Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "GBNews" channel.

  1. Have you seen the Medicine With Dr. Moran video from 5/1? He discusses a very important article, published in Nature, about heart issues associated with vaccines. They have not proved causation, but urge immediate attention to figure out what is going on. This is the first mainstream confirmation. Nature is gold standard.
    8
  2. You were right the first time.
    7
  3. ​@loring5784 He was a Westerner, was he not?
    3
  4. ​@richardgallagher4880 You call that a debate? My how standards have fallen through the sub-sub-basement
    3
  5. Don't overreact. Just explain that these are deeply troubled and confused people, and not to say anything to upset them because they are very fragile and may end up in a ward. Don't treat them as if they had a point, much less the power to confuse your son. He knows what he is.
    3
  6.  @sh.4409  Whew, am I glad to hear that. Perfect reaction. If any child gets in trouble for laughing, then by all means retain a lawyer.
    3
  7.  @blackdog1392  Well that was pellucid.
    2
  8.  @richardgallagher4880  WHAT debate? A little gotcha here and there . . . faux gotcha
    2
  9. Try listening. And thinking.
    2
  10. Are the kids allowed to bust out laughing? Sounds like the perfect opportunity to roll on the floor, literally.
    2
  11. I think Samantha's facial expressions -- and belief in her own psychoanalytic and geopolitical prowess -- suggest she needs some counseling. "Marquis de Sade's playbook?" Does she know what that is?
    2
  12.  @Rose-jz6ix  Because I read? So, a woman who was twice divorced, once bankrupt, and whose two older children were raised by their father's parents is so "intelligent," she must be the object of jealousy by her younger sister? Really, now? And who brings up de Sade. Yeesh, that wouldn't occur to a normal person. I remember how each of Paul McCartney's wives got hate bombed. Old story. blocked, btw
    2
  13. Well that's jealousy, and Amber Heard withdrawal.
    2
  14. I have never seen more jealousy displayed toward a woman. It is amusing to watch. N.B., if I dislike someone, I act like they do not exist. They don't become my central obsession -- or my meal ticket. Sweetie. Get a real job.
    1
  15. I would never go to any of these demonstrations because I am not convinced that there are no antisemites present. The cause of maintaining the rules of war under the Geneva Conventions in every conflict, no matter how it started, is worth fighting for. The cause of peace with justice is worth fighting for. I also agree there is zero evidence that most of those demonstrating for those things are antisemitic. There are, however, antisemites taking advantage of the protests and using the honest protestors as a cover. That's why I wouldn't go. Everyone knows or should know that Zionism is not Judaism. Anyone who uses Zionism as an excuse to be antisemitic is sinister.
    1
  16. Oh. So that's who gave the West Hitler.
    1
  17. @loring5784  The theme of Weinstein's entire intervention was to extol "the West." Adolf Hitler was no less a product of Western culture than was Emil Zola. On the other hand, Vasili Arkhipov was not, except in a very broad sense (certainly far broader than Weinstein would allow), and yet he saved the world from a nuclear exchange. The Americans trying to force his submarine to the surface had no problem risking it. They didn't pause for a moment. I think it's time to look at all cultures more dispassionately and quit flattering ourselves.
    1
  18.  @ritualcloset  I wasn't trolling you. Go back and read. This guy is just name calling. He has no facts, no argument. They never do.
    1
  19.  @brenttesterman3171  Right. The people who call other people names do that because they don't have anything else. They never do --- and so, they substitute invective as a scare tactic.
    1
  20. Posted a comment on a problem with chat Gpt, one that has published research about it, made mainstream news Here? Subjected to sense or ship
    1
  21. @andylewis7360  Several things I wrote about a well-known AI have been subjected to sensor sheep. Get it? It is correct in formation, already appearing in at least one peer rev'd publication. But taken down all the time. Chat*** is making rithme tique errors. THAT'S how bad it is. See if this survives.
    1
  22. @andylewis7360  Basically I'm saying we can't even discuss it.
    1
  23.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  That's not Socrates.
    1
  24.  @richardgallagher4880  Proof of what?
    1
  25.  @richardgallagher4880  You don't seem to understand. I don't wish this society well. The coping part is your problem. I can just sit back and watch.
    1
  26. @MartinParsons-tr6wi  1. No way to know what others can see, actually. 2. No.
    1
  27. @MartinParsons-tr6wi  How do you know those are not all cuts and pastes? Just like the quote about "kids today," falsely attributed to Socrates? Not to mention the false or misleading attributions to Einstein, Twain, etc. I studied at L'Institut des Etudes Greques. You need more than Google (and your testimony about what it said) to persuade me. I practically know The Apology by heart.
    1
  28.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  Are the references all amérloques? 🤔🤣
    1
  29.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  Socrates' style was never to make such pronouncements. Why do you think the Dialogues are classics? They don't read like middle-brow greeting cards at Whole Foods.
    1
  30. @MartinParsons-tr6wi  According to your saying, that you think must be from Socrates "because google," where do you rank?
    1
  31. @MartinParsons-tr6wi  Oh, more homespun wisdom! That always tops EVIDENCE. Just ask anyone wrongly convicted. Oh yeah. That actually happened, to SOCRATES.
    1
  32. WOW did I get censored here!! You deserve google.
    1
  33.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  I got sense oared so much it's not funny.
    1
  34.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  It may be interdit
    1
  35.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  To mention Eric
    1
  36.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  Sadin, or the problem with
    1
  37.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  Wrong math
    1
  38.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  GPT
    1
  39.  @MartinParsons-tr6wi  Google U "educating" you, sense or ring me
    1
  40. @MartinParsons-tr6wi  Why were you permitted to ridicule me in French, but my factual response (also in French) was sense oared? I'm reporting you, then. Is belligerent ignorance open minded? How about sensor sheep? Open minded, too?
    1
  41. Interesting how someone with two divorces, a bankruptcy, and who left her children to their paternal grandparents to raise can sound good to you, if you both hate the same person. Grifters is what America is made of now -- grifters and tribes. It's a lesson, of sorts, I suppose.
    1
  42. Twice divorced, once bankrupt, and didn't raise her two oldest children, who grew up with their father's parents. You must not know much about Americans.
    1
  43.  @janeknight5070  So then you must know that grift is everywhere, and some of the best-sounding people are reprobates, or were, in their real lives.
    1
  44. Every time more people take gratuitous jabs at people they literally know nothing about, and have no point of reference to judge, they prove Meghan and Harry right. Did Samantha ever meet Prince Harry? One time? But she knows what makes him tick. How would you like it if someone said this about you?
    1
  45.  @janeknight5070  Look, Harry wouldn't have married you instead, if only . . . so chill. You have no idea about any of these people, and I'm sure you didn't know "Samantha" (not her given name) couldn't even raise her children. I remember how everyone hated on Paul McCartney's wives, too. Only Linda became a saint by dying far too young.
    1
  46.  @janeknight5070  I DON'T CARE!! Can you be serious? How about None of the Above? How about, I Was Not There? How about There Is No Reason To Believe Samantha? I think I'm old enough to be Harry's mother, too, more or less. How can someone your age still be so easily led? "Fact-checked" by whom? After the pandemic, you should be wary of any such claims. I think you're all relishing the mass flogging of The Woman Who Married Harry, and that would have been the upshot regardless of who married him. It was for Paul McCartney's wives, all three. The first had to develop cancer at a young age to be acceptable to the mob. The last one is grudgingly accepted for the most part, if not liked, because most of the hate was spent on No. 2, and Paul is old now. Do you plan never to grow up? Why? Anyway, done here. Carry on.
    1
  47.  @singtweetypie  Believe what you want, based on whatever irrelevant or spurious personal experience you can find to assimilate to the lives of celebrities you don't know. I don't criticize her life. That is no one's business. I criticize her reliability, for good reasons. Anyone watching this video who is not already determined to join a ridiculous hate-fest would question her reliability based on simply watching and listening. It is said that she is still estranged from those kids. Perhaps she has done nothing to deserve that, and it's tragic. But that would be rather unusual. In any case, a wrinkle in the loving parent story. Most people find a way not to give up their children. More important, it's not our business. You judge it positively, I see no reason to speculate -- and plenty of reasons not to believe her account here. If this is your idea of a reliable actor, all I can say is watch your wallet.
    1
  48.  @singtweetypie  Upholding what? I don't watch Oprah. I haven't had a television in ten years, and I've never watched cable. You write this essay? For what? Look, a lot of people are lonely. Reclaim your social life, meet new people, go to a play, walk on a beach. Do not live in your imagination with virtual friends you don't know and never will. blocked as a nut
    1
  49.  @Agnar669  The study you cite was conducted on adult male prison inmates, you FOOL.
    1
  50.  @Agnar669  Nor would the identification of changes in the brain "support the belief that psychopaths can't be rehabilitated and therapy only makes them worse." People with traumatic brain injuries, tumors, and strokes have been successfully rehabilitated. I hope you aren't in any medical field or other profession. You are simplistic in the extreme, and you like to use information to bully others.
    1