Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "GBNews"
channel.
-
@Agnar669 Even the existence of what you deem to be "the empathy center" is no more than a decade old, controversial, and frankly, the nature of the labeling hardly sounds scientific -- it smacks of a desire to become well-know, publish books in the popular psychology/self-help domain, or achieve tenure. Everything is advertising now, and a lot of money is at stake.
Only recently have we learned that the notion that antidepressants work by bringing neurotransmitters into balance was a metaphor, and didn't have a scientific basis. It certainly sounded scientific.
If you think that Harry and Meghan are doing unethical things, what prevents you from saying that? Why are you trying to don the lab coat of science to make it sound more objective? You have no idea whether they have a diagnosis, or what their diagnosis is, and you weren't with them when they claim they were systematically undercut and made to look horrid to the British public. You must know nothing about their tabloid culture. It is the most vicious in the world. Your "science" is Fauci-style, a claim to an authority you lack.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1