General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Debany Doombringer
The Rubin Report
comments
Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "The Rubin Report" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
@BiggMo No it was from WWII from Nazi soldiers at the trials. No soldiers in the US said that about Vietnam because there haven't been any trials about that war. It's not an excuse because soldiers are exempt from prosecution for refusing to follow an illegal order. Edit: I hope you edit that or remove it. Equating Vietnam vets to Nazi soldiers is wrong on so many levels. If you were taught that, your teacher should be ashamed. That's just anti US propaganda. It was in most ways for the exact same reason as the Korean War. Not political reasons but to stop the spread of Communism and allow those that didn't wish to live under it that opportunity as a neighboring government had become Communist and was attempting to take over the one that split away from it.
16
In most cases someone else would take care of it. A member of their staff. A person like that doesn't just hand a personal credit card to a stranger. It would come from a seperate account made to deal with personal purchases that a single accountant or trusted staff member would only have access to. Someone that would stay behind and deal with it after security has removed the person from the area because that's the first concern.
9
I think a lot don't understand the structure of companies or why they'd have so many useless workers. Any profit you reinvest into your company isn't taxed. So it incentivizes companies to do just that. So because in a company like that you can't build new warehouses, new vehicles, or better machinery, you simply hire more people. This gives the appearance that you need more people because it's so busy to investors so they pour money in. Eventually it'll hit the wall because it's not actually growing like a normal company does and that's easy to hide because there's no physical way to judge because it's all just data. That's why these companies are so bloated and why they appear to keep growing long after they've hit that wall.
8
I'm more interested in the information of who were victims of FTX that the judge blocked from being released. That's a very unusual move and it's information investors and the public should be privy to because of its potential impact on companies as well as individuals.
8
Oh dear Lord. There are 1.8 billion Muslims and over 1 billion Arabs. How is a few thousand "genocide"? Words have lost all meaning.
7
@rubinski878 Everything is a health risk. Why is asthma increasing when nothing has changed and everything is safer and cleaner than ever before? It's because it's too clean. That's why allergies and asthma have increased even though pollution is much better and smoking in public is gone. The increase in those problems aren't happening in very rural farm areas. Not because of ventilation, but because they are exposed to stuff at a very young age and their body learns to deal with what it's exposed to. I would need to see the study they are referring to before I believe it's caused by a stove rather than other contributing factors. Unless they were in a bubble and everything but a gas stove was removed, there's no way to prove it. They aren't saying they aggravate it, they're claiming they cause it. That's a big claim. It's also not just stoves. They want to eliminate all gas lines to private residences.
5
That's from before this stuff started. Yes I saw it and it was horrific. In the US we really don't have a lot of that. Outside an area in Michigan, Muslim immigrants aren't allowed to create enclaves and seperate themselves from the general population. They're not congregated enough to wield any real power locally or federally. I think since we've always had large amounts of immigration we've got it down pretty good how to force integration. No immigrant is looked at as special or treated with kid gloves. Like everyone else, you sink or swim on your own actions. Nobody's going to give you a place to live, no handouts, nothing. Refugees get a small amount of money for 6 months from the government to settle and get a job. After that, you're on your own. That's because to meet that qualification is difficult and it's usually people fleeing a disaster where they've lost everything. Even then, it's not enough to live comfortably on. It's just at the poverty amount to incentivize them to find a job quickly and get on their own. Europe coddles them. Gives them hotels with everything provided including an allowance to spend on frivolous things. That was the mistake. Edit: Your governments were too worried about making them feel welcome and afraid of being accused of being called names instead. They cringed at the very idea of forced integration and now the citizens pay the price.
5
She's changed since then. She'll talk about it sometimes but it was a lot of drugs and a lot of pressure.
5
@Cavilier210 TED talks aren’t “YouTube drama”. If you don’t know what they are it’s better to just not say anything.
4
@mayowankenobi I've been trying to tell people that. They seem to think elective surgery is just things like boob jobs. They don't realize all but emergency surgery is elective. The longterm effects on overall health and avoidable deaths will be interesting if they keep up with that following the shutdowns. Since this has all been an experiment (none of this has ever been attempted on this scale befor), they should to help determine if this is the best way to handle future pandemics.
4
And tons of made up ones
4
@BboyKeny This is what I don't understand. She comes right out and says she is and not just in the new definition sense but in every sense. The fact she believes all white people think like her is her own narcissism.
3
@evergray5063 Mantis doesn't understand Gen X ideology has infiltrated the Republican party and we haven't changed who we are or ever compromised on what we believe. We've always accepted everyone as they are as individuals and believed individualism is the most important thing. Of course we'd reject this collectivist BS.
3
@mantistoboggan5171 I bet you think it was Republicans that were trying to ban music and video games in the 80s and 90s. It wasn't. The PMRC was the Democrats. Tipper Gore, Al Gore's wife, was the leader. Democrat senators testified in court about the dangers of violent video games. I'm pretty sure the most prominent one was still in office, elected as a Democrat, until a few years ago. Obama ran on a no legalized gay marriage platform. I'm glad to have grown up when I did. I know the truth because I lived it.
3
There's a former Muslim woman who Triggernometry did an interview with and explained this mentality isn't as prevalent in the US as it is in Europe. She said it's because in the US we don't coddle our immigrants. It's welcome and good luck! They have to sink or swim on their own. They've got little choice but to integrate at least mostly. Where as in Europe they are just handed everything and tend to remain segregated mostly from the general population so they don't have to integrate to survive. France is an even more different situation. These are Albanians. France took it over to stop the European slave trade. Unlike Britain and the African slave trade, they refused to stop no matter what was done so it was the only way to stop it. They didn't get their freedom from France until fairly recently. So yes some of these people were born while it was still under French control. They never should have taken them in in such large numbers knowing the resentment that was still there. It was far too early in the process to have done that. Edit: That's why he's giving a very specific number of years. That's the number of years Albania was under French rule.
3
She talked about how much money Kroger made but neglected to say they only have like 1.8% profit margin.
3
The riots last year red pilled a lot last year. You could watch them live online and then the MSM was like, it was a peaceful protest. 🤯
3
They did an interview with a former Muslim woman, no longer Muslim but still a woman, about why it's so different in Europe than the US. She's from the US and now an atheist. She said it's because the US forces assimilation. We don't coddle them like Europe does their immigrants. In Europe they're given money monthly, have access to all the social benefits, and are given housing. In the US we say " Welcome and good luck!" They're on their own. They either make it or they don't. They aren't eligible for benefits and if they do use them, they're expected to pay them back. That's because they aren't taxpayers and haven't been taxpayers to add to the fund. Then again we've got centuries of experience with high amounts of immigration and Europe doesn't. Not saying it's perfect obviously, but the problem here is different than what you're seeing all over Europe. I believe many Americans were trying to warn these countries when they started taking numbers far higher than they had ever taken. You just simply can't go overnight from hundreds of immigrants a year to 10s if not 100s of thousands and except it to just work itself out.
3
Asian is the race, Chinese is the ethnicity. Just like there are different ethnicities of huwhite people and black people. This way of categorizing is based on skull differences and bone differences. In other words, I can tell if a skeleton is of Asian origin or not. I can not tell if it's Chinese or Korean.
2
@jajajajajajajajaja867 No it’s people expecting people that recently moved somewhere to not interfere in the area until they’ve been there awhile and learned more about it. The things that attracted you to the area took years to cultivate and build. It didn’t just spring up magically. It’s no different than moving to a new country. You need to integrate into the area and learn how people think and until then keep your complaints to yourself. Nobody owes you immediate full acceptance, trust, or respect. You’ve got to earn it just like every family there did. The fact you think where someone’s from determines their intelligence says a lot about you and it’s nothing good.
2
Free Thinker What exactly does WWII have to do with any of this? Everyone was essential during that time and told it repeatedly. Nobody was locked down and prevented from working except those in camps. It's the total opposite of this situation. Women joined the workforce at numbers never experienced before because the country needed every able bodied person to fill a roll. You can respond if you like, but I don't feed the trolls. This is only to educate others that you have no idea what you're talking about.
2
I'm independent and always will be. However, like you, the exposure of just how bad the corruption is inside the upper levels of the Democratic party has caused me to vow to not vote for a single one. I will not reward them with money and power.
2
No because that's an entire continent not an ethnicity. Chinese is the people that live in China. Just because China controlled other territories in the past, doesn't make the people there now Chinese. The population tends to speak Mandarin. That would be like demanding every person that speaks English be called British because that's where the language originated.
2
@pl m Libertarianism isn't anarchism. I'm not sure where this confusion comes from. It's socially liberal and fiscally conservative. No where does it advocate zero government. Federal government should go back to the powers assigned to it by the Constitution and the state should have the rest. Nothing should be forced. Your ideas shouldn't be forced on me and my ideas shouldn't be forced on you. Why is that so hard to comprehend?
2
@mantistoboggan5171 So I can't go take several courses in college and learn CRT theory? They aren't now required for pretty much any degree in many of them? I'd say that's more than just conservatives talking about CRT. After BLM last year, CRT literature didn't become required reading in many corporations and seminars still aren't being done about how to implement it into the workplace? That's sarcasm in case you missed it. I'm not conservative, I'm independent and we're screaming about it too because we aren't indoctrinated idiots. Edit: Why are you championing an idea that encourages segregation? That's pretty racist, so you're admitting you're racist? Thanks for letting everyone know so they can avoid you.
2
We also now have a couple of meds that help and have learned techniques that improve the odds of those needing ventilation. We were also still being hit with a pretty bad strain of flu. Almost 150 children died from strain B this flu season.
2
He's a journalist. It's his job to report on stuff like this. Democracy falling in a European country is significant. That doesn't mean the US government needs to go and invade Italy.
2
@2shoes-xg6 They were all talking about moving to Canada. It became a joke that they were moving to an even whiter country.
2
@kenglavens6455 That's his 2024 platform. The only person that seems to have "lost his mind" is you. I've never seen a candidate phrase their platform as if, maybe, I hopefully win I'll do these things. Did you have the same reaction when Biden was saying what he was going to do in his first 100 days?
2
I’m assuming that was the one that did the study and conclude they were born that way. Or was it the one saying we needed to stop calling them that and instead MAPs so they wouldn’t be so stigmatized. Either would be terrible to listen to. The first one because her study was done on convicts and we know they aren’t a reliable source for study and because her own study determines it was tiny portion of those convicted. The other because it absolutely should be stigmatized. This idea that they haven’t done anything just because they haven’t gotten caught yet is crazy.
2
@littlekingtrashmouth9219 What law is that? That a person convicted of selling drugs (a nonviolent crime) can't own a gun, but someone that the police are at their house almost weekly for domestic violence (a violent crime) can? Those laws? How about all the laws that protect women from stalkers? Oh that's right, there isn't any until he/she actually harms them in some way. I'm a huge supporter of the 2nd amendment, but I'm pretty sure 99.9% of the population believe not everyone should have unfettered access to guns. I have no issue with red flag laws if done appropriately, in a court and it not just be a person calls and says they're a danger. It should be proven by a set of standards in a court of law where it's subject to appeal. That's how we handle the majority of limitations we set on rights.
1
Legally Trump couldn't have "f'd up". The court decided in a similar case with Bill Clinton that anything the President removes from the office is automatically declassified. He may have told them that to flatter them, but legally if it wasn't at the White House and he was out of office, it wasn't classified. Everything is labeled classified for the benefit of the President. It's not for the FBI or any other administration. It's for the President that classified documents exist. He or she can declassify it by simply speaking about it to someone else. So either way, once he showed it to a 3rd party it was no longer classified. Edit: Clinton has classified tapes that the archives was trying to get and he refused to hand over. They took him to court in an attempt to get them and that was the court's decision. Obama has digital classified documents on his personal server at home that he removed with him when he left office. The reason they were even able to attempt to bring charges is Biden rescinded Trump's clearance which he doesn't have the authority to do. If you're not a lawyer well versed in this field perhaps refrain from making legal guesses about the validity of charges.
1
If it’s not representative of you, why are you taking it so personal? I’m not sorry that as I see California plates more and more in my new town it causes serious concern. You’re a new immigrant to a new area and you’re acting like you already own it instead of integrating into your new place. That’s exactly the type of attitude that’s the problem. It’s an attitude that comes from certain areas because they believe the south is a bunch of stupid people and people like that should be told how to be. Another “conservative” that’s a California political figure is Arnold. So saying you’re a conservative from California doesn’t afford you the benefit of the doubt you seem to think you’re owed, because you’re not owed anything from anyone. You moved there they didn’t invite you to or beg you to. Instead of being grateful you’re already complaining about political officials. Edit: I’ve seen people in my little town that moved there for work complaining about everything being done at churches. That they won’t volunteer at anything associated with a church. That they don’t like how there’s religious stuff everywhere and it makes them uncomfortable and how to get people to understand and stop it. That’s what this is about and you clearly share that attitude to a degree by already complaining because someone hurt your feelings and trying to stop them from saying it again. Get over yourself.
1
They want to eliminate natural gas to residences period. Not just stoves. It's heating, water heaters, dryers, everything. No way is that going to fly. I'm sick of this war on rural areas. They are trying to systematically remove the ability to live anywhere outside a city. Trying to force electric cars which have a limited range and don't produce enough power to haul anything. Banning wood burning in some states and now trying to ban natural gas. Then it'll be kerosene they'll find some reason to get rid of and propane.
1
I love how these talking heads ignore the previous decisions that said it shouldn't be forever and after about 50 years it should be removed. It always had an expiration date. It was never ever intended to be permanent because that's against the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act. They yell about equality but don't really want it.
1
The only problem with that is the check still elevates that user. There's still not an even playing field so to speak. He's said he will restrict the reach of certain speech. There's still suppression on Twitter and shadow bans of speech that doesn't break the ToS. How much of that is because he still hasn't been able to fix the algorithm or is a permanent feature we'll have to wait and see.
1
@cheddar2648 I disagree. I like them out in the open. Hiding this in academia is what got us here. I'm glad I didn't go to a school that promoted this in the early 90s when I attended college. I know now it was around then, I just live in the south so I wasn't exposed to it until the last few years, primarily online.
1
Oh no! Did the Antifa member get their feelings hurt? I've watched them online during the riots. I'm fully aware of who and what they are. If they wanted to try to maintain that myth they shouldn't have had all the people streaming their meetings and riots.
1
I guess she hasn't watched the Grammys since the 50s because black people have been there and getting awards for decades. Nobody would ever claim Aretha Franklin, Fats Domino, or Chubby Checker, or Aaron Neville were skinny so overweight people have been represented for decades too. Elton John, Boy George, Freddie Mercury, and many others have won awards so the LGBT has been represented for decades as well. Sam Smith is the same person that was upset because he wasn't the first gay man to receive an Oscar for music (after claiming he was only to be corrected by everyone reminding him Elton John exists) so it's pretty clear why he "came out" as nonbinary.
1
@jwd0808 Late night TV audience size is miniscule to what it once was. Being the best of the worst isn't an accomplishment. Johnny Carson regularly had an audience size of 60 million. Colbert's audience size is 2 million. He's behind Greg Gutfeld who has 2.4 million so your claim of him being number 1 isn't even true. Edit: If you think 2 million out of a possible audience size of 100+ million is "good" nobody will be able to explain it to you. He had more viewers on Comedy Central with a much smaller possible audience.
1
@halbleavy9900 You're correct. The mindset that a group of people can't do anything unless another group allows them is indeed evidence of missing "massa". Good thing there are people like this man trying to change that.
1
I see so many delusional people trying to make this claim. I guess everyone forgot the super delegates in the Democratic party who decide who the nominee is. RFK has been banned everywhere that the majority of Democrats watch. The party has already said there will be no primary debates. They've already said Joe is running and as the incumbent he's the automatic nominee. If something happens and he can't, it still won't be RFK. They'll pull someone else out of their hat to prop up there, most likely Newsom (which explains his recent countrywide tour). It amazes me how many seem to forget how the party screwed Bernie in 2016. Edit: If Joe runs, most states won't even have a Democrat primary. They'll just automatically go to Joe. The party controls the nomination process, not the voters.
1
Thank you. Unfortunately it's ridiculed all the time. It's just someone who's physically helpless to do anything doing the only thing they can for someone else they see suffering.
1
I can explain how the MS developed. You have a hereditary gene that predetermins if you're susceptible to autoimmune diseases. Environmental factors turn it on. It's caused by an immune response which is what was triggered by the shot. It has to be a pretty severe reaction too. Not just a simple normal one. Stress can cause them to turn on as well, but that's because we know high levels of stress can cause immune responses as well. That's why people with autoimmune diseases aren't recommended for vaccines. They can create a violent immune response. Especially if there's already organ involvement. I have several and pretty much all organs as well as a couple of glands have been attacked and damaged. I'm not even recommended for a flu shot because I've had life threatening flares before.
1
I'm sorry, do you think you're entitled to someone else's skill and knowledge without paying them for it? It's either you're able to pay for it or you go into massive debt. How about YOU let people decide if it's worth it to them to go instead of pushing people that can't afford it into getting degrees in what they love or are passionate about that doesn't translate into a job. Edit: It's no different than a private school. Wealthy people can send their children to them because they can afford it. Just like they can afford to send their kid to a PRIVATE university like Harvard and others can't. Those that can't afford it can go to a publicly funded state university.
1
This is what I don't understand. They're "protesting" their government about the actions of a completely different government thousands of miles away. I've never seen that before and it's not the purpose of protected protesting. I think it's just a larger indicator of how they don't understand what these rights are for or their limitations. The only large protest my generation did was against globalism and the inclusion of China into the WTO. It was a global protest because we wanted our countries to deny them entry. We absolutely understood what that step would mean for our working future. While technically protesting against another country, it was against our own country's actions. Do these people ever once stop and think how ignorant and against their own proclaimed beliefs it is to expect another country to care what citizens of other countries want them to do? Isn't that so called "colonization"? Demanding other countries of a different culture bow to the beliefs of a stronger, larger culture/country?
1
@robertmartin5561 I see comments like this and they simply tell me you're uninformed. It's not Mexicans flooding across the border. It's Venezuelans and other south American countries, people from African countries, Arabs, and even Russians. Stop blaming Mexicans. There are plenty of videos of people asking them where they're from and not a single one says Mexico.
1
@billbartley3007 I agree, but when they are trying to make what they believe a law is where I care. I didn't like it when Evangelicals called for it and I don't agree with it when the other side does it. I think what's most telling is when you look back at actual policies and who did what. With all the preaching the Democrats have done while I've been alive about free speech and rights for minorities, it's been their policies that have been oppressing those very things. The right preaches moral values, but rarely ever actually legislates it at the federal level, though they certainly have at the state and local. Meanwhile the left did the PMRC, the crime bill, defined marriage between a man and a woman, and various other things. If anything it shows you were each party believes the power should be.
1
A YouTuber I watch in Canada said the only black person, a man, got removed from a local school board. It was for being racist. He said he didn’t believe he was oppressed and a victim of systemic supremacy so they removed him.
1
Every job is a means to make money. That doesn't mean that's the only way to view it. This job is to take care of my family, this job is so I can afford to do the things I enjoy like traveling, this job is to help me go to school so I can get a better job, etc. That puts work in the correct perspective.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All