “right” is the Austrian with the funny mustache? Conservatives, the right, conserve societal norms and culture which is liberalism.
1
It's funny because they wanted race "consciousness." Even for the group they hate. They just wanted that group beaten down with guilt first. Then, their group consciousness would have them just give everything they'd achieved up. They were warned by others they really didn't want that to happen. People who understood it was through their grace alone that any other group was even allowed to enjoy the comfort they created. Now they're finding out.
1
This! At no point did anyone believe everyone is magically equal. Equal in the eyes of the government. Everything is about government not individuals. Even when it does come to the individual it’s about government not stifling the individual where they intersect while still maintaining society. Even in regards to the Civil Rights Act, it’s because government created different laws for different groups. It’s still all about government.
1
@tljsucks1166 You still haven't answered what policies. The only thing she talks about is giving away more money. Buying votes, basically. Her and Biden both have said repeatedly he didn't do anything without her. They worked hand in hand. There's nothing she would change about the last 4 years, yet runs on being change. She says a "new generation" when she's a boomer, and that's been 3 of our Presidents already. Bush, Clinton, and Obama. The reason people say Ukraine wouldn't have happened is because Putin has talked about how Trump was a wildcard. That when Trump threatened him, even if he thought it was only a 1% chance, he wouldn't risk it. There's a reason he started mobilizing in high gear after Biden was elected. Because he didn't see Biden as someone to take seriously and he was right clearly. Obama openly talked about how when Biden would visit say Saudi Arabia, he'd have to get on the phone and smooth things over. Kamala has called Biden her mentor. Think about that. None of the Democrat platform are her policies. They're all Biden's. The DNC has said they didn't have time to write and vote on a new one, so they went with what they had. If you want to vote for a machine rather than a person, that's fine. But be honest about it.
1
No. Just no. Why would an orc care about passing on his genes? He only wants to k1ll and harm. They're chaos as Morgoth corrupted them to be. Bent only on destruction. They wouldn't have families and they wouldn't care about any offspring. You're making assumptions about their children that have no basis. We don't know about Elf children either other than they have them and they stop aging once they reach adulthood. We don't know if that's a long time or a short time. We don't know if they're helpless at birth. I don't even understand the desire to know such details. It's like article of the interview with Martin. Why do you think such explicit details matter? It's irrelevant to the story.
1
I may not like his attitude all the time, but there’s little doubt James is an absolute expert at this point in it. It also makes no sense that abandoning liberalism will somehow make Communism disappear. It’s there, it exists. It’s been used to displace every other form of government so then every form causes it by that reasoning.
1
Except you can't because Tolkien made it clear they're all bad. That breaks the lore. You can certainly create your own world that's like that.
1
@PariahPsypomp6775 Are you calling her a camel? Do you not even realize how difficult doing what she’s chosen is? It’s completely against the current norm. That makes her the lion. It’s like how women today view early Christian women. They see them as oppressed when the truth is the opposite. Women were just looked at as for sex. It was demanded of them because the other religions at the time were hedonistic. Orgies and stuff were common place. To be chaste was seen as against the norm. It was very freeing for them. Just like now. A woman that chooses family over herself is seen as wrong and against the norm.
1
The economy thing is because they changed the metrics to determine it. It used to be hard numbers combined with other factors like layoffs, part-time vs full-time, and labor participation. Now it's just hard numbers. It's the same with crime statistics. They acknowledge that SA and gr@pe are severely under reported, but only use the officially reported cases to determine how prevalent it is and pretend that's not true for any other crimes. The real measurement is reported crimes combined with the victimization study which surveys how many victims of crimes are there are.
1
That’s what I grew up being told. It’s the People’s house. It’s the People’s buildings. That’s why all the museums in DC are free to the public. They belong to us.
1
@hohenzollern6025 If you want that the Middle East is ready when you are. Monarchy combined with religion. Perfect according to you.
1
@AverageAlien Yes. Liberalism has created the greatest advancement ever seen in history. In all areas. Wanting to just toss it aside because some idiots decided to undermine it is ridiculous. Nothing the far left says is liberal. It’s anti liberal. It’s why they changed from equality to equity. They do not mean the same thing and ignoring that and putting equality where they use equity is just as underhanded a tactic.
1
Ha! My first vote was Ross Perot. I was always a rebel. My favorite was Jack Daniels. It used to be very easy to get on the ballot in my state so we’d have around 10 people running for President. Good ole Jack was there a couple years so he was my go to because everyone else sucked.
1
It used to mean something. It no longer does. The title is now just used an appeal to authority. Much like many words have been shifted and changed for political purposes.
1
@ClayWeblogistics Exactly! It used to mean you'd achieved something in the field. Now it just means you got this super special degree that millions of others have too. Also, used to an expert in one field was completely disregarded in pretty much any other field. Now, you can be certified an expert in one field and used as an authority in a completely unrelated one.
1
@Archmage9885 He’s read Locke and all those. Liberalism has obviously adapted and changed since it’s first conception back then. Plus he’s under the belief that ideas like Communism can’t exist without liberalism. The problem with that is that might have prevented it but it’s not going to disappear if liberalism does. We just lose how to fight against it.
1
I've tried to point to our previous progressive era in the US and the striking similarities. It was, like now, this weird combination of trying to move society forward while still having a prudish aura about it. For example, it was the progressives that pushed for the alcohol ban. While still pushing social justice. Not racial justice like today, but it was a rise in pitying the criminal and not caring much about the victim. We also saw mass immigration. It lasted almost as long at around 27 years vs the almost 25 it's been this time. The result of the pushback, hopefully, will be similar as it ushered in our greatest period. Edit: I'm using 2000 as the starting point because that's when it started really being seen in colleges and a lot of the writings took place. So that would be where it began. It just stayed in mostly in the more liberal colleges for awhile before it spread out.
1
@sammygoodnight Championed how? Everything over here came from over there. For decades, the left side have cried how they wanted the US to be more European. Communism, post modernism, the removal and mockery of Christianity all started in Europe. I've even seen people claim the witch hunting happened all over the US. You mocked us for not being like you then blame us when we take on the ideas you created.
1
@bigol9223 Wrong. I suggest you look into the Church hearings where the CIA and FBI were spreading that false rumor. We had two paths to choose at that time period. MLK's or Malcolm X. Malcolm X was a communist and a black supremacist. MLK was a Christian leader, with many flaws as any man does, that like many before him wanted the Constitution to live up to its promise. Next you're going to say Walt Disney was an Austrian artist enjoyer which was a lie spread by the Communist in their paper because he stood up against the Union run by them intimidating his artists. Edit: That that was uncovered along with project Mockingbird in the sane hearings and people believe one but still claim MLK is a commie is astounding and an example of cognitive dissonance.
1
@Alfred5555 How did we evolve to mimic something that didn't exist? You said we evolved to mimic mechanical movements, but there were none. You had me until that. What are you trying to claim we learned to mimic when outside Apes and chimps nothing else on Earth performs tasks how we do?
1
That's the unique thing about the US and our system. Even if you feel your voice isn't heard on the federal level, you can and do feel it is on the state or (more importantly) local level. Those two keep us engaged in the system. As long as states remain strong and push back against the federal government, which thank goodness Republicans found their balls and remembered their powers during the coof, it will prevent a Caesar from arising. Putting such a figure into federal power or destroying the system to put him in power, would remove the voice they do have. It's much more likely the federal government will start being ignored as we drift further apart until we break up into regional governments.
1
@The_Haruspex I'm in the US. There was never a time church and state were combined. Religion has never had anything to do with conservatives here. It's just been something put upon conservative by others. Both parties have always contained religious members. Look at Congress now. Almost all of them follow a religion. It's not just a conservative thing. So you claiming it is shows your own uneducated understanding. During the moral panic of the 80s and 90s, it was Democrats pushing for censorship and regulations. I'm fairly certain Tipper Gore, wife of Al Gore, has never been a conservative or a Republican. Somehow that's been erased and it's now considered something conservatives alone did. Conservatism in the US is about preserving the ideals of the Constitution and our founders. Which, as much as it pains you, means living up to those ideals like all people are created equal and have rights ordained to them. That's why "conservatives" were the first party with black people in political positions and the first openly gay member of Congress. Probably the first female in a political position but I've never researched that. They don't brag about it like Democrats do because they don't see it as anything unique or special because it's just how it was always intended. That's not "progressive" either. It's what this country was founded on, the vision of those that created it to be eventually reached. If you're not in the US then your political references are completely different and right and left mean something entirely different.
1
@Moltonmetal776 "Birthing pains?" Seriously? Imagine if past generations were so weak and frightened by a short-term amount of pain. We'd have died out as a species before we'd even gotten started. There's this wonderful thing available thanks to modern medicine called an epidural. It removes all pain. No woman has to experience "birthing pains" unless she chooses to. Don't want to go through the work of labor at all? Scheduling a c-section. It's done all the time.
1
@Moltonmetal776 " What about women in 3rd world countries?" You mean the countries with high birthrates? They're doing their duty. They know and understand it's a duty. It's only in the developed world that birthrates have plummeted. The better and easier life is, the fewer children. That's because it's so comfortable the idea of a duty to society and future generations gets removed. There's a stark increase in selfishness and hedonism. Everything you're complaining about is called first world problems for a reason.
1
@GarerBear It’s drying up. Contrary to popular opinion, it wasn’t ideologically driven. At least not at the higher levels. I read financial news. About 15 or so years ago, I don’t remember the exact year but it was after the 2008 crash and under Obama, articles started coming out about the “new, young investor”. That they were more concerned with supporting a company’s policies than about profit. How true those articles were given what we know now I can’t say. They were predicting this huge market shift in what people purchased. That companies that were more say environmentally conscious would get a huge boost in the market. I personally thought it was stupid because young people have been and talked like that since the 80s but once they start really investing once they have extra cash that flies out the window. In response, a couple of larger investment groups do what they do and gambled on the prediction in an attempt to get ahead of the shift. Thus ESG was born as a way for investors, companies, and potential customers to see which companies “cared” about all these causes. Every investor wants to be the one that heavily invests on the ground floor of the next Walmart or Amazon. They saw these little companies as potentially that so they invested. A LOT. When the summer of love hit it probably massively reinforced the belief in this new type of customer and investor so the funding really ramped up. I can see why they’d think it signaled a massive shift in culture and thus buying habits from high up in their penthouses. I will say I have little doubt there were younger people fresh out of college telling them all their friends care about this stuff and are really dedicated to it which only further pushed their belief that they were right and ahead on this new market. This is why you keep hearing “modern audience” and other buzzwords like it. It’s trying to appeal to the predicted new market. Unfortunately the results are finally showing and it’s bs. The opposite is happening. People are rejecting it and refusing to participate. They’ve lost billions if not trillions on this silly gamble. Activists simply took advantage of what was being offered and because of this silly market prediction, companies believed they’d help them navigate it. TL;DR: There was a massive shift of buying habits predicted based on what causes a company supports and if they’re environmentally conscious. Thus ESG was born to rate which companies these new buyers would support. Hoping to be on the ground floor of the next Walmart or Google they’ve lost billions if not trillions to a prediction that was never going to come true.
1
@Friggsdottir Pretty much it. Technology and medicine have advanced to treat every other one. They like to bring up preeclampsia except the cure is giving birth. Ending the baby doesn’t stop it. They still have to give birth to it. So if the baby is alive or already ended is irrelevant. Meaning ending it isn’t part of the discussion at all in medical terms. Edit: I had it with both my pregnancies. Doing that wasn’t once brought up from a doctor. So it’s a ridiculous argument on its face and is only made from a non medical perspective.
1