Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut safety report, English language version, is what was cited here. You might want to take a peek. It is always a good idea to go to primary sources to verify anything a politician says. No one is suggesting that this vaccine will hurt most people. That's obviously not the case by any stretch. We expect it not to, correct? We don't take drugs with poor risk-benefit ratios. Or at least we didn't.
    2
  2. In addition, it was proposed that those who had recovered from COVID could assist medical personnel in caring for those who had it. Seems to me like a lot of things that would have been normal to do were somehow quashed.
    2
  3. ​ @margaretgreaves7246  That's your view. "We were at war" -- I object to war metaphors in this context. Immediate family was already exposed. So were medical personnel allowed to "take it back to the community?" Could they see their families? At least in the case of patients, we knew their closest relative in the same household, who probably brought them in, was already exposed. I love the lack of logic and the violent metaphors. We can trust your judgment. /s You have no business attacking anyone.
    2
  4. Let me see if I understand . . . This study suggests that there may be a way to make this particular vaccine much safer than it is. Someone please explain how this could be "bad" from any viewpoint. I mean any legitimate viewpoint whatsoever. The fact that anyone is opposed to this research tells you EVERYTHING.
    2
  5.  @seadoogti9288  What does a goldfish remember? just kidding
    2
  6. When I looked at Oxford's risk calculator, it placed my risk of death from COVID at roughly 1%. A comparable American source? 3.5% Edited for typo, ugh, I hate them.
    2
  7. UK, you fool.
    1
  8. Dr. Campbell will not say categorically, but what would you conclude for prepubescent children based on what he has said? Each child is an individual, however. There could be a reason to have it done.
    1
  9. ​@markangelorgs.2773 Now that is not likely. Many vaccine-injured are getting better now, in spite of the lack of treatment.
    1
  10.  @tompiper9276  Not strong on logic, are we? Point out the obvious logical fallacy that a child could spot, then speculate about why someone not only failed to spot it but turned hostile and aggressive toward a normal person stating normal things. LOL
    1
  11. @glenmason1876  Oh my goodness, many years ago, the New York Times used to write articles about medical errors causing as many as 100,000 deaths per year in the US. I don't expect to see that point made again in my lifetime.
    1
  12. Sputnik V is adenovirus vector vaccine. Hence, the US is prejudiced against them.
    1
  13. In who? Those with ongoing side effects, or those without side effects? If 1 in 800 had a serious side effect, this is considered very serious in a vaccine intended for universal use. But that means hundreds did not have serious side effects.
    1
  14.  @np1324  One that requires hospitalization and results in serious impairment of some organ or functionality for at least some period of time -- or worse.
    1
  15. @np1324  There are studies that drew that conclusion, yes. One was mentioned several times on this channel. I will give you a reference as soon as I find it. Hope it remains up.
    1
  16. @np1324  See the interview of Dr. Joseph Fraiman, the "Vaccine Reanalysis" video and related study, linked in the description. Dr. Fraiman got a ton of criticism for his measured approach and refusal to condemn doctors who were sincerely doing their best at the time. He is a specialist in urgent care and hence has treated these injuries.
    1
  17. @np1324  I responded; it might require a search to find. You know the drill.
    1
  18. @np1324  Anyway, people whose bodies stopped producing spike protein within a month might also be the ones who had no serious side effects -- and that would, after all, be most people. That's not good enough. See Carl Elliott, The Occasional Human Sacrifice.
    1
  19. The first step to finding out the truth is to admit that we don't know, and to start asking real questions that don't presume the answer. I would be very surprised if less than 10% of the excess cancer cases (above prior norms) were vaccine related, and even more surprised if 50% of them were. I'd be surprised if COVID itself played no role. It's not about personalities, dear. It's about real science. Real science is not happening.
    1
  20. THANK YOU.
    1
  21. This tech keeps autocorrecting and preventing edits. I wrote mitigation MEASURES. Oh well.
    1
  22. Panic disorder doesn't do that to pulse and blood pressure and troponins. Nor does it make you lose weight. And exercise does not make panic vastly worse. If you can stiffen your upper lip and swim during a panic attack, it will almost always subside in 15 to 20 minutes, if not sooner.
    1
  23. ​ @mandyo9690 Disagree. The protein itself is a toxin, possibly engineered to be. It can cause harm however it enters your cells. Long COVID is not necessarily from vaccines.
    1
  24. We don't know for sure. The studies that need to be done haven't been. Some doctors in Europe no longer recommend boosters because they suspect the repeated exposure, from both contracting COVID and having shots, is harmful. The fact that the vaccines do not prevent infection is a huge disappointment.
    1
  25. Astounding. WEF has never been so overt. When they can no longer be subtle, then they are losing their touch, clearly.
    1
  26. That seems likely. After all, the vaccines never promised more than six months of immunity, and we know antibodies begin to decline quite quickly from the vaccines.
    1
  27.  @DUB-sential  😂😂😂
    1
  28.  @nosferatut9084  Oh, I like goat cheese. Wait. This isn't about that.
    1
  29.  @johneubank8543  HA HA HA HA . . . I even remember Dr. Ornish! And where he went wrong, despite overall impressive work. Say, whatever happened to the diverse microbiome craze? They squeezed all the 💰 they could out of that one, so on to The Next Big Thing?
    1
  30. I did not get the vaccine, and if I had gotten it over 18 months ago with no side effects to date, I would cease worrying. There is no credible evidence that you are at risk at this point. But DO research ways to reduce inflammation, improve your general health, and so forth. Find reliable sources, not charlatans who try to sell you something.
    1
  31. The only function any government agency should have is to identify "deep fakes." We all know why we can't expect a comprehensive list.
    1
  32. Not to mention that no one questioned the wisdom of vaccinating people who already had COVID. Perhaps this cytotoxic protein was overwhelming people's systems' ability to clear it.
    1
  33. Are symptoms driving all of the flooding of hospitals, or is panic over mild symptoms and the prolonged isolation we've endured driving a lot of this? Not sure that it matters, practically speaking -- we opted for panicking people, and now they panic. Not good.
    1
  34.  @Stormer13  SO WELL SAID!
    1
  35.  @Stormer13  It has been shocking to me how much is known and not shared -- and how much is censored as well. Dr. Campbell has spread the word on Vitamin D in particular, and zinc is of some help as well -- plus, there is evidence that these vaccines may work better in those with ample vitamin D levels. (Or maybe it's just the D!) When I write about something I've read in a peer-reviewed journal, in a measured way and with references, it is almost always taken down. Look up lysine-arginine ratios, for example, and what the good ones do for viral illnesses, including this one. The least expensive foods have excellent ratios. Look at which foods are high in vitamin K and quercetin. Similar result. When it dawned on me, I felt so dispirited. Of course these are not "cures," or sure-fire prevention. No one said they were. But failing to tell us what we could DO is unconscionable. I'm being careful here in what I say, not to attract censorship. :/
    1
  36.  @Stormer13  So glad to hear! So sorry for this disruption in the lives of young people. :/ Lots of the least expensive foods have these nutrients, and as you mentioned, we all need D in the winter, and zinc when sick. It's as though they think everyone is stupid, and will overdose and believe they're invincible as a result.
    1
  37.  @tizzolicious  If people who do not need emergency care by any rational metric are nevertheless rushing to emergency rooms, during a pandemic, then math it is not. Maybe they have no doctor to consult about their symptoms? Nowhere else to get advice? Insurance pays ER for suspected COVID more readily than a telephone consultation that creates a limited record? Lots of possibilities, huh? If I were sick but not very, I would not want to risk spreading what I had or catching something else. I'm funny that way. /s
    1
  38.  @ruready2learn1  Well, the worst part is that if a person provides facts, they may be censored. A small misstatement or difference in emphasis could be considered misinformation. But if you just jeer at a person and say stuff like, "that's a LIE!!", because that can be construed as an opinion it will not be flagged or censored. That's how we get so much trash talk on media like this, and it starts to appear as though that's all that anyone ever does -- because the facts are long gone before anyone sees them. I know a LOT of people who try their best to state the facts and not descend into ad hominem will be censored the most. But anyway, you're kind. Thank you.
    1
  39.  @MsGarnet77  Either my posts are shadowed or you haven't read them.
    1
  40.  @MsGarnet77  That I don't know how to assess my sources. Laughable.
    1
  41.  @firstname2072  "Due to the benefit of the mRNA vaccines?" Most of the world's population, even excluding China, as is necessary to make the point, has not partaken of the mRNA vaccines. No one continues to claim that they stop infection or contagion, and their ability to stop serious disease is limited. Why do you assume everyone is stupid?
    1
  42.  @MsGarnet77  I read it, and I wasn't impressed that it was solid. To his credit, he gave a summary of all the reasons his numbers could not be compared to a carefully controlled study, a true audit of VAERS, and so forth. Saying that, I don't want to suggest that deaths due wholly or in part to the vaccine aren't happening, or that he didn't detect a signal that necessitates immediate attention. The people who should be racing to study this are failing us. At this point, they will need to do a multivariate analysis, because so many things have changed, or been imposed on us, all at once. This is not going to be easy, and the fact that they are not urgently looking into the question of vaccine safety is one of the most shocking and disillusioning things I have ever experienced.
    1
  43. This was the most sober and rational intervention I've heard. At the height of the hysteria, the words "multivariate analysis" were being removed from platforms. When mathematics becomes controversial . . .
    1
  44. Given that the effectiveness of the vaccine wanes rapidly, what evidence do you have that those who have had vaccination and COVID are less likely to have this inflammatory response? We would need a careful, honest multivariate analysis to determine that, correct? And we have had NO SUCH THING yet, correct? The burden of proof is always on the proponent of the vaccine or any drug or treatment. Correct? Yes, it is.
    1
  45. I read a French report recently that found that it was a risk factor. These studies cannot prove a direct link.
    1
  46. No one is against therapeutics. What is the risk of vaccination? Why do many countries' ministries of health counsel caution, in the case of healthy children?
    1
  47. What Kennedy is saying now is what Hollywood A-listers were saying for years. What happened? 🤔😉
    1
  48. ​ @esecallum See Robert Whitaker on that issue re: psychoactive medications. Tremendous analysis.
    1
  49. Some people don't know the difference between suspending judgment (reasonable) and going on the attack (absurd at best). Or don't want to know.
    1
  50.  @justinburch  Precisely why legal advice would be a good idea. Are his hands bound? As soon as that is a real question, the chances we know the answer with certitude are slim.
    1